Visitor Preferences for Restorative Landscape Elements in Bogor Urban Parks: A Visitor-Employed Photography Approach

Aditya Aji Pamungkas(1) , Prita Indah Pratiwi(2) , Bambang Sulistyantara(3)
(1) Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia,
(2) Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia,
(3) Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

Abstract

Human health and well-being are affected by the quality of the environment in which an individual lives. Urban spaces must provide restorative experiences to support public mental health. This study aimed to identify visitor preferences for exciting views and stress-relieving features in urban parks. Using visitor-employed photography to capture direct experiences, the study analyzed geotagged photos to identify landscape views, classified restorative landscape elements, and evaluated their effect on urban park visitors. This research employed spatial analysis of photo distribution using QGIS, photo content analysis using Google Cloud Vision API, and assessment of restorative effect through the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS). The photo-taking hotspots were shaded areas with seating, featuring greenery, sculptures, activities, and landmarks. The results showed 2–3 hotspots with the highest photo density in the three parks. The Cloud Vision API classification results identified that the elements of a restorative landscape can be softscape, hardscape, and other factors. The results of the PRS questionnaire test showed that the three parks had a restorative effect on visitors (< 0.05), Sempur Park had the highest fascination (55.13) and compatibility (55.57) effects, and Heulang Park had the highest coherence effect (56.85) than other parks. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating shaded seating, greenery, and engaging features into urban park designs to enhance visitor health and well-being. 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Tost, H.; Champagne, F.A.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Environmental Influence in the Brain, Human Welfare and Mental Health. Nat Neurosci 2015, 18, 4121–4131, doi:10.1038/nn.4108.

Cunningham, R.; Poppe, K.; Peterson, D.; Every-Palmer, S.; Soosay, I.; Jackson, R. Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Risk among People with Severe Mental Illness: A Cohort Study. PLoS One 2019, 14, 1–13, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221521.

Hill, K.; Gardiner, P.A.; Cavalheri, V.; Jenkins, S.C.; Healy, G.N. Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour: Applying Lessons to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Intern Med J 2015, 45, 474–482, doi:10.1111/imj.12570.

Penggayuh, D.; Munibah, K.; Ardiansyah, M. The Impact of Changes in Land Use on Green Open Space and Comfort Index in Semarang City, Indonesia. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan 2023, 13, 683–693, doi:10.29244/jpsl.13.4.683-693.

Ugolini, F.; Massetti, L.; Calaza-Martínez, P.; Cariñanos, P.; Dobbs, C.; Ostoic, S.K.; Marin, A.M.; Pearlmutter, D.; Saaroni, H.; Šaulienė, I.; et al. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Use and Perceptions of Urban Green Space: An International Exploratory Study. Urban For Urban Green 2020, 56, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888.

Marques, B.; Mcintosh, J.; Webber, H. Therapeutic Landscapes: A Natural Weaving of Culture, Health and Land. In Landscape Architecture Framed from an Environmental and Ecological Perspective; Ergen, M., Ergen, Y.B., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, 2021; pp. 1–20.

Sun, F.; Xiang, J.; Tao, Y.; Tong, C.; Che, Y. Mapping the Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Urban Green Spaces: Integrating a Visitor-Employed Photography Method into SolVES. Urban For Urban Green 2019, 38, 105–113, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.012.

Mizuuchi, Y.; Son, Y. What On-Site Landscape Experiences Attract Potential Visitors to a Site? A Japan–Korea Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Forest Research 2023, 0, 1–8, doi:10.1080/13416979.2023.2257456.

Chen, S.-H.; Chen, Y.-H. A Content-Based Image Retrieval Method Based on the Google Cloud Vision API and Wordnet.; Nguyen, N.T., Tojo, S., Nguyen, L.M., Trawiński, B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017; Vol. 10191, pp. 651–662.

Pratiwi, P.I.; Xiang, Q.; Furuya, K. Physiological and Psychological Effects Ofwalking in Urban Parks and Its Imagery in Different Seasons in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Evidence from Matsudo City, Japan. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2020, 12, doi:10.3390/SU12104003.

