PERAN COMMON DYADIC COPING SEBAGAI MEDIATOR DALAM HUBUNGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI KESETARAAN PERAN DAN KEPUASAN PERNIKAHAN PADA 5 TAHUN PERTAMA PERNIKAHAN
The Role Dyadic Coping as a Mediator in the Relationship between Perceived Fairness and Relationship Satisfaction in the First 5 Years of Marriage
Abstract
Kepuasan pernikahan merupakan faktor penting yang dapat membuat hubungan pernikahan lebih stabil dan salah satu faktor yang dapat memengaruhinya adalah persepsi tentang kesetaraan peran dalam pembagian urusan rumah tangga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara persepsi kesetaraan peran dengan kepuasan pernikahan serta menguji efek mediasi common dyadic coping dalam model hubungan tersebut. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain cross-sectional study dipilih dalam penelitian ini. Sebanyak 1180 individu yang berada dalam rentang usia 5 tahun pertama pernikahan berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini yang direkrut melalui penyebaran kuesioner secara daring. Hasil analisis PROCESS v4.0 Hayes menunjukkan bahwa persepsi kesetaraan peran secara signifikan dapat memprediksi kepuasan pernikahan, serta common dyadic coping secara signifikan menjadi mediator dalam model hubungan tersebut (direct effect, c’ = 5,096, 95% CI [4,375; 5,818]; indirect effect, a*b = 2,878, 95% CI [2,3131; 3,4782]). Dengan demikian, persepsi keadilan dalam pembagian urusan rumah tangga memprediksi upaya penanganan masalah bersama yang setara oleh pasangan, yang kemudian memprediksi kepuasan pernikahan.
References
Abbas, M. (2019). Pengaruh penyesuaian diri terhadap kepuasan pernikahan pada individu yang menikah melalui proses ta’aruf. Cognicia, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v7i1.8461
Alimi, R., & Darwis, R. S. (2022). Kualitas interaksi keluarga dengan kondisi ibu bekerja. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 5(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v5i1.39609
Andriani, P., Widia, E., & Patiro, S. P. S. (2023). Determinasi keadilan prosedural, peadilan interaksional, keadilan distributif dengan motivasi kerja sebagai variabel intervening terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan di RSUD Raja Ahmad Tabib [Determination of procedural justice, interactional justice, distributive justice with work motivation as an intervening variable on employee job satisfaction Raja Ahmad Tabib Hospital]. DeReMa (Development Research of Management): Jurnal Manajemen, 18(1), 62–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v18i1.6574
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi jilid 2. Pustaka Belajar.
Bafrani, M. A., Nourizadeh, R., Hakimi, S., Mortazavi, S. A., Mehrabi, E., & Vahed, N. (2023). The effect of psychological interventions on sexual and marital satisfaction: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 52(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i1.11666
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Tingkat partisipasi angkatan kerja menurut jenis kelamin. https://pagaralamkota.bps.go.id/indicator/6/384/1/tingkat-partisipasi-angkatan-kerja-menurut-jenis-kelamin.html
Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 54(1), 34–49.
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11031-002
Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadic coping and the significance of this concept for prevention and therapy. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(3), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943–8149.16.3.108
Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., & Falconier, M. K. (2016). Coping in couples: The systemic transactional model (STM). In Couples coping with stress (pp. 5-22). Routledge.
Bodenmann, G., Arista, L. J., Walsh, K. J., Randall, A. K., Lebow, J., Chambers, A., & Breunlin, D. C. (2018). Dyadic coping inventory. In Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (pp 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–15877–8_678–1
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752–0606.1995.tb00163.x
Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., & Rudd, S. (2020). Division of housework, communication, and couples’ relationship satisfaction. Socius, 6, 2378023120924805. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120924805
Chapman, B., & Guven, C. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between marriage and wellbeing: Does marriage quality matter?. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902–014–9607–3
Charbonneau, A., Lachance–Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2021). Threshold levels for disorder, inequity in household labor, and frustration with the partner among emerging adult couples: A dyadic examination. Journal of Family Issues, 42(1), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20918616
Chong, A., & Mickelson, K. D. (2016). Perceived fairness and relationship satisfaction during the transition to parenthood: The mediating role of spousal support. Journal of Family Issues, 37(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13516764
Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60, 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199–008–9578–0
Elkifahi, N. A. (2019). Peran common dyadic coping dalam memoderasi hubungan antara penolakan orang tua dan kepuasan pernikahan [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Indonesia]. Universitas Indonesia Library. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20512762&lokasi=lokal
Falconier, M. K. (2013). Traditional gender role orientation and dyadic coping in immigrant Latino couples: Effects on couple functioning. Family Relations, 62(2), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12002
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta–analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
Falconier, M. K., & Kuhn, R. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571
Gildersleeve, S., Singer, J. A., Skerrett, K., & Wein, S. (2017). Coding “We–ness” in couple’s relationship stories: A method for assessing mutuality in couple therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 27(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1262566
Gravetter, F. J., Forzano, L.–A. B., & Rakow, T. (2021). Research methods for the behavioural sciences. Cengage Learning EMEA.
