The Estimation of Economic Valuation on Carbon Sequestration of Agroforestry Land System Estimasi Nilai Ekonomi Serapan Karbon pada sistem agroforestri di KPH Bogor
Article Sidebar
Accepted
24 November 2023
Published
30 May 2024
Keywords:
-
Carbon Stock, Forest, Benefit Transfer
Abstract
The role of Perhutani and local farmers in developing agroforestry in Bogor Forest Management Unit (FMU) is important for carbon sequestration-based climate mitigation efforts. Different compositions of the plants in seven agroforestry systems in four part of Bogor FMU. Farmers adjust the multipurpose crops planted with Perhutani main plants, which are more dominant. The potential mean annual carbon increment based on aboveground carbon stock of agroforestry is between 2.26 to 66.65 tonnes per hectare, while in 2 monocultures land system is between 13.65 to 18.29 tonnes per hectare. The carbon increment in agroforestry systems is better than monoculture because of plant diversity and different ages. Then, carbon revenue using carbon pricing set by the World Bank-FCPF Program in East Kalimantan is in the range of IDR 1,547,325 to IDR 49,292,405 per hectare, using the Social Cost scheme in the range IDR 12,997,535 to IDR
414,056,204 per hectare and using domestic carbon tax is range IDR 635.017 to IDR 20,229,441 perhectare. Regarding carbon revenues, the wider the agroforestry land managed by farmers, the higher the carbon income received. Using the benefit transfer method over a 20-year mitigation period, an estimated 2.19 times increase in carbon revenues is obtained at an inflation rate of 4%.
References
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2011. Pengukuran dan Penghitungan Cadangan Karbon – Pengukuran Lapangan untuk Penaksiran Cadangan Karbon Hutan (Ground Based Forest Carbon Accounting).
Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim. 2013. Mari berdagang karbon! Jakarta: Sekretarias DNPI.
Dharmawan AH, Prasetyo LB, Nasdian FT, Rahmadian F, Azzahra F, Fitria D, Febriani I. 2016 Apr. karbon dan nafkah rumah tangga. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan .:103–114.
Djaenudin D, Sukandar, Wicaksono D, Samyanugraha A, Iqbal M, Pambudi R, Aufar A, Nathalia D. 2018. Peran Instrumen Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Berbasis Pasar dan Pencapaian Target NDC.
Do H, Luedeling E, Whitney C. 2020. Decision analysis of agroforestry options reveals adoption risks for resource-poor farmers. Agron Sustain Dev. 40(3). doi:10.1007/s13593-020-00624-5.
Hairiah K, Ekadinata A, Sari RR, Rahayu S. 2011. Pengukuran Cadangan Karbon: dari tingkat lahan ke bentang lahan. Petunjuk Praktis (Edisi Kedua). WorLd Agroforestry Centre.
IPCC. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories – A primer, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Miwa K., Srivastava N. and Tanabe K. Eggleston HS, Miwa K, Srivastava N, Tanabe K, editors. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Irama AB. 2020. Perdagangan karbon di indonesia: kajian kelembagaan dan keuangan negara. Info Artha. 4(1):83–102. https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/.
Irawan U, Purwanto E. 2020. Pengukuran dan Pendugaan Cadangan Karbon pada Ekosistem Hutan Gambut dan Mineral, Studi Kasus di Hutan Rawa Gambut Pematang Gadung dan Hutan Lindung Sungai Lesan, Kalimantan. .
Keerthika A, Parthiban KT. 2022. Quantification and Economic Valuation of Carbon Sequestration from Smallholder Multifunctional Agroforestry: A Study from The Foothills of The Nilgiris, India. Curr Sci. 122(1):61. doi:10.18520/cs/v122/i1/61-69.
Köhl M, Neupane PR, Lotfiomran N. 2017. The impact of tree age on biomass growth and carbon accumulation capacity: A retrospective analysis using tree ring data of three tropical tree species grown in natural forests of Suriname. PLoS One. 12(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181187.
