<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><title-group><article-title>Fermented Shallot (<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L.) Extract with <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> Improves Growth Performance and Attenuates Physiological Stress in Broiler Chickens under Chronic Natural Summer Heat Exposure</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-8430</contrib-id><name><surname>Hai</surname><given-names>P. V.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6263-7787</contrib-id><name><surname>Vinh</surname><given-names>N. D.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3625-0372</contrib-id><name><surname>Vui</surname><given-names>T. Q.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3676-4950</contrib-id><name><surname>Mai</surname><given-names>H. T.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3397-9968</contrib-id><name><surname>Son</surname><given-names>H. V.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture and Forestry</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Hue University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00qaa6j11</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="VN">Vietnam</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">School of Agriculture and Natural Resources</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Vinh University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/0244cgm12</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="VN">Vietnam</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture and Forestry</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Hue University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00qaa6j11</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="VN">Vietnam</country></aff><aff id="AFF-4">Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Hong Duc University</aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-7-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-7-23"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>390</fpage><lpage>396</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-3-8"><day>8</day><month>3</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/72086" xlink:title="Fermented Shallot (Allium cepa L.) Extract with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Improves Growth Performance and Attenuates Physiological Stress in Broiler Chickens under Chronic Natural Summer Heat Exposure">Fermented Shallot (Allium cepa L.) Extract with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Improves Growth Performance and Attenuates Physiological Stress in Broiler Chickens under Chronic Natural Summer Heat Exposure</self-uri><abstract><p>Heat stress has remained one of the gravest limitations on poultry production under tropical climatic conditions. It stimulates increased stress hormone levels, oxidative damage, and impaired metabolism, which ultimately reduce growth performance. This study aimed to evaluate whether <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot bulb extract (LPFS), supplied as drinking water, could improve growth performance and physical resilience in yellow-feathered Rilai broilers exposed to chronic natural summer heat in Central Vietnam. In a completely randomized study design, 300 day-old male chicks were randomly assigned to six treatments (five replications of 10 birds each) and raised for 90 days in an open-sided house. The birds were fed plain drinking water (negative control), oxytetracycline in feed (100 mg/kg diet, positive control), or LPFS at 25, 50, 75, or 100 mg/L in drinking water. The growth performance was measured weekly, and blood samples were taken after 90 days and analyzed to determine lipid profiles, liver enzymes, acute-phase proteins, and stress/oxidative biomarkers. Body weight gain and feed conversion ratio were significantly higher with LPFS supplementation compared to the negative control (p&lt;0.05), with the most significant benefits observed in the later growth phase. Also, LPFS significantly decreased the levels of circulating corticosterone, malondialdehyde, and heat shock protein 70 in addition to increasing the activities of several major antioxidant enzymes. The serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were also lower in the groups treated with LPFS, with positive changes in liver enzyme activities. In conclusion, LPFS acts as a postbiotic–phytochemical water additive that supports productivity and metabolic resilience during prolonged natural summer heat exposure and may partially substitute for antibiotic-associated benefits in tropical poultry production.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>broiler chicken</kwd><kwd>fermented shallot extract</kwd><kwd>heat stress</kwd><kwd>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</kwd><kwd>oxidative stress</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>The rising global temperatures are indeed a major challenge to the poultry industry, especially in tropical and subtropical latitudes, where heat stress (HS) is one of the major factors leading to reduced productivity. Physiological indicators of HS include inhibited feed consumption, impaired immune competence, and elevated mortality rates<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(S. et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(J. et al., 2022)</xref>. On the cellular level, thermal challenges result in excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that disrupts the endogenous antioxidant system, impairs the integrity of the intestinal barrier (often referred to as leaky gut), and alters lipid metabolism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(F. et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(B. &amp; R, 2019)</xref>. Although in the past, antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) were used to overcome these stressors, the global shift towards eliminating AGPs due to concerns about antimicrobial resistance has necessitated the identification of sustainable, natural alternatives <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(S. &amp; S, 2019)</xref>. </p><p>Phytogenic additives, or those of the <italic>Allium </italic>genus, are a promising avenue since they have inherent antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Shallots (<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L. var. aggregatum) are a major source of bioactive organosulfur compounds and flavonoids, including quercetin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(D. et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-5" ref-type="bibr">(V. et al., 2024)</xref>. However, low palatability and low bioavailability of glycosylated flavonoids often inhibit the efficacy of raw extracts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(N. et al., 2024)</xref>. In order to avoid these limitations, it is possible to use the probiotic fermentation - i.e., the use of <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> - to biotransform phytochemicals into more readily absorbable aglycones through bacterial 8-glucosidase activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(T. et al., 2014)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(V. et al., 2025)</xref>). The result of this process is functional postbiotics, which strengthen gut health and resilience to systemic stress. </p><p>Since very little information is available on the effectiveness of fermented shallot extracts in yellow-feathered chickens under natural tropical heat loads, this experiment aimed to determine the efficacy of fermented shallot extracts as water additives in this poultry model to enhance growth and stress biomarkers.