Ecological footprint and biocapacity analysis of upper Cisadane Watershed
Abstract
The Ecological footprint/EF is used as a tool to measure human consumption of the resource when compared they ability to regenerate. EF measures how much bio-productivity (BC) areas are needed by the population for sustainable resource production activities that are used to meet the needs and absorb the resulting waste. If EF over then BC, overshoot will be happened. Overshoot usually occurs short term but if continuously increasing will cause environmental degradation. Cisadane watershed became study area because it was part of government program to minimize environmental degradation. The purpose of this study was determining the condition of the upstream Cisadane watershed, whether the ecology is surplus or deficit. The result of study explained that upstream Cisadane watershed was ecology deficit from 2016-2020.
References
[BPDASHL] Badan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Hutan Lindung. 2010. Laporan Karakteristik DAS Cisadane.
[GNF] Global Footprint Network. 2020. Earth Overshoot Day is August 22, more than three weeks later than last year. (Akses 18 Juni 2021)
https://www.footprintnetwork.org/2020/06/05/press-release-june-2020-earth-overshoot-day/
[Kementerian PU] Ministry of public works. 2010. Ecological footprint of Indonesia.
[KLH] Deputi Bidang Tata Lingkungan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2014. Pedoman Penentuan Daya Dukung Lingkungan Hidup. Indonesia: Kementerian
Lingkungan Hidup Deputi 1 Bidang Tata Lingkungan Asisten Deputi Perencanaan Pemanfaatan SDA & LH & Kajian Kebijakan LH Wilayah & Sektor.
Afrin S, Gupta Anil, Farjad Babak, Ahmed M, Achari Gopal, Hassan Quazi K. (2019). Development of land-use/land-cover maps using Landsat-8 and MODIS data,
and Their Integration for Hydro-Ecological Applications. Sensors. 19(22):-. doi:10.3390/s19224891.
Arifasihati Y, Kaswanto. 2016. Analysis of land use and cover in ciliwung and cisadane watershed in three decades. Environmental Science: 33(2016); 465-469. doi:
10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.098
Asici A.A, Acar Sevil (2015). Does income growth relocate ecological footprint?. Ecological Indicators. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022 .
Athira Ravi, Subha V. 2013. Ecological footprint analysis-an overview. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). E-ISSN: 2320-0847.
Chu, Xi, Xiangzheng Deng, Gui Jin, Zhan Wang, Zhaohua Li. 2017. Ecological security assessment based on ecological footprint approach in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei
Region, China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 101: 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2017.05.001.
Desiana TA, EB Santoso. 2019. Optimasi pemanfaatan lahan melalui pendekatan telapak ekologi di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 8(2):84-89. ISSN: 2337-
3539
Santoso EB, B U Aulia. 2018. Ecological sustainability level of surabaya city based on ecological footprint approach. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.
Foody G M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80:185– 20.
Guo Janjun, Doxia Yue, Kai Li, Cang Hui. 2017. Biocapacity optimization in regional planning. Environmental Impact-Sustainability. Doi: 10.1038/srep41150
Holden E. 2012. Ecological footprint. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. Vol. 2. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00581-6.
I Muñiz, M À Garcia-López. 2019. Urban form and spatial structure as determinants of the ecological footprint of commuting. Transportasi Research. 67:334-350.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.006.
Jaya INS. 2010. Analisis Citra Digital: Perspektif Penginderaan Jauh untuk Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam. Bogor (ID): Fakultas Kehutanan IPB.
Li Z H, Deng X Z, Yin F, Yang C Y. (2015). Analysis of climate and land use changes impacts on land degradation in the North China Plain. Advances in Meteorology.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/976370
Lin D, Hanscom L, Murthy A, Galli A, Evans M, Neill E, Mancini MS, Martindill J, Medouar F, Huang S, Wackernagel M, 2018. Ecological footprint accounting for
countries: updates and results of the national footprint accounts, 2012–2018. Resources. 7(3).
Luo Wen, Hongtao Bai, Qiaonan Jing, Ting Liu, and He Xu. 2018. Urbanization-induced ecological degradation in Midwestern China: an analysis based on an
improved ecological footprint model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.015.
M A Luck, G Darrel Jenerette, Jianguo Wu and Nancy B. Grimm. 2001. The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems.
4(8):782-796
Marganingrum D. 2019. Jejak ekologi Kawasan Regional Bandung. Jurnal Teknologi Linkungan. 20(2): 159:170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29122/jtl.v20i2
Marwa J, Anton Silas S, Francine H. 2020. Daya dukung bioekologi hutan dan lahan di Kabupaten Manokwari, Provinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Sylva Lestari. 8(2):197-
206. ISSN: 2339-0913
Navrátil Rudolf, Jana Šimonovičová, Marek Hubáček. 2012. Internet ecological footprint calculator – successful educational program in Slovakia. EnviroInfo
https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1276.9282.
