<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.6.544</article-id><title-group><article-title>Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Local Chicken in Burkina Faso</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pindé</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ouédraogo</surname><given-names>R. W.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tapsoba</surname><given-names>A. S. R.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pilabré</surname><given-names>E. A. W.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sawadogo</surname><given-names>S. E.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>F. G.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ba</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sanou</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tamboura</surname><given-names>H. H.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Periasamy</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><address><country>Austria</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Simporé</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><address><country>Burkina Faso</country></address><xref rid="AFF-3" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1">Laboratoire de Biologie et Santé Animales (LaBioSA), Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA)</aff><aff id="AFF-2">International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-Animal Production and Health Laboratory</aff><aff id="AFF-3">Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et de Génétique (LABIOGENE), Université Joseph KI-ZERBO (UJKZ)</aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-9-3" publication-format="electronic"><day>3</day><month>9</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-9-3" publication-format="electronic"><day>3</day><month>9</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal (Issue in progress)</issue-title><fpage>544</fpage><lpage>555</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-4-1"><day>1</day><month>4</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/72419" xlink:title="Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Local Chicken in Burkina Faso">Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Local Chicken in Burkina Faso</self-uri><abstract><p>Poultry farming plays a vital role in rural livelihoods and is a primary source of animal protein in Burkina Faso. However, the increasing introduction of fast-growing exotic breeds threatens the genetic integrity of local chicken populations. This study aimed to assess the genetic diversity and structure of local chickens using 27 microsatellite markers, of which 23 were selected and 19 polymorphic markers were retained for analysis. A total of 116 individuals from local populations were genotyped, along with 20 individuals of the exotic broiler breed Cobb 500 for comparison. Genetic diversity, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, genetic distances, and population structure were evaluated using Bayesian and multivariate approaches. Results showed that 19 loci were polymorphic, revealing high allelic diversity with 117 alleles and a mean of 6.16 alleles per locus. The overall heterozygosity deficit (FIS) was low (0.04). Genetic differentiation among all populations was moderate (FST = 0.10), with higher differentiation between local populations and the exotic breed (FST = 0.19) and very low differentiation among local subpopulations (maximum FST = 0.04). Phylogenetic and Bayesian analyses indicated high admixture among local chickens, suggesting a largely homogeneous genetic structure, although the Sahelian population appeared slightly distinct. Evidence of introgression from exotic breeds was also observed, particularly in the Sudanian and Sudano-Sahelian zones. In conclusion, the local chickens of Burkina Faso form a single, weakly structured genetic pool characterized by high allelic diversity and a low heterozygosity deficit.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>diversity</kwd><kwd>structure</kwd><kwd>microsatellite</kwd><kwd>chickens</kwd><kwd>Burkina Faso</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Indigenous chickens play a major socio-economic role in low- and middle-income countries by contributing to household income, food security, and nutrition, particularly in rural communities. In sub-Saharan Africa, village chicken production systems remain essential because they require low inputs and are well adapted to local environmental conditions, including high temperatures, disease pressure, and feed scarcity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Mogano et al., 2024)</xref>. In Burkina Faso, poultry production represents one of the most accessible livestock activities for rural households and contributes substantially to animal protein supply and poverty alleviation. Recent national statistics estimated the poultry population at more than 44 million birds, of which approximately 90% belong to traditional village production systems dominated by indigenous chickens <xref rid="BIBR-22" ref-type="bibr">(M.R.A.H./D.G.E.S.S., 2023)</xref>. Despite their adaptive advantages, local chicken populations in Burkina Faso face increasing genetic pressure due to the rapid dissemination of exotic commercial breeds and uncontrolled crossbreeding practices. Improved breeds are increasingly introduced to enhance meat and egg production; however, continuous introgression may progressively erode the unique genetic resources of indigenous populations. Similar concerns have been reported in several African countries, where genomic studies have revealed substantial gene flow and introgression between indigenous and exotic poultry populations, potentially affecting the conservation of locally adapted genetic resources <xref rid="BIBR-26" ref-type="bibr">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Lawal et al., 2018)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Lawal &amp; Hanotte, 2021)</xref>. Indigenous chickens possess valuable adaptive traits, including tolerance to harsh tropical environments, scavenging ability, and resistance to endemic diseases, making their conservation strategically important for sustainable livestock production under climate change conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Gheyas et al., 2021)</xref>. The characterization of animal genetic resources is therefore considered a priority for the development of sustainable breeding and conservation strategies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Leroy et al., 2018)</xref> reported that the diversity of animal genetic resources underpins a broad range of ecosystem services, underlining the need to characterize and conserve indigenous livestock populations. Advances in molecular genetics have considerably improved the assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in poultry populations. Although single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) technologies and whole-genome sequencing are increasingly used in population genomics studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Zhi et al., 2023)</xref>, microsatellite markers remain highly informative and cost-effective tools for evaluating genetic diversity, population differentiation, and introgression patterns, particularly in developing-country contexts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Zhuang et al., 2023)</xref>. Several studies have investigated the genetic diversity of indigenous chickens in Africa and Asia using microsatellite and genomic approaches, revealing substantial within-population diversity but generally weak population structuring associated with extensive gene flow and traditional free-ranging management systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Fathi et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Mwambene et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Nxumalo et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Xu et al., 2023)</xref>. In Burkina Faso, previous investigations mainly focused on phenotypic and morphobiometric characterization of indigenous chickens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Pindé et al., 2020)</xref>, while molecular characterization remains relatively limited. Previous molecular studies on indigenous chickens in Burkina Faso mainly focused on selected ecotypes and revealed substantial genetic diversity with weak population structuring <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Yacouba et al., 2022)</xref>. That study focused on specific ecotypes from selected regions; however, comprehensive assessments integrating all major agro-ecological zones of Burkina Faso and explicitly evaluating potential introgression from commercial breeds remain limited. The present study differs from former studies in several key aspects: (i) it encompasses populations from three distinct agro-ecological zones using a broader geographic sampling framework covering six regions and 57 villages; (ii) it explicitly includes a commercial exotic breed (Cobb 500) as a reference population to quantify introgression levels; and (iii) it applies additional multivariate approaches to resolve population structure. Moreover, beyond cost considerations, microsatellite markers are highly informative, technically accessible with standard PCR equipment, require no specialized bioinformatics pipelines, and are endorsed by the FAO for genetic characterization of livestock in low-resource settings (FAO, 2007). Understanding the genetic structure and diversity of indigenous chickens is essential for designing breeding programs, conserving adaptive genetic resources, and limiting uncontrolled genetic erosion. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure of local chicken populations from different agro-ecological zones of Burkina Faso using microsatellite markers and to assess their phylogenetic relationships and potential introgression with exotic commercial chickens.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Sampling Sites</title><p>The present study was conducted in Burkina Faso between July 2023 and October 2025. It encompassed six regions: Centre, Centre-East, Centre-North, Central Plateau, Hauts-Bassins, and Sahel. In each region, one province was selected. Across the six provinces, surveys were carried out in 11 municipalities covering a total of 57 villages. </p></sec><sec><title>Biological Material</title><p>The survey conducted in the present study focused on the subspecies <italic>Gallus gallus domesticus</italic>, primarily on the local chicken population of Burkina Faso and on the exotic broiler breed “Cobb 500”. The selection of the subspecies <italic>Gallus gallus domesticus</italic> was based on its predominance in rural poultry production systems, whereas Cobb 500 is mainly used in peri-urban poultry farms. Regarding the local chicken population of Burkina Faso, the different breeds or strains it may comprise are insufficiently described and inventoried within the country. This species therefore constitutes an appropriate model for a genetic characterization study. The biological material consisted of local breed chickens with a minimum estimated reproductive age of six months and the exotic “Cobb500” breed, with an estimated age of 35 days. Age estimation of the chickens was provided by the farmers themselves, based on their knowledge of their flocks.</p></sec><sec><title>Sample Collections</title><p>The study focused on traditional poultry production systems. Breeders were selected based on two criteria: a minimum flock size of three reproductive-age birds and sufficient geographic distance between farms (at least 1 km) to limit animal exchanges. All birds within each flock, including hens, pullets, roosters, and cockerels, were considered. According to these conditions, 10 to 15 breeders per municipality were chosen by the heads of the Livestock Technical Support Units (ZATE). At the time of the survey, each breeder owned at least three adult birds and was interviewed using a structured questionnaire.</p><p>Blood samples were collected from 325 unrelated local individuals and 20 exotic Cobb 500 birds using 3 mL syringes and 5 mL tubes containing EDTA. Due to financial constraints limiting laboratory genotyping costs, a subset of 116 individuals (96 local chickens distributed proportionally across the three agro-ecological zones and 20 exotic Cobb 500 birds) was selected for genotyping. Between 2 and 3 ml of blood per bird was obtained via brachial vein puncture. To avoid related sampling and ensure genetic diversity, a maximum of three local hens per flock were sampled. Additionally, 20 hens of the exotic Cobb 500 breed were collected from one farm. Samples were stored at +4 °C until DNA extraction.</p></sec><sec><title>DNA Extraction</title><p>Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the MasterPure DNA Purification Kit (Biozym Illumina Inc., USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at + 4 °C until polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.