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Ethics Approval</title><p>The protocols of the research were formally approved by the Animal Ethics Advisory Committee of Hue University, Vietnam (Approval No. HUVNO39.C; 20 March 2025).</p></sec><sec><title>Birds, Housing, and Experimental Design</title><p>Three hundred male yellow-feathered Rilai one-day-old chicks were purchased, individually weighed, and randomly assigned to six treatments with five replicate pens of ten birds each in a completely randomized design. The experiment was performed in the natural summer season in Central Vietnam in an open-sided house. For the first three days, all the chicks were fed on an anti-stress additive in drinking water. During the 90-day trial, the birds were freely exposed to commercial corn-soybean meal diets, which were formulated to meet the feeding requirements of the Vietnamese. The treatments included: (1) plain drinking water (negative control), (2) oxytetracycline at 100 mg/kg diet (positive control), or (3-6) LPFS supplemented in drinking water at 25, 50, 75, or 100 mg/L, respectively. The fermented extract was made fresh every morning and given ad libitum.</p></sec><sec><title>Preparation of Fermented Shallot Extract</title><p>Fresh shallot (<italic>Allium cepa </italic>L.; GenBank ID: NC_057575.1) bulbs, which are harvested at 4-5 months of maturity and produced according to VietGAP biosecurity regulations (TCVN 11892-1:2017), were chosen as the starting material. The outer dry scales were removed, the bulbs were washed, and the edible part was homogenized to allow fermentation. The procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(V. et al., 2024)</xref>, with slight modifications, was followed for lactic acid fermentation. <italic>L. plantarum</italic> strain 1582 at the initial concentration of 1 x 108 CFU/mL was inoculated in shallot mash. The fermentation substrate contained 5% (w/v) NaCl and 3% (w/v) glucose, and it was incubated at 37 oC over 72 h under anaerobic conditions with mild agitation at 60 rpm. The fermented solution was then filtered to get the aqueous extract, which was then diluted in the drinking water and used. The final fermented extract had an estimated viable <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic> spp. of 2.7-3.0 x 108 CFU/mL. Major nutritional and bioactive components of the extract are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1.</xref></p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p> Nutritional and bioactive composition of <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic>-fermented shallot bulb extract</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Component/compound</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Value (mean ± SEM)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Determination method</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Polyphenol (mg/g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.25±0.22</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Folin -Ciocalteu</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Quercetin (mg/g)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.67±0.06</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">UV -Vis</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Allicin (mg/kg)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.25±0.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GC -MS</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Thiosulfate (mg/g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.21±0.08</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">GC</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S-allyl cysteine (mg/g)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.98±0.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">GC -MS</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Lactic acid (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.32±0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HPLC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Acetic acid (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.46±0.01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">HPLC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Citric acid (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.69±0.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">HPLC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Crude protein (g/kg)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">17.89±1.01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">AOAC</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Crude fat (g/kg)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.56±0.09</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">AOAC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Crude fiber (g/kg)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">21.4±1.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">AOAC</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.44±0.23</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">AOAC</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: SEM= Standard error of mean.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Diet Composition and Environmental Conditions</title><p>From the first day to the last day (day 35): The initial day and last day (day 35) were assigned to the birds as a control group. During the 36<sup>th</sup> to 90<sup>th</sup> day, they were fed on a finisher diet. In T1, the baseline diet was provided to the birds without antibiotics, and in T2, the birds were fed the baseline diet with the addition of 100 mg/kg diet of oxytetracycline. In T3 and T4, T5, and T6, the basal diet (no antibiotics) was administered to birds, and their drinking water was fed daily with fermented shallot extract at 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/L. New dilutions were made daily in the morning and served <italic>ad libitum</italic>. The composition of the diet complies with the feeding standards of the Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (TCVN 2265:2020) and is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2.