The Perceptions and Risk Reduction Strategies of Small-Scale Salt Farmers on Madura Island
Abstract
Salt farming is considered a risky venture due to the influence of both internal and external factors. Therefore, this study aimed to describe farmers' perceptions regarding the causes, opportunities, and impacts of risks to develop a risk reduction strategy for salt farming in Madura Island. The study used a multistage sampling method to obtain 120 respondents and was conducted in three regencies: Sampang, Pamekasan, and Sumenep. The first objective was analyzed using the descriptive method, while the second was designed using the Kountur method. Farmers' perceptions showed that seawater quality, wind and temperature, rainfall, soil porosity, price volatility, marketing channels, government policies, capital constraints, and human resource quality could cause risks in salt farming. Several risks were perceived to significantly impact salt farming, such as government policies, partnerships, marketing channels, prices, and capital availability. Therefore, some recommendations to improve the risk reduction strategies included the use of horizontal axis windmills, revitalization of groups and partnerships, and capital strengthening through the effectiveness of the PUGAR (Empowerment of Smallholder Salt Businesses) policy by the development of standard procedures for the timely and targeted distribution of the aides.
Keywords: perception, risk, salt, strategy
Downloads
References
Ahsan D. 2018. Farmer's motivations, risk perceptions and risk reduction strategies in a developing economy: Bangladesh experience. Journal of Risk Research. 14(3): 325--349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.541558
Aryani AD, Azyzia SH. 2020. The effectiveness of people’s Salt Business Empowerment Program (PUGAR) in Demak. AFEBI Economic and Finance Review (AEFR). 5(1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.47312/aefr.v5i01.456
Asravor R. 2018. Smallholder farmer's risk perceptions and risk reduction responses: Evidence from the semi-arid region of Ghana. African Journal of Economic and Reduction Studies. 9(3): 367-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-10-2017-0250
Astuti MA, Nurmalina R, Burhanuddin. 2019. Analisis status keberlanjutan pengusahaan garam di tiga wilayah Pulau Madura. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia. 7(1): 1326. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2019.7.1.13-26
Bishu KG, Reilly SO, Lahiff E, Steiner B. 2018. Cattle farmer's perceptions of risk and risk reduction strategies: Evidence from Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Risk Research. 21(5): 579598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1223163
Darmawi H. 2014. Manajemen Risiko. Jakarta (ID): Bumi Aksara
Deliarnoor NA, Buchari RA, Felfina LK. 2015. Evaluasi program pemberdayaan usaha garam rakyat di Kecamatan Pangenan, Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat. Responsive. 1(1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v1i1.19097
Fauziyah E. 2011 Manajemen risiko pada usahatani padi sebagai salah satu upaya dalam mewujudkan ketahanan pangan rumah tangga petani (studi kasus di Desa Telang Kecamatan Kamal). Seminar Nasional Fakultas Pertanian, Reformasi Pertanian Terintegrasi Menuju Kedaulatan Pangan. 22 Oktober 2011.
Fauziyah E, Ihsannudin. 2014. Pengembangan kelembagaan pemasaran garam rakyat (Studi kasus di Desa Lembung, Kecamatan Galis, Kabupaten Pamekasan). JSEP. 7(1): 5259.
