Mythologies of Usury in Finance: Analyzing Denotation, Connotation, and Cultural Myth using Roland Barthes' Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.14.1.121-133Keywords:
Debt transaction, postmodernist perspective, Roland Barthes semiotics, semiotics, usuryAbstract
This study explores the reality of usury through a semiotic analysis based on Roland Barthes' postmodern study. The research employs a qualitative approach with a postmodernist perspective and includes in-depth interviews with academics and economic practitioners. The study was conducted both in Java and outside Java, Indonesia, involving seven participants, including practitioners and academics. The analysis reveals that usury, as postulated in Barthes' postmodern framework, can be interpreted through denotation, connotation, and myth. Denotatively, usury is seen as an additional charge on a debt at the time of repayment, exploiting debt transactions, adding monetary charges, and imposing burdensome loans on borrowers. Connotatively, usury is viewed as exploitation of borrowers, services that offer loans with high-interest rates, and unfair interest rates that favor financiers. Mythically, usury is interpreted as a revolving loan, the exchange of goods with varying qualities, pawning, and brokerage in projects. The reality of usury, as hidden behind these interpretations, suggests that usury is a form of injustice, an iceberg phenomenon, a dependency, and involves shirkah (partnership) in usury bondage.
References
Abdusshamad, S. (2014). Pandangan Islam terhadap riba. Al Iqtishadiyah Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(1), 70-86.
Aiello, G. (2020). Inventorizing, situating, transforming: Social semiotics and data visualization. Amsterdam University Press.
Berger, A. A. (2010). Pengantar Semiotika: Tanda-Tanda dalam Kebudayaan Kntemporer. Sleman (ID), Tiara Wacana.
Budi, A. (2019). Analisis Semiotika Film dan Komunikasi. Malang (ID), Intrans Publishing.
Cahya, B. T., Andriyanto, I., Lubis, I. S., & Aqim, D. P. (2022). Deconstructive semiotic discourse of profit sharing: Derridean’s postmodern critical study. SHARE Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 11(2), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v11i2.12743.
Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and The Economic Challenge. Herndon (US), The Islamic Foundation and The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Dyer, A. W. (1986). Semiotics, economic development, and the deconstruction of economic man. Journal of Economic Issues, 20(2), 541–549.
Fajar, D. A. (2021). Kajian perbedaan time value of money atau economic value of time dalam perspektif syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(03), 1435-1440.
Farooq, M. (2012). Interest, usury and its impact on the economy. The Dialogue, 7(3), 265–276.
Harahap, B. & Risfandy, T. (2022). Islamic organization and the perception of riba (usury) and conventional banks among Muslims: Evidence from Indonesia. SAGE Open.
Harahap, S. S. (2001). Akuntansi Islam. Jakarta (ID), Bumi Aksara.
Haryadi, T. (2016). Analisis iklan televisi sampoerna hijau versi “es kacang ijo” dengan pendekatan semiotika Roland Barthes. JADECS (Journal of Art, Design, Art Education & Cultural Studies), 1(1), 1-16.
Haryono, S. R. & Putra, D. K. S. (2017). Identitas budaya Indonesia: Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes dalam iklan Aqua “temukan Indonesiamu”. Acta Diurna, 13(2).
Ipandang, I. & Askar, A. (2020). Konsep riba dalam fiqih dan al-qur’an: Studi komparasi. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan, 19(2), 1080-1090.
Iqbal, Z. & Mirakhor, A. (1999). Progress and challenges of Islamic banking. Thunderbird International Business Review, 41(4), 381–405.
Iqbal, Z. & Shafiq, B. (2015). Islamic finance and the role of qard-al-hassan (benevolent loans) in enhancing inclusion: A case study of akhuwat. ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives Special Issue of Social and Sustainable Finance, 4(4), 23–40.
Irman, I. A., Hairunnisa & Alfando, J. (2021). Analisis semiotika dalam film Parasite. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(3).