</xref></p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p> Ingredients, composition, and nutritional composition of the diet for broiler chickens (as-fed basis)</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Items</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Starter phase (&lt;30 days of age)</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">Finisher phase (≥30 days of age)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="3">Ingredient composition (%)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Yellow corn</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">47.1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">56.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Soybean meal (35.1% crude protein)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">44.1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">35.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Fish meal</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.6</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">CaCO₃ (39%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">CaHPO₄</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.0</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Sodium chloride</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Choline chloride (51%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">DL-Methionine (98.5%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Vitamin premix¹</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Mineral premix²</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Calculated nutritional values (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">20</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude protein</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">221.7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">20.0</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude fat</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.18</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.37</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude fiber</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.25</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.05</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Calcium</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.20</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Phosphorus</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.31</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.44</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Lysine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.22</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.14</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Methionine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.70</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.45</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Methionine + Cystine</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.92</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.82</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Metabolizable energy (kCal/kg)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3100.0</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3150.0</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Each kilogram of vitamin premix contained 10 mg nicotinamide, 0.02 mg cholecalciferol, 0.3 mg folic acid, 2 mg pyridoxine HCl, 1.8 mg all-trans-retinyl acetate, 8 mg cyanocobalamin, 2.2 mg menadione, 8.3 mg alpha-tocopherol acetate, 160 mg choline chloride, and 20 mg D-biotin. Each kilogram of mineral premix contained 60 µg selenium (Se), 200 µg cobalt (Co) from CoSO₄, 800 µg iodine (I) from KI, 2 mg copper (Cu) from CuSO₄·5H₂O, 24 mg zinc (Zn) from ZnO, and 16 mg iron (Fe) from FeSO₄.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>During the experiment, feed and water were given freely. Ambient dry-bulb temperature and relative humidity were measured at 30-minute intervals with a digital thermo-hygrometer set at bird height. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 1</xref>, the temporal thermal pattern is depicted. Heat load was estimated using the temperature-humidity index according to Habeeb (2018): THI = Tdb - [(0.31 - 0.31 x RH) x (Tdb - 14.4)], where RH = RH%/100. Interpretation of THI values was made as follows: no heat stress, THI &lt; 27.8; moderate heat stress, 27.8 &lt;= THI &lt; 28.9; severe heat stress, 28.9 &lt;= THI &lt; 30.0; and extremely severe heat stress, THI &gt;= 30.0. The records of the environment revealed that there was extremely severe heat load in une and July and severe heat load in August, which confirmed the chronic natural summer heat challenge during the study period.</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-2"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Temporal profile of ambient dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, and derived temperature–humidity index (THI) during the experimental period based on repeated house measurements.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72086/version/52554/34011/416126"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Growth Performance and Sampling Serum Biochemistry</title><p>To measure the body weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR), the total feed intake and body weight for each replicate were recorded weekly on a replicate basis throughout the experiment by using standard procedures as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(V. et al., 2025)</xref>. One bird was randomly selected from each replicate pen at day 90, resulting in five birds per treatment (n = 5) and 30 birds in total. Blood samples were taken at the time of slaughter and examined for the lipid profile, liver function, acute phase proteins, corticosterone, and heat shock protein concentrations.</p></sec><sec><title>Serum Biochemistry</title><p>Total serum cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were measured using an automatic analyzer (Automatic analyzer 902, Hitachi, Germany), and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were estimated using the Friedewald equations: LDL = Total cholesterol - HDL - VLDL, where VLDL = Triglycerides/5 (Friedewald et al., 1972). The following parameters for liver function were determined using a BA400 biochemical and turbidimetry analyzer from Spain (Manual code TEUS00048-07-EN): alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST).</p></sec><sec><title>Stress and Oxidative Biomarkers</title><p>Using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (QAYEE-BIO, China), the concentrations of serum amyloid A (SAA), alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), ceruloplasmin (CP), and heat shock protein 70 (HSP 70) in each blood serum sample were measured. Although the working phases of all the ELISA kits are similar, each kit uses a unique set of standards with known concentrations. A microplate reader (Bio-Rad Microplate Reader, USA) was used to determine optical density (OD) at 450 nm. The standard curve linear regression equation was established using the concentration of the standards and the corresponding OD values, and the sample concentration was computed using this same equation.