<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.6.562</article-id><title-group><article-title>Dietary Supplementation of Encapsulated <italic>Dendrophthoe pentandra</italic> Leaf Extract in Broilers under High Stocking Density</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-1478</contrib-id><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7717-760X</contrib-id><name><surname>Puspitaningrum</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-9183</contrib-id><name><surname>Agusetyaningsih</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-8571</contrib-id><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-3282</contrib-id><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>D. A. P.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-0543</contrib-id><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal and  Agricultural Sciences</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Diponegoro</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/056bjta22</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-9-11" publication-format="electronic"><day>11</day><month>9</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-9-3"><day>3</day><month>9</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal (Issue in progress)</issue-title><fpage>562</fpage><lpage>572</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-2-10"><day>10</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/71484" xlink:title="Dietary Supplementation of Encapsulated Dendrophthoe pentandra Leaf Extract in Broilers under High Stocking Density">Dietary Supplementation of Encapsulated Dendrophthoe pentandra Leaf Extract in Broilers under High Stocking Density</self-uri><abstract><p>High stocking density can compromise broiler welfare and physiological homeostasis, but the magnitude of the challenge depends on housing and environmental conditions. This study evaluated whether encapsulated <italic>Dendrophthoe pentandra</italic> leaf extract modified production performance, hematological and serum biochemical variables, relative immune organ weights, and antioxidant status in broilers reared at high stocking density. A total of 300 Cobb CP 707 broiler chicks were assigned to four treatments with five pen replicates: T0, 9 birds/m²; T1, 17 birds/m²; T2, 17 birds/m² plus 0.5 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract; and T3, 17 birds/m² plus 1.0 g/kg extract. Variables measured included daily feed intake, daily weight gain, feed conversion ratio, blood profile, serum biochemistry, lymphoid organ weights, and antioxidant activity. Results showed that the treatment significantly improved daily feed intake and increased the relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius (p&lt;0.05). Platelet distribution width (PDW) and thrombocyte counts were significantly lower in extract-supplemented groups compared to controls. However, the treatment did not significantly affect daily weight gain, feed conversion ratio, most blood biochemical profiles, albumin, SGOT, SGPT, SOD, or MDA activity (p&gt;0.05). The T2 treatment (0.5 g extract) yielded optimal improvements without adverse effects on other measured variables. These findings suggest that encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract can serve as a natural supplement to enhance feed intake and immune organ development, supporting broiler health and performance under high-density rearing conditions in tropical environments. This approach offers a promising strategy to mitigate the negative impacts of high stocking density in poultry production.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dendrophthoe pentandra</kwd><kwd>broiler density</kwd><kwd>immune responses</kwd><kwd>encapsulated extract</kwd><kwd>phytochemical compound</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Broiler chicken (<italic>Gallus gallus domesticus</italic>) is one of the sources of animal protein that is readily available and affordable compared with other types of meat. Consumption of broiler chicken meat has increased rapidly each year. It is a challenge for broiler chicken farmers to increase their production capacity. One of the efforts to increase the productivity of broiler chickens is to increase their density <xref rid="BIBR-19" ref-type="bibr">(Hu et al., 2019)</xref>. High stocking density may induce stress conditions that adversely affect growth performance, physiological status, and the balance of intestinal microflora <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Li et al., 2019)</xref>. In addition, increased stress intensity was associated with decreased immunity, resulting in increased susceptibility to disease in broilers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Li et al., 2019)</xref>.</p><p>Stress arising from the high number of chickens in the cage area increases the ratio of heterophiles to lymphocytes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Astaneh et al., 2018)</xref>, decreases the number of lymphoid cells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">(Yanai et al., 2018)</xref>, and decreases the activity of antioxidant enzymes<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(J. et al., 2015)</xref>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Sugiharto et al., 2019)</xref>, stress-induced physiological changes can increase the formation of free radicals or reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby causing oxidative stress.</p><p>Oxidative stress refers to a condition in which the production of ROS exceeds the body’s antioxidant defense capacity. An imbalance of free radicals may induce lipid peroxidation in cell membranes, particularly in unsaturated fatty acids. Lipid peroxidation is a complex process involving the reaction between polyunsaturated fatty acids in membrane phospholipids and ROS, resulting in the formation of hydroperoxides and ultimately producing malondialdehyde (MDA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Tu et al., 2024)</xref>. The high MDA content in the bodies of broiler chickens indicates the presence of cellular damage and excessive oxidation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Iheagwam &amp; Chinedu, 2024)</xref>.</p><p>To overcome these negative effects, synthetic antioxidant supplementation is often applied in the broiler industry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Awang et al., 2023)</xref>. However, prolonged use of synthetic antioxidants, such as butylated hydroxytoluene and butylated hydroxyanisole, may pose potential toxic effects and health risks to consumers<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">(Y. et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">(M. &amp; S.M, 2015)</xref>. Therefore, natural antioxidants are considered safer and are recommended as an alternative to reduce dependence on synthetic antioxidants in broiler chicken rearing, including at high densities. Typical recommended stocking densities for broilers vary by region and climate but generally range from 10 to 15 birds/m² in tropical climates to optimize welfare and production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Iffiong et al., 2021)</xref>. The density of 17 birds/m² used in this study represents a high-density condition to simulate stress challenges. Broilers are usually raised from day-old chicks through three main growth phases: starter (0-14 days), grower (15-28 days), and finisher (29-42 days) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-53">(Tikate et al., 2020)</xref> In this study, the high stocking density treatment was applied starting at 8 days of age, corresponding to the starter phase, to evaluate the early physiological responses of broilers to density-induced stress during the rearing period<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Chauhan et al., 2022)</xref>. The application of 17 birds/m² is relevant for the entire rearing period and reflects intensive production systems in tropical climates where space constraints are common<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Iffiong et al., 2021)</xref>. This density choice is justified to investigate the physiological and performance impacts under stress-inducing conditions while considering animal welfare and production efficiency.</p><p><italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaves are generally abundant and easily sourced in tropical regions where broiler production is intensive, particularly in Southeast Asia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Awang et al., 2023)</xref>. Their widespread presence on host trees and adaptability to local environments make them a sustainable resource <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Alabbosh, 2024)</xref>. Harvesting leaves for antioxidant supplementation can be managed without significant depletion of natural populations, especially if collection focuses on pruning rather than complete defoliation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Andreichenko et al., 2023)</xref>. This sustainable availability supports their suitability as a long-term, eco-friendly alternative to synthetic antioxidants in broiler diets, aligning with growing demands for natural feed additives that reduce environmental impact.</p><p>Encapsulated<italic> D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract as a source of antioxidants contains various bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, amino acids, carbohydrates, tannins, alkaloids, and saponins, which play a role in inhibiting oxidative damage caused by free radicals <xref rid="BIBR-27" ref-type="bibr">(Lazuardi et al., 2022)</xref>. The antioxidant activity of <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaves is mainly influenced by the content of flavonoids and phenolic compounds, including quercetin, which can neutralize hydroxyl radicals, superoxide anions, and fat peroxide radicals and function as antibacterial and immunomodulatory agents. In addition, secondary metabolites, such as tannins, saponins, alkaloids, and sterols (e.g., β-sitosterol and stigmasterol acetate), contribute to the suppression of oxidative stress and the strengthening of the immune response <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Kong et al., 2023)</xref>. Therefore, encapsulation of <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract is expected to provide a synergistic or complementary effect in minimizing the impact of stress on broiler chickens by improving physiological balance and body resistance.</p><p>In plant extracts, the encapsulation process protects bioactive compounds from oxidation and prevents the influence of external factors such as humidity, temperature, and microbial contamination during storage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Mishra, 2016)</xref>. To date, research on the potential interaction or synergy between various bioactive compounds in <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract is still very limited, particularly regarding its ability to mitigate oxidative stress in broiler chickens reared under high stocking density conditions. Therefore, it is hypothesized that supplementation with encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract may alleviate oxidative stress induced by high stocking density (17 birds/m²), thereby improving antioxidant status, immune response, and production performance in broiler chickens. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> extract on the production performance, blood biochemical parameters, immune organ weights, and antioxidant status of broilers under high stocking density.