<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.5.440</article-id><title-group><article-title>Comparative Metabolomic Analysis of Lactating Saanen Goats with Different Milk Production Levels</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5311-0364</contrib-id><name><surname>Syarifuddin</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-6748</contrib-id><name><surname>Rizal</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-1918</contrib-id><name><surname>Habibah</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-8990</contrib-id><name><surname>Rahmat</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2338-8215</contrib-id><name><surname>Diansyah</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-1195</contrib-id><name><surname>Nurlatifah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6776-664X</contrib-id><name><surname>Priyatno</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-2960</contrib-id><name><surname>Herdis</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-5"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1731-7226</contrib-id><name><surname>Churriyah</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="EDITOR-AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Lambung Mangkurat University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01khn0w07</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Hasanuddin University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00da1gf19</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Gadjah Mada University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/03ke6d638</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-4"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Sriwijaya University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/030bmb197</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-5"><institution content-type="dept">Research Center for Animal Husbandry</institution><institution-wrap><institution>National Research and Innovation Agency</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02hmjzt55</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-7-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-7-23"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>440</fpage><lpage>452</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-4-1"><day>1</day><month>4</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/72347" xlink:title="Comparative Metabolomic Analysis of Lactating Saanen Goats with Different Milk Production Levels">Comparative Metabolomic Analysis of Lactating Saanen Goats with Different Milk Production Levels</self-uri><abstract><p>Variation in milk yield among dairy goats maintained under identical feeding and management conditions suggests underlying differences in metabolic organization and nutrient utilization efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the precision of nutritional status in lactating Saanen dairy goats classified by milk production level by integrating productive performance, energy metabolic biomarkers, hormonal profiling, and untargeted serum metabolomics. Twenty multiparous goats were categorized into high production (HP; n = 10) and low production (LP; n = 10) groups based on average daily milk yield. Circulating non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA), insulin, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) were measured, and serum metabolomic profiling was performed using LC–HRMS followed by multivariate and pathway enrichment analyses. HP goats produced significantly more milk (3.93 ± 0.35 L/day) than LP goats (2.55 ± 0.19 L/day) and exhibited lower NEFA, BHBA, and cortisol concentrations, indicating greater metabolic efficiency and reduced stress-associated burden. Untargeted metabolomics identified 54 annotated metabolites, of which 25 were significantly altered between groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated clear metabolic separation, and pathway enrichment highlighted tryptophan metabolism, one-carbon metabolism, riboflavin metabolism, and carbohydrate-related pathways as key differentiating routes. HP goats were characterized by higher uridine diphosphate glucose, riboflavin, S-adenosylmethionine, and betaine, whereas LP goats showed increased kynurenine, L-formylkynurenine, 1-methylhistidine, cortisone, and methylmalonic acid. Nine metabolites exhibited strong discriminative performance (AUC &gt; 0.8), supporting their potential as biomarker candidates. These findings indicate that milk production divergence in Saanen dairy goats reflects coordinated differences in systemic metabolic remodeling, defining distinct precision nutritional status phenotypes associated with metabolic efficiency and stress–energy adaptation.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Saanen dairy goats</kwd><kwd>milk production</kwd><kwd>precision nutritional status</kwd><kwd>metabolic efficiency</kwd><kwd>metabolomics</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Saanen dairy goats are widely recognized as one of the most productive dairy goat breeds and contribute substantially to milk production systems at both national and global levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Irawan et al., 2026)</xref>. In intensive dairy goat operations, optimizing milk yield while maintaining metabolic stability is essential for ensuring production efficiency, economic sustainability, and animal welfare <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Pardo et al., 2022)</xref>. However, considerable inter-individual variation in milk production is frequently observed even among animals maintained under identical feeding and management conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Dosseh et al., 2025)</xref>. Such variability suggests that productive performance is not solely determined by nutrient supply but is also influenced by differences in metabolic efficiency and physiological adaptability.</p><p>Lactation is an energy-demanding process that requires coordinated regulation of nutrient partitioning, endocrine signaling, and systemic metabolic adaptation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(J, 2022)</xref>. During high milk synthesis, glucose, fatty acids, and amino acids are preferentially allocated to mammary gland activity, leading to dynamic changes in whole-body energy balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Irawan et al., 2026)</xref>. Circulating non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) are commonly used indicators of lipid mobilization and ketogenesis, whereas insulin, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) reflect key aspects of glucose utilization, stress response, anabolic signaling, and mammary function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Zamuner et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Caputo et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Zheng et al., 2025)</xref>. Together, these metabolic and endocrine indicators provide useful insight into lactational energy status, although they may not fully capture the complexity of biochemical networks underlying individual differences in milk yield. Conventional assessment of nutritional status in dairy goats primarily relies on production records, body condition scoring, and selected biochemical indicators <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Andjelić et al., 2022)</xref>. While these approaches are valuable for herd-level management, they offer limited insight into systemic metabolic coordination at the individual-animal level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Ghavipanje et al., 2021)</xref>. Increasing evidence suggests that productive variability is closely related to differences in metabolic resilience, nutrient-use efficiency, and pathway-level biochemical regulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Islamiyati et al., 2025)</xref>. Therefore, integrative molecular approaches are required to characterize better metabolic phenotypes associated with variations in milk production.</p><p>Metabolomics has emerged as a powerful analytical platform for profiling low-molecular-weight metabolites that represent the downstream products of gene expression and enzymatic activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Yusuf et al., 2026)</xref>. By providing a comprehensive snapshot of metabolic processes, metabolomic analysis enables the identification of pathway-level alterations associated with physiological adaptation and production efficiency. In ruminant research, metabolomic profiling has been increasingly applied to investigate energy balance, metabolic disorders, and lactational physiology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Irawan et al., 2026)</xref>. Alterations in amino acid metabolism, lipid pathways, carbohydrate utilization, and oxidative stress-related metabolites have been implicated in variability in productive performance, highlighting the potential of metabolomics within precision nutrition frameworks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Carlino et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Despite growing interest in precision livestock management and metabolomic technologies, comparative characterization of systemic metabolic signatures between high- and low-producing dairy goats maintained under uniform management conditions remains limited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Islamiyati et al., 2025)</xref>. In the present context, precise nutritional status is considered an integrative metabolic phenotype inferred from production performance, energy metabolic biomarkers, endocrine indicators, and serum metabolomic profiles, rather than a direct measurement of individual feed or nutrient intake. Identifying distinct metabolic and endocrine patterns associated with productive differences may enhance understanding of nutrient utilization efficiency and support the development of biomarker-based strategies for metabolite-informed nutritional evaluation.</p><p>Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate and compare production-associated metabolic and metabolomic phenotypes in lactating Saanen dairy goats classified by milk production level. By integrating milk production performance, energy metabolic biomarkers (NEFA and BHBA), hormonal profiles (insulin, cortisol, and IGF-1), and LC–HRMS-based untargeted serum metabolomics, this study sought to identify differential serum metabolites and associated metabolic pathways related to variations in milk yield. The findings are expected to provide associative biological insights into metabolic efficiency and support the development of metabolite-informed nutritional evaluation strategies in dairy goats.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Experimental Design and Ethical Approval</title><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the precision nutritional status of lactating Saanen dairy goats through an integrative assessment of productive performance, energy metabolic profile, hormonal profile, and metabolomic signatures. A total of 20 multiparous lactating Saanen goats, defined as goats in their second to fourth parity, were enrolled and classified into two groups based on average daily milk yield recorded over a 14-day pre-experimental observation period: High Production (HP, n = 10) and Low Production (LP, n = 10). Goats with milk yield above the herd mean were assigned to the HP group, whereas those below the herd mean were assigned to the LP group.</p><p>All animals were maintained under identical housing and feeding management systems throughout the experimental period. The diet was formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of lactating dairy goats in accordance with NRC recommendations, and feed and water were provided ad libitum. To minimize confounding variation, animals were selected based on similar parity, body condition score (BCS), and stage of lactation. Within the precision nutrition framework, milk production was considered a functional phenotypic indicator of nutrient utilization efficiency and metabolic adaptation. Therefore, productive, metabolic, hormonal, and metabolomic parameters were integratively evaluated to characterize individual nutritional status.