</p></sec><sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 21. For growth performance traits, the replicate pen was considered the experimental unit (five replicates per treatment). Weekly measurements were collected throughout the trial for management and monitoring purposes; however, the inferential analysis reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref> focused on biologically meaningful phase endpoints, namely day 35 (starter phase) and day 90 (overall final performance). For serum biochemical and stress-related measurements, one bird sampled from each replicate pen was used as the experimental observation (n = 5 per treatment). Because the primary objective was to compare treatment effects at these prespecified phase endpoints rather than model repeated trajectories over time, Time/Week was not included as a fixed factor in the primary model. When treatment effects were significant, means were separated using Tukey’s post hoc test. Results are presented as mean ± SE, and differences were considered significant at p&lt;0.05.</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Growth performance of chickens receiving <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot extract supplementation in drinking water</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Variables</th><th align="center" colspan="6" valign="middle"><italic>L. plantarum</italic> 1582 supplementation in drinking water</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">P-value</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">T1</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">T2</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">T3</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">T4</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">T5</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">T6</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="9" valign="top">35 days old (Starter phase)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Initial body weight (g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">44.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">45.1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">44.4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">44.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">45.2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">44.7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.878</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Final body weight (g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">898.5ᵈ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">906.3 cd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">946.3ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">934.5 <sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">919.2<sup> bc</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">907.9<sup> cd</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.32</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Body weight gain (g)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">853.3ᵈ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">861.3cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">901.4ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">889.4 <sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">874.3 <sup>bc</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">862.7 <sup>cd</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.19</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Feed intake (kg)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.200</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.202</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.237</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.232</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.244</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.243</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.813</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Cumulative FCR</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.40<sup> ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.39 <sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.37 <sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.38 <sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.42<sup> ab</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.44ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.091</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="9">90 days old (Finisher phase)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Final body weight (g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2230.3ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2230.5ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2298.3ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2219.2ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2219.6ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2230.5ᵇ</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Body weight gain (g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2185.3ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2185.5ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2253.1ᵃ</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2174.2ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2173.6ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2185.5ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Feed intake (kg)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.235ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.119<sup>c</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.175ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.153<sup> bc</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.145 <sup>bc</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.133<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Cumulative FCR</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.13ᵃᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.09 <sup>bc</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.05c</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.11ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.10ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.08 <sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.004</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Within a row, values with different superscripts differ at p&lt;0.05. FCR: Feed conversion ratio; T1: Negative control (basal diet plus plain drinking water without antibiotic or <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot bulb extract (LPFS)); T2: Positive control (basal diet plus oxytetracycline at 100 mg/kg diet); T3, T4, T5, and T6, basal diet plus LPFS in drinking water at 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/L, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><sec><title>Growth Performance</title><p>The effects of LPFS supplementation on the growth performance of Rilai chickens reared under chronic natural summer heat exposure are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>. The sustained thermal load documented by the environmental profile<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2"> (Figure 1)</xref> adversely affected the control group (T1), which exhibited the lowest body weight gain and the poorest overall feed efficiency. LPFS supplementation significantly mitigated these negative effects (p&lt;0.05). During the starter phase, treatment differences were already evident for final body weight and body weight gain, whereas the clearest treatment-related improvements in cumulative feed conversion became apparent by the final 90-day evaluation. Overall, birds receiving the fermented extract used nutrients more efficiently and grew better than untreated birds despite a sustained summer heat challenge.