Iskandar, A., Possumah, B. T. & Aqbar, K. (2019). The inflation and poverty in Indonesia: Consequence of usury?. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 17(2), 91–105.
Kasmir. (2004). Dasar-dasar Perbankan. Jakarta (ID), PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Khan, M. (2011). Islamic banking practices: Islamic law and prohibition of ribā. Islamic Studies, 50(3), 413–422.
Kouser, D. R., Aamir, M. & Mehvish, H. (2011). Camel analysis for Islamic and conventional banks: Comparative study from Pakistan. Economics and Finance Review Vol., 1(10), 55–64.
Kurniawan, R. R. & Maemanah, A. (2020). Praktek bunga majemuk rentenir dan larangannya dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir, x (September 2020), 3.
Mbawuni, J. & Nimako, S. G. (2016). Muslim and non-Muslim consumer perception towards introduction of Islamic banking in Ghana. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(3).
Morissan. (2013). Teori Komunikasi: Individu Hingga Massa. Jakarta (ID), Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mudjiyanto, B. & Nur, E. (2013). Semiotika dalam metode penelitian komunikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, Informatika dan Media Massa (PEKOMMAS), 16(1), 73-82.
Muftisany, H. (2021). Hukum Riba. Sleman (ID), Intera.
Muhammad. (2002). Pengantar Akuntansi Syari’ah. Jakarta (ID), Salemba Empat.
Muhammad. (2012). Rekonstruksi time value of money menuju economic value of time untuk keuangan Islam. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman, 1(2), 163–190.
Ningish, P. A., Mukhlisin, M. & Nelli, J. (2022). Family financial management in realizing sakinah family. In Wealth Management and Investment in Islamic Settings: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 151-164). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Noor, F. & Wahyuningratna, R. N. (2017). Representasi sensualitas perempuan dalam iklan new era boots di televisi (kajian semiotika Roland Barthes). IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(2), 1-9.
Noorzoy, M. S. (1982). Islamic laws on riba (interest) and their economic implications. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 14(1), 3–17.
Pertiwi, D. (2019). Uang dan konsep time value of money dalam pandangan Islam. J-ESA (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah), 2(1), 90-105.
Pradopo, R. D. (1998). Semiotika: Teori, metode, dan penerapannya. Humaniora, 10(1), 42-48.
Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Keempat. Jakarta (ID), Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Qureshi, A. I. (1974). Islam and the Theory of Interest. Lahore (PK), SH. Muhammad Ashraf.
Rammal, H. G. & Zurbruegg, R. (2007). Awareness of Islamic banking products among Muslims: The case of Australia. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760060.
Rohmaniah, A. F. (2021). Kajian semiotika Roland Barthes dalam vidio parodi kampanye covid-19. Al-Ittishol Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 2(2).
Şimşek, H. (2023). Usury in scriptures: The case of the Qur’an. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 10(1), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR122449.
Soga, Z. (2018). Semiotika signifikasi: Analisis struktur dan penerapannya dalam Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Aqlam, 3(1).
Swartz, N. P. (2009). The prohibition of usury (riba) a moral-ethical perspective of Islamic financial and banking law: A comparative study between the Islamic and the conventional model. Jurnal Syariah, 17(2), 409–430.
Taib, F. M., Ramayah, T. & Razak, D. A. (2008). Factors influencing intention to use diminishing partnership home financing. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538390810901168.
Wahana, P. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta (ID), Pustaka Diamond.
Wulansari, R., Setiana, R. A., & Aziza, S. H. (2020). Pemikiran tokoh semiotika modern. Textura Journal, 1(1), 48-62.
Yuliono. (2017). Time value of money dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. El Jizya: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 5(1), 177–192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 AL-MUZARA'AH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who published in this journal agree to following terms:
- Authors understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts published are held by Al-Muzara'ah. The statement to release the copyright to Al-Muzara'ah is stated in Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA) form.
- Copyright encompass exclusive rights to reproduce, to distribute, and to sell any part of the journal articles in all form and media.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
