<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><title-group><article-title>Processing-Associated Taxonomic Profiles of Microbiota in Liquid and Powdered Horse Milk Revealed by Full-Length 16S rRNA Sequencing</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Radiati</surname><given-names>L. E.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Andriani</surname><given-names>R. D.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Amertaningtyas</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Supamri</surname></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Faradila</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fardiaz</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Products Technology, Faculty of Animal Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Brawijaya</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01wk3d929</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2">Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Madako</aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Nahdlatul Ulama University of Blitar</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/003fvsp28</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-4"><institution content-type="dept">Faculty of Dentistry</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/017hvgd88</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-7-23"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-7-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>439</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-1-30"><day>30</day><month>1</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" license-type="open-access"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/71366" xlink:title="Processing-Associated Taxonomic Profiles of Microbiota in Liquid and Powdered Horse Milk Revealed by Full-Length 16S rRNA Sequencing">Processing-Associated Taxonomic Profiles of Microbiota in Liquid and Powdered Horse Milk Revealed by Full-Length 16S rRNA Sequencing</self-uri><abstract><p>Horse milk contains diverse microbial communities whose composition may be altered by processing and the addition of carrier ingredients. This study evaluated the effects of milk form and dextrin supplementation on the microbiota of horse milk prepared as pasteurized liquid milk (SKC), powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin (SKD), and powdered milk without dextrin (SKT). Microbial diversity and composition were analyzed using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing covering the V1–V9 regions. SKT showed the highest microbial richness, with 1185 observed taxa and a Shannon index of 3.43 ± 0.23, compared with 963 taxa and 2.40 ± 0.99 in SKD and 190 taxa and 2.02 ± 0.06 in SKC. SKC and SKD were dominated by lactic acid bacteria, particularly<italic> Lactobacillus gallinarum</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus helveticus</italic>, whereas SKT contained higher proportions of stress-tolerant and spore-forming taxa such as <italic>Brevibacillus parabrevis</italic> (26%), <italic>Thalassoporum komareki</italic> (12%), and <italic>Lysinibacillus boronitolerans</italic> (10%). Sankey diagrams and principal component analysis further demonstrated distinct microbial community structures among the treatments. Overall, dextrin supplementation appeared to act as a protective carrier during drying, helping maintain the predominance of lactic acid bacteria, whereas powdered milk produced without dextrin was associated with a broader microbial profile.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dextrin</kwd><kwd>full-length 16S rRNA</kwd><kwd>horse milk</kwd><kwd>microbiota</kwd><kwd>powdered milk</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Processing methods and the use of additives are known to play a crucial role in shaping the microbial taxonomic profiles of dairy products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abdul Hakim et al., 2023)</xref>. In mare milk, the natural microbiota is important from both technological and safety perspectives because it contributes to fermentation characteristics, product stability, and the presence of beneficial microorganisms, while also influencing the risk of contamination by undesirable taxa  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(İstanbullugil et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Boranbayeva et al., 2025)</xref>. However, information regarding the dynamics of its microbial community in relation to processing conditions remains limited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Kossaliyeva et al., 2025)</xref>. </p><p>Mare milk is reported to contain relatively high levels of lysozyme and lactoferrin compared with cow milk, which may contribute to its natural antimicrobial properties and longer shelf life <xref rid="BIBR-21" ref-type="bibr">(Kossaliyeva et al., 2025)</xref>. In addition, the high lactose content of mare milk provides a favorable substrate for the growth of lactic acid bacteria, which are commonly reported as dominant members of the mare milk microbiota <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Kudaibergenova et al., 2025)</xref>. Like other dairy products, however, mare milk remains susceptible to microbial contamination during handling and distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Ljubojević Pelić et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Shalini &amp; Gurunathan, 2025)</xref>. To improve stability and facilitate transportation, milk is often converted into powder by drying, sometimes with the addition of dextrin as a carrier compound <xref rid="BIBR-47" ref-type="bibr">(Wu et al., 2024)</xref>. Although these approaches improve storage stability, they may also modify the microbial community by reducing heat-sensitive microorganisms and favoring stress-tolerant taxa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Lohita &amp; Srijaya, 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Gao et al., 2021)</xref>. </p><p>Previous studies on cow, goat, and camel milk have shown that processing treatments such as pasteurization, fermentation, and drying can alter microbial diversity and community structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Bao et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Monareng et al., 2025)</xref>. Heat treatment and food additives may reduce the abundance of lactic acid bacteria, whereas spore-forming taxa such as Bacillus and Paenibacillus can persist in dried milk products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Dash et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Grujović et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Liu et al., 2025)</xref>. In mare milk, lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus and Streptococcus, are generally reported as dominant taxa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Monareng et al., 2025)</xref>. Nevertheless, little is known about how drying and dextrin addition affect the diversity and taxonomic composition of the mare milk microbiota during powder production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Blanco-Doval et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Wei et al., 2021)</xref>.</p><p>To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has systematically compared the microbial communities of mare milk in liquid form, powdered form, and powdered form supplemented with dextrin under the same processing conditions. We hypothesized that drying would modify the microbial community structure of mare milk and that dextrin addition, through its role as a protective carrier during dehydration, might help preserve lactic acid bacteria during powder production, thereby resulting in a microbial profile different from that of milk powder produced without dextrin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Kong et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Hamed et al., 2025)</xref>. The application of metagenomic approaches, such as full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing to investigate and compare processing-associated microbiota profiles across these three milk forms has also been rarely reported in the literature <xref rid="BIBR-9" ref-type="bibr">(Melo Pereira et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-39" ref-type="bibr">(Supamri et al., 2025)</xref>. Such an approach can provide more detailed information on microbial taxa that persist, decline, or emerge following different treatments and may help identify microbial groups with potential technological relevance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Nam et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Accordingly, this study compared the microbiota of pasteurized liquid milk, powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin, and powdered milk without dextrin using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The objective was to evaluate treatment-related changes in microbial diversity and composition at the phylum, genus, and species levels and to identify taxa shared among, or specific to, the different milk forms. The results provide descriptive information relevant to food microbiology, particularly for horse milk–based products, and serve as a reference for future studies exploring microbial stability and potential functional roles following powder production and dextrin supplementation.