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Production of Encapsulated <italic>Dendrophthoe pentandra</italic> Leaf Extract</title><p><italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaves were collected from mango host trees located in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, specifically within the campus area of Universitas Diponegoro under natural field conditions. Leaves were dried at room temperature without exposure to direct sunlight. The dried leaves were ground using a grinder mixer until they became a fine powder and were extracted with 70% ethanol at room temperature for 72 h at a ratio of 1:5 (b/v). The resulting extracts were filtered using filter paper to obtain the filtrate. The filtrate was evaporated using a vacuum rotary evaporator to obtain a paste-shaped extract of <italic>D. pentandra</italic>. After the evaporation process, the extract was encapsulated with maltodextrin as a coating agent using the freeze-drying method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Jamdar et al., 2021)</xref>. The coating material consisted of maltodextrin dissolved in distilled water at a ratio of 1:3. The maltodextrin solution was then mixed with the<italic> D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract filtrate at a ratio of 5:1 and subsequently dried using the freeze-drying method to obtain encapsulated <italic>D. pentandr</italic>a leaf extract powder. Antioxidant activity of the leaf material and encapsulated extract was assessed using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging assay, following the spectrophotometric principle described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Yismairai et al., 2019)</xref>. Briefly, the sample solution was mixed with DPPH reagent, incubated in the dark, and absorbance was measured against a reagent blank. Radical-scavenging activity was calculated as inhibition (%) = [(A control – A sample)/A control] × 100. The same sample concentration, reaction time, solvent, wavelength, and analytical batch were used for both materials. The reported values represent percentage inhibition under these assay conditions. The antioxidant activity of <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaves and encapsulated <italic>D. pentandr</italic>a leaf extract is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 1</xref>. </p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-3"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Antioxidant activity of <italic>Dendrophthoe pentandra </italic>leaves and encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th scope="col" align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Items </th><th scope="col" align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Antioxidant activity (Inhibition) (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><italic>D. pentantra </italic>leaves</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">39,96</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra </italic>leaf extract</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">76,18</td></tr></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: *Analyzed at the Laboratory of Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang (2025).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Ethical Approval</title><p>The research procedures were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro (62-03/A-08/KEP-FPP).</p></sec><sec><title>Animals and Experimental Diets</title><p>A total of 300 unsexed Cobb CP 707 broiler chicks with an average body weight of 46.7 ± 2.2 g were randomly assigned to four treatments with five replicates following standard experimental designs in poultry studies: T0 (density of 9 birds/m²), T1 (density of 17 birds/m²), T2 (density of 17 birds/m² + 0.5 g encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract), and T3 (density of 17 birds/m² + 1 g encapsulated <italic>D. pentandr</italic>a leaf extract). The stocking density treatments (9 and 17 birds/m²) were selected based on Agusetyaningsih et al. (2025), who reported broiler studies using comparable low- and high-density conditions (9-10 vs 14-16 birds/m²) to induce production stress and evaluate physiological responses. Similarly, the inclusion levels of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract (0.5 and 1.0 g/kg feed) were based on prior studies reporting effective phytogenic supplementation ranges of 0.5-1.5 g/kg feed in broilers, particularly under high stocking density conditions <xref rid="BIBR-2" ref-type="bibr">(Agusetyaningsih et al., 2025)</xref>. Broiler chicks were reared in an open-house system using litter (rice husks). Chickens were fed commercial feed from 0 to 7 days of age. At 8-35 days of age, chickens were fed a pre-formulated feed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 2</xref>) with different doses of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract. </p><p>The sample size was determined based on previous studies to ensure adequate statistical power <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Sugiharto et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Li et al., 2019)</xref>. Broilers were reared in an open-sided house with natural ventilation using rice husk litter (8-10 cm depth), which is commonly applied in tropical poultry production systems<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Soliman &amp; Hassan, 2020)</xref>. The ambient temperature ranged from 28 to 32 °C with relative humidity between 60%-75%, and a continuous lighting program (23 h light:1 h dark) was applied <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Osti et al., 2017)</xref>. Temperature and humidity were recorded twice daily.</p><p>All chickens were vaccinated with an active ND vaccine (Medivac ND Clone 45®, PT. Medion Farma Jaya) administered at the age of 22 days through drinking water. Body weight and feed consumption were recorded weekly from the age of 8 to 35 days. At 35 days of age, one chicken per replicate was randomly selected for blood collection via the brachial vein. The collected blood was transferred into vacutainer tubes containing an anticoagulant (EDTA) for complete blood count analysis, or into tubes without anticoagulant for serum separation. Serum was obtained by centrifuging the blood samples at 3,000 rpm for 15 min and subsequently stored at freezing temperature until further analysis. At the end of the 35-day experimental period, the sampled chickens were slaughtered, and their lymphoid organs, including the bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus, were collected.</p><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p> Ingredients and nutritional composition of broiler diets provided on days 08-35</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Type of feed / item</th><th colspan="2" valign="top" align="center">Broiler growth phase</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Starter (day 8-21)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Finisher (day 22-35)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Yellow maize (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">50.27</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">58.67</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Soybean meal (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">42.97</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">34.67</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Palm oil (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.9</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.9</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">DL-methionine (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Bentonite (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.75</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.75</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Limestone (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Monocalcium phosphate (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Premix (%)<sup>2</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.34</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.34</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Choline chloride (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Salt (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Analysed nutritional compositions:</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3249.69</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3204.43</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Crude protein</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">25.11</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">21.87</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Crude fibre</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.86</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.54</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Crude fat</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.58</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.69</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Water</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.87</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.89</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ash</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.09</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.80</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: ¹ Metabolizable energy was calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Bolton, 1967)</xref> formula: 40.81 {0.87 [crude protein + 2.25 crude fat + nitrogen-free extract] + 2.5}. ² Premix contained (per kg of diet) of Vitamin A 7750 IU, Vitamin D3 1550 IU, Vitamin E 1.88 mg, Vitamin B1 1.25 mg, Vitamin B2 3.13 mg, Vitamin B6 1.88 mg, Vitamin B12 0.01 mg, Vitamin C 25 mg, folic acid 1.50 mg, Ca-D-pantothenate 7.5 mg, niacin (Niacin) 1.88 mg, biotin 0.13 mg, Co 0.20 mg, Cu 4.35 mg, Fe 54 mg, I 0.45 mg, Mn 130 mg, Zn 86.5 mg, Se 0.25 mg, L-lysine 80 mg, choline chloride 500 mg, DL-methionine 900 mg, CaCO3 641.5 mg, dicalcium phosphate 1500 mg</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Data Collection and Laboratory Analysis</title><p><bold>Performance of broilers</bold>. Broiler performance was evaluated based on daily body weight gain, daily feed intake, final body weight, and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Daily body weight gain was calculated following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Agusetyaningsih et al., 2022)</xref> by recording the body weight of birds on day 35 to obtain the final weight, subtracting the initial weight measured at the end of day 7, and dividing the difference by the experimental duration (28 days). Daily feed intake was determined by dividing the total feed consumed during the trial by the length of the experimental period. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio between feed intake and body weight gain during the treatment period. In this study, the final body weight and FCR are presented as mean ± standard deviation.</p><p><bold>Complete blood counts</bold>. To assess the hematological parameters, one bird was randomly selected from each replicate, and blood samples were collected via the brachial vein. Blood was drawn using a 3 mL syringe fitted with a 25G needle and then transferred into EDTA tubes (0.5 mL). The samples were subsequently subjected to hematological analysis in the laboratory. The parameters measured included Red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), packed cell volume (PCV), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC). Complete blood counts were determined using the dilution flask method as described by <xref rid="BIBR-5" ref-type="bibr">(Almuthaybiri et al., 2025)</xref>. Hemoglobin levels were measured using the Sahli method. Erythrocyte and leukocyte counts were determined based on the dilution method, and a Bürker chamber was used for cell counting. Hematocrit values were determined using the microhaematocrit technique, while differential leukocyte counts were assessed using a light microscope.</p><p><bold>Serum protein profiles of broilers</bold>. During the fifth week of the experiment, one bird was randomly selected from each replicate pen for blood sampling. Approximately 2 mL of blood was collected from the brachial vein, resulting in five independent serum samples per treatment. Blood sampling was performed using a 3 mL syringe fitted with a 25 G needle. The collected blood was transferred into plain tubes and allowed to stand for approximately 15 minutes to facilitate serum separation. The serum was then separated from the remaining cellular components by aspirating it with a pipette and subsequently used for biochemical analysis. The analyses followed the procedures described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Sugiharto et al., 2016)</xref> with minor modifications. The albumin levels were determined by the bromocresol green (BCG) method. SGOT and SGPT levels were determined using the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) method. </p><p><bold>Relative immune organ weights of broilers</bold>. The relative weights of immune organs (bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus) were calculated following the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Choi et al., 2021)</xref>by dividing the organ weight by live body weight and multiplying the result by 100%.</p><p><bold>Antioxidant activity.