Peng Benhong, Yue Li, Ehsan Elahi, Guo Wei. 2018. Dynamic evolution of ecological carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint theory: a case study of
Jiangsu Province. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.009
Rachmawati T. 2013. Kajian daya dukung bioekologika kawasan puncak Kabupaten Bogor. Majalah Geografi Indonesia. 28(2):180-197. ISSN: 0125-790
Rahman MH, Rizky SA, Ariyaningsih, Cut Keumala B. 2020. Daya dukung lingkungan lahan tanaman pangan berdasarkan pendekatan telapak ekologi di Provinsi
Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Agroekoteknologi Tropika Lembab. 2(2):71-79. doi:10.35941/JATL
RM Subekti, DSA Suroso. 2018. Ecological footprint and ecosystem services models: a comparative analysis of environmental carrying capacity calculation
approach in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 158 012026
Rwanga SS. and Ndambuki J M. 2017. Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classifica-tion using remote sensing and GIS. Inter-national Journal of
Geosciences. 8:611-622. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033
Schaefer F, Luksch U, Steinbach N, Cabeça J, Hanauer J, (2006). Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity: The world’s ability to regenerate resources and absorb waste
in a limited time period. European Commission Report: 1–10.
Sun J, Liu C, Luo B. 2009. Calculation of resources carrying capacity based on ecological footprint in beijing mountainous area. IFIP International Federation for
Information Processing. Volume 293, Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture II, Volume 1, eds. D. Li, Z. Chunjing. Boston. Springer: 593-602.
TA Almira, EB Santoso. 2019. Optimasi Pemanfaatan Lahan melalui Pendekatan Telapak Ekologi di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 8(2). ISSN: 2337-3539
Toth G, Szigeti C. 2016. The historical ecological footprint: from over-population to over-consumption. Ecological Indicators. 60:283–291.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.040
Wang YC, Feng CC. 2011. Patterns and trends in land-use land-cover change research explored using self-organizing map. International Journal of Remote
Sensing. 32(13):3765–3790. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.540590
Wackernagel M, D Lin, L Hanscom, A Galli, K Iha. 2019. Ecological Footprint. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 2nd edition. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09567-1.
Weijing Ma, Liu Bin, Yang DeWei, Xu LingXing. Guo QingHai. 2018. Study on spatio-temporal evolution of watershed ecological capacity using the ecological
footprint model. Journal Environmental Science & Technology. 41(1):163-171. ISSN: 1003-6504 [Abstract]
W Fu, Jonathan C T, Junquan Z, Guozhen D. 2015. Ecological Footprint (EF): An expanded role in calculating resource productivity using china and the G20 member
countries as examples. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.023
Zhou Ping, Guobin Liu. 2009. The change in values for ecological footprint indices following land-use change in a Loess Plateau watershed in China. 59(3): 529–536.
doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0050-4
[GNF] Global Footprint Network. 2020. Earth Overshoot Day is August 22, more than three weeks later than last year. (Akses 18 Juni 2021)
https://www.footprintnetwork.org/2020/06/05/press-release-june-2020-earth-overshoot-day/
[Kementerian PU] Ministry of public works. 2010. Ecological footprint of Indonesia.
[KLH] Deputi Bidang Tata Lingkungan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2014. Pedoman Penentuan Daya Dukung Lingkungan Hidup. Indonesia: Kementerian
Lingkungan Hidup Deputi 1 Bidang Tata Lingkungan Asisten Deputi Perencanaan Pemanfaatan SDA & LH & Kajian Kebijakan LH Wilayah & Sektor.
Afrin S, Gupta Anil, Farjad Babak, Ahmed M, Achari Gopal, Hassan Quazi K. (2019). Development of land-use/land-cover maps using Landsat-8 and MODIS data,
and Their Integration for Hydro-Ecological Applications. Sensors. 19(22):-. doi:10.3390/s19224891.
Arifasihati Y, Kaswanto. 2016. Analysis of land use and cover in ciliwung and cisadane watershed in three decades. Environmental Science: 33(2016); 465-469. doi:
10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.098
Asici A.A, Acar Sevil (2015). Does income growth relocate ecological footprint?. Ecological Indicators. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022 .
Athira Ravi, Subha V. 2013. Ecological footprint analysis-an overview. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). E-ISSN: 2320-0847.
Chu, Xi, Xiangzheng Deng, Gui Jin, Zhan Wang, Zhaohua Li. 2017. Ecological security assessment based on ecological footprint approach in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei
Region, China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 101: 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2017.05.001.
Desiana TA, EB Santoso. 2019. Optimasi pemanfaatan lahan melalui pendekatan telapak ekologi di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 8(2):84-89. ISSN: 2337-
3539
Santoso EB, B U Aulia. 2018. Ecological sustainability level of surabaya city based on ecological footprint approach. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.
Foody G M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80:185– 20.
Guo Janjun, Doxia Yue, Kai Li, Cang Hui. 2017. Biocapacity optimization in regional planning. Environmental Impact-Sustainability. Doi: 10.1038/srep41150
Holden E. 2012. Ecological footprint. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. Vol. 2. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00581-6.