</p><p>All experimental procedures involving animal handling and biological sampling were conducted in accordance with institutional ethical standards and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarbaru, Indonesia (Approval No. 037/UN1.23.5/PG/2026).</p></sec><sec><title>Milk Production Measurement</title><p>Milk production was measured individually throughout the study period using standardized milking and recording procedures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Landi et al., 2021)</xref>. All Saanen goats were milked twice daily (morning and afternoon) at consistent times to minimize diurnal variation. Milk from each session was collected in calibrated containers and immediately quantified using a graduated cylinder or volumetric milk meter. Milk volume was recorded in liters (L), and daily milk yield (L/day) was calculated as the sum of morning and afternoon production for each animal.</p><p>Milk yield was recorded for 14 consecutive days prior to biological sampling to obtain representative baseline production data. Recording was continued during the sampling period to ensure accurate alignment of productive performance with metabolic, hormonal, and metabolomic analyses.</p></sec><sec><title>Blood Sampling and Serum Preparation</title><p>Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of each goat prior to the morning feeding to minimize postprandial variation. Approximately 5 mL of blood was drawn into plain vacuum tubes without anticoagulant and allowed to clot at room temperature for 20–30 minutes. Samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes to separate serum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Nurlatifah et al., 2025)</xref>. The obtained serum was aliquoted into sterile microtubes and stored at −80 °C until further biochemical, hormonal, and metabolomic analyses.</p></sec><sec><title>Energy Metabolic Profile</title><p>To evaluate systemic energy balance and metabolic adaptation, circulating non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) were measured as indicators of the energy metabolic profile. Serum NEFA concentrations were determined using a commercial enzymatic colorimetric assay kit (NEFA Assay Kit, Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, United Kingdom), while BHBA concentrations were measured using a β-Hydroxybutyrate Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Barletta et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Benedet et al., 2020)</xref>. Absorbance readings were obtained using a microplate spectrophotometer at the specified wavelength, and metabolite concentrations were calculated based on standard calibration curves provided with the kits. Results were expressed in mmol/L.</p></sec><sec><title>Hormone Profile</title><p>Hormonal profiling was performed to evaluate endocrine responses associated with nutrient utilization, metabolic regulation, and lactational performance. Serum insulin, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations were determined using commercially available goat-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Goat Insulin ELISA Kit, MyBioSource Inc., San Diego, CA, USA; Goat Cortisol ELISA Kit, Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China; Goat IGF-1 ELISA Kit, MyBioSource Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturers’ instructions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Zamuner et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-30" ref-type="bibr">(Santoso et al., 2024)</xref>. Briefly, serum samples and standards were added to antibody-coated microplate wells and incubated according to the recommended protocol. After appropriate washing steps and substrate reaction, the optical density was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. Hormone concentrations were calculated based on standard calibration curves generated from known standards and expressed in ng/mL.</p></sec><sec><title>Metabolomic Analysis</title><p>Untargeted metabolomic analysis of serum samples from lactating Saanen dairy goats was performed using a liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) platform following the procedure of <xref rid="BIBR-15" ref-type="bibr">(Islamiyati et al., 2025)</xref>. Serum samples obtained as described previously were subjected to metabolite extraction using a methanol-based protein precipitation method. Briefly, 100 µL of serum was transferred into Eppendorf tubes and mixed with prechilled 80% methanol by vigorous vortexing. Samples were incubated on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, diluted with LC–MS-grade water to obtain a final methanol concentration of 53%, transferred into a fresh tube, and centrifuged again at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove residual particulates. The resulting supernatant  was subjected to LC–MS/MS analysis.</p><p>Chromatographic separation was performed using a Thermo Scientific™ Vanquish™ Horizon UHPLC system equipped with a binary pump and an Accucore™ C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm ID, 2.6 µm) maintained at 40 °C. The mobile phases consisted of MS-grade water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and MS-grade acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B). The flow rate was set at 0.3 mL/min with a total run time of 25 min. The gradient elution program was as follows: 5% B at initial conditions, increased to 90% B over 16 min, held at 90% B for 4 min, and returned to 5% B for column re-equilibration until 25 min. The injection volume was 5 µL.</p><p>Mass spectrometric detection was carried out using a Thermo Scientific™ Orbitrap™ Exploris 240 HRMS operated in Full MS/data-dependent MS2 (dd-MS2) acquisition mode with polarity switching in both positive and negative ionization modes. Full MS scans were acquired at 60,000 FWHM resolution over an m/z range of 67–1000 with a mass accuracy threshold of 5 ppm. Data-dependent MS2 spectra were obtained at 30,000 FWHM using stepped normalized collision energies of 30, 50, and 70.</p><p>Raw LC–MS data were processed using Thermo Scientific™ Compound Discoverer™ 3.5 for peak detection, alignment, background subtraction, and normalization. Metabolite annotation was performed by matching MS/MS spectra against the mzCloud library. Structural prediction was further supported by SIRIUS using the KEGG and PubChem databases. Additional annotation was conducted through ChemSpider-integrated resources, including the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), KEGG, PubChem, ChEBI, ChEMBL, FooDB, and species-relevant metabolome databases. Mass list searches were also performed using HMDB v5 and the Natural Products Atlas (2024_09 release).</p></sec><sec><title>Bioinformatic and Statistical Analysis</title><p>The processed feature table from Thermo Scientific™ Compound Discoverer™ 3.5 was used for downstream analysis. Metabolites were filtered based on annotation confidence, MS/MS quality, and mass accuracy (≤ 5 ppm), verified using mzCloud, and cross-referenced with KEGG and PubChem. Only reliably identified metabolites were retained and reported using KEGG compound IDs. Data were log-transformed and Pareto-scaled prior to multivariate analysis. PCA and PLS-DA were performed using MetaboAnalyst 6.0 to assess clustering and identify discriminative metabolites between HP and LP groups. The performance of the PLS-DA model was evaluated using R² and Q² values, where R² indicates the goodness of fit and Q² represents predictive ability estimated through cross-validation. To assess model robustness and reduce the risk of overfitting, permutation testing was performed by randomly permuting class labels and comparing the resulting model statistics with those of the original model. Differential metabolites were identified using volcano plot analysis with independent-samples t-tests (or Mann–Whitney U tests when appropriate), applying thresholds of p&lt;0.05 and VIP &gt; 1.0, with FDR correction. Hierarchical clustering and KEGG-based pathway enrichment analyses were conducted within MetaboAnalyst.</p><p>Productive, energy metabolic, and hormonal parameters were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Normality was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests were applied. Results were expressed as mean ± SD, with p&lt;0.05 considered significant. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess associations between physiological parameters (milk yield, NEFA, BHBA, insulin, cortisol, and IGF-1) and selected biomarker candidate metabolites, with significance set at p&lt;0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><sec><title>Milk Production Performance</title><p>Daily milk yield differed markedly between the two production groups <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">(Figure 1)</xref>. Goats classified in the high production (HP) group produced significantly greater milk volume compared to those in the low production (LP) group (HP: 3.93 ± 0.35 L/day vs. LP: 2.55 ± 0.19 L/day; p&lt;0.05). The HP group consistently exhibited higher individual production values and a wider distribution, whereas LP goats showed lower and more homogeneous milk output. The clear separation between groups confirmed a distinct productive divergence under identical management and feeding conditions.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Daily milk production (L/day) in high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between groups (p&lt;0.05).</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416158" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Energy Metabolic Profile</title><p>Energy metabolic profile parameters differed significantly between production groups <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">(Figure 2)</xref>. NEFA concentrations were significantly lower in the HP group compared to the LP group (HP: 0.256 ± 0.028 mmol/L vs. LP: 0.470 ± 0.061 mmol/L; p&lt;0.05). Similarly, BHBA concentrations were significantly reduced in HP goats relative to LP goats (HP: 0.684 ± 0.081 mmol/L vs. LP: 1.115 ± 0.118 mmol/L; p&lt;0.05). Overall, LP goats exhibited markedly elevated circulating NEFA and BHBA concentrations compared to HP goats.</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-3"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Energy metabolic profile in high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats. (A) Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) concentrations. (B) Beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) concentrations. </p></caption><p>Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between groups (p&lt;0.05).</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416159" mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Hormonal Profile</title><p>Hormonal profiles in HP and LP goats are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 1</xref>. No significant differences were observed in IGF-1 and insulin levels between the two production groups (p&gt;0.05). Both parameters showed comparable distributions across HP and LP goats, indicating similar anabolic and metabolic regulatory status between groups. In contrast, cortisol concentrations differed significantly between groups (p&lt;0.05), with LP goats exhibiting higher levels compared to HP goats. The separation in cortisol values between groups was consistent across individual animals, indicating a clear difference in stress-associated endocrine responses by to production level.</p><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Hormonal profile in high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Parameter</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="2">Mean ± SD</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">p-value</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">HP</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">LP</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">IGF-1 (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">302.90 ± 18.53</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">289.26 ± 42.83</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.368</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Insulin (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">16.11 ± 2.71</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">15.06 ± 4.17</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0.513</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Cortisol (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">18.20 ± 4.58ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">30.83 ± 4.46ᵃ</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Different superscript letters within the same row indicate significant differences between groups (p&lt;0.05).