Land use Conflict in Gunung halimun Salak National Park Lebak District

  • Nurman Hakim
  • Kukuh Murtilaksono
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i2.13377

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Development for conservation, agriculture and settlements have equal importance for humankind. Reality showed, conflict is occured because of each goal use its own knowledge and values. The conflict was found in the forest area of Gunung Halimun Salak National Park. The study aimed to identify the landuse conflict between conservation with agriculture, settlement, include mining, and identify the strategic issues that arised from the conflict. This study was conducted in Gunung Halimun Salak National Park at Lebak regency. The study using qualitative and quantitative approach. Spatial multicriteria analysis was employed to identify the areas of conflict. List of issue derived from three sources: observing landuse conflict map, discussion with the expert and stakeholder’s strategic document. The strategic issues is classifyed based on level of agreement among experts.The result showed that conflict which had been occurred between conservation and agriculture of 22,061.11 ha (49%); between conservation and settlement of 1,830.36 Ha (4%); and between conservation and mining of 26,007.86 Ha (58 %). Analysis of strategic issues leads to 11 issues were grouped to three agendas, namely (1) Tenure and environmental damage, (2) disaster mitigation and food security, and (3) infrastructure development for agriculture and settlement.
Keywords: Gunung Halimun Salak district Lebak, landuse conflict, landuse preferences, multicriteria analysis.

ABSTRAK
Pembangunan untuk tujuan konservasi, pertanian dan permukiman memiliki nilai penting yang setara demi kesejahteraan manusia. Kenyataan menunjukan bahwa ketiga tujuan tersebut kerap berbenturan dan menimbulkan konflik karena masing-masing menggunakan pengetahuan dan nilainya sendiri-sendiri. Konflik tersebut dijumpai di kawasan hutan Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi konflik penggunaan lahan antara konservasi dengan pertanian, permukiman termasuk pertambangan, serta mengidentifikasi isu strategis yang muncul dari konflik yang terjadi. Penelitian dilakukan di kawasan hutan Taman nasional Gunung Halimun salak di Kabupaten Lebak. Penelitian ini menggunakan kombinasi pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Analisis spasial multikriteria digunakan untuk mendeskripsikan area-area yang mengalami konflik. Isu-isu digali dari pengamatan peta konflik, wawancara narasumber ahli dan kajian dokumen strategis. Perumusan isu strategis didasarkan pada tingkat kesepakatan diantara para narasumber. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan terjadi konflik penggunaan lahan antara konservasi dengan pertanian seluas 22.061,11 ha (49%); antara konservasi dengan permukiman seluas 1.830,36 Ha (4%); dan antara konservasi dengan pertambangan seluas 26.007,86 Ha (58 %). Terdapat 11 isu strategis yang dirumuskan menjadi 3 kelompok isu dan diajukan sebagai agenda bersama pengelolaan konflik penggunaan lahan, yaitu: (1) Isu lingkungan dan penyelesaian tenurial, (2) Isu mitigasi bencana dan ketahanan pangan, dan (3) Isu pengembangan infrastuktur pertanian dan permukiman.
Kata kunci: TNGHS Kabupaten Lebak, konflik penggunaan lahan, preferensi penggunaan lahan, analisis multikriteria.

Published
2016-12-17
How to Cite
HakimN., & MurtilaksonoK. (2016). Land use Conflict in Gunung halimun Salak National Park Lebak District. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i2.13377
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).