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Mare's Milk Sampling</title><p>Approximately 3 liters of raw Sumbawa mare’s milk were purchased directly from local producers located near the Curi Mori Karamabura partner site. The milk was obtained during routine morning milking and immediately placed into sterile containers in accordance with standard hygiene and sanitation procedures. After collection, the milk was portioned into sterile breast milk storage bags with a capacity of 150 mL using aseptic handling techniques. Throughout collection and initial handling, the temperature of the milk was maintained at approximately 4 ± 1 °C. The samples were then transported to the laboratory within about 2 hours using dry ice and subsequently stored at −80 °C until further processing and analysis.</p></sec><sec><title>Preparation of Mare's Milk Samples</title><p>Sumbawa mare’s milk was processed into three different forms: pasteurized liquid milk (SKC), powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin (SKD), and powdered milk without dextrin (SKT). Before treatment preparation, raw mare’s milk was pasteurized using the low-temperature long-time (LTLT) method at 63 °C for 30 min in a thermostatically controlled water bath (Memmert WNB 14, Memmert GmbH, Germany), followed by immediate cooling to 4 °C. For each treatment, 500 mL of pasteurized milk was used. The powdered products were prepared separately using a vacuum-drying technique. A digital vacuum drying oven was selected because it is more suitable for laboratory-scale processing and provides lower oxygen exposure and milder thermal conditions than spray drying, which may help preserve the detectable microbial profile prior to sequencing. In the SKD treatment, the milk was supplemented with 15% dextrin and whipped to produce stable foam prior to the drying process. The procedure followed the method described in our previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Sari et al., 2025)</xref>. Prior to processing, the milk was weighed and mixed with 1% Tween 80 as a food-grade emulsifier, while dextrin at a concentration of 15% was added according to the treatment design.</p><p>The use of 15% dextrin was determined based on preliminary optimization experiments carried out in our laboratory. These trials indicated that this concentration achieved a suitable balance between drying performance, powder stability, and the prevention of protein aggregation during dehydration. Similar carrier concentrations have also been reported in dairy powder processing applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Tița et al., 2024)</xref>. In addition, Tween 80 (1%) was added to improve the dispersion of milk components, support stable foam formation prior to drying, and reduce phase separation during dehydration. The use of such emulsifiers is commonly reported in vacuum- and spray-drying systems involving carbohydrate–protein matrices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Exarhopoulos et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Drying was carried out using a digital vacuum drying oven (VOV-91, B-One Scientific, Korea) operated at 70 °C under a vacuum pressure of −66 cmHg for 7 hours. The resulting powders had final moisture contents of 4.33 ± 0.14% for powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin (SKD) and 4.54 ± 0.13% for powdered milk without dextrin (SKT). After drying, the resulting flakes were milled using a laboratory grinder (FGD-20, FOMAC, Indonesia) for 1–2 minutes to obtain a fine and homogeneous powder. Three milk batches were prepared, and each treatment was produced in triplicate to ensure consistency during the drying process. One representative sample from each treatment was subsequently selected for sequencing. Each selected sample was analyzed twice during the sequencing workflow to confirm technical consistency. The powdered samples were then stored in a desiccator at room temperature and kept protected from light until further analysis.</p></sec><sec><title>Microbial Cell Preparation Prior to DNA Extraction</title><p>Prior to DNA extraction, the three horse milk samples—SKC (pasteurized liquid milk), SKD (powdered horse milk with dextrin), and SKT (powdered horse milk without dextrin)—were gently homogenized to ensure an even distribution of microbial cells. An aliquot of 1–2 mL from each sample was then transferred into sterile microcentrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes to concentrate the microbial biomass. After centrifugation, the supernatant was carefully removed, while the pellet containing microbial cells was retained for genomic DNA extraction. All procedures were carried out under sterile conditions to minimize the risk of external contamination.</p></sec><sec><title>16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Taxonomic Analysis</title><p>Three types of Sumbawa mare’s milk samples—SKC, SKD, and SKT—were analyzed to characterize their microbial communities. For each treatment, one independently prepared milk batch was selected for full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing. To improve sequencing reliability and maintain technical consistency, two technical replicates were included during the next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow. These replicates served exclusively for quality-control purposes and were not treated as independent biological replicates.</p><p>Genomic DNA was extracted using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, D4300) following the manufacturer’s instructions, which included mechanical lysis through bead-beating to facilitate effective disruption of microbial cells. All extraction steps were carried out in a sterilized laminar flow hood using DNA-free consumables to reduce the risk of contamination. A negative extraction control (blank control) was included in each extraction batch and processed through library preparation and sequencing to detect any potential background contamination. DNA concentration and purity were evaluated using a Qubit fluorometer and a NanoDrop spectrophotometer, respectively.</p><p>Sequencing was performed using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform, which enables long-read sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene encompassing the V1–V9 regions, thereby providing improved taxonomic resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Bahram et al., 2019)</xref>. All procedures, including DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing, were conducted at PT Genetika Science Indonesia. Library preparation followed the standard ONT protocol using official ONT kits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Indonesia, 2023)</xref>. Sequencing runs were carried out on a MinION device operated with MinKNOW software version 23.04.5, while basecalling was performed using Guppy software version 6.5.7 with the high-accuracy model<xref rid="BIBR-46" ref-type="bibr">(Wick et al., 2019)</xref>. Prior to taxonomic classification, quality control and data preprocessing were conducted. The resulting FASTQ files were first examined using NanoPlot version 1.41.0 to evaluate read length distribution and sequence quality metrics. Low-quality reads were subsequently filtered using NanoFilt version 2.8.0, applying a minimum Q-score threshold of ≥7 and a minimum read length of ≥500 bp, ensuring that only high-quality reads were retained for downstream analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Coster et al., 2018)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Nygaard et al., 2020)</xref>. </p><p>Taxonomic assignment was carried out using Centrifuge software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Kim et al., 2016)</xref>. The reference database included bacterial and archaeal sequences obtained from the NCBI 16S RefSeq database (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/TargetedLoci/). The use of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences allowed improved taxonomic resolution, enabling putative identification of microbial taxa at the species level.</p></sec><sec><title>Analysis and Statistics</title><p>Relative abundances of microbial taxa were derived from the 16S rRNA sequencing data and used to generate community profiles at the phylum, genus, and species levels. To ensure biological relevance and minimize analytical noise, only taxa with a relative abundance of ≥1% were considered. Within this threshold, analyses were further restricted to the ten most abundant taxa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Supamri et al., 2025)</xref></p><p>Alpha diversity metrics, including the Shannon, Simpson, and Inverse Simpson indices, were calculated to characterize patterns of microbial richness and evenness among treatments. For each treatment, one representative sample was selected for sequencing and analyzed twice during the sequencing workflow to confirm technical consistency. Descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation) were calculated from these duplicate measurements. Because the dataset was derived from repeated technical measurements of the same sample rather than from independent samples, the alpha diversity results were interpreted descriptively to identify trends in microbial diversity among treatments. Sankey diagrams were constructed from the relative abundance matrix to visualize microbial community dynamics across treatments, with branch width representing the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs). All analyses and data visualizations, including relative abundance calculations, stacked bar plots, alpha diversity boxplots, Sankey diagrams, and principal component analysis (PCA), were performed using OriginPro 2024 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><sec><title>Relative Abundance of Dominant Microorganisms Microbiota Composition Analysis</title><p>The analysis of microbial composition revealed that ten phyla were detected with relative abundances exceeding 1%, whereas the remaining taxa occurred below this threshold. Among these groups, Bacillota represented the predominant phylum across all treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1a</xref>). Its relative abundance was particularly high in the SKC (98%) and SKD (95%) samples, indicating a consistent dominance of the core microbial community. In contrast, in SKT, the abundance of Bacillota drastically decreased to 60%, accompanied by an increase in the proportion of Cyanobacteriota (31%), Pseudomonadota (5%), and Planctomycetota (2%). In addition, other taxa such as Actinomycetota (1.3%) and Bacteroidota (1.2%) were also noticeably present in SKT.