Collaborative Management of Rice Field for Household Food Security: The Case of Santri Tani Sukabumi Regency
Abstract
The collaborative rice field management that has been carried out in Ciracap Village, Ciracap District, Sukabumi Regency, aims to achieve the level of food security of farmer households. The stakeholders have roles as capital providers, facilitators, and off-takers. This study aims to analyze the extent to which the effectiveness of collaboration can provide positive changes to the level of food security of farmer households in Ciracap Village. This research started from February to August 2021, using mixed methods. The data collected was obtained based on a survey method with a questionnaire instrument for quantitative methods, as well as observations and in-depth interviews for qualitative methods. Quantitative data were processed using a multivariate test with MANOVA analysis, while qualitative data is processed by data reduction, data presentation, and data verification. The results showed that the collaborative process of rice field management was based on a high level of trust between the closest stakeholders. However, based on the administrative data that is not on field conditions, the effectiveness of the collaboration process on the level of household food security is less effective. The effectiveness of collaboration tends to be weak because the program implementation has not yet fully guaranteed the fulfillment of food for farmer households. This is indicated by the socio-economic conditions of farmers that have not changed positively because the quality and quantity of rice production are not in line with the target.
References
[Bappenas] Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2020. Presidential Decree No. 18 Year 2020. https://www.bappenas.go.id/id/data-dan...dan.../rpjmn-2015-2019/.
[BKPKP] Badan Ketahanan Pangan Kementerian Pertanian. 2019. Indeks Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia 2019. Jakarta: BKPKP. http://bkp.pertanian.go.id/storage/app/media/Bahan 2020/IKP 2019 FINAL.pdf.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2015. Pedoman Pencacahan Nilai Tukar Petani dengan Metode Nilai Produksi (NP).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Luas Panen dan Produksi Padi di Indonesia 2020.
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2017. The Future of Food and Agriculture-Trends and Challenges. Rome.
[Kementan] Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. 2020a. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Padi. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian.
[Kementan] Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. 2020b. Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian 2020-2024. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.
Agranoff R, McGuire M. 2004. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Georgetown Univ Pr.
Andayani SA, Sulistyowati L, Azisah SN. 2016. Analisis Kolaborasi Pada Pengembangan Kemitraan Usahatani Mangga di Kabupaten Majalengka. AGRICORE-Jurnal Agribisnis dan Sos Ekon Pertan. 1(1):1–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.24198/agricore.v1i1.22685.
Ansell C, Gash A. 2007. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 18(4):543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Asni N. 2016. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Jambu Mete di Kecamatan Parangloe Kabupaten Gowa. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Basri Z. 2018. Evaluasi Program Optimasi Lahan Petani Ditinjau dari Aspek Sosial Ekonomi Petani di Desa Batetangnga Polewali Mandar. AGROVITAL J Ilmu Pertan. 3(1):28. doi:10.35329/agrovital.v3i1.218.
Belem W, Hariadi SS, Wastutiningsih SP. 2014. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional terhadap Kemandirian Gapoktan. JSEP. 7(2). https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JSEP/article/view/1448.
Canita PL, Haryono D, Kasymir E. 2017. Analisis Pendapatan dan Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga Petani Pisang di Kecamatan Padang Cermin Kabupaten Pesawaran. J Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis. 5(3):235–241. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v5i3.1635.
Darwanto DH. 2009. Ketahanan Pangan berbasis Ketersediaan Produk dari Petani Subsisten. Ilmu Pertan. 12(2):152–164.
Ellis F. 2008. The Determinants of Rural Livelihood Diversification in Developing Countries. J Agric Econ. 51(2):289–302. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x.
Gandasari D, Sarwoprasodjo S, Ginting B, Susanto D. 2015. Proses Kolaboratif Antarpemangku Kepentingan Pada Konsorsium Anggrek Berbasis Komunikasi. MIMBAR. 31(1):81. doi:10.29313/mimbar.v31i1.1109.
Hasanah M. 2019. Pemilihan Jumlah Kategori Terbaik pada Model Rough-Regresi Berdasarkan Mean Square Error. Pekanbaru: Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/24233/.