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Distribution of Identified Metabolites</title><p>After quality control filtering and annotation verification, a total of 54 serum metabolites with confirmed KEGG compound IDs were retained for downstream analysis<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2"> (Figure 3)</xref>. Among these, 30 metabolites (55.6%) were commonly detected in the serum of both HP and LP goats. In contrast, 12 metabolites (22.2%) were uniquely identified in the serum of HP goats, and 12 metabolites (22.2%) were uniquely identified in the serum of LP goats. These results indicate a substantial overlap in core serum metabolic components between groups while also revealing distinct subsets of serum metabolites associated with production level.</p><fig id="figure-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Venn diagram showing the distribution of serum metabolites retained after quality control filtering and KEGG-based annotation in high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416160" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Multivariate Analysis</title><p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to explore global metabolic variation between groups <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">(Figure 4A)</xref>. The PCA score plot showed a clear separation between HP and LP goats primarily along PC1, which explained 49.5% of the total variance, with PC2 accounting for 8.1%. Together, the first two principal components explained 57.6% of the overall variance, indicating distinct metabolic profiles associated with production level. To further evaluate supervised discrimination, Partial Least Squares–Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) was conducted <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">(Figure 4B)</xref>. The PLS-DA model showed a clear separation between HP and LP groups, confirming distinct metabolic signatures. Several KEGG-annotated metabolites contributed strongly to group discrimination, as indicated by loading vectors in the biplot. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">(Figure 4C)</xref>. The cross-validation and permutation testing supported the stability of the PLS-DA model. However, given the limited sample size, these results should be interpreted with caution as exploratory evidence of serum metabolomic separation between groups rather than definitive classification.</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-5"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Multivariate analysis of QC-filtered KEGG-annotated metabolites in high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><p>(A) Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot; (B) PLS-DA biplot showing sample clustering and metabolite loadings; and (C) Cross-validation performance of the PLS-DA model across increasing numbers of components.</p><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416161"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Differential Metabolites</title><p>Volcano plot analysis identified 25 metabolites with confirmed KEGG compound IDs that were significantly altered between HP and LP goats (p&lt;0.05) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">(Figure 5A</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2)</xref>. Among these, 13 metabolites were upregulated in HP goats, whereas 12 metabolites were upregulated in LP goats, indicating bidirectional metabolic shifts associated with production level. Several metabolites exhibited substantial log₂ fold change values, accompanied by highly significant p-values, demonstrating strong statistical differentiation between groups.</p><p>To further identify metabolites contributing to supervised group discrimination, VIP analysis derived from the PLS-DA model was performed <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">(Figure 5B)</xref>. Among the 25 significant metabolites, 15 KEGG-annotated metabolites exhibited VIP scores exceeding the predefined threshold. These included C00029, C02305, C00328, C00255, C00207, C01152, C00019, C00378, C05984, C00762, C05635, C00719, C02477, C02170, and C02700. These metabolites represented the most influential variables driving separation between HP and LP goats in the multivariate model.</p><p>Hierarchical clustering analysis of the significantly altered metabolites revealed distinct grouping patterns by production level <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">(Figure 5C)</xref>. HP and LP goats formed clearly separated clusters, with consistent intra-group similarity and marked inter-group divergence. The heatmap visualization revealed contrasting metabolite abundance patterns between groups, further supporting the metabolic differentiation identified through univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><fig id="figure-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p> Identification of differential metabolites between high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><p>(A) Volcano plot showing significantly altered metabolites; (B) Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) scores from PLS-DA highlighting key discriminatory metabolites; and (C) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of significantly altered metabolites.</p><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416162"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Differential metabolites in high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">KEGG ID</th><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Metabolite</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">FC</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">log2(FC)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">raw.pval</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-log10(p)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00029</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Uridine diphosphate glucose (UDP-glucose)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13934</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.766</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.21E-18</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">17.493</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">C02305</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Phosphocreatine</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19708</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.267</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.84E-18</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">17.234</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00328</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Kynurenine</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.13E-5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">-14.962</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.77E-17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.751</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00255</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Riboflavin</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10103</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.302</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.80E-17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.421</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00207</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Xanthine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.87E-5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-14.656</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.63E-17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.016</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C01152</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1-Methylhistidine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.64E-5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-13.879</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.02E-16</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">15.992</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00019</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">21443</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.388</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.40E-15</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.853</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00378</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Thiamine</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11988</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.549</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.23E-15</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.652</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C05984</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2-Hydroxybutyric acid</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.48E-5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-15.299</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.20E-15</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.143</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00762</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Cortisone</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.21E-5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-14.536</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.81E-14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.055</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C05635</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5-Hydroxyindoleacetate</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.53E-5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-14.79</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.14E-12</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.669</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00719</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Betaine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">21145</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.368</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.05E-8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">79.784</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C02477</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">α-Tocopherol</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">23698</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.533</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.17E-8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">79.302</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">C02170</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Methylmalonic acid</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.73E-5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-15.16</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.64E-8</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">77.853</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C02700</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">L-Formylkynurenine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.89E-5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-15.077</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.93E-8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.715</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C02794</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3-Hydroxykynurenine</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.65E-5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-14.111</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.64E-8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.579</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00120</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Biotin</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">24129</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.558</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.51E-8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">72.588</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C01586</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Hippuric