</bold> Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity were determined as described by Agusetyaningsih et al. (2022). SOD activity was evaluated based on the ability of the sample to inhibit pyrogallol auto-oxidation. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.2), 1 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, and the sample. The reaction was initiated by adding pyrogallol to achieve a final concentration of 0.2 mM, followed by kinetic measurement of absorbance. SOD levels were expressed in units (U/ml). Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were determined using a thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reactive substances assay. Each sample was vortexed, mixed with 8.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The control samples were processed similarly. Subsequently, 20% acetic acid and 0.6% TBA were added, and the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 90-95 °C for 1 h. After incubation, a butanol/pyridine solution (15:1) was added to the supernatant, vortexed, and centrifuged. MDA concentrations were reported in nmol/mL.</p></sec><sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on a completely randomized design (CRD). The statistical model used was:</p><p>Y<sub>ij </sub>= μ + τ<sub>i</sub> + ϵ<sub>ij</sub></p><p>where Y<sub>ij </sub>is the observed value, μ is the overall mean, τ<sub>i​</sub> is the treatment effect, and ϵ<sub>ij​ </sub>is the experimental error. Prior to analysis, data normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene’s test. Differences among treatments were further analyzed using Duncan’s multiple range test when significant effects were observed (p&lt;0.05). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><sec><title>Growth Performance of Broilers</title><p>Dietary supplementation of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract significantly affected daily feed intake (DFI) (p&lt;0.05), whereas no significant effects were observed on daily weight gain (DWG), final body weight, or feed conversion ratio (FCR) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 3</xref>). Broilers in the T2 group exhibited the highest feed intake, which increased by 6.1% compared to T0 (107.07 vs 100.89 g/day) and by 1.7% compared to T1 (107.07 vs 105.29 g/day). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in DWG (p = 0.737), final body weight (p = 0.647), or FCR (p = 0.504).</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-5"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Performance of broilers (days 8-35) with supplemented encapsulated Dendrophthoe pentandra leaf extract in high stocking density</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Variables</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="4">Treatments</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">p value</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">T0</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">T1</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">T2</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">T3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">DWG (g)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">61.94</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">57.22</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">63.73</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">62.35</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">0.720</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.737</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">DFI (g)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">100.89<sup>d</sup></td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">105.29<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">107.07<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">104.77<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0.084</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">&lt;0.000</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Final BW (g)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1958.98</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1943.78</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2011.26</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1961.87</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">19.510</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.647</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">FCR</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1.63</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1.72</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1.68</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1.68</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.088</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.504</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Different superscripts (a, b, c, d) within the same row indicate significant differences (p&lt;0.05). T0: broiler chickens were reared at a density of 9 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T1: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T2: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 0.5 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra </italic>leaf extract; T3: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 1.0 g/kg encapsulated<italic> D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract. SEM: standard error of the mean; DWG: daily weight gain; DFI:  daily feed intake; Final BW: final body weight; FCR: feed conversion ratio.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Complete Blood Counts of Broilers</title><p>Most hematological variables, including erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV, MCH, MCHC, leukocytes, heterophils, lymphocytes, and H/L ratio, were not significantly affected by treatments (p&gt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 4</xref>). However, significant differences were observed in thrombocyte count and platelet distribution width (PDW). Thrombocyte count decreased significantly in T3 by 42.8% compared to T0 (15.80 vs 27.60 ×10³/µL; p = 0.003). Similarly, PDW values were reduced by 41.3% in T2 compared to T0 (8.00 vs 13.64; p = 0.010). </p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Complete blood counts of broilers with supplemented encapsulated Dendrophthoe pentandra leaf extract in high stocking density</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Variables</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4">Treatments</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">SEM</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">p value</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">T0</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">T1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T2</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Erythrocytes (10 6 /μL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.07</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.87</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.90</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.86</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.049</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.424</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Hemoglobin (g/dL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.40</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.66</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.76</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.28</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.178</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.387</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Haematocrit (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">34.78</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">31.26</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">31.66</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">31.44</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.826</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.408</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCV (fL)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.46</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.38</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.36</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.893</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.823</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">MCH (pg)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">40.48</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">40.76</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">40.82</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">44.36</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.611</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.119</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MCHC (g/dL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">23.60</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">23.90</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">24.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">25.74</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.356</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.181</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">RDW-SD (fL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">47.96</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">46.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">45.72</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">46.84</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.631</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.658</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">RDW-CV (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.84</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.58</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.44</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.56</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.105</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.602</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MPV (fL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.18</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.08</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.74</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.116</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.579</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">PDW (fL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.64ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.72ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.00ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.76ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.551</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.010</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Leukocytes (10³/μL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">69.50</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">71.88</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">72.88</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.594</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.316</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Heterophils (10³/μL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.62</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.40</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.60</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.92</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.258</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.240</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Lymphocytes (10³/μL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">57.40</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">66.10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">69.28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">68.96</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.439</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.311</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Thrombocytes (10³/μL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">27.60ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">24.40ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">22.00ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">15.80ᵇ</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.924</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.003</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratio H/L</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.04</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.05</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.106</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.772</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Different superscripts (a, b) within the same row indicate significant differences (p&lt;0.05). T0: broiler chickens were reared at a density of 9 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T1: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T2: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 0.5 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract; T3: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 1.0 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract. SEM: standard error of the mean; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; RDW-SD: red blood cell distribution width-standard discrepancy; RDW-CV: red blood cell distribution width-coefficient of variation; MPV: mean platelet volume; PDW: platelet distribution width; Ratio H/L: ratio heterophils/ lymphocytes.