</p></sec><sec><title>PCR Amplification and Genotyping</title><p>A conventional PCR was performed using 23 microsatellite markers selected from 27 initially screened. Of these, four were excluded due to monomorphism or amplification failure, and 19 polymorphic markers were retained for analysis. The microsatellites were labeled with one of three fluorescent dyes (FAM, HEX, or ATTO550). PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 50 seconds, primer annealing for 50 seconds at 53, 55, 57, 58, or 60 °C (depending on the optimal annealing temperature of each marker), and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute, with a final extension step of 10 minutes at 72 °C.</p><p>PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis following multiplexing on an automated DNA analyzer (SeqStudio, Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific), using LIZ600 (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) as the internal size standard. The 23 microsatellite loci were multiplexed into five panels for genotyping, as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>. Genotypes were subsequently scored using GeneMapper v4.1 software (Applied Biosystems, USA).</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>List and characteristics of the markers used to genotype the local chicken <italic>(Gallus gallus domesticus)</italic> populations of Burkina Faso and the exotic Cobb 500 breed</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Panel no</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Locus</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Primer sequences</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Fluorescent dye</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Allele size range</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Annealing temperature</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">ADL0112-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GGCTTAAGCTGACCCATTAT</td><td align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="top">HEX</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">120-134</td><td rowspan="2" valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">58°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1 </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">ADL0112-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">ATCTCAAATGTAATGCGTGC</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0016-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATGGCGCAGAAGGCAAAGCGATAT</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATTO550</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">120-180</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">60°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0016-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TGGCTTCTGAAGCAGTTGCTATGG</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0034-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TGCACGCACTTACATACTTAGAGA</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">FAM</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">211-247</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1 </td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0034-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TGTCCTTCCAATTACATTCATGGG</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0295-F</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">ATCACTACAGAACACCCTCTC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">FAM</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">81-109</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">62°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1 </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">MCW0295-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TATGTATGCACGCAGATATCC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0330-F</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">TGGACCTCATCAGTCTGACAG</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HEX</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">246-300</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">64°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1 </td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0330-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">AATGTTCTCATAGAGTTCCTGC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">LEI0094-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GATCTCACCAGTATGAGCTGC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">HEX</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">247-287</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">62°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">LEI0094-R</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">TCTCACACTGTAACACAGTGC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0014-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TATTGGCTCTAGGAACTGTC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATTO550</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">165-189</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">62°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0014-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GAAATGAAGGTAAGACTAGC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0078-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">CCACACGGAGAGGAGAAGGTCT</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">HEX</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">135-147</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">62°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0078-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TAGCATATGAGTGTACTGAGCTTC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">MCW0111-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GCTCCATGTGAAGTGGTTTA</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">FAM</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">96-120</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">60°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2 </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">MCW0111-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATGTCCACTTGTCAATGATG</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">ADL0278-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">CCAGCAGTCTACCTTCCTAT</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">FAM</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">99-127</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">58°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ADL0278-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TGTCATCCAAGAACAGTGTG</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center"></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0067-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GCACTACTGTGTGCTGCAGTTT</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATTO550</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">174-186</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3 </td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0067-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GAGATGTAGTTGCCACATTCCGAC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0098-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GGCTGCTTTGTGCTCTTCTCG</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HEX</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">255-265</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0098-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">CGATGGTCGTAATTCTCACGT</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0206-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">CTTGACAGTGATGCATTAAATG</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">FAM</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">221-249</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">58°C</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3 </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">MCW0206-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ACATCTAGAATTGACTGTTCAC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0216-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GGGTTTTACAGGATGGGACG</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HEX</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">136-150</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">60°C</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0216-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">AGTTTCACTCCCAGGGCTCG</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">ADL0268-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">CTCCACCCCTCTCAGAACTA</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">FAM</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">102-116</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">60°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">ADL0268-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">CAACTTCCCATCTACCTACT</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0037-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ACCGGTGCCATCAATTACCTATTA</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">HEX</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">152-160</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">64°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0037-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GAAAGCTCACATGACACTGCGAAA</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0103-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">AACTGCGTTGAGAGTGAATGC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HEX</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">264-276</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">62°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0103-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TTTCCTAACTGGATGCTTCTG</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0104-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TAGCACAACTCAAGCTGTGAG</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATTO550</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">190-234</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">64°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0104-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">AGACTTGCACAGCTGTGTACC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">LEI0192-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">TGCCAGAGCTTCAGTCTGT</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">FAM</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">244-370</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">62°C</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">5 </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">LEI0192-R</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GTCATTACTGTTATGTTTATTGC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCW0069-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GCACTCGAGAAAACTTCCTGCG</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HEX</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">155-177</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">62°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0069-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">ATTGCTTCAGCAAGCATGGGAGGA</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0081-F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GTTGCTGAGAGCCTGGTGCAG</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">FAM</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">107-135</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">60°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0081-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">CCTGTATGTGGAATTACTTCTC</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">MCW0183-F</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ATCCCAGTGTCGAGTATCCGA</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HEX</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">292-326</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">58°C</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0183-R</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">TGAGATTTACTGGAGCCTGCC</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Data Analysis</title><p>The software Micro-Checker version 2.2.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Oosterhout et al., 2004)</xref> was used to detect and account for null alleles. Genetic diversity indices, including the mean number of observed alleles (Na), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and Wright’s F-statistics, were calculated using MICROSATELLITE ANALYZER (MSA) version 3.15 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Dieringer &amp; Schlotterer, 2003)</xref>. Exact tests for heterozygote excess and deficit relative to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were performed using GENEPOP version 1.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Raymond &amp; Rousset, 1995)</xref>. Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) was estimated using CERVUS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Kalinowski et al., 2007)</xref>. The Estimated Heterozygosity deficit (FIS) values per locus across all populations were determined using the jackknife method over loci, and confidence intervals were estimated by bootstrapping over loci. The significance of FIS values was inferred based on 95% confidence intervals. The FIS of <xref rid="BIBR-39" ref-type="bibr">(Weir &amp; Cockerham, 1984)</xref> was calculated using FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Goudet, 2002)</xref>. The Fixation Index (F<sub>ST</sub>) values were estimated per locus across all populations using FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Goudet, 2002)</xref>, applying the jackknife procedure over loci and bootstrapping to generate 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was inferred from the 95% confidence intervals. The Overall genetic variation (FIT) values were also calculated per locus across all populations using FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 <xref rid="BIBR-10" ref-type="bibr">(Goudet, 2002)</xref>, with jackknife and bootstrap procedures over loci, and significance was assessed using 95% confidence intervals. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed using Arlequin v.3.5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Excoffier &amp; Lischer, 2010)</xref>. The significance of the variance components was assessed using 10,000 permutations (α = 0.05). The proportions of shared alleles among individuals and among populations, calculated using Microsatellite Analyzer (MSA) version 3.15 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Dieringer &amp; Schlotterer, 2003)</xref>, were used to construct phylogenetic trees of individuals and populations based on the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method implemented in PHYLIP version 3.5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Felsenstein, 1989)</xref>. The robustness of tree nodes was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 resampling iterations. Dendrograms were visualized using MEGA version X <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Kumar et al., 2018)</xref>. To investigate the occurrence of independent genetic clusters (K) and to assign each individual to the population in which its genotype had the highest probability of occurrence, Structure version 2.3.4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Pritchard et al., 2000)</xref> was used. This program applies a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach based on a clustering model to infer population genetic structure and to assess individual assignment to populations according to a membership probability (Q), representing the proportion of ancestry from inferred clusters. Results generated by STRUCTURE were analyzed using Structure Harvester <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Earl &amp; VonHoldt, 2012)</xref> to determine the most likely number of genetic clusters (K) based on the log-likelihood method L(K) and the Evanno method through the modal distribution of ΔK values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Evanno et al., 2005)</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS </title><sec><title>Biodiversity and Inbreeding Estimates</title><p>Of the 23 microsatellite markers initially screened, 19 were polymorphic and retained for analysis, generating 2,204 genotypes across 116 individuals. A total of 117 alleles were detected (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). The Sudano-Sahelian subpopulation (SDS) showed the highest allelic count (83), followed by the Sudanian (77) and Sahelian (75) groups, while the exotic population (EXO) had the lowest (70). Across loci, allele numbers (Na) ranged from 2 (MCW0098)  to 13 (MCW0034 and LEI0192), with a mean of 6.16 per locus. Mean number of alleles per population varied slightly among zones (SDS: 4.37; SD: 4.05; SHL: 3.95; EXO: 3.68). Observed heterozygosity (Ho) ranged from 0.192 (MCW0248) to 0.686 (ADL0278) with a mean of 0.484, while expected heterozygosity (He) varied from 0.180 (MCW0248) to 0.702 (MCW0111) with a mean of 0.545. The mean PIC was 0.486, with 42.1% of loci below 0.50. Allelic richness (Rt) ranged from 1.52 (MCW0248) to 3.18 (LEI0192), averaging 2.51 alleles per locus.</p><p>Among the 76 locus x population combinations analyzed, 36.84% showed significant deviation (p&lt;0.05) from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium due to heterozygote deficiency, while 5.26% deviated due to heterozygote excess. No significant deficiency-related deviation was observed in the SHL subpopulation. In contrast, four (04) loci showed heterozygote deficiency in the SDS subpopulation (MCW0034, MCW0330, MCW0206, MCW0081) and four (04) in the SD subpopulation (MCW0295, MCW0330, MCW0111, MCW0069), while one (01) locus (MCW0081) was affected in the EXO population. Only one (01) significant case of heterozygote excess was detected at locus MCW0067 in the EXO population (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Genetic variability parameters of the different chicken populations studied per locus</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">LOCI</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="4">Variability parameters</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="5">Na per population</th></tr><tr><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Ho</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">He</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">PIC</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Rt</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Na</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SDS</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SHL</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">SD</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">EXO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0034</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.589</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.630</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.605</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.094</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0295</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.564</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.637</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.583</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.876</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0330</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.277</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.455</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.427</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.356</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">LEI0094</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.478</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.486</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.450</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.426</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0078</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.539</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.571</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.514</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.566</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0111</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.632</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.702</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.643</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.052</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">ADL0278</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.686</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.639</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.559</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.673</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0067</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.396</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.442</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.399</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.193</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0098</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.382</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.499</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.373</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.967</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0206</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.609</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.648</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.583</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.837</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0216</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.441</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.503</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.385</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.018</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">ADL0268</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.518</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.619</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.583</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.930</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0037</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.504</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.533</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.439</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.235</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0103</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.292</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.302</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.264</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.760</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">LEI0192</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.651</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.700</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.648</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.181</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0069</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.485</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.587</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.500</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.483</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0081</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.417</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.592</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.504</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.472</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0183</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.542</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.621</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.597</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.076</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0248</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.192</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.180</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.171</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.519</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Total</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">117</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">83</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">75</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">77</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">70</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Mean</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.484</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.545</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.486</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.511</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.158</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.368</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.947</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.053</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.684</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note = Ho: observed heterozygosity; He: Expected heterozygosity; PIC: Polymorphism Information content; Rt: Allelic richness; Na: Mean number of observed alleles; SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Results of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test by locus and chicken population</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">LOCI</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="4">Heterozygote deficiency</th><th align="center" colspan="4" valign="middle">Heterozygote excess</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">SDS</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SHL</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">SD</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">EXO</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SDS</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">SHL</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SD</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">EXO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0034</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.96</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.88</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.10</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.08</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.92</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0295</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.22</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.68</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.08</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.79</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.42</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0330</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.17</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.14</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.99</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.97</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.98</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.86</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">LEI0094</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.87</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.74</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.47</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.57</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.33</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.49</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.62</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0078</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.59</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.61</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">1.