acid</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.26E-5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-14.903</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.03E-7</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">69.873</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C05658</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Indoxyl</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.03E-5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-15.011</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.61E-7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">67.933</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C00114</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Choline</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14837</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.857</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.18E-6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">54.971</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00864</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Pantothenic acid</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">15659</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.935</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.60E-6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">52.518</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C01104</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Trimethylamine N-oxide</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.000</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-13.246</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.03E-6</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">50.953</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00153</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Nicotinamide</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7661</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.903</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.17E-5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">40.876</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00072</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Ascorbate (L-ascorbic acid)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">14264</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.74E-5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">40.583</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C00042</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Succinate</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">20.799</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.565</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.001</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">28.986</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Functional Pathway Enrichment Analysis</title><p>Pathway enrichment analysis identified 11 metabolic pathways associated with the differential metabolites that were detected with measurable pathway impact values, reflecting their topological involvement within the reconstructed metabolic network <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-7">(Figure 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 3)</xref>. The identified pathways and their corresponding impact values were as follows: riboflavin metabolism (0.5), tryptophan metabolism (0.21368), one carbon pool by folate (0.13393), pentose and glucuronate interconversions (0.06024), cysteine and methionine metabolism (0.05271), amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (0.04888), glycine, serine and threonine metabolism (0.04766), valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation (0.02264), starch and sucrose metabolism (0.00974), steroid hormone biosynthesis (0.00663), and galactose metabolism (0.00228).</p><p>These pathways collectively represent the metabolic routes associated with the differential metabolite set identified between HP and LP goats.</p><fig id="figure-7" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Pathway enrichment of differential metabolites</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416163"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Pathway enrichment of differential metabolites identified between high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Pathway name</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">p</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-log(p) </th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Holm p</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">FDR</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Impact</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">KEGG ID</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Tryptophan metabolism</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.0040377 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.3939</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.32302</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.32302</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.21368</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C01152; C02700; C00328</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">One carbon pool by folate</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.018686</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.7285</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.6911</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.13393</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C00019; C00719</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Riboflavin metabolism</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.033013</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.4813</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.6911</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C00255</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Starch and sucrose metabolism</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.1408</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.8514</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.00974</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C00029</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Pentose and glucuronate interconversions</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.14806</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.82957</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.06024</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C00029</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Galactose metabolism</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.20411</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.69013</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.00228</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C00029</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Cysteine and methionine metabolism</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2439</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.61279</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.05271</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C00019</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.25035</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.60145</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.04766</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">C00719</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.28799</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.54062</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02264</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C02170</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.30015</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.52266</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04888</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C00029</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Steroid hormone biosynthesis</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.48869</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.31096</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.00663</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C00762</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Biomarker Candidate Performance</title><p>Based on the integrated metabolomic analysis, nine metabolites were identified as potential biomarker candidates capable of discriminating HP and LP groups. These candidates met all predefined criteria, including clear group-associated differential expression, a VIP score &gt; 1.0 in the PLS-DA model, involvement in pathways identified in the enrichment analysis, and strong discriminative performance with an AUC &gt; 0.8. The detailed information regarding KEGG ID, metabolite name, associated group, VIP score, related pathway, and AUC values is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>. The selected metabolites comprised C00029 (uridine diphosphate glucose), C00328 (kynurenine), C00255 (riboflavin), C01152 (1-methylhistidine), C00019 (S-adenosylmethionine), C00762 (cortisone), C00719 (betaine), C02170 (methylmalonic acid), and C02700 (L-formylkynurenine).</p><p>Several metabolites were predominantly associated with the HP group, including uridine diphosphate glucose (C00029), riboflavin (C00255), S-adenosylmethionine (C00019), and betaine (C00719), whereas kynurenine (C00328), 1-methylhistidine (C01152), cortisone (C00762), methylmalonic acid (C02170), and L-formylkynurenine (C02700) were associated with the LP group. Notably, riboflavin, S-adenosylmethionine, betaine, methylmalonic acid, and L-formylkynurenine demonstrated perfect discrimination performance (AUC = 1.00), while the remaining metabolites also exhibited excellent classification ability (AUC range 0.93–0.98), as summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-8">Figure 7</xref>, the boxplot clearly demonstrates distinct separation between HP and LP groups for each candidate metabolite. HP-associated metabolites showed consistently higher relative intensities in the HP group and lower levels in LP, whereas LP-associated metabolites exhibited the opposite pattern. Minimal overlap between groups further supports the robustness of these features as discriminative features. The consistency between multivariate importance (VIP), pathway involvement, and ROC performance strengthens the reliability of these metabolites as potential indicators of metabolic divergence between HP and LP.