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Serum Protein Profiles of Broilers</title><p>Serum protein profile data are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 5</xref>. No significant differences were observed in albumin (p = 0.401), SGOT (p = 0.495), or SGPT (p = 0.185) levels among treatments. Although SGPT levels in T3 were numerically higher (5.98 U/L) compared to T0 (2.70 U/L), this increase (+121.5%) was not statistically significant.</p><table-wrap id="table-6" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Serum protein profiles of broilers with supplemented encapsulated <italic>Dendrophthoe pentandra</italic> leaf extract in high stocking density</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Variables</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4">Treatments</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">p value</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T0</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">T1</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">T2</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Albumin (g/dL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.46</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.38</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.36</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.036</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.401</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">SGOT (U/L)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">273.72</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">275.10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">290.80</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">320.46</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.900</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.495</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">SGPT (U/L) </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.0</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.98</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.232</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.185</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: T0: broiler chickens were reared at a density of 9 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T1: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T2: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 0.5 g/kg encapsulated D. pentandra leaf extract; T3: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 1.0 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract. SEM: standard error of the mean.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Relative Immune Organ Weights of the Broilers</title><p>The relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius was significantly affected by treatment (p = 0.015), while spleen and thymus weights remained unchanged (p = 0.711 and P = 0.438,  respectively) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 6</xref>). Broilers in T2 exhibited the highest bursa weight, which increased by 50.0% compared to T0 (0.06 vs 0.04%).</p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 6</label><caption><p> Relative immune organ weights of the broilers with supplemented encapsulated <italic>Dendrophthoe pentandra</italic> leaf extract in high stocking density</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Variables (% live body weight)</th><th colspan="4" valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">SEM</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">p value</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">T0</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T1</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">T2</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bursa of Fabricius</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.05 <sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.06ᵃ</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.06 <sup>ab</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.055</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.015</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Spleen</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.11</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.09</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.09</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.174</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.711</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Thymus</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.21</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.18</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.374</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.438</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Different superscripts (a, bc, c) within the same row indicate significant differences (p&lt;0.05). T0: broiler chickens were reared at a density of 9 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T1: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T2: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 0.5 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract; T3: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 1.0 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra </italic>leaf extract. SEM: standard error of the mean.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Antioxidative Status of Broilers</title><p>No significant differences were observed in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (p = 0.205) or malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (p = 0.883) among treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>). However, SOD activity showed an increasing trend in T3, with a 29.3% higher value compared to T0 (5.433 vs 4.203 U/mL). In contrast, MDA levels remained relatively stable across treatments, with only a slight increase of 7.4% in T3 compared to T0 (1.721 vs 1.602 nmol/mL). While encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> did not significantly alter antioxidant status, the numerical increase in SOD activity in T3 warrants further investigation to determine if a biologically relevant effect exists under different experimental conditions.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) with supplemented encapsulated<italic> Dendrophthoe pentandra</italic> leaf extract in high stocking density</p></caption><p> T0: broiler chickens were reared at a density of 9 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T1: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² without additive supplementation; T2: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 0.5 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract; T3: broilers were reared at a density of 17 birds/m² and supplemented with 1.0 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract; SEM: standard error of the mean; SOD (  ): superoxide dismutase, U/mL; MDA (  ): malondialdehyde, mmol/mL.</p><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/71484/version/51949/34178/417840"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><sec><title>Growth Performance of Broilers</title><p>Data on daily weight gain (DWG), final body weight, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) observed in this study were within the normal range for broiler chickens, indicating that the applied high stocking density (17 birds/m²) did not markedly impair growth performance under the current experimental conditions. This suggests that the physiological stress induced was not severe enough to adversely affect growth-related parameters, which represents a limitation in fully evaluating the extract’s impact under strong stress. This finding agrees with previous reports by Chauhan et al. (2022) indicating that broilers can maintain productive performance under moderate stocking densities when environmental management and nutritional conditions are adequate. Consistent with this interpretation, the high-density control group (T1) showed no significant deterioration in DWG, final body weight, FCR, SGOT, or SGPT compared with the low-density control group (T0), further indicating that the stocking-density treatment did not impose a sufficiently severe physiological challenge under the present experimental conditions.</p><p>The higher daily feed intake (DFI) observed in the T2 group indicates that supplementation with encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract may help maintain feed consumption under relatively challenging conditions. This response may be attributed to the biological activities of flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and phenolic compounds present in the extract <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Saavedra-Molina et al., 2024)</xref>. These phytochemicals have been reported to improve gastrointestinal health by enhancing intestinal integrity, modulating gut microbiota composition, reducing oxidative damage to intestinal epithelial cells, and stimulating digestive enzyme secretion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Kwon et al., 2023)</xref>. Improved intestinal functionality may subsequently increase feed palatability and nutrient utilization efficiency, leading to higher feed consumption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Michalak et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Flavonoids, particularly quercetin derivatives identified in <italic>D. pentandra</italic>, are known to exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects within the gastrointestinal tract, thereby preserving villus structure and absorptive capacity <xref rid="BIBR-39" ref-type="bibr">(Parasuraman et al., 2016)</xref>. Likewise, saponins may suppress pathogenic microorganisms while promoting beneficial microbial populations, contributing to improved digestive health and nutrient assimilation <xref rid="BIBR-59" ref-type="bibr">(Zhang et al., 2023)</xref>. Similar increases in feed intake following phytogenic supplementation with encapsulated Cosmos caudatus have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Agusetyaningsih et al., 2022)</xref>in broilers receiving polyphenol-rich plant extracts under environmental stress conditions.</p><p>Despite the increase in feed intake, no significant improvements were observed in DWG or FCR. This finding suggests that the increased feed consumption was not sufficient to produce measurable improvements in growth performance<xref rid="BIBR-23" ref-type="bibr">(Kavoi et al., 2016)</xref>. One possible explanation is that the physiological challenge imposed by the experimental stocking density was relatively mild, limiting the opportunity for phytogenic supplementation to demonstrate growth-promoting effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Li et al., 2024)</xref>. Previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Li et al., 2019)</xref> have shown that the beneficial effects of phytogenic additives become more evident when broilers are exposed to severe oxidative, thermal, or management-related stressors. Therefore, future studies should evaluate the efficacy of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract under more pronounced stress conditions.</p></sec><sec><title>Complete Blood Counts of Broilers</title><p>The hematological parameters, including erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and erythrocyte indices (MCV, MCH, MCHC), remained within normal physiological ranges and did not differ significantly among treatments. This indicates that neither high stocking density nor supplementation with encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract adversely affected oxygen transport capacity or erythropoiesis. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting that broilers can maintain normal hematological profiles under moderate stocking density when environmental and nutritional conditions are adequately managed<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Rashid et al., 2016)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Tella, 2025)</xref>.</p><p>The current results are consistent with those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Rashid et al., 2016)</xref>, who observed stable hematological profiles in broilers receiving antioxidant-rich phytogenic additives. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Tella, 2025)</xref> reported that plant-derived bioactive compounds did not significantly alter erythrocyte-related parameters when birds were maintained under relatively stable environmental conditions.</p><p>Leukocyte counts and heterophil-to-lymphocyte (H/L) ratios also remained unaffected by treatments. Leukocyte values observed in this study were within the normal physiological range reported for healthy broilers, suggesting that birds maintained adequate immune surveillance and physiological homeostasis throughout the experimental period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Lebedev et al., 2024)</xref>. The H/L ratio is considered one of the most reliable indicators of chronic stress in poultry because elevated corticosterone concentrations typically increase heterophil numbers while reducing circulating lymphocytes <xref rid="BIBR-16" ref-type="bibr">(Cotter, 2015)</xref>. Generally, H/L ratios exceeding 0.5 are associated with significant physiological stress, whereas lower values indicate normal adaptation to environmental conditions (B, 2018). The low H/L ratios observed in the present study (0.03-0.05) therefore suggest that the birds did not experience substantial chronic stress despite being reared at a higher stocking density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">(Uysal et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>In contrast, thrombocyte counts and PDW were significantly lower in T1, T2, and T3 compared to T0, with only minor numerical differences among the high-density groups. Thrombocytes play important roles in hemostasis and innate immune responses in avian species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Ferdous &amp; Scott, 2023)</xref>. The reduction in PDW may indicate a more homogeneous platelet population and reduced platelet activation status <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Shubha Sangeetha et al., 2019)</xref>. This effect may be associated with flavonoids present in <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaves, which have been reported to possess antiplatelet and antioxidant properties through inhibition of thromboxane synthesis, suppression of oxidative stress-induced platelet activation, and modulation of intracellular calcium signaling pathways <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Santoso et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">(Zverev, 2017)</xref>.</p><p>Previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Santoso et al., 2017)</xref> have demonstrated that flavonoid-rich phytogenic supplements can influence platelet activity without inducing pathological changes in hematological status. Because thrombocyte counts remained within physiological limits, the observed reductions likely represent modulation of platelet function rather than suppression of thrombopoiesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">(Vallance et al., 2019)</xref>. Nevertheless, the biological significance of these findings requires further investigation, particularly regarding the potential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of <italic>D. pentandra</italic> bioactive compounds.</p></sec><sec><title>Serum Protein Profiles of Broilers</title><p>Data on serum concentrations, including albumin, SGOT, and SGPT, did not differ significantly among treatments and remained within normal physiological ranges, indicating that liver function and protein metabolism were not adversely affected by high stocking density or dietary supplementation. Similar findings have been reported in broilers, where stable serum biochemical parameters reflect normal hepatic function and metabolic homeostasis under controlled rearing conditions <xref rid="BIBR-40" ref-type="bibr">(Punyatong et al., 2025)</xref></p><p>These findings suggest that encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract is physiologically safe and does not cause hepatotoxicity. The stability of liver enzyme activity may also reflect the protective role of antioxidant compounds in maintaining hepatocyte integrity, as flavonoids and polyphenols are known to mitigate oxidative damage and support liver function in poultry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Siyanova &amp; Zalyubovskaya, 2025)</xref></p><p>However, the absence of significant variation among treatments may also indicate that the experimental conditions did not impose sufficient metabolic or hepatic stress to challenge liver function in broilers. Under mild or non-stress conditions, hepatic biomarkers often remain stable, thereby limiting the ability to detect functional improvements from dietary interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Mukul Ray et al., 2020)</xref>. As a result, the capacity of the extract to demonstrate hepatoprotective effects under stress conditions may not have been fully expressed. This highlights the need for future studies under more challenging physiological conditions to evaluate better the functional benefits of the extract on liver health.</p></sec><sec><title>Relative Immune Organ Weights of the Broilers</title><p>Data on the relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius were significantly higher in the T2 group, indicating a positive effect of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract on the development of this primary lymphoid organ. The bursa of Fabricius is a primary lymphoid organ unique to avian species and serves as the principal site for B-lymphocyte proliferation, differentiation, and maturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Szőcs et al., 2024)</xref>. Enlargement of this organ is generally associated with enhanced humoral immune competence and improved antibody production capacity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Szőcs et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><p>The observed increase may be attributed to the immunomodulatory activities of flavonoids, quercetin derivatives, tannins, and other phenolic compounds present in <italic>D. pentandra</italic>. These bioactive compounds have been reported to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation, regulate cytokine secretion, enhance macrophage activity, and protect immune cells from oxidative damage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abubakar et al., 2019)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Ang et al., 2014)</xref>, demonstrated that <italic>D. pentandra</italic> extract significantly stimulated splenocyte and thymocyte proliferation, supporting its immunostimulatory potential.</p><p>Furthermore, flavonoids may promote B-cell differentiation through modulation of intracellular signaling pathways involved in immune cell activation and cytokine production <xref rid="BIBR-31" ref-type="bibr">(Liu &amp; Jiao, 2025)</xref>. Enhanced antioxidant protection may also preserve the viability and functionality of developing lymphocytes within the bursa, thereby contributing to increased organ development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Ke et al., 2023)</xref>. Similar improvements in lymphoid organ development and humoral immunity have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Ke et al., 2023)</xref>in broilers receiving phytogenic supplements rich in polyphenols and flavonoids.</p><p>Interestingly, the positive response was most evident in the T2 (0.5 g/kg), whereas the higher supplementation level T3 (1.0 g/kg) did not produce additional improvements. This finding suggests that moderate supplementation may provide optimal immunomodulatory stimulation, whereas excessive concentrations may not confer further benefits due to saturation of physiological response mechanisms. Similar dose-dependent responses have been reported for various phytogenic feed additives used in poultry nutrition.</p><p>The absence of significant changes in spleen and thymus weights suggests that systemic immune activation and T-cell development remained stable<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Mehrzad et al., 2024)</xref>. This observation may indicate that the birds were not exposed to severe immunological challenges during the experimental period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Mehrzad et al., 2024)</xref>. Therefore, future studies employing pathogen challenge models or vaccination response assessments are warranted better to characterize the immunomodulatory properties of<italic> D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract.</p></sec><sec><title>Antioxidative Status of Broilers</title><p>Serum SOD activity and MDA levels are widely used indicators of antioxidant defense and oxidative stress in broilers, reflecting the balance between reactive oxygen species production and antioxidant capacity <xref rid="BIBR-36" ref-type="bibr">(Nawaz &amp; Zhang, 2021)</xref>. Data on SOD activity did not differ significantly among treatments, although a numerical increase was observed in supplemented groups. Similarly, MDA levels remained stable across all treatments, indicating that lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage were not markedly elevated.</p><p>These results suggest that broilers maintained oxidative balance under the given experimental conditions and that the endogenous antioxidant system was sufficient to prevent excessive oxidative stress. Similar findings have been reported in broilers under moderate environmental stress, where antioxidant biomarkers remain stable due to effective physiological adaptation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Cimpean et al., 2025)</xref>. The absence of significant differences in SOD and MDA levels suggests that under the present experimental conditions, the broilers’ endogenous antioxidant system was sufficient, or the oxidative challenge was not severe enough to elicit a detectable antioxidative effect from the supplement. This limits the ability to clearly demonstrate the extract’s antioxidative potential in this specific context.</p><p>This condition represents an important limitation in evaluating the efficacy of antioxidant supplementation. When oxidative stress is not strongly induced, the measurable benefits of exogenous antioxidants may be minimal or undetectable, as also discussed in studies on antioxidant supplementation under low-stress conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Carvalho et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Ngestiningsih et al., 2019)</xref>. Therefore, the absence of significant differences in SOD and MDA should not be interpreted as a lack of biological activity, but rather as a consequence of limited oxidative challenge within the experimental system.</p><p>In addition, the relatively short experimental duration and controlled environmental conditions may have further contributed to the stability of oxidative parameters. Previous studies have shown that stronger stressors, such as heat stress or higher stocking densities, are required to significantly elevate oxidative stress markers in broilers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Sharma et al., 2020)</xref>. Future studies employing stronger stress models, such as higher stocking densities, heat stress, or longer rearing periods, are needed to assess better the antioxidative potential of encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Supplementation with 0.5 g/kg encapsulated <italic>D. pentandra</italic> leaf extract improved daily feed intake and increased the relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius in broilers reared under high stocking density without adversely affecting growth performance, hematological and serum biochemical parameters, or antioxidant status. These findings indicate that encapsulated D. pentandra leaf extract has potential as a safe natural feed additive to support immune development and contribute to sustainable broiler production under intensive rearing conditions.