</p><p>At the genus level, five taxa were identified with a relative abundance above 1%, while the other genera were below that threshold (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1b</xref>). SKC and SKD showed very strong dominance by <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, at 96% and 86%, respectively. In contrast, SKT displayed a more even and complex microbial community distribution, with various dominant genera such as <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic> (20%), <italic>Bacillus</italic> (19%), and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> (16%). Other genera with proportions above 1% in SKT included <italic>Thalassoporum</italic> (12%) and <italic>Paenibacillus</italic> (4%).</p><p>Seven taxa at the species level had a relative abundance above 1%, while other species were detected in lower amounts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1c</xref>). SKC and SKD showed relatively similar dominant compositions, marked by the presence of <italic>Lactobacillus helveticus</italic> (SKC: 32%; SKD: 30%), <italic>L. gallinarum</italic> (SKC: 39%; SKD: 40%), and <italic>L. crispatus</italic> (9% in both samples). In contrast, the SKT samples exhibited a shift in microbial community composition, characterized by the predominance of <italic>Brevibacillus parabrevis</italic> (26%), <italic>Thalassoporum komareki</italic> (12%), and <italic>Lysinibacillus boronitolerans</italic> (10%). Lower but still notable abundances were also observed for members of the <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic> group (4%) and <italic>L. helveticus </italic>(4%).</p><p>These observations suggest that the form of horse milk and the drying process substantially influence the structure and diversity of the microbial community. This interpretation is supported by the microbial community profiles shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>, which illustrate clear differences among the treatments.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Relative abundance of bacterial communities in fermented horse milk products at different taxonomic levels based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: (a) phylum, (b) genus, and (c) species</p></caption><p>Bacillota was the predominant phylum across all samples, with particularly high abundance in SKC and SKD. In contrast, SKT exhibited greater microbial diversity at the genus and species levels, including notable representation of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and several other taxa. SKC: liquid fermented horse milk; SKD: powdered horse milk + 15% dextrin; SKT: powdered horse milk.</p><graphic mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/71366/version/51831/34015/416150"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Alpha Diversity Analysis of Microbial Communities</title><p>Because the dataset was derived from technical replicates, the statistical analyses presented here should be interpreted as exploratory. Alpha diversity indices calculated from the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref> and illustrated in<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3"> Figure 2</xref>. The number of observed species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2a</xref>) increased markedly across treatments, from 190 in SKC to 963 in SKD and 1185 in SKT. This pattern indicates that powdered horse milk samples were associated with a higher detected taxonomic richness under the sequencing and analytical conditions applied in this study compared with the liquid milk sample (SKC). Overall, these findings suggest that processing horse milk into powdered form is linked to a broader detection of microbial taxa within the analytical framework used in this research.</p><p>The Shannon diversity index (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2b</xref>) likewise increased across treatments, rising from 2.02 ± 0.06 in SKC to 2.40 ± 0.99 in SKD and reaching 3.43 ± 0.23 in SKT. This trend suggests a gradual increase in microbial diversity and evenness from pasteurized liquid milk to powdered milk without dextrin under the applied processing conditions. In contrast, the Simpson index (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2c</xref>) displayed the opposite trend, decreasing from 0.18 ± 0.03 in SKC and 0.17 ± 0.01 in SKD to 0.07 ± 0.00 in SKT. Because the Simpson index is inversely related to diversity, the lower value observed in SKT indicates a more even and diverse microbial community compared with SKC and SKD.</p><p>A similar trend was observed for the Inverse Simpson index (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2d</xref>), which increased substantially from 5.61 ± 0.99 in SKC and 5.93 ± 0.50 in SKD to 14.26 ± 0.57 in SKT. This pattern suggests a more complex microbial composition in SKT under the applied experimental conditions. The consistency among the alpha diversity metrics indicates that the different milk treatments, particularly powder production without dextrin, were associated with distinct patterns of microbial richness and evenness. Overall, these results suggest that the drying process and dextrin supplementation may influence the detectable microbial diversity of horse milk.</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Alpha diversity metrics (Observed species, Shannon, Simpson, and Inverse Simpson indices) of horse milk products (SKC, SKD, and SKT) derived from 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Sample</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Observed</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Shannon (Mean ± SD)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Simpson (Mean ± SD)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Inv. Simpson (Mean ± SD)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">SKC</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">190</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2.02 ± 0.06 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0.18 ± 0.03 </td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">5.61 ± 0.99 </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">SKD</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">963</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2.40 ± 0.99 </td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.17 ± 0.01 </td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">5.93 ± 0.50 </td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="left">SKT</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1185</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">3.43 ± 0.23 </td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0.07 ± 0.00 </td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">14.26 ± 0.57 </td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical results are exploratory in nature and are based on technical replicates, representing analytical patterns associated with processing conditions rather than biological or population-level variation. SKC: pasteurized liquid milk; SKD: powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin; SKT: powdered milk without dextrin.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Alpha diversity metrics of horse milk products (SKC: pasteurized liquid milk; SKD: powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin; SKT: powdered milk without dextrin) derived from 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis: (a) observed species, (b) Shannon index, (c) Simpson index, and (d) Inverse Simpson index</p></caption><p>Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from duplicate technical measurements and are intended to descriptively illustrate trends in microbial diversity among treatments.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/71366/version/51831/34015/416151" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Taxonomic Distribution of Microbial Communities Based on Phylogenetic Relationships</title><p>The Sankey diagram depicts the hierarchical distribution of microbial taxa from the phylum to the species level across the different treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 3</xref>). To facilitate meaningful comparison among samples, only taxa with a relative abundance of ≥1% were considered in the visualization. In SKC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 3a</xref>), the microbial community was largely dominated by members of the family <italic>Lactobacillaceae</italic>, particularly the genera <italic>Lactobacillus, Lactococcus</italic>, and <italic>Enterococcus</italic>. The SKD sample (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 3b</xref>) exhibited an intermediate pattern, sharing characteristics with both SKC and SKT. By contrast, SKT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 3c</xref>) showed a more diverse taxonomic composition, including representatives of the families <italic>Bacillaceae</italic> and <italic>Paenibacillaceae</italic>. Dominant genera detected in this treatment included<italic> Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Lysinibacillus,</italic><italic>Brevibacillus, Thalassoporum</italic>, and <italic>Gloeothece</italic> under the sequencing and processing conditions applied in this study.