</p><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>ROC performance of selected VIP metabolites identified as potential biomarker candidates distinguishing high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">KEGG ID</th><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Metabolite</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Group</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">VIP</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Pathway</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">AUC</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">C00029</td><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Uridine diphosphate glucose</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">HP</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,41858</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0,93</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">C00328</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Kynurenine</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">LP</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1,41651</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0,96</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">C00255</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Riboflavin</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">HP</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1,41546</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1,00</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">C01152</td><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">1-Methylhistidine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">LP</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,41395</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">0,98</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="left">C00019</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">S-Adenosylmethionine</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">HP</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,40904</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1,00</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">C00762</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Cortisone</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">LP</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,39762</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0,94</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">C00719</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Betaine</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">HP</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1,31281</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1,00</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="left">C02170</td><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Methylmalonic acid</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">LP</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,30675</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,00</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">C02700</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">L-Formylkynurenine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">LP</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1,30446</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-8"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p>Boxplot distributions of selected biomarker candidate metabolites discriminating high production (HP) and low production (LP) Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><p>(A) S-adenosylmethionine, (B) uridine diphosphate glucose, (C) riboflavin, (D) kynurenine, (E) betaine, (F) cortisone, (G) 1-methylhistidine, (H) methylmalonic acid, and (I) L-formylkynurenine.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416164" mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Correlation Analysis</title><p>Correlation analysis was conducted to examine the associations between physiological parameters and selected biomarker candidate metabolites within each production group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 8A–B</xref>). Only statistically significant correlations are described. In the HP group (Figure 8A), riboflavin (C00255) showed significant positive correlations with milk production and NEFA. S-adenosylmethionine (C00019) was significantly and positively correlated with BHBA. No other significant associations were observed in the HP group. In the LP group <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">(Figure 8B)</xref>, kynurenine (C00328) demonstrated a significant positive correlation with IGF-1. 1-Methylhistidine (C01152) showed significant negative correlations with IGF-1 and insulin. Cortisone (C00762) exhibited a significant and strong positive correlation with BHBA. Overall, significant correlations in the HP group were primarily associated with production performance and lipid mobilization parameters, whereas in the LP group, significant associations were mainly related to endocrine regulation and ketone body metabolism.</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-6"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p>Pearson correlation heatmaps showing the relationships between physiological parameters and selected biomarker candidate metabolites in Saanen dairy goats</p></caption><p>(A) High production (HP) group and (B) low production (LP) group. Asterisks indicate statistically significant correlations (p&lt;0.05). C00029= Uridine diphosphate glucose; C00328= Kynurenine; C00255= Riboflavin; C01152= 1-Methylhistidine; C00019= S-Adenosylmethionine; C00762= Cortisone; C00719= Betaine; C02170= Methylmalonic acid; and C02700= L-Formylkynurenine.</p><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72347/version/52826/34016/416165"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>This study demonstrates that variation in milk yield among lactating Saanen dairy goats maintained under similar management conditions was associated with coordinated differences in energy metabolism, endocrine response, and serum metabolomic profiles. Although more than half of the annotated serum metabolites were shared between HP and LP goats, multivariate analysis, differential metabolite testing, and pathway enrichment consistently indicated distinct serum metabolic patterns between production groups <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Islamiyati et al., 2025)</xref>. The main pathways involved included tryptophan-related immunometabolic signaling, one-carbon metabolism, riboflavin-linked redox regulation, carbohydrate-related metabolism, and organic acid metabolism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Lima et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Daddam et al., 2025)</xref>. These findings suggest that differences in milk production level were associated with systemic metabolic variation rather than isolated changes in individual metabolites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Wang et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><p>A central physiological difference between the production groups was observed in the energy metabolic profile. LP goats exhibited markedly higher NEFA and BHBA concentrations, indicating greater lipid mobilization and ketogenesis, which are commonly associated with a more pronounced negative energy balance during lactation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Ghavipanje et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Lisuzzo et al., 2022)</xref>. In contrast, HP goats showed lower NEFA and BHBA despite producing more milk, suggesting that higher milk output was associated with a less pronounced lipid mobilization and ketogenesis response. This finding indicates a more stable energy metabolic profile in HP goats than in LP goats and is consistent with previous reports linking metabolic stability and oxidative balance to production performance in dairy animals <xref rid="BIBR-24" ref-type="bibr">(Meli et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Ponnampalam et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><p>Endocrine profiling showed that LP goats had significantly higher cortisol concentrations, whereas IGF-1 and insulin did not differ significantly between groups. This finding indicates that the difference between HP and LP goats was more evident in stress-associated endocrine response than in anabolic hormone status. Cortisol is closely related to hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity and may influence glucose metabolism, lipid mobilization, and stress adaptation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Knezevic et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Ünal &amp; Uztimür, 2025)</xref>. The detection of cortisone as an LP-associated discriminatory metabolite further supports the involvement of glucocorticoid-related metabolism in the LP phenotype. In addition, the positive correlation between cortisone and BHBA in LP goats suggests an association between glucocorticoid-related metabolism and ketone body production, although this relationship should be interpreted as correlative rather than causal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Zamuner et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>At the pathway level, LP goats showed higher kynurenine and L-formylkynurenine, indicating that tryptophan metabolism differed between production groups. Kynurenine pathway activity has been associated with immune activation, oxidative stress adaptation, and endocrine–metabolic interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Tsuji et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Sorboni et al., 2022)</xref>). In the present study, the increase in kynurenine-related metabolites in LP goats was accompanied by higher cortisol, NEFA, and BHBA concentrations, suggesting that this pathway may be associated with the stress–energy metabolic profile observed in the LP group. The positive correlation between kynurenine and IGF-1 in LP goats further suggests a possible link between tryptophan metabolism and endocrine regulation, although this association requires further validation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Salama et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Chen et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>LP goats also exhibited higher 1-methylhistidine, which may reflect increased protein turnover or dietary muscle-derived compounds. Under conditions of increased energy demand or metabolic challenge, protein mobilization may contribute to the supply of energy and glucose precursors in lactating animals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Siachos et al., 2024)</xref>. In this study, 1-methylhistidine was negatively correlated with IGF-1 and insulin in LP goats, suggesting an association between this metabolite and reduced anabolic endocrine signaling. Together with higher NEFA, BHBA, and cortisol, this finding supports the interpretation that LP goats had a more catabolic metabolic profile than HP goats <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Li et al., 2026)</xref>.</p><p>In contrast to LP goats, HP goats were characterized by higher UDP-glucose, S-adenosylmethionine, betaine, and riboflavin. UDP-glucose is related to carbohydrate activation and glycosylation pathways, and carbohydrate utilization is particularly important during lactation because glucose supports lactose synthesis and milk volume regulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Lin et al., 2016)</xref>. In the present study, higher UDP-glucose in HP goats, together with lower NEFA and BHBA concentrations, suggests that the HP phenotype was associated with a more stable systemic energy profile and less dependence on lipid mobilization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Zamuner et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>HP goats also showed higher S-adenosylmethionine and betaine, both of which are involved in one-carbon metabolism and methyl-group transfer reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Jiang et al., 2023)</xref>. One-carbon metabolism is linked with methylation processes, hepatic metabolic function, antioxidant defense, and metabolic adaptation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Clare et al., 2019)</xref>. In this study, higher S-adenosylmethionine and betaine in HP goats may indicate differences in methyl-donor-related metabolism between production groups. The positive correlation between S-adenosylmethionine and BHBA in the HP group may also suggest an adaptive association between methyl-donor metabolism and lipid-derived energy use, although this interpretation should be approached with caution, given the limited sample size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Ghavipanje et al., 2021)</xref>.