Fauziyah E. 2020. Model reduksi risiko kountur berdasarkan perilaku petani jagung di Pulau Madura. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 18(1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v18n1.2020.25-40
Hasan F, Darwanto DH, Mashuri. 2016. Risk reduction strategy on shallot farming in Bantul and Nganjuk Regency. Ilmu Pertanian. 1(2): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.22146/ipas.12534
Hayran S, Aykut G. 2015. Risk perception and reduction strategies in dairy farming: A case of Adana Province of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology. 3(12): 952–961. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v3i12.952-961.583
Hermanto, Swastika DKS. 2011. Penguatan kelompok tani: langkah awal peningkatan kesejahteraan petani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 9(4): 1, 371–390. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v9n4.2011.371-390
Ihsannudin I. 2016. Evaluasi program pemberdayaan usaha garam rakyat (Pugar) di Pulau Madura. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Kompetensi Fasilitator dan Kelembagaan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Era MEA, Hotel Lor In, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia, 30 November 2016
Iskandar R, Ayu SF. 2020. Risk perception and risk reduction efforts of red chili business in Langkat Regency North Sumatera Province. International Conference on Agriculture, Environment and Food Security, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 782 (2021)022046 https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/782/2/022046
Islam DIl, Rahman A, Sarker NI. 2021. Factors influencing rice farmer's risk attitudes and perceptions in Bangladesh. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 30(1): 177187. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/120365
Kahan D. 2008. Managing Risk in Farming. Rome; Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations.
Kountur R. 2004. Manajemen Risiko Operasional: Memahami Cara Mengelola Risiko Operasional Perusahaan. Jakarta: PPM
Kurniati D. 2015. Perilaku petani terhadap risiko usahatani kedelai di Kecamatan Jawai Selatan Kabupaten Sambas. Jurnal Social Economic of Agriculture. 4(1): 32–36. https://doi.org/10.26418/j.sea.v1i3.4366
Kurniawan BA, Suryono A, Saleh C. 2014. Implementasi program dana bantuan pemberdayaan usaha garam rakyat (PUGAR) dalam rangka pengembangan wirausaha garam rakyat (Studi pada Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Sumenep). Wacana, 17(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.wacana.2014.017.03.4
Moqoddas SL, Subari S. 2020. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi harga garam di Indonesia. Agriscience. 1(2): 464–474. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriscience.v1i2.8456
Nughoro P, Susandini A, Islam D. 2020. Mengkaji sistem pemasaran garam di Madura. Media Trend. 15(1): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.21107/mediatrend.v15i1.6176
Obalola TO, Ayinde OE. 2018. risk and risk reduction strategies of smallholder onion farmers in Sokoto State, Nigeria. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 111(3): 559–566. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2018.111.3.04
Prasetyo ASW. 2016. Petani garam vs impor garam. Buletin APBN, 18 (1): https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puskajianggaran/buletin-apbn/public-file/buletin-apbn-public-18.pdf.
Rabihah. 2020. Agriculture risk reduction: A case study on rock melon farm in Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia. Food & Agribusiness Reduction. 1(2): 5259, https://doi.org/10.26480/fabm.02.2020.75.82
Rosyidah. 2020. Pengembangan Infrastruktur tambak garam rakyat berdasarkan zonasi pada kawasan. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 9(2): 190195, https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v9i2.56257
Saptana, Daryanto A, Daryanto HK, Kuntjoro. 2010. Strategi manajemen risiko petani cabai merah pada lahan sawah dataran rendah di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis. 7(2): 115131.
Sarwar. 2013. Risk perception and risk reduction strategies by farmers in agriculture sector of Pakistan. Scientific Papers Series Reduction, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 13(3): 267270.
Setiawan, Rusita. 2015. Perancangan kincir angin sumbu horizontal untuk pemompa air laut ke lahan garam. Saintek. 9(1): 3437.
Sinaga O, Made A, Dewi RK. 2020. Strategi pengembangan usaha garam rakyat di Desa Kusamba, Kecamatan Dawan, Kabupaten Klungkung. Agrisocionomics.4(1): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v4i1.6081
Suherman T, Fauziyah E, Hasan F. 2011. Analisis pemasaran garam rakyat (Studi kasus Desa Kertasada, Kecamatan Kalianget. Embryo. 8(2): 73–81.
Widiyastutik MA, Hapsari TD. 2016. Pemasaran garam rakyat di Desa Pangarengan Kecamatan Pangarengan Kabupaten Sampang. Agritrop, 14(2): 222–230. https://doi.org/10.32528/agr.v14i2.437
Copyright (c) 2023 Elys fauziyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.