Perbandingan Kelayakan Ekonomi Usaha Sapi Perah Skala Kecil Dengan dan Tanpa Biodigester di Desa Mundu, Kabupaten Klaten

Comparison of Economic Feasibility of Small Scale Dairy Cattle Business with and without Biodigester in Mundu Village, Klaten District

  • Melani Arina Pradita Department of Resource and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
  • A Faroby Falatehan Department of Resource and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Dea Amanda Agribusiness Management Study Program, Vocational School, IPB University, Indonesia

Abstract

Desa Mundu, Kecamatan Tulung merupakan salah satu sentra peternakan sapi perah di Klaten. Keberadaan peternakan berimplikasi pada timbulnya limbah serta potensi pencemaran lingkungan akibat aktivitas peternakan. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan analisis kelayakan ekonomi dan analisis non-finansial pada usaha sapi perah yang menggunakan biodigester dan non-biodigester. Penelitian dilakukan di Desa Mundu, Kecamatan Tulung, Kabupaten Klaten, Provinsi Jawa Tengah tahun 2024 dengan menggunakan metode survei lapang, kuesioner, dan wawancara sebanyak 40 peternak. Pemilihan lokasi dilakukan secara sengaja (purposive) dengan kriteria peternak sapi perah yang telah menerapkan pengolahan limbah ternak dengan biodigester dan non-biodigester. Data yang digunakan berupa data primer dan sekunder. Data primer diperoleh dari hasil wawancara dengan peternak dan sekunder diperoleh dari dinas terkait. Data yang diperoleh ditabulasi dan dianalisis secara deskriptif, kuantitatif, dan nilai ekonomi. Tujuan tulisan ini untuk mengetahui perbandingan kelayakan ekonomi usaha sapi perah skala kecil di peternak yang menggunakan biodigester dan non-biodigester. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbandingan kelayakan ekonomi pada usaha sapi perah yang menggunakan biodigester memiliki nilai ekonomi lebih tinggi, sedangkan non-biodigester lebih rendah. Namun, kedua usaha sapi perah memiliki nilai NPV, Net B/C, IRR, dan payback period secara ekonomi layak untuk dijalankan. Analisis sensitivitas terhadap biaya perbaikan biodigester tidak mempengaruhi usaha sapi perah secara signifikan. Analisis switching value penurunan harga jual produksi susu sapi perah berpengaruh sangat signifikan, sedangkan pada kenaikan harga pakan konsentrat dan ampas tahu tidak berpengaruh signifikan pada usaha sapi perah.

Mundu Village, located in Tulung District, is a prominent hub for dairy production in Klaten. The presence of farms has consequences for waste production and the risk of environmental degradation resulting from agricultural practices. Consequently, it is imperative to evaluate the economic viability and non-financial aspects of dairy cattle enterprises utilizing biodigesters vs those that do not. The study was carried out in Mundu Village, Tulung Subdistrict, Klaten Regency, Central Java Province in 2024 employing field survey techniques, questionnaires, and interviews with 40 farmers. The site selection was conducted purposefully, focusing on dairy producers that have utilized both biodigesters and non-biodigesters for livestock waste treatment. The utilized data comprised both primary and secondary sources. Primary data were acquired through interviews with farmers, while secondary data were sourced from pertinent agencies. The collected data were systematically organized and examined descriptively, numerically, and regarding economic worth. This paper aims to compare the economic viability of small-scale dairy cattle operations among farmers utilizing biodigesters vs non biodigesters. The findings indicated that the economic feasibility of dairy cow operations utilizing biodigesters possesses greater economic value compared to non biodigesters. Both dairy cow enterprises have economically viable values for NPV, Net Benefit-Cost ratio, IRR, and payback period. The sensitivity analysis of biodigester repair expenses does not substantially impact the dairy cow enterprise. The analysis of switching values indicates that a reduction in the selling price of dairy milk production has a substantial impact, although a rise in the prices of concentrate feed and tofu dregs does not significantly affect the dairy cattle company.

References

Azanella LA, Nugroho RS. (2021). Kompas.com. Hari susu sedunia 1 Juni 2021: tingkat konsumsi susu penduduk Indonesia masih rendah. [diakses 5 September 2023]. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2021/06/01/062500065/hari-susu-sedunia-1-juni-2021--tingkat-konsumsi-susu-penduduk-indonesia?lgn_method=google.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2023. Populasi Sapi Perah menurut Provinsi (Ekor), 2020-2022. [internet]. [diunduh 15 Juni 2024]. Tersedia pada: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NDcwIzI=/populasi-sapi-perah-menurut-provinsi.html.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2024. Realisasi Pendapatan Negara (Milyar Rupiah), 2022-2024. [internet]. [diunduh 28 April 2024]. Tersedia pada: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTA3MCMy/realisasi-pendapatan-negara.html.

