The Potential of Cellulolytic Bacteria to Control Heart Rot Disease (Phytophthora nicotianae) on Pineapple

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.31.3.597

Keywords:

Bacillus subtilis, biological control agents, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Abstract

Pineapple (Ananas comosus) is a high-value horticultural commodity whose productivity is frequently reduced by heart rot disease caused by the soil-borne pathogen Phytophthora sp., which can lead to severe infections and yield losses of up to 100%. Cellulolytic bacteria, known for producing hydrolytic enzymes, volatile compounds, and antimicrobial metabolites, are promising biological control agents. This study aimed to isolate and evaluate cellulolytic bacteria from the rhizosphere of Bromeliaceae plants with the potential to inhibit Phytophthora sp. Research activities included rhizobacterial isolation, pathogen identification, cellulolytic screening, biosafety assessment, antagonistic assays (in vitro and semi-in vivo), and molecular characterization of promising isolates. Molecular identification of the pathogen using ITS1/ITS4 primers confirmed its close similarity to the Phytophthora nicotianae strain BG4K3b. Nineteen cellulolytic were obtained, exhibiting diverse cellulolytic indices. Dual culture assays identified A45 (47.11%) and FTA22 (40.99%) as the most effective isolates, whereas volatile compound assays revealed the highest inhibition by FT57 (55.18%) and K5 (44.98%). Semi-in vivo assays on five isolates selected through the Analytic Hierarchy Process demonstrated that all isolates could inhibit lesion development, with FT57 and A45 showing the highest reductions of 73.74% and 71.81%, respectively. Both isolates also produced indole-3-acetic-acid, solubilized phosphate, and exhibited cellulolytic index of 1.83 and 1.18. Molecular identification using 16S rRNA gene amplification (27F/1492R) indicated that FT57 was similar to Bacillus subtilis MS7, whereas A45 was similar to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Y042. Overall, the isolates FT57 and A45 exhibited strong potential for development as biological control agents to manage heart rot disease in pineapple.

Keywords: Bacillus subtilis, biological control agents, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin Z, Gunam IBW, Antara NS, Setiyo Y. 2019. Isolation of cellulolytic bacteria degrading cellulose from compost. Journal of Agroindustrial Engineering and Management. 7(1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.24843/JRMA.2019.v07.i01.p04

Barnett HL, Hunter BB. 1972. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi 2th Edition. West Virginia (US): Burgress Publishing Company

[BPS] Statistics Indonesia. 2025. Production of annual fruit and vegetable crops by province and crop type, 2024. Jakarta (ID): BPS.

Bua B, Karungi J, Kawube G. 2013. Occurrence and effects of pineapple mealy bug wilt disease in central Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 3: 410–416.

Choi YW, Hodgkiss IJ, Hyde KD. 2005. Enzyme production by endophytes of Brucea javanica. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 1: 55–66.

Cooke DEL, Duncan JM. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of the ribosomal RNA gene repeat. Mycological Research. 101: 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756296003218

Hashem A, Tabassum B, Fathi AAE. 2019. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi Journal Biology Science. 26(6): 1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004

Jasper O, Bosco B, Akasari O. 2019. Quantification of yield loss to pineapple heart rot disease on pineapple cultivars in Uganda. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 41(1): 6784–6792. https://doi.org/10.35759/JAnmPlSci.v41-1.5

Jeon S, Krasnow CS, Kirby CK, Granke LL, Hausbeck MK, Zhang W. 2016. Transport and Retention of Phytophthora capsici Zoospores in Saturated Porous Media. Environmental Science & Technology. 50(17): 9270–9278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01784

Manns JM, Mosser DM, Buckley HR. 1994. Production of a hemolytic factor by Candida albicans. Infection and Immunity. 62:5154–5156. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.62.11.5154-5156.1994

Ngo VA, San LW, Van BN, Chien TD, Thi NT, Dinh MH, Trung DT, Anh DN. 2020. Antagonism against Phytophthora by endophytic bacteria isolated from roots of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Agronomy. 10(2): 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020286

Puspawati NMI, Atmaja IWD, Sutari NWS. 2018. Exploration of cellulolytic bacteria from organic waste in Denpasar City. Tropical Agroecotechnology Journal. 7(3): 363–373.

Raaijmakers JM, De Bruijn I, Nybroe O, Ongena M. 2010. Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and Pseudomonas: more than surfactants and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiology. 34(6): 1037–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x

Rikawati AM, Dewi YSK, Lestari OA. 2018. Evaluation of meat puree and pineapple core puree (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr) formulation in cookies production. Equator Agricultural Science Journal. 8(2): 1–11.

Rodriguez H, Fraga R. 1999. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology Advances. 17: 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2

Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Paré PW. 2004. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 134: 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.026583

Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 1(1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Shaikh NM, Patel AA, Mehta SA, Patel ND. 2013. Isolation and screening of cellulolytic bacteria inhabiting different environments and optimization of cellulase production. Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology. 3(1): 39–49.

Shen HF, Lin BR, Zhan JX, Pu XM. 2013. First report of pineapple heart rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae in Hainan Province, China. Plant Disease. 97(4): 560–560. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-12-1017-PDN

Suriani S, Muis A. 2016. Prospects of Bacillus subtilis as a biological control agent against soil-borne pathogens in maize. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development. 35(1): 37–45.

Tang A, Haruna AO, Majid NMA, Jalloh MB. 2020. Potential PGPR properties of cellulolytic, nitrogen-fixing, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in rehabilitated tropical forest soil. Microorganisms. 8(3): 442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991

Teather RM, Wood PJ. 1982. Use of congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 43(4): 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982

Wang Z, Yun S, An Y, Shu L, Li S, Sun K, Zhang W. 2025. Effect of fungicides on soil respiration, microbial community, and enzyme activity: A global meta-analysis (1975–2024). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 289: 117433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117433

Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology. 173(2): 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Sitanggang, R.S., Giyanto, G. and Tondok, E.T. (2026) “The Potential of Cellulolytic Bacteria to Control Heart Rot Disease (Phytophthora nicotianae) on Pineapple”, Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 31(3), pp. 597–604. doi:10.18343/jipi.31.3.597.