</p><fig id="figure-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Sankey diagrams showing the hierarchical distribution of dominant microbial taxa (≥1% relative abundance) from the domain to species levels in SKC (a), SKD (b), and SKT (c)</p></caption><p>Taxonomic ranks (D–P–F–G–S) serve as positional references, since Sankey diagrams do not employ conventional axes. Legends and labeling were standardized across all panels to enable direct comparison among treatments. Numerical values indicate relative abundances obtained from full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, representing processing-associated compositional patterns based on technical replicates, with taxonomic assignments resolved to the species level whenever sequence resolution allowed. SKC: pasteurized liquid milk; SKD: powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin; SKT: powdered milk without dextrin.</p><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/71366/version/51831/34015/416152"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Overlapping Microbial Communities</title><p>The Venn diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 4</xref>) presents the distribution of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) detected in SKC, SKD, and SKT, highlighting both shared and unique microbial members among the treatments. Only OTUs that passed the quality-filtering step were considered in the analysis. Among the samples, SKT showed the highest OTU richness (944 OTUs), followed by SKD (310 OTUs) and SKC (72 OTUs), suggesting a greater number of detectable taxa in the powdered horse milk samples under the sequencing and processing conditions applied in this study. A total of 74 OTUs were common to all three treatments, representing the core microbial community based on presence–absence within this dataset. In addition, 151 OTUs were shared between SKT and SKD, 28 OTUs between SKC and SKD, and 16 OTUs between SKC and SKT.</p><p>These quantitative patterns align with the alpha diversity results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>, where SKT showed the highest observed OTU richness, followed by SKD and SKC. Although several dominant lactic acid bacteria—including <italic>Lactobacillus gallinarum</italic>, <italic>L. helveticus</italic>, and <italic>L. crispatus</italic>—were identified in all treatments, their relative abundances varied noticeably among the different processing conditions. Samples from SKC and SKD were characterized by a greater relative contribution of lactic acid bacteria, whereas SKT showed increased representation of spore-forming genera such as Bacillus and Brevibacillus. This pattern suggests a shift in the detected microbial composition associated with the drying process without dextrin.</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-2"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Venn diagram showing the unique and shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among the treatment groups SKC (yellow), SKD (red), and SKT (blue)</p></caption><p> Each circle represents one treatment, and overlapping regions indicate OTUs shared between groups based on presence–absence data. Numerical values denote the total number of OTUs detected within each treatment or shared combination. OTUs were assigned to the species level when sequence resolution permitted, based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and represent processing-associated detection patterns derived from technical replicates rather than independent biological replication. SKC: pasteurized liquid milk; SKD: powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin; SKT: powdered milk without dextrin.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/71366/version/51831/34015/416153" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Separation of Microbiota Community Structure</title><p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed a separation pattern of microbial community structures among treatments based on relative abundance profiles derived from technical replicates. Two principal components, PC1 (34.01%) and PC2 (33.61%), explained 67.62% of the total variation in the data. SKT samples were predominantly distributed in the positive quadrants of both PC1 and PC2, indicating a distinct ordination pattern under the applied processing and analytical conditions. SKC was positioned in the positive PC1 and negative PC2 quadrant, while SKD was located in the negative quadrants of both components. This distribution reflects processing-associated differences in detected microbial composition, with minimal overlap observed between the samples. within this exploratory ordination space. This pattern is clearly illustrated in<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5"> Figure 5.</xref></p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to visualize differences in microbial community composition based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing data</p></caption><p>The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) together accounted for 67.62% of the total variance in the dataset. Within the ordination plot, SKT formed a distinct cluster compared with SKC and SKD under the analytical conditions applied in this study. This separation indicates differences in microbial composition associated with the processing treatments, as observed from technical replicates, rather than reflecting population-level biological variation. Each treatment, therefore, displayed a characteristic distribution within the PCA ordination space. SKC: pasteurized liquid milk; SKD: powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin; SKT: powdered milk without dextrin.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/71366/version/51831/34015/416154" mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>Substrate form and the incorporation of functional carbohydrates such as dextrin have been reported to influence microbial community structures in fermented dairy products <xref rid="BIBR-18" ref-type="bibr">(Kaur et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Ge et al., 2025)</xref>. In the present study, clear differences in microbial diversity were observed among the treatment groups. These variations reflect patterns associated with the different milk treatments. Powdered horse milk without dextrin (SKT) showed the highest microbial diversity, characterized by a relatively balanced distribution at the genus level and the presence of less commonly reported genera, including <italic>Lysinibacillus, Thalassoporum</italic>, and<italic> Brevibacillus,</italic> within the dataset. By contrast, both pasteurized liquid milk (SKC) and powdered horse milk supplemented with dextrin (SKD) were strongly dominated by <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, which comprised more than 85% of the detected community. The greater microbial diversity observed in SKT may be related to the absence of dextrin during the drying process. Without a protective carbohydrate matrix, the relative dominance of heat-sensitive lactic acid bacteria may have decreased, allowing stress-tolerant and spore-forming taxa to become more detectable under the applied sequencing conditions <xref rid="BIBR-34" ref-type="bibr">(Selmi et al., 2026)</xref>. In addition, the low water activity typically associated with drying may contribute to the persistence of genera such as <italic>Bacillus, Brevibacillus</italic>, and<italic> Lysinibacillus</italic>, which are commonly reported as tolerant to harsh environmental conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Saha et al., 2025)</xref>. </p><p>This pattern of dominance aligns with findings reported in probiotic goat milk and fermented camel milk, where <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species often prevail due to their tolerance to acidic conditions and competitive advantage during fermentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Monareng et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Shori, 2024)</xref>. In the present dataset, SKC largely maintained microbial characteristics typically associated with fresh milk. The SKD samples exhibited a slightly more heterogeneous community structure, whereas SKT showed a greater presence of spore-forming and stress-tolerant taxa under the drying conditions applied in this study. These observations are in agreement with previous reports suggesting that thermal processing and storage conditions can affect microbial survival and resilience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(García et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Hebishy et al., 2023)</xref>. The compositional patterns observed were further reflected in the alpha diversity metrics (Observed, Shannon, Simpson, and Inverse Simpson), which showed higher microbial richness and evenness in SKT within the analyzed dataset. </p><p>These observations suggest