Markum M, Ichsan AC, Saputra M, Mudhofir MRT. 2021 Oct 29. Penerapan Ragam Pola Agroforestri Terhadap Pendapatan dan Cadangan Karbon di Kawasan Hutan Sesaot Lombok Barat. Jurnal Sains Teknologi & Lingkungan.:67–83. doi:10.29303/jstl.v0i0.241.
Njurumana GN, Sadono R, Marsono D, Irham. 2021. Ecosystem Services of Indigenous Kaliwu Agroforestry System in Sumba, Indonesia. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 305. EDP Sciences.
Odum EP, Barrett GW. 2005. Fundamentals of Ecology. In Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning (Fifth Edit). Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
Rajan R, Ahmed Mirza A, Pandey K. 2022 Mar 31. Fruit Based System- A viable alternative for carbonsequestration. Ecology, Environment and Conservation.:263–265. doi:10.53550/eec.2022.v28i01.036.
Rose Sk, Diaz Db, Blanford Gj. 2017. Understanding the social cost of carbon: a model diagnostic and inter-comparison study. Clim Chang Econ (Singap). 08(02):1750009. doi:10.1142/S2010007817500099.
Seeberg-Elverfeldt C, Schwarze S, Zeller M. 2009. Carbon finance options for smallholders’ agroforestry in Indonesia. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26523000.
Sheikh MA, Tiwari A, Anjum J, Sharma S. 2021. Dynamics of carbon storage and status of standing vegetation in temperate coniferous forest ecosystem of north western Himalaya India. Vegetos. 34(4):822–833. doi:10.1007/s42535-021-00265-3.
Shinbrot X, Holmes I, Gauthier M, Tschakert P, Wilkins Z, Baragón L, Opúa B, Potvin C. 2022. Natural and financial impacts of payments for forest carbon offset: A 14 year-long case study in an indigenous community in Panama. Land use policy. 115:106047. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106047.
Soerianagara I, Indrawan A. 1998. Ekologi Hutan Indonesia. Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan Institut Pertanian Bogor.
UNFCC. 2020. Mitigation benefits and co-benefits of policies, practices and actions for enhancing mitigation ambition and options for supporting their implementation The social and economic value of carbon and the promotion of efficient public transport and energy efficiency of vehicles.
Waldén P, Ollikainen M, Kahiluoto H. 2020. Carbon revenue in the profitability of agroforestry relative to monocultures. Agroforestry Systems. 94(1):15–28. doi:10.1007/s10457-019-00355-x.
Yana A, Zulkarnaini Z, Warningsih T. 2021. Nilai ekonomi potensi jasa lingkungan menyerap karbon di taman wisata alam buluh cina kabupaten kampar provinsi riau. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan. 15(1):32. doi:10.31258/jil.15.1.p.32-44.
Yulistyarini T, Hadiah JT. 2022. Carbon stock potential of Indonesian local fruit trees, some collections of Purwodadi Botanic Garden. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 976. IOP Publishing Ltd.
Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim. 2013. Mari berdagang karbon! Jakarta: Sekretarias DNPI.
Dharmawan AH, Prasetyo LB, Nasdian FT, Rahmadian F, Azzahra F, Fitria D, Febriani I. 2016 Apr. karbon dan nafkah rumah tangga. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan .:103–114.
Djaenudin D, Sukandar, Wicaksono D, Samyanugraha A, Iqbal M, Pambudi R, Aufar A, Nathalia D. 2018. Peran Instrumen Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Berbasis Pasar dan Pencapaian Target NDC.
Do H, Luedeling E, Whitney C. 2020. Decision analysis of agroforestry options reveals adoption risks for resource-poor farmers. Agron Sustain Dev. 40(3). doi:10.1007/s13593-020-00624-5.
Hairiah K, Ekadinata A, Sari RR, Rahayu S. 2011. Pengukuran Cadangan Karbon: dari tingkat lahan ke bentang lahan. Petunjuk Praktis (Edisi Kedua). WorLd Agroforestry Centre.
IPCC. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories – A primer, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Miwa K., Srivastava N. and Tanabe K. Eggleston HS, Miwa K, Srivastava N, Tanabe K, editors. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Irama AB. 2020. Perdagangan karbon di indonesia: kajian kelembagaan dan keuangan negara. Info Artha. 4(1):83–102. https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/.