</p><p>Riboflavin emerged as another prominent HP-associated metabolite with high pathway relevance and discriminative performance. Riboflavin is a precursor of flavin cofactors involved in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, and redox balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Hampel et al., 2016)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-28" ref-type="bibr">(Ponnampalam et al., 2024)</xref>. In the present study, higher riboflavin levels in HP goats and their positive correlation with milk production suggest that riboflavin metabolism is associated with the high-production phenotype. This finding is consistent with the lower NEFA, BHBA, and cortisol levels observed in HP goats and may reflect a more favorable metabolic condition for sustaining milk production, although targeted validation is still required <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Meli et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Beyond these core pathways, enrichment analysis also identified carbohydrate- and amino acid-related pathways, as well as steroid hormone biosynthesis. Although some pathways had modest impact values, their collective appearance suggests that production-level differences were associated with coordinated changes in substrate metabolism and endocrine-related pathways <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Ni et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-38" ref-type="bibr">(Zamuner et al., 2020)</xref>. The steroid hormone biosynthesis signal was consistent with the observed differences in cortisol and cortisone between groups, supporting an association between endocrine response and serum metabolomic variation in LP goats <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Ünal &amp; Uztimür, 2025)</xref>.</p><p>The integration of VIP scores, univariate significance, pathway involvement, and ROC analysis identified nine candidate metabolites that differentiated HP and LP goats. HP-associated metabolites included UDP-glucose, riboflavin, S-adenosylmethionine, and betaine, whereas LP-associated metabolites included kynurenine, L-formylkynurenine, 1-methylhistidine, cortisone, and methylmalonic acid. This integrated approach is commonly used to prioritize candidate biomarkers in metabolomics studies, although such candidates require further validation before practical application <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Cardoso et al., 2024)</xref>. Methylmalonic acid was particularly relevant in LP goats because it may reflect altered organic acid metabolism and vitamin B12-related metabolic function, which can influence energy metabolism in ruminants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Liu et al., 2022)</xref>. Therefore, the LP-associated metabolite profile may indicate greater stress-associated and catabolic metabolic adaptation, whereas the HP-associated profile may indicate more stable substrate and cofactor-related metabolism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Salama et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Tsuji et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>From a translational perspective, the present findings suggest that serum metabolomics can complement conventional indicators such as milk yield, NEFA, BHBA, and hormone profiles by providing additional pathway-level information on production-associated metabolic phenotypes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Ghavipanje et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Lisuzzo et al., 2022)</xref>. A composite panel comprising UDP-glucose, riboflavin, S-adenosylmethionine, betaine, kynurenine pathway metabolites, cortisone, 1-methylhistidine, and methylmalonic acid may serve as a candidate indicator panel for identifying goats with distinct metabolic profiles under intensive management. However, because individual feed intake was not measured and the sample size was limited, the practical application of this panel for precision nutrition should be considered preliminary and requires further validation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Clare et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Pardo et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>The correlation analysis further supported the physiological relevance of selected biomarker candidates. In HP goats, riboflavin was positively correlated with milk production, while S-adenosylmethionine was positively correlated with BHBA. In LP goats, kynurenine was positively correlated with IGF-1, 1-methylhistidine was negatively correlated with IGF-1 and insulin, and cortisone was positively correlated with BHBA. These findings suggest that the candidate metabolites were associated with production, endocrine, and energy metabolic parameters. However, these correlations do not imply causality and should be interpreted cautiously.</p><p>Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, individual feed intake and nutrient intake were not measured in this study. Therefore, the concept of precision nutritional status should be interpreted as an integrative metabolic and metabolomic phenotype under similar feeding and management conditions, rather than as a direct measurement of individual nutrient consumption. Second, the cohort size was relatively small (n = 10 per group), which may inflate apparent classification performance, increase the risk of overfitting in multivariate analyses such as PLS-DA, and limit generalizability across farms, diets, and lactation stages. Therefore, the multivariate classification results should be interpreted as exploratory and should be validated in larger independent datasets. Third, untargeted metabolomics provides relative abundance rather than absolute quantification; thus, targeted validation with standardized assays is necessary before defining actionable thresholds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Islamiyati et al., 2025)</xref>. Fourth, serum reflects systemic metabolism and cannot directly specify tissue-level flux in the liver, adipose tissue, or mammary gland <xref rid="BIBR-33" ref-type="bibr">(Sun et al., 2017)</xref>. Future studies should incorporate individual feed intake and nutrient intake measurements, larger multi-farm populations, longitudinal sampling across lactation phases, targeted quantification of the key metabolites identified, and integration with inflammatory markers and rumen-derived energy precursors to strengthen biological interpretation and develop more robust predictive models <xref rid="BIBR-14" ref-type="bibr">(Irawan et al., 2026)</xref>.</p><p>Overall, milk yield divergence in Saanen dairy goats under similar feeding and management conditions was associated with distinct systemic metabolic phenotypes. HP goats were characterized by lower NEFA, BHBA, and cortisol concentrations and higher abundance of metabolites related to carbohydrate activation, one-carbon metabolism, and riboflavin-linked pathways. In contrast, LP goats showed higher lipid mobilization and ketogenesis indicators, glucocorticoid-related metabolites, kynurenine pathway metabolites, methylmalonic acid, and 1-methylhistidine. These findings indicate that serum metabolomics, when combined with conventional metabolic and hormonal indicators, may help characterize production-associated metabolic differences in lactating dairy goats and support the future development of metabolite-informed nutritional evaluation strategies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Islamiyati et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Irawan et al., 2026)</xref>. </p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Lactating Saanen dairy goats with higher milk production exhibited a more favorable metabolic phenotype characterized by improved energy balance, reduced metabolic stress, and enhanced carbohydrate and redox metabolism, whereas lower-producing goats showed metabolic signatures associated with lipid mobilization, ketogenesis, protein catabolism, and stress-related pathways. The identified metabolite biomarkers provide promising indicators for distinguishing metabolic efficiency between production groups. These findings support the application of metabolomic profiling as a practical tool for the early assessment of metabolic status and for developing targeted nutritional and herd management strategies to improve milk production, animal health, and the sustainability of dairy goat production systems.</p></sec><sec><title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial or personal, that could have influenced the work reported in this manuscript.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Head and the laboratory staff of the Animal Production Laboratory and the Animal Nutrition and Feed Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Lambung Mangkurat University, for providing the necessary facilities and technical support throughout the study. We would also like to express our sincere appreciation to the Talent Management of the National Research and Innovation Agency for supporting the postdoctoral program.</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE  WRITING PROCESS</title><p>During the writing process, none of the authors used generative AI or AI-assisted technologies.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="how-to-cite"><title>How to Cite</title><p>Syarifuddin, N. A., Rizal, M., Habibah, H., Rahmat, R., Diansyah, A. M., Nurlatifah, A., Priyatno, L., Herdis, H., &amp; Churriyah, A. N. (2026). Comparative Metabolomic Analysis of Lactating Saanen Goats with Different Milk Production Levels. <italic>Tropical Animal Science Journal</italic>, <italic>49</italic>(5), 440. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.5.440</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Relationships between milk and blood biochemical parameters and metabolic status in dairy cows during lactation</article-title><source>Metabolites</source><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andjelić</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Djoković</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cincović</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bogosavljević-Bošković</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrović</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mladenović</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Čukić</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>733</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo12080733</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Association of changes among body condition score during the transition period with NEFA and BHBA concentrations, milk production, fertility, and health of Holstein cows</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>104</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barletta</surname><given-names>R.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maturana Filho</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>P.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Del Valle</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Netto</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rennó</surname><given-names>F.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mingoti</surname><given-names>R.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gandra</surname><given-names>J.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mourão</surname><given-names>G.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fricke</surname><given-names>P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sartori</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Madureira</surname><given-names>E.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiltbank</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>30</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><page-range>30-36</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heritability estimates of predicted blood β-hydroxybutyrate and nonesterified fatty acids and relationships with milk traits in early-lactation Holstein cows</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benedet</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marchi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Penasa</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>6354</fpage><lpage>6363</lpage><page-range>6354-6363</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2019-17916</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Regulation of GH and GH signaling by nutrients</article-title><source>Cells</source><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caputo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pigni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agosti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Daffara</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrero</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Filigheddu</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prodam</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1376</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cells10061376</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Identification of predictive biomarkers of lameness in transition dairy cows</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>14</volume><issue>14</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cardoso</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Whitby</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Green</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Randall</surname><given-names>L.V.