that powder production without dextrin was associated with the detection of a broader range of microorganisms within the analytical scope of this study. From an ecological perspective, the higher diversity observed in SKT indicates a more complex microbial community within the dataset, where spore-forming and stress-tolerant taxa occur alongside lactic acid bacteria under the experimental conditions applied <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Sibanda et al., 2024)</xref>. Such community patterns may reflect potential ecological resilience rather than demonstrating confirmed functional advantages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Tan et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>The differences observed in microbial community profiles may also be influenced by physicochemical factors associated with the drying process. Dextrin functions as a carbohydrate carrier capable of forming a semi-crystalline matrix around microbial cells, which may help reduce thermal and osmotic stress during dehydration <xref rid="BIBR-3" ref-type="bibr">(Bamidele &amp; Emmambux, 2021)</xref>. In the SKD samples, this matrix may have contributed to the persistence of lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus spp., thereby supporting a moderate level of diversity within the analyzed sample. By contrast, the absence of dextrin in SKT likely exposed microorganisms to greater stress conditions, which may have favored the detection of stress-tolerant or spore-forming taxa such as Bacillus and Brevibacillus. Although water activity (a_w) was not directly measured in this study, the drying process was conducted at 70 °C and produced powders with low final moisture contents. Under such low-moisture conditions, bacterial cellular proteins and membrane integrity may be affected, whereas spore-forming microorganisms generally remain more resistant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Tong et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Shymialevich et al., 2024)</xref>. Therefore, the observed microbial differences may be associated with the drying conditions applied, although this interpretation remains tentative because a_w was not determined experimentally. These differences in microbial composition may also influence the quality characteristics of the final product. The greater persistence of lactic acid bacteria in SKD may be relevant to maintaining microbial characteristics commonly associated with fermented milk products commonly associated with fermented milk, including a more stable microbial profile and possible contributions to flavor development. In contrast, the higher representation of spore-forming taxa in SKT may be relevant to product stability during storage, as some species of Bacillus and Brevibacillus are known to survive harsh processing conditions and may contribute to spoilage in dried dairy products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Medjahdi et al., 2025)</xref>. Consequently, the microbial structure observed in the powdered horse milk samples likely reflects interactions between the presence of dextrin and the drying conditions applied in this experiment.</p><p>From a microbial ecology standpoint, the higher alpha diversity detected in SKT may indicate a broader metabolic potential within the microbial community identified in this dataset; however, such interpretations remain descriptive and exploratory. The simultaneous presence of both spore-forming and non-spore-forming taxa under the applied processing conditions suggests a pattern consistent with survival under environmental stress rather than evidence of confirmed ecological adaptation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Manyi-Loh &amp; Lues, 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Toor et al., 2024)</xref>. Additionally, the identification of microbial taxa uniquely detected in SKT, including <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic><italic>boronitolerans</italic> and <italic>Thalassoporum</italic><italic>komareki</italic>, represents analytical findings within the current dataset, and their functional roles were not experimentally verified in this study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Tuesta-Popolizio et al., 2021)</xref>.</p><p>Taxonomic shifts were also reflected in the dominance of particular taxa across the treatments. Although several core microbial groups were detected in all samples, their relative abundances varied within the limits of the technical replicate dataset. Samples from SKC and SKD were primarily characterized by the presence of species such as <italic>L. helveticus</italic> and <italic>L. gallinarum</italic>. In contrast, SKT showed relatively higher detection of <italic>Brevibacillus</italic><italic>parabrevis</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., which may be associated with the processing conditions applied. These descriptive observations are consistent with the alpha diversity patterns reported earlier, although they should not be interpreted as statistical evidence of population-level differences. Previous research has also shown that the use of additives can influence patterns of microbial dominance in processed food systems, providing contextual support for these observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Xiong et al., 2022)</xref>. Taken together, the compositional differences observed among treatments indicate that each sample type exhibited a distinct microbial profile under the applied experimental conditions, with SKT displaying the broadest taxonomic representation. These results highlight processing-related trends rather than confirmed biological effects and suggest that food processing practices, such as those applied to horse milk in this study, can influence the detected structure and relative abundance of microbial communities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Blanco-Doval et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(García et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Several limitations of the present study should be considered. First, the microbial analyses were based on technical replicates derived from a limited number of processed samples; therefore, the patterns observed should be interpreted as analytical trends associated with processing conditions rather than as indicators of population-level biological variability. Second, key physicochemical parameters—including water activity (a_w), drying kinetics, and temperature gradients—were not measured directly, which restricts the ability to relate the observed microbial shifts to specific processing factors quantitatively. Furthermore, microbial profiling was performed using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing, which provides detailed taxonomic information but does not permit direct assessment of microbial functionality, viability, or metabolic activity. As a result, the ecological and biotechnological interpretations presented here remain exploratory and would benefit from further validation through studies that include biological replication, functional characterization, and genome-resolved analytical approaches. Despite these limitations, the present findings provide preliminary descriptive information relevant to the milk powder industry, particularly in the selection of drying conditions and carrier additives to help maintain desirable microbial groups and improve the microbiological stability of horse milk powder products.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>The results of this study indicate that different milk treatments were associated with distinct microbial profiles in horse milk. Pasteurized liquid milk (SKC) and powdered milk supplemented with 15% dextrin (SKD) were dominated by lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus gallinarum and Lactobacillus helveticus. In contrast, powdered milk without dextrin (SKT) showed higher microbial diversity and greater representation of stress-tolerant and spore-forming taxa, including Brevibacillus parabrevis, Lysinibacillus boronitolerans, and members of the Bacillus cereus group. These findings indicate that dextrin supplementation during drying was associated with maintaining lactic acid bacteria in powdered horse milk. </p></sec><sec><title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>This work was supported by the Professor Research Grant from Universitas Brawijaya under Decree No. 1027.12/UN10.F05/PN/2025.</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used generative AI tool to assist with language editing, grammar correction, and improvement of sentence clarity. All sections of the manuscript were subsequently reviewed and revised by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final content of the publication.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="funding"><title></title></sec><sec sec-type="how-to-cite"><title>How to Cite</title><p>Radiati, L. E., Andriani, R. D., Amertaningtyas, D., Supamri, Faradila, R., &amp; Fardiaz, D. (2026). Processing-Associated Taxonomic Profiles of Microbiota in Liquid and Powdered Horse Milk Revealed by Full-Length 16S rRNA Sequencing. <italic>Tropical Animal Science Journal</italic>, <italic>49</italic>(5), 429. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.5.429</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A comprehensive review of bioactive compounds from lactic acid bacteria: potential functions as functional food in dietetics and the food industry</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>12</volume><issue>15</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdul Hakim</surname><given-names>B.