Happiness Differences among University Students Living with Family and Those Living Alone
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.v10i2.63913Keywords:
acceptance, family, happiness, resilience, social supportAbstract
Urban issues, particularly in the context of university students, were shaped by factors such as the type of residence, mode of transportation, and social interactions, which influenced their daily lives and decisions regarding privacy, freedom, and convenience. This study explored how the type of residence influences the happiness of university students, focusing on students living with their families versus those living independently. Using a descriptive qualitative method with semi-structured interviews, four students aged 23–30 years were interviewed. The data were analysed thematically, with the PERMA theory serving as a conceptual framework to understand the participants' experiences. Findings showed that students living with their families experience higher happiness levels due to stronger social support, which fostered positive emotions and a sense of meaning in their daily lives. In contrast, students living independently faced more challenges and limited social support, requiring extra effort to achieve acceptance and happiness. The key factors influencing happiness for both groups included the form of social support, engagement in daily activities, and the meaning attributed to challenges. Students living with their families received more support through direct interactions, while those living independently relied on support from significant others outside their residence. Despite differences in support sources, both groups demonstrated resilience and meaning-making strategies that contributed to their happiness. The study highlighted the importance of social support and individual coping strategies in shaping students' well-being.
References
Alkam, R. B., & Said, L. B. (2018). Pemilihan moda transportasi menuju kampus mahasiswa Universitas Muslim Indonesia. Jurnal Transportasi, 18(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.26593/jtrans.v18i3.3158.201-210
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Christina Hart, E. A., Lakerveld, J., McKee, M., Oppert, J. M., Rutter, H., Charreire, H., Veenhoven, R., Bárdos, H., Compernolle, S., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Brug, J., & Mackenbach, J. D. (2018). Contextual correlates of happiness in European adults. PLoS ONE, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190387
Diener, E., Seligman, M. E. P., Choi, H., & Oishi, S. (2018). Happiest People Revisited. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617697077
Gunaydin, G., Oztekin, H., Karabulut, D. H., & Salman-Engin, S. (2021). Minimal Social Interactions with Strangers Predict Greater Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(4), 1839–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00298-6
Hanurawan, F. (2016). Metode penelitian kualitatif: untuk ilmu Psikologi. Rajawali Press.
Hidayat, V. (2019). Kebermaknaan hidup pada mahasiswa semester akhir. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 6(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v6i2.1491
Jiang, Y., Lu, C., Chen, J., Miao, Y., Li, Y., & Deng, Q. (2022). Happiness in university students: Personal, familial, and social factors: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084713
Katz, S., & Somers, C. L. (2017). Individual and environmental predictors of college adjustment: prevention and intervention. Current Psychology, 36(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9384-0
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Kun, A., & Gadanecz, P. (2022). Workplace happiness, well-being and their relationship with psychological capital: A study of Hungarian Teachers. Current Psychology, 41(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00550-0
Leyden, K. M., Hogan, M. J., D’Arcy, L., Bunting, B., & Bierema, S. (2024). Walkable neighborhoods: linkages between place, health, and happiness in younger and older adults. Journal of the American Planning Association, 90(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2123382
Morales-Rodríguez, F. M., Espigares-López, I., Brown, T., & Pérez-Mármol, J. M. (2020). The relationship between psychological well-being and psychosocial factors in university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134778
Oktaviani, M., Elmanora, & Hasanah, U. (2023). Parenting style, social support, peer relationship, and coping strategies among students during online learning. Journal of Family Sciences, 8(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.v8i2.49756
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Parker, J., Yacoub, A., Mughal, S., & Mamari, F. (2023). Family support and psychological distress among commuter college students. Journal of American College Health, 71(2), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1895805
Peifer, C., Syrek, C., Ostwald, V., Schuh, E., & Antoni, C. H. (2020). Thieves of flow: how unfinished tasks at work are related to flow experience and wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(5), 1641–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00149-z
Ramadhana, M. R. (2024). Family Resilience in urban extreme poverty. Journal of Family Sciences, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.vi.49784
Requena, F. (2016). Rural–urban living and level of economic development as factors in subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1051-1
Reski, I., & Tampubolon, A. C. (2019). Faktor Penentu Preferensi Tipe Hunian di Kalangan Mahasiswa. RUAS, 17(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2019.017.01.2
Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Sørensen, J. F. L. (2021). The rural happiness paradox in developed countries. Social Science Research, 98, 102581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102581
Sørensen, J. F. L. (2024). Why are city residents less happy than the rest of the population in developed countries? studying the urban-rural happiness gap in Denmark Using Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10380-3
Thongsri, N., Seksan, J., & Warintarawej, P. (2024). Factors affecting the happiness of learners in higher education: attitude, grade point average, and time management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(18), 8214. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188214
Wan Mohd Yunus, W. M. A., Badri, S. K. Z., Panatik, S. A., & Mukhtar, F. (2021). The unprecedented movement control order (lockdown) and factors associated with the negative emotional symptoms, happiness, and work-life balance of Malaysian University Students during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.566221
Yıldırım, M., & Green, Z. A. (2024). Social support and resilience mediate the relationship of stress with satisfaction with life and flourishing of youth. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 52(4), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2023.2172551
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Family Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
_001.png)