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.42</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.43</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.88</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0111</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.08</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.77</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.04</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.92</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.23</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.96</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.18</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">ADL0278</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.77</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.88</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.24</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.80</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.95</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0067</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">1.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.20</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.68</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.99</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.66</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.86</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.58</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0098</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.72</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.15</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.51</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.57</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.96</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.81</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.97</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0206</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.09</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.71</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.92</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.93</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.39</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0216</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.62</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.66</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.17</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.82</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.67</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.62</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.93</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">ADL0268</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.21</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.12</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.29</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.86</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.88</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.89</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.74</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.24</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0037</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.27</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.47</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.75</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.15</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.83</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.77</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.27</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.86</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0103</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.50</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.44</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.98</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.90</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.95</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.18</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">LEI0192</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.29</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.14</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.60</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.96</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.75</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.89</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.52</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0069</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.56</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.11</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.59</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.91</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0081</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.77</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.70</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.03</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.97</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.49</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.41</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0183</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.22</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.58</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.58</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.85</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.84</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.60</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.58</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.21</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0248</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.88</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.89</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.96</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.63</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Loci deviating significantly from HWE equilibrium (p&lt;0.5) are marked in bold. SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Genetic Relationships and Population Structure</title><p>Across all populations, FIS values ranged from - 0.16 (ADL0278) to 0.36 (MCW0330), with an overall mean of 0.04. About 26.31% of loci showed heterozygote excess (FIS &lt; 0). The overall FIT indicated a 13% heterozygote deficiency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>), with values between - 0.07 (MCW0248) and 0.41 (MCW0330). Considering all loci, the F<sub>ST</sub> value was moderate (0.10), suggesting that 10% of the total genetic variation was due to differences among subpopulations.</p><p>Pairwise F<sub>ST</sub> values among subpopulations and between each subpopulation and the total population showed varying levels of genetic differentiation. F<sub>ST </sub>ranged from 0.03, observed between SDS-SHL and SD-SHL, to 0.19, recorded between each local subpopulation and the EXO population. The highest genetic differentiation occurred between local chickens and the exotic population, accounting for 19% of total genetic variation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>). Among local subpopulations, SDS-SHL and SD-SHL showed the lowest pairwise FST values (0.03 each), indicating equally close genetic relationships. The greatest differentiation among local groups was between SDS and SD (F<sub>ST</sub> = 0.04). Nei’s genetic distances followed a similar trend, being high (≥ 0.18) between local and exotic populations and low (0.05) between SHL and SDS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>). These results show, therefore, stronger genetic divergence between local and exotic chickens than within local subpopulations.</p><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>The values of some F-statistics by locus in the chicken populations studied</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"> LOCUS</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">FIT</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">FST</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">FIS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0034</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0295</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0330</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.41</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.08</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">LEI0094</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.09</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.05</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0078</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0111</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.12</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">ADL0278</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.11</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.16</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0067</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.16</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.22</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.08</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0098</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.27</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.19</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.10</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0206</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.00</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0216</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.15</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.12</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.04</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">ADL0268</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.18</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.10</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">MCW0037</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0103</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.02</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">LEI0192</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.09</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.02</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0069</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.19</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.13</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0081</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.34</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.24</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCW0183</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.18</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCW0248</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.00</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.07</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Mean</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.10</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note : F<sub>IS</sub> = Estimated Heterozygosity deficit; F<sub>IT</sub>= Overall genetic variation; F<sub>ST</sub>= Fixation Index among Subpopulations</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Pairwise FST values (lower triangle) and Nei’s genetic distances (upper triangle) among the chicken populations studied</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Type of chicken</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">SDS</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">SHL</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">SD</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">EXO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">SDS</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.05</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.18</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">SHL</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.03</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.07</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.20</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">SD</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.04</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.03</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">-</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.20</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">EXO</td><td colspan="1" valign="bottom" align="center">0.19</td><td valign="bottom" align="center" colspan="1">0.19</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">0.19</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="bottom">-</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note:	SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The AMOVA results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 6.