I Muñiz, M À Garcia-López. 2019. Urban form and spatial structure as determinants of the ecological footprint of commuting. Transportasi Research. 67:334-350.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.006.
Jaya INS. 2010. Analisis Citra Digital: Perspektif Penginderaan Jauh untuk Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam. Bogor (ID): Fakultas Kehutanan IPB.
Li Z H, Deng X Z, Yin F, Yang C Y. (2015). Analysis of climate and land use changes impacts on land degradation in the North China Plain. Advances in Meteorology.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/976370
Lin D, Hanscom L, Murthy A, Galli A, Evans M, Neill E, Mancini MS, Martindill J, Medouar F, Huang S, Wackernagel M, 2018. Ecological footprint accounting for
countries: updates and results of the national footprint accounts, 2012–2018. Resources. 7(3).
Luo Wen, Hongtao Bai, Qiaonan Jing, Ting Liu, and He Xu. 2018. Urbanization-induced ecological degradation in Midwestern China: an analysis based on an
improved ecological footprint model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.015.
M A Luck, G Darrel Jenerette, Jianguo Wu and Nancy B. Grimm. 2001. The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems.
4(8):782-796
Marganingrum D. 2019. Jejak ekologi Kawasan Regional Bandung. Jurnal Teknologi Linkungan. 20(2): 159:170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29122/jtl.v20i2
Marwa J, Anton Silas S, Francine H. 2020. Daya dukung bioekologi hutan dan lahan di Kabupaten Manokwari, Provinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Sylva Lestari. 8(2):197-
206. ISSN: 2339-0913
Navrátil Rudolf, Jana Šimonovičová, Marek Hubáček. 2012. Internet ecological footprint calculator – successful educational program in Slovakia. EnviroInfo
https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1276.9282.
Peng Benhong, Yue Li, Ehsan Elahi, Guo Wei. 2018. Dynamic evolution of ecological carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint theory: a case study of
Jiangsu Province. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.009
Rachmawati T. 2013. Kajian daya dukung bioekologika kawasan puncak Kabupaten Bogor. Majalah Geografi Indonesia. 28(2):180-197. ISSN: 0125-790
Rahman MH, Rizky SA, Ariyaningsih, Cut Keumala B. 2020. Daya dukung lingkungan lahan tanaman pangan berdasarkan pendekatan telapak ekologi di Provinsi
Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Agroekoteknologi Tropika Lembab. 2(2):71-79. doi:10.35941/JATL
RM Subekti, DSA Suroso. 2018. Ecological footprint and ecosystem services models: a comparative analysis of environmental carrying capacity calculation
approach in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 158 012026
Rwanga SS. and Ndambuki J M. 2017. Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classifica-tion using remote sensing and GIS. Inter-national Journal of
Geosciences. 8:611-622. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033
Schaefer F, Luksch U, Steinbach N, Cabeça J, Hanauer J, (2006). Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity: The world’s ability to regenerate resources and absorb waste
in a limited time period. European Commission Report: 1–10.
Sun J, Liu C, Luo B. 2009. Calculation of resources carrying capacity based on ecological footprint in beijing mountainous area. IFIP International Federation for
Information Processing. Volume 293, Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture II, Volume 1, eds. D. Li, Z. Chunjing. Boston. Springer: 593-602.
TA Almira, EB Santoso. 2019. Optimasi Pemanfaatan Lahan melalui Pendekatan Telapak Ekologi di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 8(2). ISSN: 2337-3539
Toth G, Szigeti C. 2016. The historical ecological footprint: from over-population to over-consumption. Ecological Indicators. 60:283–291.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.040
Wang YC, Feng CC. 2011. Patterns and trends in land-use land-cover change research explored using self-organizing map. International Journal of Remote
Sensing. 32(13):3765–3790. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.540590
Wackernagel M, D Lin, L Hanscom, A Galli, K Iha. 2019. Ecological Footprint. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 2nd edition. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09567-1.
Weijing Ma, Liu Bin, Yang DeWei, Xu LingXing. Guo QingHai. 2018. Study on spatio-temporal evolution of watershed ecological capacity using the ecological
footprint model. Journal Environmental Science & Technology. 41(1):163-171. ISSN: 1003-6504 [Abstract]
W Fu, Jonathan C T, Junquan Z, Guozhen D. 2015. Ecological Footprint (EF): An expanded role in calculating resource productivity using china and the G20 member
countries as examples. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.023
Zhou Ping, Guobin Liu. 2009. The change in values for ecological footprint indices following land-use change in a Loess Plateau watershed in China. 59(3): 529–536.
doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0050-4
Authors
KharismaR., PurnomoH. and KuncahyoB. (2022) “Ecological footprint and biocapacity analysis of upper Cisadane Watershed ”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management). Bogor, ID, 12(2), pp. 197-209. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.12.2.197-209.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
