The Role of Social Capital in Clove Marketing: A Case Study of Rural South Sulawesi

Jumiati Jumiati; Nadir Nadir; Ardi Rumallang; Ikmal  Saleh; Saleh Molla; Akbar Akbar; ika Fitri

doi:10.18343/jipi.31.2.346

Authors

Jumiati Jumiati Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia
Nadir Nadir Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-4735
Ardi Rumallang Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-3277
Ikmal Saleh Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia
Saleh Molla Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1807-1461
Akbar Akbar Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-8871
ika Fitri Agribusiness Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar 90221, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.31.2.346

Keywords:

clove, marketing channels, rural agribusiness, social capital, trust

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine clove marketing channels and the impact of social capital in facilitating marketing processes in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi. In-depth interviews were conducted with clove producers, intermediate traders, and wholesalers to obtain data for a qualitative case study. The data was evaluated thematically to identify patterns of trust, reciprocity, and network interaction in the clove marketing system. The findings revealed two major marketing channels: (1) farmers sell wet cloves to intermediary traders, who then distribute the product to wholesalers and industries, and (2) farmers sell dried cloves directly to wholesalers for higher pricing and greater market control. Trust, reciprocal relationships, and adherence to social standards facilitate unsecured capital loans, promote information exchange, and assure compliance with informal agreements. Strong community values, particularly gotong royong (mutual cooperation) and solidarity, enhance the robustness and adaptation of clove marketing systems. The combination of social capital and digital networking enhances access to market knowledge and promotes sustainable marketing practices. The findings highlight the necessity of increasing social capital to improve farmer welfare, increase market efficiency, and create a sustainable marketing framework.

Keywords: clove, marketing channels, rural agribusiness, social capital, trust

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addai G, Guodaar L, Dinye RD, Boafo J, Purohit S, Felix K, Asare O, Abi VA. 2025. Advancing agricultural diversification within rural regions: The dynamic role of interregional rural-rural migration. Habitat International. 156(02): 103273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103273

Alene AD, Manyong VM, Omanya G, Mignouna HD, Bokanga M, Odhiambo G. 2008. Smallholder market participation under transactions costs: maize supply and fertilizer demand in Kenya. Food Policy. 33(4): 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.12.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.12.001

Arnott D, Chadwick DR, Jones SW, Dandy N, Jones DL. 2021. Importance of building bridging and linking social capital in adapting to changes in UK agricultural policy. Journal of Rural Studies. 83(4):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.001

Cahyono B. 2014. Peran modal sosial dalam peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat petani tembakau di Kabupaten Wonosobo. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. 15(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30659/ekobis.15.1.1-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/ekobis.15.1.1-16

Bravo C, Gabriela, Klerkx L, Engler A. 2019. Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies 69: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004

Fafchamps M, Minten B. 2002. Returns to social network capital among traders. Oxford Economic Papers. 54(2): 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/54.2.173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/54.2.173

Fischer E, Qaim M. 2012. Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Development. 40(6): 1255–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018

Fitzpatrick E, Baycan T, Akgungor S. 2023. Social capital and rural development: An introduction to the special issue. The Annals of Regional Science. 70(3): 603–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-023-01222-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-023-01222-5

Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Hobbs JE. 2020. Food supply chains during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68(2):171–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12237

Khazami N, Lakner Z. 2022. The development of social capital during the process of starting an agritourism business. Tourism and Hospitality. 3(1): 210-224. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp3010015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp3010015

Krishna, A. 2002. Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy. Columbia (US): University Pr. https://doi.org/10.7312/kris12570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/kris12570

Markelova H, Dick RM, Hellin J, Dohrn S. 2009. Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy. 34(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001

Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). California (US): Sage Publ.

Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review. 23(2):242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259373

Nielsen BB. 2004. The role of trust in collaborative relationships: A multi-dimensional approach. Management. 7(3):239-256. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.073.0239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.073.0239

Pretty J, Ward H. 2001. Social capital and the environment. World Development 29(2): 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X

Narayan D, Pritchett L. 1999. Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 47(4):871–897. https://doi.org/10.1086/452436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/452436

Reardon T, Barrett CB, Berdegue JA, Swinnen JFM. 2009. Agrifood industry transformation and small farmers in developing countries. World Development. 37(11): 1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.023

Ren Z, Fu Z, Zhong K. 2022. The influence of social capital on farmers' green control technology adoption behavior. Frontiers Psychology. 10(13):1001442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001442

Sapto A, Rahmawati R, Widodo S. 2020. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta (ID): Deepublish.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Penelitian yang Bersifat Eksploratif, Deskriptif, dan Verifikatif. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.

Sumarwan, U. 2015. Pemasaran Strategik: Perspektif Perilaku Konsumen dan Marketing Plan. Bogor (ID): IPB Pr.

Swinnen J, Kuijpers R. 2020. Inclusive Value Chains to Accelerate Poverty Reduction in Africa. Jobs Working Paper. 37: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1596/33397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/33397

Thirtawati T, Sarwoprasodjo, S, Muljono, Hapsari, DR. 2025. Facing challenges, seizing opportunities: marketing communications of agricultural social enterprises in Indonesia. BIO Web of Conferences FISAED 2024. pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517104005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517104005

Trebbin A, Hassler M. 2012. Farmers’ producer companies in India: A new concept for collective action?. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 44(2):411-427. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a44143

Tsan M, Totapally S, Hailu M, Addom BK. 2019. The Digitalisation of African Agriculture Report 2018–2019. Wageningen (NL): CTA/Dalberg Advisers.

Uphoff N, Wijayaratna CM. 2000. Demonstrated benefits from social capital: The productivity of farmer organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development 28(11): 1875–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00063-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00063-2

Woolcock M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27(2): 151–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135

Woolcock M, Narayan D. 2000. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer 15(2): 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225

Yu S, Abbas J, Draghici A, Negulescu OH. Ain NU. 2022. Social media application as a new paradigm for business communication: The role of Covid-19 knowledge, social distancing, and preventive attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology. 19(13): 903082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082

Zhou Z, Ning A. 2025. The impact of social capital on farmers’ green production behavior: Moderation effects based on agricultural support and protection subsidies. Land. 14(11): 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112123