Model kebijakan strategis pengelolaan lingkungan kawasan industri (Studi Kasus Kawasan Industri Jababeka dan EJIP di Kabupaten Bekasi)
Abstract
The model of key factors contributing to support sustainability of the environmental management in the industrial estate were studied. These factors were the result of the prior research of prospective analysis that classified as the leverage factors and the driving factors. These factors were studied by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as the criteria and alternatives input to elaborate the priority in the model of environmental management. AHP matrices were analyzed by purposive expert in the depth interview procedure. The analysis result showed that the industrial estate manager is the most important as the firts actor in the model (63.7%), the second actor is the industrial company as the tenant of the first actor (25.8%), and third actor is the local government (10.5 %). The priority of the dimension of the model in a row were economic (38.1%), social (19.4%), institutional management (19.3%), ecology (13.8%) and technology (9.4%). For developing the model there were five driving factors that develop the alternatives of the policy for achieving the goal. The priority of the alternatives in a row were improving the quality of industrial wastewater (29.5%), improving wastewater quality of integrated wastewater treatment plant outlet of the estate manager facility (21.5%), obtaining the industrial water demand (19.1%), conducting 3R (reduce, reuse and recycle) program of hazardous waste, and maintaining and supporting employed people in condusive work environment. By AHP result which resulting the priority of actors, dimensions, and alternatives, the model was developed effectively.
References
‘Arcy B, Kim LH, Redillas MM Ed. 2018. Wealth Creation without Pollution: Designing for Industri, Eco Business Park and Industrial Estates. London: IWA Publising.
Budiyanto P, Saefuddin A, Putri EIK. 2015. Analisis keberlanjutan PT East Jakarta Industrial Park dalam mewujudkan kawasan industri yang berwawasan lingkungan. Jurnal Pengeloaan Sumberdaya alam dan Lingkungan. 5(2):199-209.
Cahyanto AD, Noorachmat BP, Noor E. 2016. Model pengembangan kebijakan integrasi sistem manajemen mutu dan lingkungan. Jurnal Pengeloaan Sumberdaya alam dan Lingkungan. 6(1):31-44.
Fonseca F, Ramos RAR, Da Silva ANR. 2015. An agent-based model to assess the attractiveness of industrial estates. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 18 (4):13. doi: 10.18564/jasss.2893.
Hadiwijoyo R, Purwanto P, Hadi P. 2013. Innovative green technology for sustainable industrial estate development. International Journal of Renewebale Energy Development (IJRED). 2(1):53-58.
Marimin. 2013. Aplikasi Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Manajemen Rantai Pasok. Bogor: IPB Press.
Mohammed AS, Melkania U, Kumar BN. 2014. Sosio economic impact assessment of integrated Industrial Estate Pantnagar India. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies & Management. 7:890-901. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v7i2.9S.
Riberio P, Fonseca F, Neiva C, Bardi T, Laurenco JM. 2017. An integrated approach towards transforming an industrial park into an eco-industrial park: the case of salaise-sablons. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 61(2):195-213.
Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences. 1(1):83-98.
Sulaiman F, Saefudin A, Zain AFM. 2008. Strategi pengelolaan kawasan industri cilegon menuju eco industrial park. Journal of Regional and City Planning. 19(2):37-57.
Supono S. 2009. Model kebijakan pengembangan kawasan pantai utara jakarta secara berkelanjutan [disertasi]. Bogor (ID): Program Studi Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Wikaningrum T, Noorachmat BP, Noor E. 2015. Kebijakan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Kawasan Industri sesuai Proper KLHK Peringkat Hijau. Jurnal Pengeloaan Sumberdaya alam dan Lingkungan. 5(2):111-120.
Wikaningrum T. 2018. Prospek skenario kebijakan pengelolaan lingkungan kawasan industri (Studi Kasus Kawasan Industri Jababeka dan EJIP di Kabupaten Bekasi). Journal Environmental Engineering and Waste Treatment. 3(1):36-47.
Winardi, Priyarsono DS, Siregar H, Kustanto H. 2017. Impacts of industrial estate development policy on household poverty in West Java Province. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). 31(3):308-317.
Budiyanto P, Saefuddin A, Putri EIK. 2015. Analisis keberlanjutan PT East Jakarta Industrial Park dalam mewujudkan kawasan industri yang berwawasan lingkungan. Jurnal Pengeloaan Sumberdaya alam dan Lingkungan. 5(2):199-209.
Cahyanto AD, Noorachmat BP, Noor E. 2016. Model pengembangan kebijakan integrasi sistem manajemen mutu dan lingkungan. Jurnal Pengeloaan Sumberdaya alam dan Lingkungan. 6(1):31-44.
Fonseca F, Ramos RAR, Da Silva ANR. 2015. An agent-based model to assess the attractiveness of industrial estates. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 18 (4):13. doi: 10.18564/jasss.2893.
Hadiwijoyo R, Purwanto P, Hadi P. 2013. Innovative green technology for sustainable industrial estate development. International Journal of Renewebale Energy Development (IJRED). 2(1):53-58.
Marimin. 2013. Aplikasi Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Manajemen Rantai Pasok. Bogor: IPB Press.
Mohammed AS, Melkania U, Kumar BN. 2014. Sosio economic impact assessment of integrated Industrial Estate Pantnagar India. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies & Management. 7:890-901. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v7i2.9S.
Riberio P, Fonseca F, Neiva C, Bardi T, Laurenco JM. 2017. An integrated approach towards transforming an industrial park into an eco-industrial park: the case of salaise-sablons. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 61(2):195-213.
Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences. 1(1):83-98.
Sulaiman F, Saefudin A, Zain AFM. 2008. Strategi pengelolaan kawasan industri cilegon menuju eco industrial park. Journal of Regional and City Planning. 19(2):37-57.
Supono S. 2009. Model kebijakan pengembangan kawasan pantai utara jakarta secara berkelanjutan [disertasi]. Bogor (ID): Program Studi Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Wikaningrum T, Noorachmat BP, Noor E. 2015. Kebijakan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Kawasan Industri sesuai Proper KLHK Peringkat Hijau. Jurnal Pengeloaan Sumberdaya alam dan Lingkungan. 5(2):111-120.
Wikaningrum T. 2018. Prospek skenario kebijakan pengelolaan lingkungan kawasan industri (Studi Kasus Kawasan Industri Jababeka dan EJIP di Kabupaten Bekasi). Journal Environmental Engineering and Waste Treatment. 3(1):36-47.
Winardi, Priyarsono DS, Siregar H, Kustanto H. 2017. Impacts of industrial estate development policy on household poverty in West Java Province. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). 31(3):308-317.
Authors
WikaningrumT. and HakikiR. (2019) “Model kebijakan strategis pengelolaan lingkungan kawasan industri (Studi Kasus Kawasan Industri Jababeka dan EJIP di Kabupaten Bekasi)”, Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management). Bogor, ID, 9(3), pp. 802-817. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.9.3.802-817.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).