Green Open Space Collaborative Governance: a Systematic Literature Review

  • Irvan Dian Pratama Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Salahudin Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Ali Roziqin Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Keywords: Collaborative Governance, Green Space, Optimization, Planning


This research aims to find out the collaborative governance of green open space has been running well but not optimal in its implementation. This study uses systematic literature review as the basic basis to make it easier for researchers /students to be able to review and identify scientific articles systematically with predetermined steps.  This study revealed that there were 124 articles selected from 378 articles relevant to the topics discussed The results of the analysis resulted in 3 different clusters in 38 concepts relevant to the collaborative governance study of green open space. Density visualization mode, there is no dominating author in reviewing author data mapping according to the theme of green open space collaborative governance. This Paper, has limited articles to support literature review, total articles obtained through the scopus database not all of them have related topics that will be used to conduct research, so researchers have difficulty in conducting analysis. Researchers' recommendations on further research need to use analysis by adding several articles that have the same relevance in some sources of scientific articles to make it easier to conduct concrete data analysis.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Avoyan, E., & Meijerink, S. (2021). Cross-sector collaboration within Dutch flood risk governance: historical analysis of external triggers. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 37(1), 24–47.
Ben Yahia, N., Eljaoued, W., Bellamine Ben Saoud, N., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2021). Towards sustainable collaborative networks for smart cities co-governance. International Journal of Information Management, 56.
Butler, M. (2021). Relationship between community capitals and governance: The perspective of local actors in the Maya Biosphere Reserve. World Development Perspectives, 21.
Follador, D., Tremblay-Racicot, F., Duarte, F., & Carrier, M. (2021). Collaborative Governance in Urban Planning: Patterns of Interaction in Curitiba and Montreal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(1).
Lahat, L., & Sabah, Y. (2021). Effects of different kinds of trust and leadership on outputs of collaborative processes: the case of personal social services in Israel. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Lindgren, A. Y., Reed, M. G., & Robson, J. P. (2021). Process Makes Perfect: Perceptions of Effectiveness in Collaborative Environmental Governance. Environmental Management, 67(2), 228–241.
McAfee, D., Reinhold, S.-L., Alleway, H. K., & Connell, S. D. (2021). Environmental solutions fast-tracked: Reversing public scepticism to public engagement. Biological Conservation, 253.
Nieminen, J., Salomaa, A., & Juhola, S. (2021). Governing urban sustainability transitions: urban planning regime and modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(4), 559–580.
Suleiman, L. (2021). Blue green infrastructure, from niche to mainstream: Challenges and opportunities for planning in Stockholm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166.
Temmerman, L., Veeckman, C., & Ballon, P. (2021). Collaborative governance platform for social innovation in Brussels. Social Enterprise Journal.
Wolf, J., Nogueira, F., & Borges, M. (2021). A Collaborative Methodology for Local Strategic Planning: Insights from Four Plans in Portugal. Planning Practice and Research, 36(1), 91–107.
Zhou, K., Yin, Y., Li, H., & Shen, Y. (2021). Driving factors and spatiotemporal effects of environmental stress in urban agglomeration: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(1), 91–110.
How to Cite
PratamaI. D., Salahudin, & RoziqinA. (2021). Green Open Space Collaborative Governance: a Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 19(02), 125-139.