</p></sec><sec><title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>The authors acknowledge Universitas Diponegoro for funding this research, contract number 222-459/UN7.D2/PP/IV/2025. Gratitude was also expressed to the laboratory assistants, laboratories involved, and students who actively participated in this research.</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>We declare that generative AI and AI-assisted technologies were used for language refinement and reference organization. All content has been critically reviewed and edited to ensure it reflects the authors’ understanding, analysis, and academic integrity.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="how-to-cite"><title>How to Cite</title><p>Widiastuti, E., Puspitaningrum, A., Agusetyaningsih, I., Yudiarti, T., Sari, D. A. P., &amp; Sugiharto, S. (2026). Dietary Supplementation of Encapsulated Dendrophthoe pentandra Leaf Extract in Broilers under High Stocking Density. <italic>Tropical Animal Science Journal</italic>, <italic>49</italic>(6), 562. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.6.562</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The phytochemical and anti-inflammatory studies of Dillenia suffruticosa leaves</article-title><source>Phytotherapy Research</source><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abubakar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al‐Mansoub</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murugaiyah</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>660</fpage><lpage>675</lpage><page-range>660-675</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ptr.6255</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Improving broiler growth and immunity with encapsulated Cosmos caudatus and Andrographis paniculata extracts at high stocking density</article-title><source>Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture</source><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agusetyaningsih</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Krismiyanto</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>D.A.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pawesti</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>121</lpage><page-range>111-121</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14710/jitaa.50.2.111-121</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of encapsulated Cosmos caudatus leaf extract on the physiological conditions, immune competency, and antioxidative status of broilers at high stocking density</article-title><source>Annals of Animal Science</source><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agusetyaningsih</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahyuni</surname><given-names>H.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murwani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sartono</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>653</fpage><lpage>662</lpage><page-range>653-662</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/aoas-2021-0043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Leveraging the potential of environmental microorganisms: an extensive examination of their capacity in tackling global and local environmental and ecological challenges</article-title><source>Polish Journal of Environmental Studies</source><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alabbosh</surname><given-names>K.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><page-range>1-11</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15244/pjoes/185701</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Complete blood count (CBC) interpretation and analysis: a comprehensive review for medical laboratory professionals</article-title><source>Journal of Posthumanism</source><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almuthaybiri</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bawazir</surname><given-names>A.A.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Almutairi</surname><given-names>F.A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Almutairi</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faqeehi</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Harbi</surname><given-names>T.F.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1683</fpage><lpage>1699</lpage><page-range>1683-1699</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.63332/joph.v5i1.3144</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Ecological and economic efficiency of harvesting medicinal plant raw materials</article-title><source>Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. Biology</source><volume>10</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andreichenko</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Didenko</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amber</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasylenko</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><page-range>113-119</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15330/jpnubio.10.113-119</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Immunomodulatory effects of Potentilla indica and Dendrophthoe pentandra on mice splenocytes and thymocytes</article-title><source>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine</source><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ang</surname><given-names>H.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Subramani</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeap</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ho</surname><given-names>W.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>M.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alitheen</surname><given-names>N.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>1733</fpage><lpage>1737</lpage><page-range>1733-1737</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2014.1657</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of stocking density on performance and immunity in Ross 308 broiler chickens</article-title><source>Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi</source><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Astaneh</surname><given-names>I.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chamani</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mousavi</surname><given-names>S.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sadeghi</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Afshar</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>483</fpage><lpage>489</lpage><page-range>483-489</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9775/kvfd.2017.18869</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A review of Dendrophthoe pentandra (Mistletoe): Phytomorphology, extraction techniques, phytochemicals, and biological activities</article-title><source>Processes</source><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Awang</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nik Mat Daud</surname><given-names>N.N.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>I.</surname><given-names>Mohd Ismail N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>F.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Benjamin</surname><given-names>M.A.Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2348</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pr11082348</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Hematocrit isn’t targeted indicators for hemotransfusion</article-title><source>Medical Journal of Clinical Trials &amp; Case Studies</source><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Belousov</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>000148</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23880/MJCCS-16000148</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Poultry nutrition</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolton</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1967</year><publisher-name>Her Majesty’s Stationery Office</publisher-name><edition>3rd revised</edition></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Biological indicators of oxidative stress [malondialdehyde, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase] and their application in nutrition</article-title><source>Biomarkers in nutrition. biomarkers in disease: methods, discoveries and applications</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>Carmo</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>M.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva Santos Oliveira</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>L.A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Primo</surname><given-names>M.G.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho Lira</surname><given-names>V.B.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>V.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Preedy</surname><given-names>V.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>833</fpage><lpage>856</lpage><page-range>833-856</page-range><publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-031-07389-2_49</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impacts of stocking density on broiler chicken performance stress reaction and mortality in broiler chicken</article-title><source>Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences &amp; Biotechnology</source><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chauhan</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>K.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pramanik</surname><given-names>P.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Srivastav</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tripathi</surname><given-names>K.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nandan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><page-range>36-39</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48165/ijvsbt.18.4.08</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of dietary hatchery by-products on growth performance, relative organ weight, plasma measurements, immune organ index, meat quality, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens</article-title><source>Animal Bioscience</source><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>W.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>G.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>C.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kil</surname><given-names>D.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1181</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ab.20.0755</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The impact of oxidative stress on growth performance and metabolic health in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Cluj Veterinary Journal</source><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cimpean</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brozan</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pojar</surname><given-names>T.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><page-range>19-31</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52331/cvj..v30i1.52</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>An examination of the utility of heterophil-lymphocyte ratios in assessing stress of caged hens</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>94</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cotter</surname><given-names>P.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>512</fpage><lpage>517</lpage><page-range>512-517</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/peu009</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The immunological capacity of thrombocytes</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>24</volume><issue>16</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferdous</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>12950</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms241612950</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Growth, immune, antioxidant, and bone responses of heat stress-exposed broilers fed diets supplemented with tomato pomace</article-title><source>International Journal of Biometeorology</source><volume>60</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Hosseini-Vashan S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Golian</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yaghobfar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>1183</fpage><lpage>1192</lpage><page-range>1183-1192</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00484-015-1112-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Polyphenols as potential attenuators of heat stress in poultry production</article-title><source>Antioxidants</source><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arowolo</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>67</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox8030067</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effects of stocking density on the performance of broiler chickens</article-title><source>Nigerian Journal of Animal Production</source><volume>6</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iffiong</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fulani</surname><given-names>I.