</xref> Without hierarchical grouping, analyses showed that 9.63% of the total genetic variation was distributed among populations, whereas 90.37% was distributed within populations, with a significant overall differentiation (p&lt;0.001). Under Grouping I (EXO vs. SD, SDS, and SHL), 16.54% of the total variation was attributed to differences among groups, 2.92% to variation among populations within groups, and 80.53% to variation within populations, with all variance components being significant (p&lt;0.001). Under Grouping III (SD vs. SDS and SHL), the variance component among groups was negative (-1.34%) and non-significant (p = 0.792), whereas 4.59% of the variation occurred among populations within groups and 96.74% within populations, both showing significant differentiation (p&lt;0.001).</p><p>The phylogenetic tree based on shared allele proportions revealed that Burkina Faso local chicken subpopulations and the exotic population were grouped into three distinct clades with strong bootstrap support (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 1</xref>). The first clade separated the SHL subpopulation from the others. The second clade clearly distinguished the SD subpopulation from SDS and EXO, with very high support (100%). The third clade, supported by a bootstrap value of 57%, differentiated the SDS subpopulation from the EXO population.</p><p>The phylogenetic tree based on shared allele proportions among individuals showed partial clustering patterns across subpopulations. SHL individuals tended to group together, although their cluster overlapped with many SD individuals. SD individuals displayed a less defined structure, with branching that sometimes included SDS individuals. Overall, the tree revealed a heterogeneous arrangement, mixing individuals from different subpopulations, with only partial clustering observed for EXO and SDS individuals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table-6" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 6</label><caption><p> Analysis of molecular variance among Burkina Faso chicken populations</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Group</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Source of variation</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Sum of squares</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Variance components</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Percentage of variation</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">P-Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left">No Grouping</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Among population</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">84.64</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.4777</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.62</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.000</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Within populations</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">894.346</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.48501</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">90.37</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.000</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="top" align="left">Grouping I (Group I = EXO; Group II = SD, SDS, SHL)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Among groups</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">55.242</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.92128</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.54</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Among population</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">29.405</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.16278</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.92</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.000</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Within populations</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">894.346</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.48501</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">80.53</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.000</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3">Grouping III (Group I = SD; Group II = SDS; SHL)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Among groups</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.139</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.06079</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-1.33</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.792</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Among population</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">16.265</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.20899</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.59</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.000</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Within populations</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">760.228</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.40229</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">96.74</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.000</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note = SD : Local chickens from the Sudanian zone ; EXO : Exotic chickens ; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone ; SDS : Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Phylogenetic tree of Neighbor Joining based on distances between subpopulations</p></caption><p>SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone.</p><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72419/version/52905/34103/417439"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Phylogenetic tree of Neighbor Joining based on inter-individual distances in the 3 local chicken subpopulations and the EXO chicken population</p></caption><p> (SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone). </p><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72419/version/52905/34103/417440"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>The principal components derived from F<sub>ST</sub> values enabled the graphical representation of the different populations across the dimensions of the scatterplot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 3</xref>). The configuration of the plot displayed a three-dimensional triangle, with a basal tripod formed by the clustering of the local chicken subpopulations (SD, SDS, and SHL), and the apex represented by the EXO population.</p><p>To infer the cryptic genetic structure of local chicken populations in Burkina Faso, individuals from the different populations studied were clustered using a Bayesian approach. The results indicated that K = 4 best described the structure of the local chicken population sampled across the three agro-ecological zones of Burkina Faso in the present study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>The genotypic structure of Burkina Faso’s local chicken population revealed different patterns depending on the assumed number of ancestral populations (K) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 5)</xref>. At K = 1, the population appeared as a single homogeneous group. With K = 2, two distinct clusters emerged, clearly separating the EXO population from local subpopulations, although the latter still shared part of their genetic background with EXO. At K = 3, all local subpopulations (SDS, SD, and SHL) were distinguished from the EXO population, but showed mutual introgression, with only limited genetic contribution from EXO. Among them, SHL appeared less introgressed than SDS and SD. At the most informative level (K = 4), SDS and SD displayed strong introgression with other subpopulations. SHL also showed introgression, but some individuals retained a relatively conserved and homogeneous genetic background. Similarly, most EXO individuals exhibited a highly homogeneous genotypic structure.</p><fig id="figure-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Scatter plot showing the distribution of chicken populations according to the different principal components based on FST values </p></caption><p>(SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone).</p><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72419/version/52905/34103/417441"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>	Rate of change of the log-likelihood, L′(K), as a function of the number of clusters (K), used to determine the optimal K for the chicken populations studied following the Evanno method.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72419/version/52905/34103/417442"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Genetic structure of the local sub-populations and the EXO chicken population </p></caption><p>(SD: Local chickens from the Sudanian zone; EXO: Exotic chickens; SHL: Local chickens from the Sahelian zone; SDS: Local chickens from the Sudano-Sahelian zone).</p><graphic mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72419/version/52905/34103/417443" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION </title><sec><title>Biodiversity and Inbreeding Estimates</title><p>The microsatellite markers selected in this study have previously been used to characterize local chicken populations in Burkina Faso <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Yacouba et al., 2022)</xref>, Nigeria<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Manjula et al., 2021)</xref>, and Kenya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref>, as well as indigenous chicken populations across Asia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Rashid et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Roh et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Ren et al., 2022)</xref>. The number of alleles detected per locus indicated a sufficient level of polymorphism, since loci carrying several alleles allow allele-frequency differences among populations to be detected more readily and thus yield better-resolved estimates of genetic differentiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Sunde et al., 2020)</xref>. Accordingly, the 19 microsatellite markers used in the present study can be considered appropriate for assessing genetic diversity in the local chicken population of Burkina Faso, consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Long et al., 2017)</xref>, who likewise found 19 microsatellite loci to be highly polymorphic in nine local chicken breeds. All markers proved to be informative, with a mean polymorphism information content (PIC) of 0.486. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Botstein et al., 1980)</xref>, PIC values are classified into three categories : highly informative markers (PIC &gt; 0.5), reasonably informative markers (0.25 ≤ PIC ≤ 0.5), and slightly informative markers (PIC &lt; 0.25). In the present study, 52.63% of the microsatellite markers were highly informative, 42.11% were reasonably informative, and 5.26% were slightly informative. These proportions differ from those reported by Okumu et al. (2017), who found 100 % highly informative markers. These results reflect the moderate marker informativeness also reported for Ethiopian indigenous chicken ecotypes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Hailu et al., 2020)</xref>. The overall mean number of alleles per locus across all populations was 6.158. When comparing population-level allelic diversity, local chickens showed higher means (SDS: 4.37; SD: 4.05; SHL: 3.95) compared with the EXO population (3.684), a difference attributable to the open mating system prevailing in Burkina Faso local chickens, which favors the maintenance of a greater number of alleles. The lower allelic diversity observed in the EXO population is consistent with its origin from genetically selected individuals, in agreement with the reduced allelic diversity reported for commercial breeds relative to indigenous Asian populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Roh et al., 2020)</xref>. The mean allelic diversity per population observed here is lower than values reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref> for local chickens in Sri Lanka (ranging from 6.50 to 7.30). These differences may reflect the smaller sample size in this study, the different number of markers analyzed, and potentially higher historical admixture in Sri Lankan populations associated with their geographic position along ancient trade routes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref>. Substantial intra-population allelic variability was detected. Expected heterozygosity (He) exceeded observed heterozygosity (Ho) in all populations (local and EXO), except at loci ADL0278 (Ho = 0.686; He = 0.639) and MCW0248 (Ho = 0.192; He = 0.18), suggesting potential deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Results of HWE tests, together with positive FIS values in the local sub-populations, indicate a heterozygote deficit consistent with a low level of inbreeding (approximately 4%). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Wright, 1978)</xref>, FIS values below 0.05 are generally considered indicative of low inbreeding. Similar findings have been reported in African village chicken populations<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Traoré et al., 2018)</xref>, where poultry are typically raised under traditional systems with small flock sizes per household. No deliberate selection was practiced by farmers during the present study. Uncontrolled mating within small flocks likely contributed to the observed heterozygote deficit. The presence of null alleles and a potential Wahlund effect may also have influenced these results. However, the EXO population exhibited a negative FIS value, indicating heterozygote excess. A similar observation was reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref>, who attributed this pattern to controlled mating schemes in commercial populations, typically involving a limited number of selected males and females bred for either egg or meat production. The mean observed and expected heterozygosity values in the Burkina Faso local chicken population (Ho = 0.484; He = 0.545) indicate a moderate level of genetic diversity, consistent with the substantial phenotypic variability observed. The expected heterozygosity falls within the range reported for African and Asian local chicken populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Manjula et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Yacouba et al., 2022)</xref>. The relatively high diversity observed in the Burkinabè populations is consistent with their random mating system. The absence of organized selection for specific production traits and the occurrence of uncontrolled crossbreeding likely promote continuous gene flow among local sub-populations. Comparable patterns have been reported in other African local chicken populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-20" ref-type="bibr">(Manjula et al., 2021)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Genetic Relationships and Population Structure</title><p>The overall F<sub>ST</sub> value obtained in the present study indicates moderate genetic differentiation among the sub-populations. Indeed, F<sub>ST</sub> values ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 are generally interpreted as reflecting moderate genetic differentiation<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Hall, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Nematbakhsh et al., 2024)</xref>. Despite the geographic distances separating the sub-populations (52-650 km), inter-population genetic differentiation remained low. This limited differentiation may be explained by the reproductive mode and extensive management system of local chickens, as well as bird movements associated with livestock mobility and commercial exchanges, which can generate substantial gene flow between regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-37" ref-type="bibr">(Traoré et al., 2018)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Tapsoba et al., 2024)</xref>. The low among-population component of variation is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Mwambene et al., 2019)</xref>, who found that only 2% of the total genetic variation in Tanzanian local chicken ecotypes was attributable to between-ecotype differences and with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Ajibike et al., 2022)</xref>, who reported greater within- than among-population variation in Nigerian indigenous chickens. The highest pairwise F<sub>ST </sub>values involved the EXO population (0.19). This likely reflects the distinct origin of exotic breeds and their more limited admixture with local populations compared to gene flow among local sub-populations. Moreover, exotic breeds are subject to directional selection and specialization, which may further accentuate genetic differentiation <xref rid="BIBR-41" ref-type="bibr">(Xu et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Nematbakhsh et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Wen et al., 2025)</xref>. The relatively lower F<sub>ST</sub> observed in Burkina Faso may also result from crossbreeding practices, whereby farmers mate local hens with improved cocks to enhance zootechnical performance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref>;  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Zhuang et al., 2023)</xref>. The lowest pairwise F<sub>ST</sub> values were observed between SDS-SHL and SD-SHL (both 0.03), followed by SDS-SD (0.04), indicating very small genetic distances. It is noteworthy that the NJ phylogenetic tree-based on shared allele proportions may yield a different topology from F<sub>ST</sub> rankings when pairwise distances are similarly low; the tree topology should therefore be interpreted in conjunction with the F<sub>ST</sub> matrix. These results suggest substantial gene flow between the Sudano-Sahelian agro-ecological zone (SDS) and the other local sub-populations (SD and SHL). Consequently, SDS, SD, and SHL are genetically close, sharing a high proportion of common alleles. Strong demand for local chicken meat in major urban centers such as Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso may also contribute to sustained commercial flows of birds toward these cities. Overall, a moderate level of genetic diversity is maintained both within and among local chicken sub-populations in Burkina Faso.</p><p>The AMOVA results obtained in the present study revealed that most of the genetic variation was distributed within populations rather than among populations, which is consistent with the general pattern commonly observed in indigenous chicken populations. Without hierarchical grouping, 90.37% of the total genetic variation was found within populations, whereas 9.63% was attributable to differences among populations, indicating moderate genetic differentiation among the studied populations. Under Grouping I, where EXO was separated from SD, SDS, and SHL, the proportion of variation among groups increased to 16.54%, while only 2.92% of the variation was observed among populations within groups. In contrast, Grouping III, which included SD, SDS, and SHL as separate groups, showed a non-significant variance component among groups, indicating weak genetic structuring among these populations. Overall, these results suggest that the main genetic differentiation in the dataset is driven by the divergence of EXO, whereas SD, SDS, and SHL are genetically closer to each other. These findings are broadly consistent with those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Yacouba et al., 2022)</xref> in indigenous chicken populations from Burkina Faso, where AMOVA also revealed that the majority of genetic variation was distributed within populations, with limited differentiation among ecotypes. Their study further identified a relatively distinct genetic structure for the Konde ecotype, which originates from the Sudan-Sahelian (SDS) zone. In the present study, however, no significant structuring was detected among SD, SDS, and SHL when analyzed separately, suggesting a lower level of differentiation among populations from this zone. This discrepancy may reflect differences in sampling design, population composition, or levels of gene flow and admixture across production systems. Nevertheless, both studies consistently highlight that indigenous chicken populations in Burkina Faso maintain high within-population genetic diversity and generally low to moderate population structure. </p><p>Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic analysis based on shared alleles revealed substantial overlap among individuals from different sub-populations, indicating weak genetic structuring at the population level relative to within-subpopulation variation. The SHL sub-population and the EXO population appeared relatively distinct from the others. Similar observations were reported by <xref rid="BIBR-26" ref-type="bibr">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref> in Kenyan local chickens and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref> in local chickens of Sri Lanka. In the case of the SHL sub-population, this relative distinctiveness may be associated with the limited introduction of improved breeding males in that region.</p><p>In the present study, allelic frequencies were used to assign genotypes based on probabilistic and Bayesian approaches. Individuals from the EXO population were correctly assigned at 100%, whereas individuals from the SDS, SHL, and SD ken population of Burkina Faso. A similar pattern of high admixture has been reported in other African local chicken populations, including those from Kenya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref>, Tanzania <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Mwambene et al., 2019)</xref>, and Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Manjula et al., 2021)</xref>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref>, such structuring reflects low differentiation and substantial gene flow. This contrasts with commercial reference populations, which typically display clearer genetic separation.</p><p>Clustering of local sub-populations according to agro-ecological zones was not supported, owing to low inter-population genetic differentiation. This absence of geographic structuring can be attributed to several interacting factors: (i) the traditional extensive management system promotes continuous gene flow across boundaries; (ii) commercial trade networks connecting rural areas to urban markets facilitate bird displacement across agro-ecological zones; and (iii) the absence of organized selective breeding prevents artificial divergence. The SHL sub-population appeared relatively distinct and showed the lowest level of introgression, possibly reflecting limited access by exotic breeds in the more remote Sahelian zone. Similar findings were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Okumu et al., 2017)</xref> in Kenya,  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Yacouba et al., 2022)</xref>in Burkina Faso, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Habimana et al., 2020)</xref> in Rwanda and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Samaraweera et al., 2021)</xref> in Sri Lanka. In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Xu et al., 2023)</xref> found that the structure of certain Chinese indigenous breeds strongly reflects their geographic distribution and distinct breeding histories.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>The present study provides a comprehensive assessment of the genetic diversity and population structure of local chickens across the major agroecological zones of Burkina Faso. Using microsatellite markers, we observed a relatively high level of genetic diversity, marked by substantial intra-population variability, high allelic richness, and heterozygosity. Despite the geographic and agroecological distribution of populations, no clear genetic structuring by agroecological origin was detected. Instead, the populations formed a single broad genetic complex shaped by continuous gene flow, with only limited introgression from commercial breeds. This high within-population diversity, combined with weak differentiation, indicates strong potential for genetic improvement and underscores the need for sustainable management and conservation of these local genetic resources.</p></sec><sec><title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title><p>We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial, personal, or other relationships with other people or organizations related to the material discussed in the manuscript.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>We would like to express our sincere gratitude to “Projet d’Appui au Développement de l’Elevage au Burkina Faso” (PADEL-B) for funding this thesis, and to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA, Project BKF5022) for providing equipment and reagents. We also extend our thanks to Dr. Kathiravan Periasamy for his valuable support.</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>During the preparation of this work, a generative AI tool was used to assist with the translation and summarization of certain sections of the manuscript. After using this tool, we carefully reviewed, edited, and validated the content as needed and took full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, and final content of the publication.