Walkability Index Value Jalur Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Heritage Sebagai Pengembangan Perdagangan dan Jasa di Jalan Tunjungan, Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2025.9.2.194-208Keywords:
Heritage, Pedestrian path, Walkable City, Walkability Index ValueAbstract
Walking is one of the physical activities that uses the feet as the main tool in moving, walking activities are included in the universal cheap transportation modes that are easily found in developed cities, to connect the movement of human activities from one area to another, so that socio-economic and cultural activities are created. This walking activity is a fundamental aspect of the city, where the centers of large urban economic activities depend on one of them on walking activities. A city that is friendly to walking activities is called a city with the character of Walkable City or a city that is friendly to pedestrians and the environment, while the status of a Walkable City can be known by analyzing the Walkable City Value (WIV) or the pedestrian-friendly index value of an observed area. The Walkable City concept promotes walking activities as the main means of transportation with the aim of improving a healthier lifestyle that is more environmentally friendly. In the city of Surabaya there are many centers of economic distribution, one of which is Jalan Tunjungan, the road is included in the Heritage area which has a center of economic, social and cultural activities, so that in any case it requires an analysis of the Walkability Index Value on the pedestrian path on the road. This study aims to analyze WIV on the Tunjungan Street lane, the analysis was conducted using the actual direct participatory observation method, in the observation area using a Likert scale questionnaire that was previously compiled. The results of this study are the Walkability Index Value of the Tunjungan Street Heritage Area, which is 86 out of a maximum score of 100. This value indicates that the quality of the Tunjungan Street Heritage Area is included in the "Highly Walkable" category.
References
Affif, A. M. (2020). Walkability Index of Kampung Madras Commercial Area. Arsitektura, 18(2 Oktober 2020), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v18i2.43421
Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274016
Badan Informasi geospasial. (2023). Peta Wilayah Indonesia. https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/portal-web/download/perwilayah
Cerin, E., Lee, K. yiu, Barnett, A., Sit, C. H. P., Cheung, M. chin, Chan, W. man, & Johnston, J. M. (2013). Walking for transportation in Hong Kong Chinese urban elders: A cross-sectional study on what destinations matter and when. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-78
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kota Surabaya, & Walikota Surabaya. (2018). Perda Kota Surabaya Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 Rdtr. Rencana Detail Tata Ruang dan Peraturan Zonasi Kota Surabaya Tahun 2018-2038.
Ernawati, J., Adhitama, M. S., Surjono, & Sudarmo, B. S. (2016). Urban Design Qualities Related Walkability in a Commercial Neighbourhood. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 1(4), 242. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v1i4.385
Gota, S., Fabian, H. G., Mejia, A. A., & Punte, S. S. (2010). Walkability Surveys In Asian Cities. http://www.urbanindia.nic.in/programme/ut/final_Report.pdf
Habibian, M., & Hosseinzadeh, A. (2018). Walkability index across trip purposes. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.005
Ikhram, M., & Idris, U. (2021). Influence Of Intersection On Walkability Index In Campus And Surroundings (Case Study Indonesia And Japan). 10(1), 1–8. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/planomadani
Ikram, M., & Idris, U. (2018). Development Of Evaluation Tool For Walkability On Campus And Surrounding Area. Case Study: Public Universities In Indonesia And Japan.
Kato, H. (2020). Effect of walkability on urban sustainability in the Osaka metropolitan fringe area. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219248
Kaziyeva, D., Stutz, P., Wallentin, G., & Loidl, M. (2023). Agent-based simulation model of cyclists and pedestrians at a regional scale. AGILE: GIScience Series, 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-30-2023
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2023). Pedoman Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki.
Kim, E. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2020). A Reliability check of walkability indices in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010176
Krambeck, H. V., & Gakenheimer, R. (2006). The Global Walkability Index Thesis Supervisors.
Larranaga, A. M., Arellana, J., Rizzi, L. I., Strambi, O., & Cybis, H. B. B. (2019). Using best–worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: a study of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transportation, 46(6), 2347–2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9944-x
Leather, J., Fabian, H., Gota, S., & Mejia, A. (2011). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities State and Issues ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series. www.adb.org/poverty
Nugroho, R. A., & Rusnabilah, A. (2021). Nilai Index Walkability Jalur Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Perdagangan Dan Jasa Kota Samarinda. Reksabumi, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33830/reksabumi.v1i1.1962.2022
Propiona, J. K. (2021). Implementasi Aksesibilitas Fasilitas Publik Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Jurnal Analisis Sosiologi, 10(Edisi Khusus Sosiologi Perkotaan), 1–18.
Sakurada, S., Nishimura, K., & kaneko, S. (2023). US011823563B2. United States Patent.
Sari, D. L. N., & Pawestri, A. (2022). Ketersediaan Fasilitas yang Aksesibilitas Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Kabupaten Bangkalan Madura. In Journal Inicio Legis, (3). https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/iniciolegis/article/view/14338/7266
Sofwan, M., & Tanjung, M. H. (2020). Evaluation Study Of Walkability Index In Central Business District (CBD) Area, Pekanbaru City. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, 5(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.25299/jgeet.2020.5.3.4181
Sohn, D. W., Moudon, A. V., & Lee, J. (2012). The economic value of walkable neighborhoods. Urban Design International, 17(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.1
Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the Walkable City. Journal Of Urban Planning And Development © ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0733-94882005131:4246
Speck, J. (2018). Walkable City Rules: 101 Steps to Making Better Places. https://web.archive.org/
Tsiompras, A. B., & Photis, Y. N. (2017). What matters when it comes to “walk and the city”? Defining a weighted GIS-based walkability index. Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.06.001
Zaenal Muttaqin, M., & Khodizah, S. (2021). Walkability Index Pada Zona Komersial Melalui Segmentasi Area Trotoar di Kota Pekanbaru Walkability Index for Commercial Zone Through Sidewalk Area Segmentation in Pekanbaru. 08(02). https://journal.itltrisakti.ac.id/index.php/jmtranslog.
.png){kind=logo}