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Olomu</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><page-range>21-25</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51791/njap.v6i.2652</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>High eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum L.) fruit intake for short duration enhances the antioxidant activity and biochemical parameters in rats</article-title><source>Journal of Phytology</source><volume>16</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iheagwam</surname><given-names>F.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chinedu</surname><given-names>S.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><page-range>121-126</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25081/jp.2024.v16.8962</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Physicochemical properties and enzymatic activity of wheat germ extract microencapsulated with spray and freeze drying</article-title><source>Food Science &amp; Nutrition</source><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jamdar</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ali Mortazavi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Asl</surname><given-names>M.R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharifi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1192</fpage><lpage>1201</lpage><page-range>1192-1201</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fsn3.2104</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of dietary Moringa oleifera leaf meal supplementation on chicken intestinal structure and growth performance</article-title><source>Journal of Morphological Sciences</source><volume>33</volume><issue>04</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kavoi</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gakuya</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mbugua</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kiama</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>186</fpage><lpage>192</lpage><page-range>186-192</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4322/jms.095915</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Distribution and developmental changes of IL-21 immunopositive cells in the bursa of Fabricius of Jinhu silky chicken</article-title><source>Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A Ecological and Integrative Physiology</source><volume>341</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ke</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khaliq</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiafu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Waqas</surname><given-names>M.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Javid</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Basit</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhatti</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saleem</surname><given-names>M.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farooq</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murtaza</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>41</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><page-range>41-47</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jez.2759</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Dendrophthoe falcata (Lf) Ettingsh. and Dendrophthoe pentandra (L.) Miq.: A review of traditional medical uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicity, and applications</article-title><source>Frontiers in Pharmacology</source><volume>14</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Niu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sang</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>1096379</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphar.2023.1096379</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Interplay between phytochemicals and the colonic microbiota</article-title><source>Nutrients</source><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ediriweera</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim Cho</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu15081989</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Toxicity test of flavonoid compounds from the leaves of Dendrophthoe pentandra (L.) Miq. using in vitro culture cell models</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>15</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lazuardi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suharjono</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chien</surname><given-names>C.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>C.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>C.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maslachah</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>2896</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2022.2896-2902</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Immune status of broiler chickens during different times of physiological development</article-title><source>Вестник Российской Сельскохозяйственной Науки</source><volume>3</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lebedev</surname><given-names>S.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kazakova</surname><given-names>T.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marshinskaya</surname><given-names>O.V.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>92</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><page-range>92-96</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S2500208224030205</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of stocking density and alpha-lipoic acid on the growth performance, physiological and oxidative stress and immune response of broilers</article-title><source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source><volume>32</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>1914</fpage><lpage>1922</lpage><page-range>1914-1922</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.18.0939</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of chronic stress from high stocking density in mariculture: evaluations of growth performance and lipid metabolism of rainbow trout (Oncorhychus mykiss</article-title><source>Biology</source><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mei</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>263</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology13040263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Flavonoids as immunoregulators: molecular mechanisms in regulating immune cells and their therapeutic applications in inflammatory diseases</article-title><source>Frontiers in Immunology</source><volume>16</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiao</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1703672</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fimmu.2025.1703672</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Avian innate and adaptive immune components: a comprehensive review</article-title><source>Journal of Poultry Sciences and Avian Diseases</source><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mehrzad</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shojaei</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Keivan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Forouzanpour</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sepahvand</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kordi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hooshmand</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><page-range>73-96</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61838/kman.jpsad.2.3.7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of dietary phytochemicals on gut microbiota and intestinal barrier integrity - nutritional interventions and their role in chronic diseases prevention</article-title><source>Quality in Sport</source><volume>39</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Michalak</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Janowski</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piotrowicz</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Góras</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>59218</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12775/QS.2025.39.59218</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Materials of natural origin for encapsulation</article-title><source>Handbook of Encapsulation and Controlled Release</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><page-range>493</page-range><publisher-name>CRC Press Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of proprietary hepatoprotective additives (CadlivTM liq.) supplementation on the growth performance and hepatic histological architecture of commercial broiler chickens</article-title><source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mukul Ray</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banik</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhagat</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>338</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><page-range>338-345</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2020.338.345</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Oxidative stress in broiler chicken and its consequences on meat quality</article-title><source>International Journal of Life Science Research Archive</source><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nawaz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>045</fpage><lpage>054</lpage><page-range>045-054</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.53771/ijlsra.2021.1.1.0054</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of superoxide dismutase (SOD) supplementation on plasma levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the elderly</article-title><source>Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research</source><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ngestiningsih</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rahayu</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Batubara</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><page-range>29-33</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14710/jbtr.v5i2.4679</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Climatic variation: effects on stress levels, feed intake, and bodyweight of broilers</article-title><source>Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola</source><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Osti</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattarai</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>489</fpage><lpage>496</lpage><page-range>489-496</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0494</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Overviews of biological importance of quercetin: a bioactive flavonoid</article-title><source>Pharmacognosy Reviews</source><volume>10</volume><issue>20</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parasuraman</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anand David</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arulmoli</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><page-range>84</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/0973-7847.194044</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of glutamine supplementation on performance, carcass traits, and oxidative stress markers in native crossbred chickens under heat stress conditions</article-title><source>Veterinary Integrative