Kayser, K., & Acquati, C. (2019). The influence of relational mutuality on dyadic coping among couples facing breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 37(2), 194-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2019.1566809
Kornrich, S., & Eger, M. A. (2016). Family life in context: Men and women's perceptions of fairness and satisfaction across thirty countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 23(1), 40-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu030
Hosseini, N., Poh, L. L., & Baranovich, D. L. (2019). Enhancing marital satisfaction through acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of marital satisfaction improvement of Iranian couples. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(33), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.433005
Hu, Y., & Yucel, D. (2018). What fairness? Gendered division of housework and family life satisfaction across 30 countries. European Sociological Review, 34(1), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx085
Huffman, A. H., Matthews, R. A., & Irving, L. H. (2017). Family fairness and cohesion in marital dyads: Mediating processes between work–family conflict and couple psychological distress. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(1), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-012-9321-4
Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077
Jansen, L., Weber, T., Kraaykamp, G., & Verbakel, E. (2016). Perceived fairness of the division of household labor: A comparative study in 29 countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 57(1–2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715216642267
Juniarsyah, M. F., Murtati, M., & Suci, R. P. (2022). Kepuasan kerja sebagai mediasi: Karakteristik pekerjaan, kedisiplinan kerja, kinerja pegawai. JIM (Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen), 7(3), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.31328/jim.v7i3.3524
Kim, Y & Hong, S. (2021). Profiles of working moms’ daily time use: Exploring their impact on leisure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052305
King, M. E. (2016). Marital satisfaction. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of family studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs054
Kumar, R. (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lambert, J. E., Hasbun, A., Engh, R., & Holzer, J. (2015). Veteran PTSS and spouse relationship quality: The importance of dyadic coping. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research Practice, and Policy, 7, 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000036
McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6
Meier, F., Milek, A., Rauch–Anderegg, V., Benz–Fragnière, C., Nieuwenboom, J. W., Schmid, H., ... & Bodenmann, G. (2020). Fair enough? Decreased equity of dyadic coping across the transition to parenthood associated with depression of first–time parents. PLoS One, 15(2), e0227342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227342
Muijres, P., Weitkamp, K., Bodenmann, G., & Jenewein, J. (2023). Discrepancies in dyadic coping: associations with distress and quality of life in couples facing early stage dementia. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1056428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056428
Musringudin, M., & Dinihari, Y. (2021). Pengaruh keadilan organisasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasi kepala SMA Negeri di Jakarta [Organizational justice, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of head of high school in Jakarta].: Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Peningkatan Mutu Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.21009/improvement.v8i2.21842
Nourani, S., Seraj, F., Shakeri, M. T., & Mokhber, N. (2019). The relationship between gender-role beliefs, household labor division and marital satisfaction in couples. Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery, 29(1), 43-49. https://10.29252/hnmj.29.1.301
Oshio, T., Nozaki, K., & Kobayashi, M. (2013). Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China, Japan, and Korea. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34, 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-012-9321-4
Regan, T. W., Lambert, S. D., Kelly, B., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Kayser, K., & Turner, J. (2014). Cross–sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Education and Counseling, 96, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010
Rohmah, Z. H., Fitriana, T. S., & Rahmatika, R. (2017). Marital quality in early years marriage: The role of intimacy, passion and commitment. UI Proceedings on Social Science and Humanities, 1.
Rottmann, N., Hansen, D. G., Larsen, P. V., Nicolaisen, A., Flyger, H., Johansen, C., & Hagedoorn, M. (2015). Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population–based study. Health Psychology, 34, 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000218
Rumondor, P. C. B. (2021). Peran stres eksternal, dyadic coping, attachment dan ideologi peran gender dalam memprediksikan kepuasan pernikahan pasangan bekerja berpendidikan tinggi di perkotaan [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Indonesia]. Universitas Indonesia Library. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20522835&lokasi=lokal
Siregar, N. D. (2021). Dyadic coping sebagai moderator dalam hubungan antara persepsi kesetaraan peran dan marital distress selama pandemi pada lima tahun pertama perkawinan [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Universitas Indonesia.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
Staff, H. R., Didymus, F. F., & Backhouse, S. H. (2017). The antecedents and outcomes of dyadic coping in close personal relationships: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 30(5), 498-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2017.1329931
Taniguchi, H., & Kaufman, G. (2022). Sharing the load: Housework, joint decision-making, and marital quality in Japan. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 914-933. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1769707
Thielemans, G., Fallesen, P., & Mortelmans, D. (2021). Division of household labor and relationship dissolution in Denmark 2001–2009. Journal of Family Issues, 42(7), 1582–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20949890
Vedes, A., Bodenmann, G., Nussbeck, F. W., Randall, A., & Lind, W. (2015). The role of we-ness in mediating the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236330939_The_role_of_we-ness_in_mediating_the_association_between_dyadic_coping_and_relationship_satisfaction_submitted
Wijayanti, U. T. (2021). Analisis faktor penyebab perceraian pada masa pandemi Covid-19 di Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 14(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2021.14.1.14
Wijayanti, R., Sunarti, E., & Krisnatuti, D. (2020). Peran dukungan sosial dan interaksi ibu-anak dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan subjektif remaja pada keluarga orang tua bekerja. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 13(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2020.13.2.125
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts published are held Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen. The statement to release the copyright to Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen is stated in Copyright Release Form. Copyright encompass exclusive rights to reproduce, to distribute, and to sell any part of the journal articles in all form and media. The reproduction of any part of this journal is allowed with a written permission from Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen.
