Comparative Study of Indonesia and Denmark in Creating a Smart Environment

Nita Aribah Hanif, Eko Priyono Utomo, Rahmawati Husein


This study aims to compare the efforts of the Governments of Indonesia and Denmark in realizing a smart environment SDG's agenda. This urgency is motivated by the poor environmental conditions in Indonesia while the government is targeting a reduction in emission production by 2030. This research uses a qualitative method. The results of this study indicate that the Government of Indonesia in pursuing a smart environment has not been optimal. This can be seen from the several indicators used in this study: (1) the Attraction of Natural Conditions indicator, the Indonesian Government has not enforced regulations or programs aimed at maintaining the balance of green open spaces. Meanwhile, the Danish Government has launched a city greening program  through construction of green buildings. (2) Air Pollution Integrated Index indicator, the Indonesian government has not been able to minimize the number of vehicles through the use of electromobility-based vehicles as has been done by the Danish government. (3) Indicators of Sustainable resource management, the Indonesian Government has not been able to optimize the development of technology for processing waste and waste into residues that can be reused. While in Denmark, which is able to turn waste into residue that can be reused.


Annur, C. M. (2021). Tempat Pembuangan Air Limbah Rumah Tangga di Perkotaan dan Perdesaan. Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id.
Bekesiene, S., & Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. (2022). Artificial Neural Networks for Modelling and Predicting Urban Air Pollutants: Case of Lithuania. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4).
Cheema, S. M., Hannan, A., & Pires, I. M. (2022). Smart Waste Management and Classification Systems Using Cutting Edge Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16).
Cuker, B., Chambers, R., & Crawford, M. (2019). Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability. 233–254.
Danish Ministry of Housing. (2014). Green Urban Denmark: Low Carbon & New Energy Cities in Denmark.
Dany. (2022). Macan Kertas Pengendalian Polusi Udara. Www.Kompas.Id.
De Filippi, F., Coscia, C., & Guido, R. (2019). From smart-cities to smart-communities: How can we evaluate the impacts of innovation and inclusive processes in urban context? International Journal of E-Planning Research, 8(2), 24–44.
Dihni. (2022). Pencemaran Air Terjadi di 10 Ribu Desa/Kelurahan Indonesia. Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id.
Dodgson, J. E. (2017). About Research: Qualitative Methodologies. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(2), 355–358.
Eco-innovation in Denmark. (2019). EIO Country Profile. Eco-Innovation in Denmark. Eco-Innovation in Denmark.
egsa.geo.ugm. (2019). Sejauh Manakah Inovasi Pengelolaan Sampah di Indonesia? Egsa.Geo.Ugm.Ac.Id.
EPI. (2022). 2022 Environment Performance Index Results. EPI.
European Comission. (2016). Green Infrastructure in Denmark. The Implementation of the European Green Infrastructure Strategy. European Comission.
European Commision. (2022). Eco-Innovation at The Heart of European Policies.
European Green Capital Secretariat. (2014). Green cities – fit for life. 12.
Fidel, R. (1993). Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. Library and Information Science Research, 15, 1–7.
Gabrys, J. (2022). Programming Nature as Infrastructure in the Smart Forest City. Journal of Urban Technology, 29(1), 13–19.
Giffinger, R. (2007). Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Services, 16(October), 1–24.
Gulia, S., Shukla, N., Padhi, L., Bosu, P., Goyal, S. K., & Kumar, R. (2022). Evolution of air pollution management policies and related research in India. Environmental Challenges, 6.
Hidayah, R., Sativa, S., & H, S. (2021). Strategi Pemenuhan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik di Kota Yogyakarta. INERSIA: LNformasi Dan Ekspose Hasil Riset Teknik SIpil Dan Arsitektur, 17(1), 11–18.
Huda. (2022). Jakarta Kewalahan Soal Polusi Udara, Pemerintah Pusat Kemana? Megapolitan.Kompas.Com.
IQAir. (2022a). Air Quality in Denmark.
IQAir. (2022b). Air Quality in Indonesia. IQAir.
Kaluarachchi, Y. (2022). Implementing Data-Driven Smart City Applications for Future Cities. Smart Cities, 5(2), 455–474. (2022). Inovasi Balai Kemenperin Cegah Pencemaran Air dan Udara Sektor Industri. Kemenperin.Go.Id.
Kurniawati, W., Mussadun, Suwandono, D., & Islamey, T. Z. (2019). Local Wisdom in Malay Kampung Semarang as Representatives of Smart Environment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 396(1).
Lestari. (2019). Harapan Mengurangi Polusi Ibukota dengan MRT. Www.Antaranews.Com.
Lestari, P., & Trihadiningrum, Y. (2019). The impact of improper solid waste management to plastic pollution in Indonesian coast and marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin.