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani14142030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Harnessing metabolomics to advance nutrition-based therapeutics for inflammation: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials</article-title><source>Metabolites</source><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carlino</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guerrero-Flores</surname><given-names>G.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Niclis</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Segovia-Siapco</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mayta</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>705</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo15110705</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Altered ruminal microbiome tryptophan metabolism and their derived 3-indoleacetic acid inhibit ruminal inflammation in subacute ruminal acidosis goats</article-title><source>Microbiome</source><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>215</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-025-02202-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>One-carbon metabolism: linking nutritional biochemistry to epigenetic programming of long-term development</article-title><source>Annual Review of Animal Biosciences</source><volume>7</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clare</surname><given-names>C.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brassington</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwong</surname><given-names>W.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinclair</surname><given-names>K.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><page-range>263-287</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115206</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Differences in amino acid and fatty acid metabolism contribute to variability in dairy cattle feed efficiency</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>108</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daddam</surname><given-names>J.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sura</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarmikasoglou</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Naughton</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mills</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>VandeHaar</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>8367</fpage><lpage>8379</lpage><page-range>8367-8379</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2025-26468</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparative evaluation of milk yield and composition in three indigenous West African goat breeds under semi-intensive management</article-title><source>Veterinary and Animal Science</source><volume>31</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dosseh</surname><given-names>H.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anihouvi</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kere</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diogo</surname><given-names>R.V.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hounzangbé-Adoté</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dossa</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>100560</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vas.2025.100560</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Regulation of nutritional metabolism in transition dairy goats: energy balance, liver activity, and insulin resistance in response to berberine supplementation</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghavipanje</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fathi Nasri</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farhangfar</surname><given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghiasi</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vargas-Bello-Pérez</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>2236</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11082236</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Limiting factors for milk production in dairy cows: perspectives from physiology and nutrition</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>J</surname><given-names>Gross J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>044</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/skac044</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Thiamin and riboflavin in human milk: effects of lipid-based nutrient supplementation and stage of lactation on vitamer secretion and contributions to total vitamin content</article-title><source>PLoS ONE</source><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hampel</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shahab-Ferdows</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adair</surname><given-names>L.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bentley</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Flax</surname><given-names>V.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jamieson</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellington</surname><given-names>S.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tegha</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chasela</surname><given-names>C.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamwendo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><page-range>0149479</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0149479</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Plasma metabolomics identifies nutritional biomarkers in tropical Saanen goats</article-title><source>Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Irawan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diansyah</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adiputra</surname><given-names>K.D.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Azis</surname><given-names>I.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Damayanti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurhaliza</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dagong</surname><given-names>M.I.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2026</year><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><page-range>203-214</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17582/journal.aavs/2026/14.1.203.214</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Integrative metabolomics and hormonal profiling reveal biomarkers of milk yield efficiency in Sapera dairy goats under tropical conditions</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>18</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Islamiyati</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Azis</surname><given-names>I.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amal</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bahar</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabil</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurlatifah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diansyah</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Irawan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Damayanti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>3594</fpage><lpage>3606</lpage><page-range>3594-3606</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2025.3594-3606</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>One-carbon metabolism and related pathways in ruminal and small intestinal epithelium of lactating dairy cows</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>101</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherlock</surname><given-names>D.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guyader</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Y.X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Loor</surname><given-names>J.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>062</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/skad062</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The role of cortisol in chronic stress, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychological disorders</article-title><source>Cells</source><volume>12</volume><issue>23</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knezevic</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nenic</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Milanovic</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Knezevic</surname><given-names>N.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2726</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cells12232726</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Evaluation of different test-day milk recording protocols by wood’s model application for the estimation of dairy goat milk and milk constituent yield</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Landi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maggiolino</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salzano</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Claps</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Palo</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rufrano</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedota</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Neglia</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1058</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11041058</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Rumen microbiota modulates metabolic stress in high-yield dairy cows: insights from early to peak lactation</article-title><source>Microbiome</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huo</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2026</year><page-range>61</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-025-02318-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Relationship between thermal environment, thermoregulatory responses and energy metabolism in goats: A comprehensive review</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>109</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>A.R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silveira</surname><given-names>R.M.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro</surname><given-names>M.S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vecchi</surname><given-names>L.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>M.H.M.D.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Resende</surname><given-names>K.