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="how-to-cite"><title>How to Cite</title><p>Pindé, S., Ouédraogo, R. W. ., Tapsoba, A. S. R. ., Pilabré, E. A. W. ., Sawadogo, S. E., Traoré, F. G., Ba, S., Sanou, M., Tamboura, H. H., Traoré, A., Periasamy, K., &amp; Simporé, J. (2026). Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Local Chicken in Burkina Faso. <italic>Tropical Animal Science Journal</italic>, <italic>49</italic>(6), 544. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.6.544</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of Nigerian indigenous chicken populations inferred from microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus</source><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ajibike</surname><given-names>A.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adeniyi</surname><given-names>O.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ilori</surname><given-names>B.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Durosaro</surname><given-names>S.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Osinbowale</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adeleye</surname><given-names>O.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adebambo</surname><given-names>A.O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><page-range>61-67</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/397844" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="397844">397844</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms</article-title><source>American Journal of Human Genetics</source><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Botstein</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>R.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Skolnick</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>R.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1980</year><fpage>314</fpage><lpage>331</lpage><page-range>314-331</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1686077/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="PMC1686077">PMC1686077</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>MICROSATELLITE ANALYZER (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets</article-title><source>Molecular Ecology Notes</source><volume>3</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dieringer</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schlotterer</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><fpage>167</fpage><lpage>169</lpage><page-range>167-169</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00351.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method</article-title><source>Conservation Genetics Resources</source><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Earl</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>VonHoldt</surname><given-names>B.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>359</fpage><lpage>361</lpage><page-range>359-361</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study</article-title><source>Molecular Ecology</source><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Evanno</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Regnaut</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goudet</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><fpage>2611</fpage><lpage>2620</lpage><page-range>2611-2620</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows</article-title><source>Molecular Ecology Resources</source><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Excoffier</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lischer</surname><given-names>H.E.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><fpage>564</fpage><lpage>567</lpage><page-range>564-567</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Evaluation of genetic diversity of Saudi native chicken populations using microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>96</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fathi</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Homidan</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Motawei</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abou-Emera</surname><given-names>O.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Zarei</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>530</fpage><lpage>536</lpage><page-range>530-536</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pew357</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2</article-title><source>Cladistics</source><volume>5</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Felsenstein</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1989</year><fpage>164</fpage><lpage>166</lpage><page-range>164-166</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Integrated environmental and genomic analysis reveals the drivers of local adaptation in African indigenous chickens</article-title><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><volume>38</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gheyas</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vallejo-Trujillo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kebede</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lozano-Jaramillo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dessie</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanotte</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>4268</fpage><lpage>4285</lpage><page-range>4268-4285</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msab156</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>FSTAT version (2.9.3.2). A computer program to calculate F-Statistics</article-title><source>Journal of Heredity</source><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goudet</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><fpage>485</fpage><lpage>486</lpage><page-range>485-486</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken in Rwanda using microsatellite markers</article-title><source>PLoS ONE</source><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Habimana</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Okeno</surname><given-names>T.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ngeno</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mboumba</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Assami</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gbotto</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Keambou</surname><given-names>C.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishimwe</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahoro</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>0225084</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0225084</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic differentiation among livestock breeds-values for Fst</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>S.J.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1115</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12091115</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken ecotypes (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Ethiopia using LEI0258 microsatellite</article-title><source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hailu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kyallo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yohannes</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sendeku</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Getu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dagnachew</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dejen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolde</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Engdaw</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kidane</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dessie</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tarekegn</surname><given-names>G.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Githae</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pelle</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>102</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><page-range>102-110</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2020.102.110</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment</article-title><source>Molecular Ecology</source><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalinowski</surname><given-names>S.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Taper</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marshall</surname><given-names>T.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><fpage>1099</fpage><lpage>1106</lpage><page-range>1099-1106</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms</article-title><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stecher</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Knyaz</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamura</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>1547</fpage><lpage>1549</lpage><page-range>1547-1549</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msy096</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Whole-genome resequencing of red junglefowl and indigenous village chicken reveal new insights on the genome dynamics of the species</article-title><source>Frontiers in Genetics</source><volume>9</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lawal</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Atiyat</surname><given-names>R.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aljumaah</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mwacharo</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanotte</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>264</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2018.00264</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Domestic chicken diversity: Origin, distribution, and adaptation</article-title><source>Animal Genetics</source><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lawal</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanotte</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>385</fpage><lpage>394</lpage><page-range>385-394</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/age.13091</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Animal genetic resources diversity and ecosystem services</article-title><source>Global Food Security</source><volume>17</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leroy</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baumung</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boettcher</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Besbes</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>From</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>84</fpage><lpage>91</lpage><page-range>84-91</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic variation of nine chicken breeds collected from different altitudes revealed by microsatellites</article-title><source>The Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qing</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>18</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><page-range>18-25</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2141/jpsa.0160033</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>High levels of genetic variation in MHC-linked microsatellite markers from native chicken breeds</article-title><source>Genes</source><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manjula</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>240</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes12020240</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The risk status, signatures of adaptation, and environmental suitability of village-based indigenous chickens from certain regions of Limpopo and KwaZulu-Natal provinces of South Africa</article-title><source>Frontiers in Genetics</source><volume>15</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mogano</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mpofu</surname><given-names>T.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mtileni</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadebe</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1450939</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2024.1450939</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Annuaire statistique du Ministère des Ressources Animales et Halieutiques</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>M.R.A.H./D.G.E.S.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><publisher-loc>Burkina Faso</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity of 10 indigenous chicken ecotypes from Southern Highlands of Tanzania based on Major Histocompatibility Complex-linked microsatellite LEI0258 marker typing</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>98</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mwambene</surname><given-names>P.