Lim, N. O., Hwang, J., Lee, S.-J., Yoo, Y., Choi, Y., & Jeon, S. (2022). Spatialization and Prediction of Seasonal NO2 Pollution Due to Climate Change in the Korean Capital Area through Land Use Regression Modeling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9).
Manika, S. (2020). Mechanisms for innovative-driven solutions in european smart cities. Smart Cities, 3(2), 527–540. (2021). Top 20 sustainable smart cities in the world. Maphub.Net.
Mariaa, F., Mastrantoniob, M., & Uccellib, R. (2021). The life cycle approach for assessing the impact of municipal solid waste incineration on the environment and on human health. Science of the Total Environment, 776.
Martins, J., Gonçalves, C., Silva, J., Gonçalves, R., & Branco, F. (2022). Digital Ecosystem Model for GIAHS: The Barroso Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral System. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16).
Micozzi, N., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2022). Understanding Smart City Policy: Insights from the Strategy Documents of 52 Local Governments. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. In Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Arizona State University.
Moss, T., Voigt, F., & Becker, S. (2021). Digital urban nature: Probing a void in the smart city discourse. City, 25(3–4), 255–276.
Nagy, Z., Sebestyén Szép, T., & Szendi, D. (2019). Regional disparities in Hungarian Urban energy consumption – A link between smart cities and successful cities. Geographia Technica, 14(1), 92–102.
Nanda, S., & Berruti, F. (2021). Municipal solid waste management and landfilling technologies: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 1433–1456.
Nikoloudis, C., Strantzali, E., Tounta, T., Aravossis, K., Mavrogiannis, A., Mytilinaioy, A., Sitzimi, E., & Violeti, E. (2020). An evaluation model for smart city performance with less than 50,000 inhabitants: A Greek case study. SMARTGREENS 2020 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, Smartgreens, 15–21.
O’Brian, R. (2021). The Green Future Index 2021. MIT Technology Review Insights, 33.
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (No. 4). SAGE Publications. M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (No. 4). Sage Publications.&lr&hl=id&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rachmawati, R., Mei, E. T. W., Nurani, I. W., Ghiffari, R. A., Rohmah, A. A., & Sejati, M. A. (2021). Innovation in coping with the covid-19 pandemic: The best practices from five smart cities in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21).
Setiowati, R., Hasibuan, H. S., & Koestoer, R. H. (2018). Green open space masterplan at Jakarta Capital City, Indonesia for climate change mitigation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200(1).
Sharifi, A., & Allam, Z. (2022). On the taxonomy of smart city indicators and their alignment with sustainability and resilience. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 5(49), 1536–1555.
Shouket, B., Abro, K. Z., Nassani, A. A., & Qazi, A. M. A. & M. M. (2019). Management of green transportation: an evidence-based approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research Volume, 12574–12589. (2022). Denmark is Once Again Ranked the World’s Most Sustainable. Stateofgreen.Com.
Statista Database. (2022). Number of Deaths Attributable to Air Pollution in Denmark from 1990 to 2019. Statista Database. (2022). The Green Future Index 2022. Technologyreview.Com.
The Green Future Index. (2022). The Green Future Index 2nd Edition MIT Technology Review Insights. (2021). A proposal for green norm 2.0 in Green Cities Europe. Thegreencities.Eu.
Uswah. (2022). 70 Persen Air Minum Indonesia Terkontaminsi Tinja, Dosen UM Surbaya Sarankan Hal Ini. Um-Surabaya.Ac.Id.
Wahdaniyat, H. (2019). Ruang Terbuka Hijau yang Masih Terpinggirkan di Indonesia. Ciptakarya. Pu. Go. Id. (2018). Overview: urban waste water production and its treatment in Denmark.
Wikantiyoso, R., Suhartono, T., & Sulaksono, A. G. (2020). Controlling efforts of green open space provision in East Malang residential areas development, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 562(1).
World Cities Report 2022. (2022). Envisaging the Future of Cities.
WorldBank. (2021). Plastic Waste Discharges from Rivers and Coastlines in Indonesia. WorldBank. (2022). Cleanest Countries in the World 2022. Worldpopulationreview.Com.
Yuliani, S., Hardiman, G., & Setyowati, E. (2020). Green-roof: The role of community in the substitution of green-space toward sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4).


Nita Aribah Hanif (Primary Contact)
Eko Priyono Utomo
Rahmawati Husein
HanifN. A., UtomoE. P. and HuseinR. (2024) “Comparative Study of Indonesia and Denmark in Creating a Smart Environment”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management). Bogor, ID, 14(1), pp. 160-173. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.14.1.160-173.

Article Details