Etikan, I. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 2016, 5, 1, doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

Memon, M.A.; Ting, H.; Cheah, J.-H.; Thurasamy, R.; Chuah, F.; Huei Cham, T. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling SAMPLE SIZE FOR SURVEY RESEARCH: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling 2020, 4, 2590–4221, doi:10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01.

Wang, Y.; Ke, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Qin, F. A Composition-Oriented Aesthetic View Recommendation Network Supervised by the Simplified Golden Ratio Theory. Expert Syst Appl 2022, 195, 116500, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116500.

Shi, J.; Honjo, T.; Yazawa, Y.; Furuya, K. Recognition and Classification of Homogeneous Landscape With Visitor-Employed Photography and Cloud Image Annotation API: An Example of the Riverscape in Nihonbashi, Tokyo, Japan. Landsc Archit Front 2021, 9, 12, doi:10.15302/j-laf-1-020054.

Arnberger, A.; Eder, R. Are Urban Visitors’ General Preferences for Green-Spaces Similar to Their Preferences When Seeking Stress Relief? Urban For Urban Green 2015, 14, 872–882, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005.

Lo, I.S.; McKercher, B. Ideal Image in Process: Online Tourist Photography and Impression Management. Ann Tour Res 2015, 52, 104–116, doi:10.1016/j.annals.2015.02.019.

Hartig, T.; Korpela, K.; Evans, G.W.; Gärling, T. A Measure of Restorative Quality in Environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 1997, 14, 175–194, doi:10.1080/02815739708730435.

Silva, T.; Mintz, A.; Omena, J.J.; Gobbo, B.; Oliveira, T.; Takamitsu, H.T.; Pilipets, E.; Azhar, H. APIs de Visão Computacional: Investigando Mediações a Partir de estudo de Bancos de Imagens. Logos 2020, 27, 25–54, doi:10.12957/logos.2020.51523.

Hadi, A.A.; Mizuuchi, Y.; Honjo, T.; Furuya, K. Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies Identifying Impressive Landscape Objects Based on Geotagged Photographs (A Case Study of Self-Portraits and Ordinary Photos). J. Ind. Tour. Dev. Std 2017, 5, 73–80, doi:10.21776/ub.jitode.2017.005.02.02.

Mizuuchi, Y.; Son, Y.; Kang, M.; Furuya, K. Constructing a Survey Method for Landscape Evaluation Using Visitor Employed Photography and GPS. Landscape Research Japan Online 2014, 8, 1–7, doi:10.5632/jilaonline.8.1.

Schwemmer, C.; Knight, C.; Bello-Pardo, E.D.; Oklobdzija, S.; Schoonvelde, M.; Lockhart, J.W. Diagnosing Gender Bias in Image Recognition Systems. Socius 2020, 6, 1–17, doi:10.1177/2378023120967171.

Wartmann, F.M.; Tieskens, K.F.; van Zanten, B.T.; Verburg, P.H. Exploring Tranquillity Experienced in Landscapes Based on Social Media. Applied Geography 2019, 113, doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102112.

Wu, L.; Dong, Q.; Luo, S.; Jiang, W.; Hao, M.; Chen, Q. Effects of Spatial Elements of Urban Landscape Forests on the Restoration Potential and Preference of Adolescents. Land (Basel) 2021, 10, doi:10.3390/land10121349.

Budiastuti, D.; Bandur, A. Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Penelitian; Mitra Wacana Media: Jakarta, 2018;

Sari, M.; Fatimah, I.S.; Pratiwi, P.I.; Sulistyantara, B. Psychological Effects of Walking and Relaxed Sitting in Urban Greenspaces During Post-Pandemic: A Case Study in Bogor City, Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2023, 7, 1–17, doi:10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n1-1.

Pratiwi, P.I.; Sulistyantara, B.; Sisriany, S.; Lazuardi, S.N. The Psychological Effects of Park Therapy Components on Campus Landscape Preferences. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2022, 6, 143–155, doi:10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n2-3.

Stoltz, J.; Grahn, P. Perceived Sensory Dimensions: An Evidence-Based Approach to Greenspace Aesthetics. Urban For Urban Green 2021, 59, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126989.

