Social Movement in Framing Perspective: Omnibus Law Protest in Indonesia
Gerakan Sosial dalam Perspektif Framing: Protes Terhadap Omnibus Law di Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to provide a framing perspective on the study of development communication. This study explains the causes of the emergence of social movements in Indonesia in rejecting the Omnibus Law. The protests against the Omnibus Law that occurred in various cities in Indonesia as a form of resistance to government policies were examined from the perspective of framing theory. The method used is text analysis with Robert N Entman’s framing framework. The unit of analysis is the Omnibus Law protest news published in Tempo Magazine in October 2020. The results of this study indicate that social movements to reject the Omnibus Law were carried out by various elements of society, ranging from workers, students, and other elements of society. Even though the Omnibus Law was finally signed by President Joko Widodo on October 5, 2020, the protest effort remained an important note that this law has many loopholes that are considered to be detrimental to elements of society, potentially damaging the environment, and weakening government authority area.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, N., & Popa, I.-L. (2014). The Social Media Usage and the Transformation of Political Marketing and Campaigning of the Emerging Democracy in Indonesia. In Social media in politics (pp. 97–125). Springer.
Amanah, S., (2010). Peran Komunikasi Pembangunan dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pesisir. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 8(1), 1-19.
Anggoro, A. D. (2016). Media, Politik dan Kekuasaan (Analisis Framing Model Robert N. Entman tentang Pemberitaan Hasil Pemilihan Presiden, 9 Juli 2014 di TV One dan Metro TV). ARISTO, 2(2), 25–52.
Briandana, R. (2019). Television and National Identity: An Ethnography of Television Audience in the Border of Indonesia-Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 23(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.22146/ jsp.27205
Edelman, M. (1993). Contestable Categories and Public Opinion. Political Communication, 10(3), 231–242.
Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis isi: Pengantar Metodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Entman, R. M. (2010a). Framing Media Power. In Doing News Framing Analysis (pp. 347–371). Routledge.
Entman, R. M. (2010b). Media Framing Biases and Political Power: Explaining Slant in News of Campaign 2008. Journalism, 11(4), 389–408.
Entman, R. M., & Usher, N. (2018). Framing in a Fractured Democracy: Impacts of Digital Technology on Ideology, Power and Cascading Network Activation. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 298–308.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
Ida, R., & Saud, M. (2020). An Empirical Analysis of Social Media Usage, Political Learning and Participation Among Youth: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 54(4), 1285–1297.
Jahi, Amri. (1988). Komunikasi Massa dan Pembangunan Pedesaan di Negara-negara Dunia Ketiga Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Jamil, A., Social Movement in Framinmg Perspective: A Study on Corruption Case Issues in Indonesia (2018). Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(2), 174-191.
Jamil, A., & Doktoralina, C. M. (2016). The Save KPK Movement: A Framing Analysis of Coverage in Indonesian News Media Surrounding the KPK and Police Dispute. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (3 S1), 229.
Lim, J., & Jones, L. (2010). A Baseline Summary of Framing Research in Public Relations from 1990 to 2009. Public Relations Review, 36(3), 292–297.
Molaei, H. (2015). Discursive Opportunity Structure and the Contribution of Social Media to the Success of Social Movements in Indonesia. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 94–108.
Morley, D. (2003). Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
Novita, I., Nur, I., & Rose, T. (2021). Konstruksi Realitas Media (Analisis Framing Pemberitaan UU Cipta Kerja Omnibus Law dalam Media Online Vivanews dan Tirto. id). Jurnal of Admiration, 2 (1), 69–84.
Prakasa, S. U. W. (2021). Ecocide Crimes & Omnibus Law: Review Of International Law And Its Implications On Indonesia Law. Dinamika Hak Asasi Manusia, 12(2), 14–20.
Pratama, A. A., Jamil, A., & Briandana, R. (2021). Political Marketing on Legislative Elections in Indonesia: Case Study in Central Bengkulu. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, 26(1), 195–206.
Putri, L. D., Andika, D., & Annisarizki. (2020). The Journalists Has Built Self Meaning : Spreading Hate Speech in Presidential Election 2019 in Banten. Aspiration Journal, 1(2), 182–207.
Reese, S. D., Gandy, J., & Grant, A. E. (2001). Prologue—Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In Framing public life (pp. 23–48). Routledge.
Rusadi, U., (2014). Makna Dan Model Komunikasi Pembangunan. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media. 17 (1), 89-104.
Rogers, Everett, M. (1976). The Passing of the Dominan Paradigm-Reflection on Diffusion Research in Wilbur Schramm and Daniel Lerner, Communication Change the Last Ten Year and the Next. Honolulu: An East-West Center Book.
Setyowati, Y.,(2019). Komunikasi Pemberdayaan Sebagai Perspektif Baru Pengembangan Pendidikan Komunikasi Pembangunan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan. 17 (2), 188-199.
Scheufele, B. T., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Spreading Activation, Applicability, and Schemas: Conceptual Distinctions and Their Operational Implications for Measuring Frames and Framing Effects. In Doing News Framing Analysis (pp. 126–150). Routledge.
Sulistyo, P. B., & Azmawati, A. A. (2016). The Roles of Facebook in Creating New Anti-Corruption Social Movement Through Online Community in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(7), 33–37.
Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News Framing Theory and Research. In Media Effects (pp. 33–49). Routledge.
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78.
Wulan. R., & Edy Prihantoro. (2020). Development Communication Strategy by Bojonegoro District Government on Applying Nawacita and Sustainable Development Goals. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 18(02), 117-129.
Wibhisono, I. G. L. A. K. (2020). Framing Analysis of the Kompas’ COVID-19 Coverage: January 2020 Edition. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 5(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i2.717.
Widiyaningrum, W., & Isnaini, M. (2021). Pembingkaian Berita Aksi Unjuk Rasa Menolak Undang–Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Bisnis, 6(2), 188–203.
Yusriana, A., Hasfi, N., Rimban, L., Diponegoro, U., Tembalang, S. H., Ave, K., & Manila, M. (2021). Understanding the online movement for #hariprabangsanasional 1). Bricolage Jurnal, 7(1), 1–18.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