</p></sec><sec><title>Blood Biochemical Parameters</title><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2</xref>, heat load was associated with unfavorable changes in serum lipid profile and liver-related enzymes. The control group exhibited the highest levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol. In contrast, LPFS supplementation dose-dependently ameliorated these parameters. Groups T5 and T6 showed a significant reduction in serum cholesterol and triglycerides compared to the control (p&lt;0.05), while HDL-cholesterol levels tended to increase. Additionally, serum activities of AST and ALT, which are markers of hepatocellular damage, were significantly elevated in the control group but were effectively maintained at lower levels in the T5 and T6 groups (p&lt;0.05), suggesting a hepatoprotective effect of LPFS against heat-induced oxidative damage.</p><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Serum lipid indices and liver enzymes of chickens at day 90 receiving <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot extract supplementation in drinking water</p></caption><p> T1, negative control (basal diet plus plain drinking water without antibiotic or <italic>L. plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot bulb extract (LPFS)); T2, oxytetracycline (100 mg/kg diet); T3-T6, LPFS at 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/L, respectively.</p><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72086/version/52554/34011/416127"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Stress Biomarkers and Antioxidant Status</title><p>The impact of LPFS on physiological stress and oxidative status is summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 3</xref>. Chickens in the control group exhibited significantly elevated serum Corticosterone and Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70) levels (p&lt;0.05), confirming a state of acute heat stress. However, supplementation with LPFS significantly downregulated these stress biomarkers, with the lowest levels observed in the T6 group. Regarding oxidative stability, the malondialdehyde (MDA) content (or TBARS value), a marker of lipid peroxidation, was significantly lower in the LPFS- treated groups compared to the control (p&lt;0.05). At the same time, antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were enhanced, especially in T5 and T6. Together, these responses indicate that the fermented extract strengthened endogenous antioxidant defense in chickens exposed to chronic summer heat.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Serum stress- and immune-related biomarkers of chickens at day 90, including serum amyloid A (SAA), alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), ceruloplasmin (CP), and heat shock protein 70 (HSP 70), receiving <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot extract supplementation in drinking water</p></caption><p> T1, negative control (basal diet plus plain drinking water without antibiotic or <italic>L. plantarum</italic> 1582-fermented shallot bulb extract (LPFS)); T2, oxytetracycline (100 mg/kg diet); T3 - T6, LPFS at 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/L, respectively.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/72086/version/52554/34011/416128" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>Heat stress remains one of the most urgent environmental issues in tropical poultry production. It interferes with the overall physiological balance, which promotes oxidative damage, impairs intestinal integrity, and suppresses immune function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(A. et al., 2018)</xref>. The current study involved the rearing of birds in open-sided house conditions in real-field conditions instead of in a controlled climatic chamber. However, the experimental recording of temperature-humidity index stayed within the severe to extremely severe range in most of the experimental periods, thus confirming the fact that the flock was subjected to sustained natural heat load. The significant decrease in growth performance and the increase in stress biomarkers in the untreated control group are in line with the well-documented metabolic shift that involves the redistribution of energy between growth and thermoregulation and inflammatory processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(S. et al., 2020)</xref>. These negative effects were evidently mitigated by supplementation with the fermented shallot extract (LPFS), implying the product has protective effects through a number of complementary pathways relating to gut health, antioxidant effects, and metabolic regulation.</p><p>The observed benefits of the increase in body weight gain and the ratio of feed to metabolite among the birds fed probiotics and prebiotics can be largely attributed to a synbiotic-like interaction between the prebiotic substrates (shallots) and the metabolites produced by <italic>L. plantarum</italic>. Heat stress has been found to compromise tight-junction proteins and cause a leaky-gut system, which reduces nutrient absorption and increases systemic exposure to endotoxins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(J. et al., 2014)</xref>. The postbiotic compounds that are produced during the process of fermentation, including the short-chain fatty acids and the bacteriocin-like compounds, seem to have contributed to stabilizing the intestinal barrier and to increasing the efficiency of digestion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(S. &amp; S, 2019)</xref>. Interestingly, the positive action on cumulative feed conversion was more pronounced in the later stages of the trial, which suggests that the full physiological usefulness of the fermented extract may require prolonged exposure to the fermented extract under a persistent natural heat stress.