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kyallo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Machuka</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Githae</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pelle</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>2734</fpage><lpage>2746</lpage><page-range>2734-2746</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Identification and validation of novel breed-specific biomarker for the purpose of village chicken authentication using genomics approaches</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nematbakhsh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pei Pei</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nordin</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Selamat</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Idris</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdull Razis</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>104128</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2024.104128</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity, population structure and ancestral origin of KwaZulu-Natal native chicken ecotypes using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers</article-title><source>Italian Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nxumalo</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ceccobelli</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cardinali</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lancioni</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lasagna</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunene</surname><given-names>N.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1275</fpage><lpage>1288</lpage><page-range>1275-1288</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1828051X.2020.1838350</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity of indigenous chickens from selected areas in Kenya using microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology</source><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Okumu</surname><given-names>O.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ngeranwa</surname><given-names>J.J.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Binepal</surname><given-names>Y.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kahi</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bramwel</surname><given-names>W.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ateya</surname><given-names>L.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wekesa</surname><given-names>F.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>489</fpage><lpage>495</lpage><page-range>489-495</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.04.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Program Note: Microchecker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data</article-title><source>Molecular Ecology Notes</source><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oosterhout</surname><given-names>C.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hutchinson</surname><given-names>W.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wills</surname><given-names>D.P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shipley</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><fpage>535</fpage><lpage>538</lpage><page-range>535-538</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Caractérisation et typologie des systèmes d’élevage de la poule locale du Burkina Faso</article-title><source>Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences</source><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pindé</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tapsoba</surname><given-names>A.S.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ouédraogo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ba</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanou</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamboura</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Simporé</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>8212</fpage><lpage>8225</lpage><page-range>8212-8225</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35759/JAnmPlSci.v46-2.6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>155</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pritchard</surname><given-names>J.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stephens</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Donnelly</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><fpage>945</fpage><lpage>959</lpage><page-range>945-959</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/155.2.945</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken of Bangladesh using microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rashid</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manjula</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faruque</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhuiyan</surname><given-names>A.K.F.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhuiyan</surname><given-names>M.S.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1732</fpage><lpage>1740</lpage><page-range>1732-1740</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.20.0189</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism</article-title><source>Journal of Heredity</source><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raymond</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rousset</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1995</year><fpage>248</fpage><lpage>249</lpage><page-range>248-249</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Cambodian indigenous chickens</article-title><source>Animal Bioscience</source><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nunome</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>826</fpage><lpage>837</lpage><page-range>826-837</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ab.21.0351</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Estimating genetic diversity and population structure of 22 chicken breeds in Asia using microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roh</surname><given-names>H.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>C.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeon</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>K.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Afrin</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>Y.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Batsaikhan</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Susanti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hegay</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kongvongxay</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorkhali</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen Thi</surname><given-names>L.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thao</surname><given-names>T.T.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manikku</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1896</fpage><lpage>1904</lpage><page-range>1896-1904</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.19.0958</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>High genetic diversity but absence of population structure in local chickens of Sri Lanka inferred by microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Frontiers in Genetics</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samaraweera</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liyanage</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>M.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Okeyo</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>723706</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2021.723706</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparing the performance of microsatellites and RADseq in population genetic studies: Analysis of data for pike (Esox lucius) and a synthesis of previous studies</article-title><source>Frontiers in Genetics</source><volume>11</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sunde</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yıldırım</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tibblin</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Forsman</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>218</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2020.00218</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of taurine cattle using STR markers in Burkina Faso, West Africa</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tapsoba</surname><given-names>A.S.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sawadogo</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yougbaré</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>F.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Béré</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanou</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamboura</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bayala</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pichler</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Periasamy</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><page-range>131-140</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2024.47.2.131</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Characterization and typology of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) farming Systems in Burkina Faso</article-title><source>International Journal of Advanced Research</source><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>F.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bayala</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dayo</surname><given-names>G.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tapsoba</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ssoudré</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanou</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tindano</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamboura</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><page-range>6-21</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21474/IJAR01/6177</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genomic analyses reveal a lack of widespread strong selection in indigenous chickens</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>104</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>105081</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2025.105081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure</article-title><source>Evolution</source><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weir</surname><given-names>B.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cockerham</surname><given-names>C.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1984</year><fpage>1358</fpage><lpage>1370</lpage><page-range>1358-1370</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Pdf">Pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Evolution and the Genetics of Populations</article-title><volume>4</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1978</year><publisher-name>Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Whole-genome sequencing revealed genetic diversity, structure and patterns of selection in Guizhou indigenous chickens</article-title><source>BMC Genomics</source><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>570</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-023-09621-w</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of local chicken ecotypes in Burkina Faso using microsatellite markers</article-title><source>Genes</source><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yacouba</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Isidore</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Michel</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Isidore</surname><given-names>G.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boureima</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinsoun</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maurice</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ousseni</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moussa</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Valerie</surname><given-names>B.-Y.M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romdhane</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1523</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes13091523</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genome-wide genetic structure of Henan indigenous chicken breeds</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhi</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Geng</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>753</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani13040753</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Genetic diversity and breed identification of Chinese and Vietnamese local chicken breeds based on microsatellite analysis</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>101</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhuang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zong</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bi</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>182</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/skad182</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>