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xuan</surname><given-names>N.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oslan</surname><given-names>S.N.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2850</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12152850</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Newly designed 16S rRNA metabarcoding primers amplify diverse and novel archaeal taxa from the environment</article-title><source>Environmental Microbiology Reports</source><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahram</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anslan</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hildebrand</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bork</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tedersoo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>487</fpage><lpage>494</lpage><page-range>487-494</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1758-2229.12684</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Encapsulation of bioactive compounds by “extrusion” technologies: A review</article-title><source>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition</source><volume>61</volume><issue>18</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bamidele</surname><given-names>O.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Emmambux</surname><given-names>M.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>3100</fpage><lpage>3118</lpage><page-range>3100-3118</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2020.1793724</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Diversity analysis and gene function prediction of bacteria and fungi of Bactrian camel milk and naturally fermented camel milk from Alxa in Inner Mongolia</article-title><source>LWT</source><volume>169</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>114001</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Nutritional quality and socio-ecological benefits of mare milk produced under grazing management</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blanco-Doval</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barron</surname><given-names>L.J.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aldai</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1412</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods13091412</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of seasonal and regional variations on the bacterial and fungal biodiversity of mares’ milk and koumiss in the Almaty and Zhambyl regions of Kazakhstan</article-title><source>International Dairy Journal</source><volume>169</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boranbayeva</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karahan</surname><given-names>A.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toishimanov</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhalelov</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bolat</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>106331</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.idairyj.2025.106331</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A comprehensive review on heat treatments and related impact on the quality and microbial safety of milk and milk-based products</article-title><source>Food Chemistry Advances</source><volume>1</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dash</surname><given-names>K.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fayaz</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dar</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shams</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manzoor</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sundarsingh</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deka</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>100041</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.focha.2022.100041</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>NanoPack: Visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data</article-title><source>Bioinformatics</source><volume>34</volume><issue>15</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coster</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>D’Hert</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schultz</surname><given-names>D.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruts</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Broeckhoven</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>2666</fpage><lpage>2669</lpage><page-range>2666-2669</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>An updated review on bacterial community composition of traditional fermented milk products: What next-generation sequencing has revealed so far?</article-title><source>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition</source><volume>62</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Melo Pereira</surname><given-names>G.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho Neto</surname><given-names>D.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maske</surname><given-names>B.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dea Lindner</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vale</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Favero</surname><given-names>G.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Viesser</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Góes-Neto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soccol</surname><given-names>C.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1870</fpage><lpage>1889</lpage><page-range>1870-1889</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2020.1848787</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of drying aids on the quality properties of kefir powder</article-title><source>Dairy</source><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Exarhopoulos</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karipoglou</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Groztidou</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Georgiou</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalogianni</surname><given-names>E.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goulas</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dimitreli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/dairy6010009</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Probiotics in the dairy industry—Advances and opportunities</article-title><source>Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety</source><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sadiq</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Simal‐Gandara</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>3937</fpage><lpage>3982</lpage><page-range>3937-3982</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1541-4337.12755</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The temperature dependence of microbial community respiration is amplified by changes in species interactions</article-title><source>Nature Microbiology</source><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>García</surname><given-names>F.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Clegg</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>O’Neill</surname><given-names>D.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Warfield</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pawar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yvon-Durocher</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>272</fpage><lpage>283</lpage><page-range>272-283</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-022-01283-w</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Advancements in the Structure, Spatial Configuration, Functional Properties, and Dairy Applications of Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides</article-title><source>Food Reviews International</source><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ge</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>30</lpage><page-range>1-30</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/87559129.2025.2467163</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Advantages and disadvantages of non‐starter lactic acid bacteria from traditional fermented foods: Potential use as starters or probiotics</article-title><source>Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety</source><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grujović</surname><given-names>M.Ž.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mladenović</surname><given-names>K.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Semedo‐Lemsaddek</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laranjo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stefanović</surname><given-names>O.