Fitriyanto, N. A., Triatmojo, S., Pertiwiningrum, A., Erwanto, Y., Abidin, M. Z., Baliarti, E., & Suranindyah, Y. Y. (2015). Counseling and assistance in the treatment of beef cattle farm waste in the Sido Mulyo livestock farmer group, Pulosari Hamlet, Jumoyo Village, Salam District, Magelang Regency. Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement, 1(01), 79-95.

Gittinger, J. P. (1982). Economic Analysis of Agricultural Project (2nd ed.). The Hopkins University Press.

Gustiani, E., & Fahmi, T. (2022). Peran Sektor Peternakan Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan di Era New Normal Melalui Penerapan Teknologi Reproduksi Pada Sapi Potong Di Kabupaten Majalengka. Di dalam: Isyanto AY, Yusuf MN, Setia B, Sudrajat, Aziz S. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Ag. 6(1), 70–76. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/prosiding/article/view/7708/5001.

Haloho RD, Sugiarto M. (2021). Analisis Break Even Point Usaha Peternakan Sapi Perah di Kabupaten Semarang. Jurnal Agribisnis Lahan Kering. 6(2):76–81. doi:10.32938/ag.v6i2.1323.

Hasan IG. 2017. Analisis kelayakan usaha peternakan sapi perah anggota KUD Mandiri Bayongbong Kabupaten Garut [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

[IPCC] Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Vol.4 (Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use).

Khairiyah, K. (2011). Zoonoses and their prevention efforts (North Sumatra case). Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 30(3), 117-124.

Lintangrino, M. C., & Boedisantoso, R. (2016). Inventory of greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural and livestock sectors in the city of Surabaya. ITS Engineering Journal, 5(2), D53-D57.

Maeanti, R. F., Fauzi, A., & Istiqomah, A. (2013). Evaluasi kelayakan finansial usaha peternakan dan pengembangan biogas: studi kasus Desa Suntenjaya, Bandung. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 14(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v14i1.02

Mustikaningrum, D., Kristiawan, & Suprayitno. (2021). Emisi gas rumah kaca sektor pertanian di Kabupaten Tuban: inventarisasi dan potensi aksi mitigasi. Jurnal Wilayah Dan Lingkungan, 9(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.9.2.155-171

Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon FM, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque JF, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H. 2013. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Nasution, A. G. (2016). Analisis kelayakan usaha peternakan sapi perah di Kawasan Usaha Peternakan (KUNAK) Kabupaten Bogor [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor. In [Skripsi]. RepositoryIpbAcId.

Oktariani, A. (2014). Daya saing usaha ternak sapi perah dengan pemasaran susu segar berbasis agrowisata [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sarwani, Nardi, S., AM Nurzaman, E., Marjohan, M., & Hamsinah. (2020). Penerapan ilmu manajemen dalam pengembangan agroindustri biogas dari limbah kotoran sapi yang berdampak pada kesejahteraan masyarakat Desa Sindanglaya Kecamatan Tanjungsiang, Kabupaten Subang. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Humanis, 1(2), 75–86.

Sembada, P., Ramadhan, I., Raihan, M. R. F., Mugniawan, A., & Hendrawan, M. R. R. (2021). Performa produksi dan reproduksi sapi perah di UPTD BPPIP-TSP Bunikasih. Jurnal Sains Terapan, 10(2), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.29244/jstsv.10.2.70-82

Sesami, D. A. (2013). Daya saing dan dampak kebijakan pemerintah terhadap peternakan sapi perah rakyat di Desa Singosari, Kecamatan Mojosongo, Kabupaten Boyolali [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.

Tuty, D. W. N., Suwarto, S., & Lestari, E. (2020). Pemberdayaan masyarakat melalui pengembangan desa mandiri energi (Studi kasus di Klaten Jawa Tengah). Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement, 2, 201–206. https://doi.org/10.31258/unricsce.2.201-206.

[UU] Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan. 2021.

Widyastuti, F. R., Purwanto, & Hadiyanto. (2013). Potensi biogas melalui pemanfaatan limbah padat pada peternakan sapi perah Bangka Botanical Garden Pangkalpinang. Metana, 9(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/metana.v9i02.7613.

Yoman, E., Massie, M. T., Osak, R. E. M., & Pandey, J. (2019). Analisis persepsi petani peternak terhadap peran penyuluhan dalam pengembangan agribisnis peternakan babi di Desa Giwan Kecamatan Tiom Kabupaten Lanny Jaya. Zootec, 39(2), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.35792/zot.39.2.2019.25256

Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
PraditaM. A., FalatehanA. F., & AmandaD. (2024). Perbandingan Kelayakan Ekonomi Usaha Sapi Perah Skala Kecil Dengan dan Tanpa Biodigester di Desa Mundu, Kabupaten Klaten: Comparison of Economic Feasibility of Small Scale Dairy Cattle Business with and without Biodigester in Mundu Village, Klaten District. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Resource and Environmental Economics, 3(2), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.29244/ijaree.v3i2.58447