Irawan U, Purwanto E. 2020. Pengukuran dan Pendugaan Cadangan Karbon pada Ekosistem Hutan Gambut dan Mineral, Studi Kasus di Hutan Rawa Gambut Pematang Gadung dan Hutan Lindung Sungai Lesan, Kalimantan. .
Keerthika A, Parthiban KT. 2022. Quantification and Economic Valuation of Carbon Sequestration from Smallholder Multifunctional Agroforestry: A Study from The Foothills of The Nilgiris, India. Curr Sci. 122(1):61. doi:10.18520/cs/v122/i1/61-69.
Köhl M, Neupane PR, Lotfiomran N. 2017. The impact of tree age on biomass growth and carbon accumulation capacity: A retrospective analysis using tree ring data of three tropical tree species grown in natural forests of Suriname. PLoS One. 12(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181187.
Markum M, Ichsan AC, Saputra M, Mudhofir MRT. 2021 Oct 29. Penerapan Ragam Pola Agroforestri Terhadap Pendapatan dan Cadangan Karbon di Kawasan Hutan Sesaot Lombok Barat. Jurnal Sains Teknologi & Lingkungan.:67–83. doi:10.29303/jstl.v0i0.241.
Njurumana GN, Sadono R, Marsono D, Irham. 2021. Ecosystem Services of Indigenous Kaliwu Agroforestry System in Sumba, Indonesia. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 305. EDP Sciences.
Odum EP, Barrett GW. 2005. Fundamentals of Ecology. In Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning (Fifth Edit). Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
Rajan R, Ahmed Mirza A, Pandey K. 2022 Mar 31. Fruit Based System- A viable alternative for carbonsequestration. Ecology, Environment and Conservation.:263–265. doi:10.53550/eec.2022.v28i01.036.
Rose Sk, Diaz Db, Blanford Gj. 2017. Understanding the social cost of carbon: a model diagnostic and inter-comparison study. Clim Chang Econ (Singap). 08(02):1750009. doi:10.1142/S2010007817500099.
Seeberg-Elverfeldt C, Schwarze S, Zeller M. 2009. Carbon finance options for smallholders’ agroforestry in Indonesia. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26523000.
Sheikh MA, Tiwari A, Anjum J, Sharma S. 2021. Dynamics of carbon storage and status of standing vegetation in temperate coniferous forest ecosystem of north western Himalaya India. Vegetos. 34(4):822–833. doi:10.1007/s42535-021-00265-3.
Shinbrot X, Holmes I, Gauthier M, Tschakert P, Wilkins Z, Baragón L, Opúa B, Potvin C. 2022. Natural and financial impacts of payments for forest carbon offset: A 14 year-long case study in an indigenous community in Panama. Land use policy. 115:106047. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106047.
Soerianagara I, Indrawan A. 1998. Ekologi Hutan Indonesia. Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan Institut Pertanian Bogor.
UNFCC. 2020. Mitigation benefits and co-benefits of policies, practices and actions for enhancing mitigation ambition and options for supporting their implementation The social and economic value of carbon and the promotion of efficient public transport and energy efficiency of vehicles.
Waldén P, Ollikainen M, Kahiluoto H. 2020. Carbon revenue in the profitability of agroforestry relative to monocultures. Agroforestry Systems. 94(1):15–28. doi:10.1007/s10457-019-00355-x.
Yana A, Zulkarnaini Z, Warningsih T. 2021. Nilai ekonomi potensi jasa lingkungan menyerap karbon di taman wisata alam buluh cina kabupaten kampar provinsi riau. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan. 15(1):32. doi:10.31258/jil.15.1.p.32-44.
Yulistyarini T, Hadiah JT. 2022. Carbon stock potential of Indonesian local fruit trees, some collections of Purwodadi Botanic Garden. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 976. IOP Publishing Ltd.
Authors
SiagianK., KaruniasaM. and MizunoK. (2024) “The Estimation of Economic Valuation on Carbon Sequestration of Agroforestry Land System: Estimasi Nilai Ekonomi Serapan Karbon pada sistem agroforestri di KPH Bogor”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management). Bogor, ID, 14(2), p. 231. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.14.2.231.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