Memari, S.; Pazhouhanfar, M.; Grahn, P. Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Green Areas: An Experimental Study on Stress Recovery. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021, 13, doi:10.3390/su13105419.

Huang, A.S.-H.; Lin, Y.-J. The Effect of Landscape Colour, Complexity and Preference on Viewing Behaviour. Landsc Res 2020, 45, 214–227, doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1593336.

Wang, R.; Zhao, J.; Meitner, M.J.; Hu, Y.; Xu, X. Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces in Relation to Aesthetic Preference and Stress Recovery. Urban For Urban Green 2019, 41, 6–13, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005.

Wang, J.W.; Poh, C.H.; Tan, C.Y.T.; Lee, V.N.; Jain, A.; Webb, E.L. Building Biodiversity: Drivers of Bird and Butterfly Diversity on Tropical Urban Roof Gardens. Ecosphere 2017, 8, doi:10.1002/ecs2.1905.

Paker, Y.; Yom-Tov, Y.; Alon-Mozes, T.; Barnea, A. The Effect of Plant Richness and Urban Garden Structure on Bird Species Richness, Diversity and Community Structure. Landsc Urban Plan 2014, 122, 186–195, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.005.

Wahyuni, S.; Syartinilia.; Aryati, M. Efektivitas Ruang Terbuka Hijau Sebagai Habitat Burung Di Kota Bogor Dan Sekitarnya. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 2018, 10, 29–36, doi:10.29244/jli.v10i1.21395.

Rumblat, W. Pengembangan Indeks Komunitas Burung Sebagai Indikator Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Hijau Perkotaan Di DKI Jakarta, Institut Pertanian Bogor: Bogor, 2016.

Hassan, A.; Tao, J.; Li, G.; Jiang, M.; Aii, L.; Zhihui, J.; Zongfang, L.; Qibing, C. Effects of Walking in Bamboo Forest and City Environments on Brainwave Activity in Young Adults. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2018, 2018, 1–9, doi:10.1155/2018/9653857.

Deng, L.; Li, X.; Luo, H.; Fu, E.K.; Ma, J.; Sun, L.X.; Huang, Z.; Cai, S.Z.; Jia, Y. Empirical Study of Landscape Types, Landscape Elements and Landscape Components of the Urban Park Promoting Physiological and Psychological Restoration. Urban For Urban Green 2020, 48, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126488.

Chen, H.; Qiu, L.; Gao, T. Application of the Eight Perceived Sensory Dimensions as a Tool for Urban Green Space Assessment and Planning in China. Urban For Urban Green 2019, 40, 224–235, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.001.

Pratiwi, P.I.; Xiang, Q.; Furuya, K. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Viewing Urban Parks in Different Seasons in Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019, 16, doi:10.3390/ijerph16214279.

Watts, G.R.; Pheasant, R.J. Factors Affecting Tranquillity in the Countryside. Applied Acoustics 2013, 74, 1094–1103, doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.03.007.

Van Renterghem, T. Towards Explaining the Positive Effect of Vegetation on the Perception of Environmental Noise. Urban For Urban Green 2019, 40, 133–144, doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.007.

Saninah, T.N.; Hermawan, R.; Setiawan, Y.; June, T. The Potential of Bekasi “Eduforest” Urban Forest in Cultural Environmental Services. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan 2023, 13, 186–198, doi:10.29244/jpsl.13.2.186-198.

Authors

Aditya Aji Pamungkas
Prita Indah Pratiwi
pritaindahpratiwi@apps.ipb.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Bambang Sulistyantara
Pamungkas, A.A. , Indah Pratiwi, P. and Sulistyantara, B. (2025) “Visitor Preferences for Restorative Landscape Elements in Bogor Urban Parks: A Visitor-Employed Photography Approach”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 15(4), p. 567. doi:10.29244/jpsl.15.4.567.

Article Details

How to Cite

Pamungkas, A.A. , Indah Pratiwi, P. and Sulistyantara, B. (2025) “Visitor Preferences for Restorative Landscape Elements in Bogor Urban Parks: A Visitor-Employed Photography Approach”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 15(4), p. 567. doi:10.29244/jpsl.15.4.567.