Sciences</source><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Punyatong</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thapingkae</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Srinual</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lamsaengkul</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>1-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12982/VIS.2026.027</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of selected vitamins and minerals on growth rate and hematological parameters in broilers</article-title><source>Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research</source><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rashid</surname><given-names>M.H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mollah</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>487</fpage><lpage>494</lpage><page-range>487-494</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3329/ajmbr.v1i3.26466</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antioxidant activity of natural products from medicinal plants</article-title><source>Biochemistry Intechopen</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saavedra-Molina</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruz</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Landa-Moreno</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murillo-Villicaña</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Berumen</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Montoya-Pérez</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manzo-Avalos</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aguilera-Méndez</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salgado-Garciglia</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cortés-Rojo</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><page-range>1-21</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.1004272</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of medicinal herb inclusion on hematologic status and blood lipid profiles in broiler chickens</article-title><source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fenita</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kususiyah</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>415</fpage><lpage>423</lpage><page-range>415-423</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2017.415.423</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Oxidative stress markers in broiler chickens under heat stress condition</article-title><source>Indian Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Swamy</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tiwari</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubey</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Verma</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>139</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0974-8180.2020.00024.0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Platelet distribution width (PDW): A novel platelet marker in thrombocytosis: An insight</article-title><source>IP Journal of Diagnostic Pathology and Oncology</source><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shubha Sangeetha</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manjunatha</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>264</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><page-range>264-267</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18231/j.jdpo.2019.055</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of plant-based hepatoprotectors on the functional state of the liver in chickens</article-title><source>Genetics and Breeding of Animals</source><volume>2</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siyanova</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zalyubovskaya</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><page-range>67-76</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31043/2410-2733-2025-2-67-76</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of housing floor on air quality, growth traits, and immunity in broiler chicken farms</article-title><source>Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soliman</surname><given-names>E.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>997</fpage><lpage>1008</lpage><page-range>997-1008</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.9.997.1008</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Fermented feed as a potential source of natural an tioxidants for broiler chickens - a mini review</article-title><source>Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus</source><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Turini</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Isroli</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahyuni</surname><given-names>H.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sartono</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>313</fpage><lpage>318</lpage><page-range>313-318</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://hrcak.srce.hr/228920" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="228920">228920</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Performances and haematological profile of broilers fed fermented dried cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Health and Production</source><volume>48</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Isroli</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>1337</fpage><lpage>1341</lpage><page-range>1337-1341</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-016-1098-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Characterization and ontogeny of a novel lymphoid follicle inducer cell during development of the bursa of Fabricius</article-title><source>Frontiers in Immunology</source><volume>15</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szőcs</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balic</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soós</surname><given-names>Á.</given-names></name><name><surname>Halasy</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagy</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1449117</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fimmu.2024.1449117</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Application and stability of natural antioxidants in edible oils in order to substitute synthetic additives</article-title><source>Journal of Food Science and Technology</source><volume>52</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Taghvaei</given-names></name><name><surname>S.M</surname><given-names>Jafari</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>1272</fpage><lpage>1282</lpage><page-range>1272-1282</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13197-013-1080-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of strain on haematology and serum biochemical profile of broiler chickens fed aqueous extract of bitter leaf</article-title><source>Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences</source><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tella</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>147</fpage><lpage>157</lpage><page-range>147-157</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35516/jjas.v21i2.3326</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of dietary multiple phase feeding on growth performance of commercial broiler chicken</article-title><source>Indian Journal of Animal Research</source><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tikate</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wade</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ranade</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Patodkar</surname><given-names>V.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dhaygude</surname><given-names>V.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhalerao</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><page-range>66-70</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18805/ijar.B-3928</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Oleanolic acid improves antioxidant capacity and the abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in the intestine of broilers</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bi</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>104340</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2024.104340</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of different cage densities on selected stress and welfare indicators in brown and white laying hens</article-title><source>Acta Veterinaria Brno</source><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uysal</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Özentürk</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laçin</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laçin</surname><given-names>B.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>154</lpage><page-range>145-154</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2754/avb202594020145</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Synthetic flavonoids as novel modulators of platelet function and thrombosis</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>20</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vallance</surname><given-names>T.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ravishankar</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Albadawi</surname><given-names>D.A.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborn</surname><given-names>H.M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaiyapuri</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>3106</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms20123106</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of stocking density on productive performance, behaviour, and histopathology of the lymphoid organs in broiler chickens</article-title><source>European Poultry Science</source><volume>82</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yanai</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abo-Samaha</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Kazaz</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tohamy</surname><given-names>H.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><page-range>1-15</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1399/eps.2018.247</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antioxidant activity of extract of mistletoe, Dendrophthoe pentandra (L.) Miq., lived in three different host plants, collected from Kampus UI, Depok</article-title><source>AIP Conference Proceedings</source><volume>2168</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yismairai</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hemelda</surname><given-names>N.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yasman</surname></name><name><surname>Handayani</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>020100</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.5132527</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Health benefits of saponins and its mechanisms: perspectives from absorption, metabolism, and interaction with gut</article-title><source>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition</source><volume>64</volume><issue>25</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farag</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Battino</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Daglia</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Capanoglu</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>9311</fpage><lpage>9332</lpage><page-range>9311-9332</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2023.2212063</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of the flavonoid baicalein as a feed additive on the growth performance, immunity, and antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>98</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Y.</surname><given-names>Zhou</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Mao</given-names></name><name><surname>M</surname><given-names>Zhou</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>2790</fpage><lpage>2799</lpage><page-range>2790-2799</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez071</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antiplatelet activity of flavonoids</article-title><source>Voprosy Pitaniia</source><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zverev</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>6-20</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24411/0042-8833-2017-00001</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>