Evaluasi Green Building Berdasarkan Greenship pada Bangunan Gedung RSUD Grati Pasuruan
Abstract
This research conducted focused on the Grati Hospital Building, which is an effort to mitigate global warming by evaluating the building in terms of green building principles. This is because the building is newly constructed and located in an industrial area with a dense population, making it suitable for a case study. The aim is to evaluate the RSUD Grati Hospital building based on the Green Building concept by applying Greenship assessment simulations. This research is classified as quantitative research, focusing on direct observational methods with reference to the Greenship Rating Tools, specifically version 1.2 for newly constructed buildings. The simulation results of the evaluation conducted on the RSUD Grati Hospital building are as follows: (1) Land Use Efficiency scores 7 points, (2) Energy Efficiency and Conservation scores 8 points, (3) Water Conservation scores 10 points, (4) Material Resources and Cycle scores 8 points, (5) Indoor Health and Comfort scores 6 points, (6) Building Environmental Management scores 4 points. Based on the points obtained, the overall rating is Bronze, with a score of 43 points or 42.57%, ranking fourth out of four ranks available, thus qualifying the building as a green building. The distinctive feature of the RSUD Grati Hospital building in implementing green building principles lies in its electricity and water conservation efforts, as reflected in the Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation categories.
References
Admin dlh (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup). (2019). Pemanasan Global (Global Warming). [diunduh 2022 Maret 9]. Tersedia pada: https://dlh.bulelengkab.go.id/informasi/detail/artikel/pemanasan-global-global-warming-76.
Arlisyah, F. N., Sukmawati, S., & Trisiana, A. (2020). Penilaian Green Building Berdasarkan Perangkat Greenship Untuk Bangunan Baru Versi 1.2 Menggunakan Logika Fuzzy (Studi Kasus: Gedung Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember). Journal of Applied Civil Engineering and Infrastructure (JACEIT) Vol, 1(1), 43-49.
Badan Pusat Statistik [BPS] Kota Pasuruan. Nomor. 01/01/Th. (2021) tentang Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Kota Pasuruan.
Chadirin, Y., & Furi, I. M. (2019). Evaluasi Aspek Green Building Pada Gedung Andi Hakim Nasoetion Rektorat IPB. Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, 3(2).
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
Green Building Council Indonesia [GBCI]. (2013). Greenship Rating Tools untuk Bangunan Baru Versi 1.2.
Kandita, Akmalah, E., & Irawati, I. (2017). Kajian Kategori Tepat Guna Lahan dalam Penerapan Konsep Green Building di ITENAS. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Institut Nasional Bandung, 22-27
Kevin, G., Anggalimanto, I., Chandra, H. P., & Ratnawidjaja, S. (2016). Analisis Tantangan dan Manfaat Bangunan Hijau. Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, Vo. 5(2), 1-8.
Komalasari, Rahayu, I., Purwanto, & Suharyanto (2013). Kajian Green Building Berdasarkan Kriteria Tepat Guna Lahan (Appropriate Site Development) pada Gedung B Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 2013, 422-428
Massie, F., Y., Dundu, A., K., T., & Tjakra, J. (2018). Penerapan Konsep Green Building pada Industri Jasa Konstruksi di Manado. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 6(8), 553-558
Mongan, A. I., Tjakra, J., & Arsjad, T. T. (2019). Evaluasi Konsep Green Building Pada Gedung Baru Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 7(12).
Ratnaningsih, A., Hasanuddin, A., & Hermansa, R. (2019). Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Pembangunan Gedung IsDB Project Berdasarkan Skala Indeks Menggunakan Greenship Versi 1.2 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Engineering Biotechnology Universitas Jember). Berkala Sainstek, 7(2), 59-66.
Roshaunda, D., Diana, L., Caroline, L. P., Khalisha, S., & Nugraha, R. S. (2019). Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Bangunan Gedung Universitas Pembangunan Jaya Berdasarkan Indikasi Green Building Council Indonesia. Widyakala: Journal of Pembangunan Jaya University, 6, 29-46.
Sedayu, A. (2015). Deskripsi Faktor-Faktor Dalam Pengembangan Kinerja Green Terminal Hamid Rusdi Malang.
Sobirin, Z. A. (2014). Analisis Kesesuaian Desain Gedung Olahraga Baru Universitas Negeri Surabaya Terhadap Konsep Green Building. Rekayasa Teknik Sipil, 3(1), 29-36.
Sudarwani, M. M. (2012). Penerapan Green Architecture Dan Green Building Sebagai Upaya Pencapaian Sustainable Architecture. Dinamika Sains, 10(24).
Sugiyono, M. (2008). Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Untoro, J. (2014). Audit Energi dan Analisis Penghematan Konsumsi Energi pada Sistem Peralatan Listrik di Gedung Pelayanan Unila. Electrician, 8(2), 93-104.
Widiarsa, K., B., Kumara., I., N., S., & Hartati, R., S. (2021). Studi Literatur Perkembangan Green Building di Indonesia. Jurnal Spektrum, 8(2), 37-47.
Widyawati, R. L. (2019). Green Building dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Konsep Hemat Energi Menuju Green Building di Jakarta. Jurnal Kalibrasi, 2(1).
Wuryanti, W. (2012). Keputusan Multikriteria dalam Menilai Konstruksi Rumah Tinggal Terhadap Lingkungan. Jurnal Permukan, 7(2), 66-75.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning (Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah dan Perdesaan)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.