Effect of Plate Materials and Operational Parameters on Hybrid Phsyco-Biological Units for Palm Oil Mill Effluent

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/jsil.11.1.77-86

Keywords:

Electrocoagulation, MBBR, POME, hybrid reactor, plate material

Abstract

Indonesia’s palm oil industry generates large volumes of palm oil mill effluent (POME) characterized by high organic load and suspended solids, requiring effective treatment. This study evaluates a continuous hybrid system consisting of a kapok fiber
(KF) pre-treatment unit, electrocoagulation (EC) reactor, and Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR), operated under varying plate materials (Fe, Al, Cu) at 24 V and 10 A. The system treated raw POME (pH 3.4; sCOD 20,796 mg/L; TSS 25,610 mg/L; oil and grease 3,243
mg/L) over 10-day operational cycles per condition. Results show that copper electrodes achieved the highest performance, with sCOD removal up to 66% and oil and grease removal up to 81.38%, alongside improved TSS reduction. The KF unit contributed 46–
53% oil and grease removal, while EC primarily reduced suspended solids and adjusted pH, supporting stable MBBR performance. The combined configuration highlights the interaction between physicochemical and biological processes, where electrode selection
and pre-treatment significantly influence overall system efficiency. These findings provide insight into optimizing integrated treatment strategies for high-strength POME, although additional polishing steps are still required to meet discharge standards.

References

[1] Food Agricultural Organization, “Agricultural Production Statistics 2000-2020,” FAO, Rome, 2020.

[2] Badan Pusat Statistik, “Statistik Ekonomi dan Perdagangan Luar Negeri: Ekspor Minyak Sawit,” BPS Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2023.

[3] E. Bazrafshan, L. Mohammadi, A. Ansari-Moghaddam, and A. H. Mahvi, “Heavy metals removal from aqueous environments by electrocoagulation process - a systematic review,” J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 2015; 13, (74): 1–16. DOI: 10.1186/s40201-015-0233-8.

[4] Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry, “Regulation on Wastewater Quality Standards,” KLHK, Jakarta, 2023.

[5] GAPKI, “Indonesian Palm Oil Industry Report 2024,” GAPKI, Jakarta, 2024.

[6] D. Dominic and S. Baidurah, “Recent developments in biological processing technology for palm oil mill effleunt treatment - a review,” Biology, 2021; 11, (5): 1–30. DOI: 10.3390/pr9050739.

[7] Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.

[8] S. N. hartika A. Bakar et al., “A review of moving-bed biofilm reactor technology for palm oil mill effluent treatment,” Hournal Clean. Prod., vol. 171, pp. 1532–1545, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.100.

[9] R. H and Sangalang, “Kapok fiber - structure, characteristics and applications: a review,” Orient. J. Chem., 2021; 37, (3): 513–523. DOI: 10.13005/ojc/370301.

[10] M. Nasrullah, A. W. Zularisam, S. Krishnan, M. Sakinah, L. Singh, and Y. W. Fen, “High performance electrocoagulation process in treating palm oil mill effluent using high current intensity application,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2019; 27, (1): 208–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.07.021.

[11] K. B. Newhart, R. W. Holloway, A. S. Hering, and T. Y. Cath, “Data-driven performance analyses of institutional and industrial wastewater treatment plants,” Water Res., 2019; 157, pp. 498–513.

[12] Z. Mohamad, A. A. Razak, S. Krishnan, L. Singh, A. W. Zularisam, and M. Nasrullah, “Treatment of palm oil mill effluent using electrocoagulation powered by direct photovoltaic solar system,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2022; 177, 578–582. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.019.

[13] J. Zhang et al., “Wastewater COD characterization: RBCOD and SBCOD characterization analysis methods,” Sci. Rep., 2021; 11,(1):1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80700-8.

[14] J. D. Bala, J. Lalung, and N. Ismail, “Palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment and characterization of effluent-degrading microorganisms,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014; 11, (8): 2269–2282.

[15] M. Y. A. Mollah, P. Morken, J. A. G. Gomes, P. Parga, and D. L. Cocke, “Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation,” J. Hazard. Mater., 2004; 114, (1–3): 199–210,

[16] E. Bazrafshan, F. K. Mostafapour, M. Farzadkia, K. A. Ownagh, and A. H. Mahvi, “Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment by Combined Chemical Coagulation and Electrocoagulation Process,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e40108, 2012.

[17] M. Kobya, O. T. Can, and M. Bayramoglu, “Treatment of textile wastewaters by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes,” J. Hazard. Mater., 2003; 100, (1–3): 163–178, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00102-X.

[18] M. M. Emamjomeh and M. Sivakumar, “Review of pollutants removed by electrocoagulation and electrocoagulation / flotation processes,” J. Environ. Manage., 2009; 90, (5): 1663–1679, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.011.

[19] M. Y. A. Mollah, R. Schennach, J. R. Parga, and D. L. Cocke, “Electrocoagulation (EC) - science and applications,” J. Hazard. Mater., 2001; 29–41, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48228-1_15.

[20] S. Zodi, O. Potier, F. Lapicque, and J. P. Leclerc, “Treatment of the industrial wastewaters by electrocoagulation: Optimization of coupled electrochemical and sedimentation processes,” Desalination, 2010; 261, (1–2): 186–190, DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.024.

[21] G. Chen, “Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment,” Sep. Purif. Technol., 2004; 38, (1): 11–41, DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.006.

[22] P. K. Holt, G. W. Barton, and C. A. Mitchell, “the future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology,” Chemosphere, 2005; 59, (3): 355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.023.

[23] E. Lacasa, P. Cañizares, C. Sáez, F. J. Fernández, and M. A. Rodrigo, “Electrochemical phosphates removal using iron and aluminium electrodes,” Chem. Eng. J., 2011; 172, (1): 137–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.080.

[24] V. Kuokkanen, T. Kuokkanen, J. Rämö, and U. Lassi, “Recent applications of electrocoagulation in treatment of water and wastewater - a review,” Green Sustain. Chem., 2013; 3, (2): 89–121. DOI: 10.4236/gsc.2013.32013.

[25] R. Katal and H. Pahlavanzadeh, “Influence of different combinations of aluminum and iron electrode on electrocoagulation efficiency: Application to the treatment of paper mill wastewater,” Desalination, 2011; 265, (1–3):199–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.052.

[26] I. Chakchouk, N. Elloumi, C. Belaid, S. Mseddi, L. Chaari, and M. Kallel, “A combined electrocoagulation-electrooxidation treatment for dairy wastewater,” Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 2017; 34, (1): 109–117. DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12287.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Effect of Plate Materials and Operational Parameters on Hybrid Phsyco-Biological Units for Palm Oil Mill Effluent. J-Sil [Internet]. 2026 May 5 [cited 2026 Jun. 5];11(1):77-86. Available from: https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jsil/article/view/72803