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>103324</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103324</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of glucose on lactose synthesis in mammary epithelial cells from dairy cow</article-title><source>BMC Veterinary Research</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><page-range>81</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-016-0704-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Changes in plasma fatty acids profile in hyperketonemic ewes during early lactation: a preliminary study</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lisuzzo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiore</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harvatine</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mazzotta</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berlanda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Spissu</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Badon</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Contiero</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moscati</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiore</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>17017</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-21088-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The regulation and characterization of mitochondrial-derived methylmalonic acid in mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress: from basic research to clinical practice</article-title><source>Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity</source><volume>2022</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>7043883</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/7043883</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Association of oxidative stress biomarkers with metabolic parameters in dairy goats during the periparturient period</article-title><source>Metabolites</source><volume>15</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fumo</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Savoini</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Invernizzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>790</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo15120790</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Characterization of pivotal metabolites influencing the production of milk components in dairy goats</article-title><source>Food Chemistry</source><volume>493</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>145783</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.145783</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Mitigating heat stress in Garut lambs: synergistic effects of lemuru fish oil, vitamin E, and selenium on antioxidant defense, hematology, and physiological responses</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nurlatifah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Astuti</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herdis</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arifiantini</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pamungkas</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diapari</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sitaresmi</surname><given-names>P.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Setiatin</surname><given-names>E.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diansyah</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>2230</fpage><lpage>2240</lpage><page-range>2230-2240</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2025.2230-2240</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of precision livestock farming on the environmental performance of intensive dairy goat farms</article-title><source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source><volume>351</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pardo</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prado</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandez-Alvarez</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yanez-Ruiz</surname><given-names>D.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belanche</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>131518</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131518</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of nutritional factors on fat content, fatty acid composition, and sensorial properties of meat and milk from domesticated ruminants: an overview</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ponnampalam</surname><given-names>E.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Priyashantha</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vidanarachchi</surname><given-names>J.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kiani</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Holman</surname><given-names>B.W.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>840</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani14060840</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Metabolic and behavior responses of lactating goats under heat stress</article-title><source>Small Ruminant Research</source><volume>203</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salama</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamzaoui</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Albanell</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Such</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caja</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>106496</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106496</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A new perspective on the association between radio-immuno and ELISA progesterone assays in Indonesian goats</article-title><source>South African Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahari</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sitaresmi</surname><given-names>P.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anwar</surname><given-names>R.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lupitasari</surname><given-names>F.B.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herdis</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pamungkas</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/sajas.v54i2.12</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Variation in protein metabolism biomarkers during the transition period and associations with health, colostrum quality, reproduction, and milk production traits in Holstein cows</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siachos</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsiamadis</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oikonomou</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panousis</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banos</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sampsonidis</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalogiannis</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arsenos</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Valergakis</surname><given-names>G.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>4056</fpage><lpage>4074</lpage><page-range>4056-4074</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2023-24168</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A comprehensive review on the role of the gut microbiome in human neurological disorders</article-title><source>Clinical Microbiology Reviews</source><volume>35</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sorboni</surname><given-names>S.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moghaddam</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jafarzadeh-Esfehani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soleimanpour</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>00338</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>00338-20</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/CMR.00338-20</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Lactation-related metabolic mechanism investigated based on mammary gland metabolomics and 4 biofluids’ metabolomics relationships in dairy cows</article-title><source>BMC Genomics</source><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>H.Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>M.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Z.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>H.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>936</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-017-4314-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The tryptophan and kynurenine pathway involved in the development of immune-related diseases</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsuji</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikeda</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoshikawa</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Taniguchi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sawamura</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morikawa</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakashima</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Asai</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>5742</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms24065742</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Investigation of steroid hormones, stress biomarkers, and energy metabolism in hyperketonemic goats</article-title><source>Veterinary Journal</source><volume>313</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ünal</surname><given-names>C.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uztimür</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>106414</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106414</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Investigating the relationship between fluctuations in daily milk yield as resilience indicators and health traits in Holstein cattle</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>107</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brito</surname><given-names>L.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1535</fpage><lpage>1548</lpage><page-range>1535-1548</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2023-23495</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Integrated metabolomic and functional assessment of sexed frozen semen in Holstein Friesian bulls</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yusuf</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diansyah</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahiruddin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Masturi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maulana</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Said</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rahmat</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alfian</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adam</surname><given-names>A.A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yusri</surname><given-names>A.N.H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurlatifah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amrullah</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2026</year><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><page-range>19-29</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.1.19</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Endocrine and metabolic responses to glucose, insulin, and adrenocorticotropin infusions in early-lactation dairy goats of high and low milk yield</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zamuner</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cameron</surname><given-names>A.W.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carpenter</surname><given-names>E.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leury</surname><given-names>B.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>DiGiacomo</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>12045</fpage><lpage>12058</lpage><page-range>12045-12058</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2020-18625</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Short communication: Associations between nonesterified fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate, and glucose in periparturient dairy goats</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zamuner</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>DiGiacomo</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cameron</surname><given-names>A.W.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leury</surname><given-names>B.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>6672</fpage><lpage>6678</lpage><page-range>6672-6678</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2019-17163</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The role of insulin-like growth factor-1 in lactation</article-title><source>Gene</source><volume>962</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>149577</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2025.149577</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>