Unintended Effects of Forestry Fiscal Transfers on Deforestation in Indonesia

Rosaline Anggita Elsa Saragih(1) , Eka Intan Kumala Putri(2) , Nuva(3)
(1) Department of Resources and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia,
(2) Department of Resources and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia,
(3) Department of Resources and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

Abstract

The largest source of emissions (63%) in Indonesia comes from land use activities as well as forest and land fires. Deforestation is affected by several factors, such as population growth, forest fires, expansion of agricultural land, farming, drought, timber harvesting, and the lack of government attention. As part of its efforts to suppress deforestation, the Indonesian Government has allocated several types of funding for the forestry industry. However, there are disagreements over the most effective funding and implementation difficulties. This research aims to analyze the impact of forestry fiscal transfer on deforestation using spatial autoregressive in Indonesia. The results show that the forestry significantly affects deforestation in Indonesia is Forest Revenue-Sharing Fund with a positive coefficient value (0.65). Other factors that significantly affect deforestation in Indonesia are the Regional Budget for Environment (0.77), population size (–2.21), Gross Regional Domestic Product in the mining sector (0.83), area (0.99), and income per capita (–2.39). The research findings conclude that forestry fiscal transfers contribute to deforestation, instead of mitigating
deforestation. The Central Government should refine ecological fiscal transfer (EFT) schemes by adopting innovative, performance-based models and collaborating with Regional Governments to implement detail-earmarked budgeting, ensuring alignment with conservation goals. 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) Pertama Republik Indonesia. 2016. p. 1–18.

REDD+ Task Force. Strategi Nasional REDD+. 2012. p. 6–32. www.satgasreddplus.org

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Rencana Kehutanan Tingkat Nasional 2011-2030. Indonesia; 2019.

Sutiyono G, Muluk S, Mafira T, Rakhmadi R. Indonesia’s Village Fund: An Important Lever for Better Land Use and Economic Growth at the Local Level. 2018. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/indonesias-village-fund-an-important-lever-for-better-land-use-and-economic-growth-at-the-local-level/

Indonesia Central Statistical Agency. Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. 2021 Jan 21 [accessed 2023 Jan 3]. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html

Yang R, Luo Y, Yang K, Hong L, Zhou X. Analysis of forest deforestation and its driving factors in Myanmar from 1988 to 2017. Sustainability. 2019 [accessed 2022 Nov 25];11(11):3047. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3047

Liu C, Li W, Zhu G, Zhou H, Yan H, Xue P. Land use/land cover changes and their driving factors in the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau based on Geographical Detectors and Google Earth Engine: A case study in Gannan Prefecture. Remote Sensing. 2020 [accessed 2022 Dec 28];12(19):3139. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/19/3139

Hishe H, Giday K, Van Orshoven J, Muys B, Taheri F, Azadi H, Feng L, Zamani O, Mirzaei M, Witlox F. Analysis of land use land cover dynamics and driving factors in Desa’a forest in Northern Ethiopia. Land use policy. 2021 [accessed 2022 Dec 28];101:105039. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837720300958

Phiri D, Morgenroth J, Xu C. Long-term land cover change in Zambia: An assessment of driving factors. Science of the Total Environment. 2019 [accessed 2022 Dec 28];697:134206. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004896971934183X

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Indeks Kualitas Tutupan Lahan. Ministry of Environment and Forestry; 2020.

Putra RAS, Muluk S, Salam R, Untung B, Rahman E. Mengenalkan Skema Insentif Fiskal Berbasis Ekologi di Indonesia: TAKE, TAPE, dan TANE. Makalah Kebijakan. The Asia Foundation, UKAID. 2019.

Haryanto JT. Studi ecological fiscal transfer sebagai potensi pendanaan lingkungan di daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 2015 [accessed 2022 May 28];18(3):252–266.

Firdaus M. Aplikasi model ekonometrika dengan RStudio. PT Penerbit IPB Press; 2021.

Busch J, Mukherjee A. Encouraging State Governments to protect and restore forests using ecological fiscal transfers: India’s tax revenue distribution reform. Conservation Letters. 2018 [accessed 2023 Mar 29];11(2):e12416. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/conl.12416

Droste N, Lima GR, May PH, Ring I. Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Brazil–incentivizing or compensating conservation? 2015 [accessed 2023 Jan 2]. https://conferences.leeds.ac.uk/esee2015/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2015/10/0718.pdf

Ardiansyah F, Jotzo F. Decentralization and avoiding deforestation. Federal Reform Strategies: Lessons from Asia and Australia. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2013 [accessed 2023 Jan 19]:273–301.

Ruggiero PGC, Pfaff A, Pereda P, Nichols E, Metzger J-P. The Brazilian intergovernmental fiscal transfer for conservation: A successful but self-limiting incentive program. Ecological Economics. 2022 [accessed 2023 Feb 3];191:107219. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800921002780

Rajaraman I, Gupta M. Fiscal Transfers for Forest Cover. Economic & Political Weekly. 2022 [accessed 2023 Feb 3];57(1):51. http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/nrdf/publications/26.pdf

Santos R, Ring I, Antunes P, Clemente P. Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation: the Portuguese Local Finances Law. Land use policy. 2012 [accessed 2023 Feb 1];29(2):261–273. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026483771100055X

Chakraborty L. Mainstreaming climate change commitments through finance commission’s recommendations. Economic and Political Weekly. 2021 [accessed 2023 Jan 22];56:33. https://nipfp.org.in/media/medialibrary/2021/08/WP__341_2021.pdf

Nurfatriani F, Darusman D, Nurrochmat DR, Yustika AE, Muttaqin MZ. Redesigning Indonesian forest fiscal policy to support forest conservation. Forest Policy and Economics. 2015 [accessed 2023 Jan 15];61:39–50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389934115300265

Sauquet A, Marchand S, Feres JG. Ecological fiscal incentives and spatial strategic interactions: The case of the ICMS-E in the Brazilian state of Paraná. 2012 [accessed 2023 Jan 22].

Adrison V. Deforestation in decentralized and democratic Indonesia. LPEM-FEUI Working Paper–001. Jakarta: Faculty of Economics University of Indonesia. 2013 [accessed 2023 Jan 15].

Jeannette Glauber A, Moyer S, Adriani M, Gunawan Elitza Mileva I, Harimurti P, Farman Izhar M, Kendrick A, Henry Stirrett Wood G. The Cost of Fire: An Economic Analysis of Indonesia’s 2015 Fire Crisis. Jakarta: World Bank; 2016. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/391e19f4-18f7-56c2-8c28-bb89cc9e7d6f

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Permen LHK RI No. 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Petunjuk Operasional Penggunaan Dana Alokasi Khusus Fisik Penugasan Bidang Lingkungan Hidup dan Bidang Kehutanan Tahun Anggaran 2022. 2022.

Authors

Rosaline Anggita Elsa Saragih
rosalineelsa@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Eka Intan Kumala Putri
Nuva
Saragih, R.A.E., Intan Kumala Putri, E. and Nuva (2025) “Unintended Effects of Forestry Fiscal Transfers on Deforestation in Indonesia”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 15(4), p. 647. doi:10.29244/jpsl.15.4.647.

Article Details

How to Cite

Saragih, R.A.E., Intan Kumala Putri, E. and Nuva (2025) “Unintended Effects of Forestry Fiscal Transfers on Deforestation in Indonesia”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 15(4), p. 647. doi:10.29244/jpsl.15.4.647.