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kocić‐Tanackov</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1537</fpage><lpage>1567</lpage><page-range>1537-1567</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1541-4337.12897</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Adaptive and predictive approaches to mitigate the impact of milk seasonality on composition, processing technologies and quality of milk powders</article-title><source>International Journal of Dairy Technology</source><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamed</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Galli</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hogan</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdel‐Hamid</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romeih</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>13148</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1471-0307.13148</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Microbiological aspects and challenges of whey powders – I thermoduric, thermophilic and spore‐forming bacteria</article-title><source>International Journal of Dairy Technology</source><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hebishy</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yerlikaya</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahony</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akpinar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saygili</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>779</fpage><lpage>800</lpage><page-range>779-800</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1471-0307.13006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Koumiss microbiome: investigation of the microbial composition and functional potential of a unique beverage of fermented milk produced at Kyrgyz mountains</article-title><source>Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>İstanbullugil</surname><given-names>F.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanli</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozturk</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Keskin</surname><given-names>B.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Düyşöbayeva</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Risvanli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Acaröz</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Acaröz</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salykov</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><page-range>1-17</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12602-025-10718-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Dairy-based probiotic-fermented functional foods: an update on their health-promoting properties</article-title><source>Fermentation</source><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>425</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation8090425</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Centrifuge: Rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences</article-title><source>Genome Research</source><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Breitwieser</surname><given-names>F.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salzberg</surname><given-names>S.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>1721</fpage><lpage>1729</lpage><page-range>1721-1729</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.210641.116</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparative study on the physical and chemical properties influenced by variations in fermentation bacteria groups: inoculating different fermented Mare’s milk into cow’s milk</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1328</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods14081328</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Chemical composition, physical properties, and immunomodulating study of mare’s milk of the Adaev horse breed from Kazakhstan</article-title><source>Frontiers in Nutrition</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kossaliyeva</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rysbekuly</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhaparkulova</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kozykan</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Serikbayeva</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shynykul</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhaparkulova</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yessimsiitova</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1443031</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2025.1443031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Probiotic characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented camel and mare’s milk products</article-title><source>ES Food and Agroforestry</source><volume>21</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kudaibergenova</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Begdildayeva</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amirkhanova</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurgazina</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ospanova</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondybayev</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jumagaziyeva</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iskakbayeva</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jumabayeva</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akhmetsadykova</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30919/faf1763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacterial viability retention in probiotic foods: A review</article-title><source>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition</source><volume>65</volume><issue>32</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>7964</fpage><lpage>7986</lpage><page-range>7964-7986</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2025.2488228</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Chemical contaminants in donkey milk: A review of literature on sources, routes and pathways of contamination, regulatory framework, health risks, and preventive measures</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>10</volume><issue>21</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ljubojević Pelić</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazić</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Živkov Baloš</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>39999</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39999</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Novel technologies for shelf-life extension of food products as a competitive advantage: a review</article-title><source>Food Production, Diversity, and Safety Under Climate Change</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lohita</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Srijaya</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Chakraborty</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathur</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>306</lpage><page-range>285-306</page-range><publisher-name>Springer Nature Switzerland</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-031-51647-4_24</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Listeria monocytogenes and Listeriosis: The Global Enigma</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manyi-Loh</surname><given-names>C.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lues</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1266</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods14071266</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Diversity, spoilage potential and biofilm formation assessment of spore-forming bacteria in post-pasteurization dairy environments</article-title><source>International Dairy Journal</source><volume>168</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Medjahdi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Didouh</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathot</surname><given-names>A.-G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leguerinel</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boudjemaa</surname><given-names>B.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>106290</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.idairyj.2025.106290</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A systematic review on microbial profiling techniques in goat milk: implications for probiotics and shelf-life</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monareng</surname><given-names>N.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ncube</surname><given-names>K.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rooi</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Modiba</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mtileni</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>5551</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms26125551</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Metagenomics: an effective approach for exploring microbial diversity and functions</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nam</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Do</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Loan Trinh</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2140</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12112140</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A preliminary study on the potential of Nanopore MinION and Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize building-dust microbiomes</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nygaard</surname><given-names>A.