Irwan. 2018. Relevansi Paradigma Positivistik Dalam Penelitian Sosiologi Pedesaan. J Ilmu Sos. 17(1):21–38.
Iyoega RR. 2020. Collaborative Governance dalam Pembangunan Sektor Pertanian di Kabupaten Bandung. Perspektif. 9(1):55–65. doi:10.31289/perspektif.v9i1.2864.
Januar M, Sumardjo. 2010. Peran Kelompok Tani dalam Ketahanan Pangan Rumahtangga Petani (Desa Banjarsari dan Desa Tanjungsari, Kecamatan Sukaresik, Kabupaten Tasikmalaya, Propinsi Jawa Barat). J Penyul. 6(2). doi:doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v6i2.11448.
Jill G. 2003. Customer loyalty : How To Earn It, How To Keep It. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kurniasari DA. 2016. Pengaruh Pendapatan, Dependency Ratio dan Tingkat Pendidikan Nelayan terhadap Pola Konsumsi Rumah Tangga Nelayan di Pesisir Pantai Depok Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. http://eprints.uny.ac.id/id/eprint/41144.
Meliala MA, Salmiah, Sihombing L. 2013. Akses Pangan Rumah Tangga Petani Padi Sawah (Studi Kasus di Desa Sempung Polding Kecamatan Lae Parira Kabupaten Dairi). J Soc Econ Agric Agribus. 2(6):1–19.
Nuryanti S. 2005. Pemberdayaan Petani dengan Model Cooperative Farming. Anal Kebijak Pertan. 3(2):152–158.
Paipan S, Abrar M. 2020. Analisis Kondisi Ketergantungan Impor Beras Di Indonesia. J Perspekt Ekon Darussalam. 6(2):212–222. doi:10.24815/jped.v6i2.15000.
Popkin SL. 1979. The rational peasant : the political economy of rural society in Vietnam. University of California Press. [diakses 2022 Mei 13]. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Rational_Peasant.html?id=b7UwDwAAQBAJ.
Priatna BA. 2007. Teknik-Teknik Analisis Multivariat Terkini yang Sering Digunakan dalam Penelitian.
Putra DA. 2020 Mar 12. Moeldoko Ungkap Tantangan Pertanian di Asia dan Indonesia. Liputan6.com., siap terbit. [diakses 2021 Apr 17]. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4200213/moeldoko-ungkap-tantangan-pertanian-di-asia-dan-indonesia.
Samsu. 2017. Metode Penelitian: (Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Mixed Methods, serta Research & Development). Ed ke-1. Rusmini, editor. Pusat Studi Agama dan Kemasyarakatan (PUSAKA). [diakses 2022 Mei 12]. http://repository.uinjambi.ac.id/468/1/06_Metode Penelitian %28Teori %26 Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif_ Kuantitatif_ Mixed Methods_ serta Research and DEvelopment%29 - Samsu %281%29.pdf.
Sukma VE. 2015. Pengembangan Model Penjadwalan Penanaman Mempertimbangkan Rotasi Tanaman Pada Pertanian Perkotaan. Intitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Sulistya. 2012. dari Ketahanan Pangan Menuju Kedaulatan Pangan. Agros. 14(1):125–132.
Suparmini, Wijayanti AT. 2015. Masyarakat Desa dan Kota (Tinjauan Geografis, Sosiologis, dan Historis). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Suryana A. 2014. Menuju Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia Berkelanjutan 2025: Tantangan dan Penanganannya. Forum Penelit Agro Ekon. 32(2):123. doi:10.21082/fae.v32n2.2014.123-135.
Suyudi, Nuryaman H, Mamoen MI, Tedjaningsih T. 2020. Kajian Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga Petani Mendong dan Petani Padi. J Agribisnis Terpadu. 13(1):91–107. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.33512/jat.v13i1.7631.
Utari S. 2020. Pola Maksimalisasi Keuntungan dalam Prespektif Samuel L. Popkin di Kalangan Petani Gapoktan Sugihwaras Kecamatan Ngoro Kabupaten Jombang. Universitas Airlangga. [diakses 2022 Mei 13]. https://repository.unair.ac.id/104703/1/2. Abstrak .pdf.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).