</p><p>Another interesting observation was the high drop in serum corticosterone levels in the birds subjected to LPFS. Their downregulation would be expected to conserve lean tissue accretion and facilitate overall growth even in stressful conditions due to glucocorticoids promoting muscle proteolysis and gluconeogenesis <xref rid="BIBR-10" ref-type="bibr">(B. &amp; R, 2019)</xref>.</p><p>It was also important that the antioxidant defense system (enhanced SOD and GPx activities) was improved along with the reduction of the malondialdehyde and heat shock protein 70 levels. We propose that the fermentation step was a key factor in this result. <italic>L. plantarum</italic> has an activity of β-glucosidase, which has the capacity to transform shallot flavonoid glycosides into more bioactive aglycones like quercetin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(T. et al., 2014)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-5" ref-type="bibr">(V. et al., 2024)</xref>. Upon absorption, the compounds are most likely to activate the Nrf2 signaling pathway, which increases the expression of the key antioxidant enzymes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(L. et al., 2020)</xref>. The consequent increase in cellular redox balance would subsequently decrease the necessity of excessive HSP70 induction, as oxidative stress is a significant trigger of the heat-shock response <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(G. et al., 2019)</xref>. Practically, these changes imply that the degree of acquired thermotolerance in the LPFS-supplemented birds was greater than in the unsupplemented control group.</p><p>Lastly, the observed dose-dependent decreases in serum cholesterol and triglycerides observed in the LPFS groups are in line with the known hypolipidemic properties of <italic>Allium</italic> species. </p><p>Two primary mechanisms are likely involved: (1) Steroidal saponins in shallot form insoluble complexes with cholesterol in the gut, inhibiting its absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(D. et al., 2019)</xref>; and (2) Probiotic metabolites inhibit the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(G. &amp; T, 2010)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(M. et al., 2018)</xref>. Additionally, the normalization of liver enzymes (AST, ALT) confirms that LPFS protected hepatocytes from oxidative injury and lipid infiltration.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p><italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic>-fermented shallot bulb extract (LPFS) administered in drinking water improved growth performance and reduced circulating stress and oxidative damage biomarkers in Rilai chickens reared under prolonged natural summer heat exposure. The most consistent responses were observed at 75–100 mg/L. LPFS in drinking water may therefore represent a practical postbiotic–phytochemical strategy to support chicken productivity in hot climates and to reduce reliance on antibiotic growth promoters, but further dose-response and biomarker-validation studies are needed.</p></sec><sec><title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>We thank laboratory staff for technical assistance and animal care during the study. This research was supported by the Leading University Project for International Cooperation through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (Grant No. NRF-2023H1A7A2A02000078) and by the Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (Project Code: B2023-DHH-24).</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>We state that generative AI and AI-assisted technologies were used for language refinement. All the content has been critically reviewed and edited by the authors.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="how-to-cite"><title>How to Cite</title><p>Hai, P. V., Vinh, N. D., Vui, T. Q., Mai, H. T., &amp; Son, H. V. (2026). Fermented Shallot (Allium cepa L.) Extract with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Improves Growth Performance and Attenuates Physiological Stress in Broiler Chickens under Chronic Natural Summer Heat Exposure. <italic>Tropical Animal Science Journal</italic>, <italic>49</italic>(5), 390. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.5.390</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of fermentation of herbal products on growth performance, breast meat quality, and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens: A meta-analysis</article-title><source>Italian Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Adli D.</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Sholikin M.</given-names></name><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Ujilestari</given-names></name><name><surname>B.</surname><given-names>Ahmed</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Sadiqqua</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Harahap M.</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Sofyan</given-names></name><name><surname>S</surname><given-names>Sugiharto</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition</article-title><source>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</source><volume>25</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Alagawany</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>El-Hack</given-names></name><name><surname>E.</surname><given-names>Farag M.</given-names></name><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Sachan M.</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Karthik</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Dhama</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge</article-title><source>Clinical Chemistry</source><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Friedewald W.</given-names></name><name><surname>I.</surname><given-names>Levy R.</given-names></name><name><surname>S</surname><given-names>Fredrickson D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1972</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Temperaturehumidity indices as indicators to heat stress of climatic conditions with relation to production and reproduction of farm animals</article-title><source>International Journal of Biotechnology and Recent Advances</source><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Habeeb A.</given-names></name><name><surname>E.</surname><given-names>Gad A.</given-names></name><name><surname>A</surname><given-names>Atta M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Selection of Lactobacillus strains from native chicken feces for the fermentation of purple onion (Allium cepa L.) as an antibiotic alternative against Salmonella spp. in chickens</article-title><source>Open Veterinary Journal</source><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V.</surname><given-names>Hai P.</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Hoang P.</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Hung P.</given-names></name><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Na T.</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Lai N.</given-names></name><name><surname>D.</surname><given-names>Khuong N.</given-names></name><name><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Liem T.</given-names></name><name><surname>X</surname><given-names>Hoa N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Fermented purple onion (Allium cepa L.) and chive (Allium schoenoprasum) bulb extracts as antibiotic alternatives against toxin-carrying bacteria: in vitro and pathogenicity assessment in chickens</article-title><source>Open Veterinary Journal</source><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V.</surname><given-names>Hai P.</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Hoa N.</given-names></name><name><surname>A</surname><given-names>Hoang T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Fermented chive (Allium schoenoprasum) with Lactobacillus plantarum: A potential antibiotic alternative feed additive for broilers challenged with Escherichia coli</article-title><source>Fermentation</source><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V.</surname><given-names>Hai P.</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Anh L.</given-names></name><name><surname>X</surname><given-names>Hoa N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>277</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Improved release and metabolism of flavonoids by steered fermentation processes: A review</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Huynh N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Camp J.</surname></name><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Smagghe</given-names></name><name><surname>K</surname><given-names>Raes</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The genus Allium as poultry feed additive: A review</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>D.</surname><given-names>Kothari</given-names></name><name><surname>W.</surname><given-names>Lee</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Niu</given-names></name><name><surname>S</surname><given-names>Kim</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>1032</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Oxidative stress in the poultry gut: Potential challenges and interventions</article-title><source>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</source><volume>6</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B.</surname><given-names>Mishra</given-names></name><name><surname>R</surname><given-names>Jha</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>60</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heat stress in poultry production: Mitigation strategies to overcome the future challenges facing the global poultry industry</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>78</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Nawab</given-names></name><name><surname>F.</surname><given-names>Ibtisham</given-names></name><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><name><surname>B.</surname><given-names>Kieser</given-names></name><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><name><surname>W.</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><name><surname>Y.</surname><given-names>Zhao</given-names></name><name><surname>Y.</surname><given-names>Nawab</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names></name><name><surname>L</surname><given-names>An</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: A review of in vivo and in vitro findings</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Ooi L.</given-names></name><name><surname>T</surname><given-names>Liong M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Song</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names></name><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Ke Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>F.</surname><given-names>Jiao L.</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Hu C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Y.</surname><given-names>Diao Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>B.</surname><given-names>Shi</given-names></name><name><surname>T</surname><given-names>Zou X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Recent advances in fermented feeds towards improved broiler chicken performance, gastrointestinal tract microecology and immune responses: A review</article-title><source>Animal Nutrition</source><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Sugiharto</given-names></name><name><surname>S</surname><given-names>Ranjitkar</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antioxidant defence systems and oxidative stress in poultry biology: An update</article-title><source>Antioxidants</source><volume>8</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>F.</surname><given-names>Surai P.</given-names></name><name><surname>I.</surname><given-names>Kochish I.</given-names></name><name><surname>I.</surname><given-names>Fisinin V.</given-names></name><name><surname>T</surname><given-names>Kidd M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>235</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A review of heat stress in chickens. Part II: Insights into protein and energy utilization and feeding</article-title><source>Frontiers in Physiology</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Teyssier</given-names></name><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Brugaletta</given-names></name><name><surname>F.</surname><given-names>Sirri</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Dridi</given-names></name><name><surname>J</surname><given-names>Rochell S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>943612</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Quercetin protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal oxidative stress in broiler chickens through activation of Nrf2 pathway</article-title><source>Molecules</source><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Sun</given-names></name><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><name><surname>Y.</surname><given-names>Dong</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><name><surname>W</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>1053</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performances, and potential mitigation strategies</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Wasti</given-names></name><name><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Sah</given-names></name><name><surname>B</surname><given-names>Mishra</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>10081266</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality? -A review</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>98</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Zaboli</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><name><surname>U</surname><given-names>Ahn D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>