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tunsjø</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meisal</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Charnock</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-59771-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Full-length sequence of 16S rRNA gene (V1-V9 regions</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Indonesia</surname><given-names>P.T.Genetika Science</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><publisher-name>using Oxford Nanopore Technology</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Expanding the functional landscape of microbial entomopathogens in agriculture beyond pest management</article-title><source>Folia Microbiologica</source><volume>70</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saha</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bora</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>343</fpage><lpage>357</lpage><page-range>343-357</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12223-025-01251-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimizing dextrin levels for enhanced physicochemical properties and microstructure of sumbawa mare’s milk powder</article-title><source>Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Utama</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Irawan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Andiana</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faradila</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manab</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Radiati</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>431</fpage><lpage>439</lpage><page-range>431-439</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17582/journal.aavs/2025/13.2.431.439</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimizing fruit and vegetable by-products/wastes exploitation: Diversity, safety and biotechnological innovations based on lactic acid bacteria</article-title><source>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Selmi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Presutto</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Capozzi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonassisa</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Drider</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abidi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Spano</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiara</surname><given-names>M.L.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fragasso</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2026</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><page-range>1-37</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2026.2624473</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Microbiological hazards in milk production, processing and products development</article-title><source>Handbook of milk production, quality and nutrition</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shalini</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurunathan</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Rana</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>173</fpage><lpage>180</lpage><page-range>173-180</page-range><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-443-24820-7.00039-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus starter cultures in fermented camel milk: effects on viability, antioxidant properties, and sensory characteristics</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>13</volume><issue>22</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shori</surname><given-names>A.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>3711</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods13223711</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The novel concept of synergically combining: high hydrostatic pressure and lytic bacteriophages to eliminate vegetative and spore-forming bacteria in food products</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shymialevich</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wójcicki</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sokołowska</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>2519</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods13162519</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bifidobacterium species viability in dairy-based probiotic foods: Challenges and innovative approaches for accurate viability determination and monitoring of probiotic functionality</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source><volume>15</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sibanda</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marole</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomashoff</surname><given-names>U.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thantsha</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Buys</surname><given-names>E.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1327010</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1327010</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Microbial diversity and food safety in duck meat preservation: Effects of nanoemulsion nutmeg seed extract with focus on proteobacteria and lactococcus</article-title><source>CyTA - Journal of Food</source><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Supamri</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Radiati</surname><given-names>L.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Susilo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>2453531</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19476337.2025.2453531</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Microbial adaptation to enhance stress tolerance</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>Y.-S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>R.-K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z.-H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.-Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Y.-J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>888746</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.888746</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Natural polymers as carriers for encapsulation of volatile oils: applications and perspectives in food products</article-title><source>Polymers</source><volume>16</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tița</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Constantinescu</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rusu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tița</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1026</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/polym16081026</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Antimicrobial strategies in food processing and post-processing</article-title><source>Antimicrobial Strategies in the Food System: Updates, Opportunities, Challenges</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tong</surname><given-names>T.A.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>T.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pham</surname><given-names>B.N.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>447</lpage><page-range>365-447</page-range><publisher-name>Springer Nature Switzerland</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-031-95056-8_11</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Microbial ecosystems as guardians of food security and water resources in the era of climate change</article-title><source>Water, Air, &amp; Soil Pollution</source><volume>235</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toor</surname><given-names>M.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ur Rehman</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abid</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ullah</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Basit</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ud Din</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>H.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>741</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-024-07533-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Thalassobacillus, a genus of extreme to moderate environmental halophiles with biotechnological potential</article-title><source>World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology</source><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tuesta-Popolizio</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Velázquez-Fernández</surname><given-names>J.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodriguez-Campos</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Contreras-Ramos</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>147</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-021-03116-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Microbial community structure and diversity in different types of non-bovine milk</article-title><source>Current Opinion in Food Science</source><volume>40</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>57</lpage><page-range>51-57</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cofs.2021.01.008</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing</article-title><source>Genome Biology</source><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wick</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Judd</surname><given-names>L.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Holt</surname><given-names>K.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>129</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>An In-depth overview of the structural properties, health benefits, and applications of resistant dextrin</article-title><source>Journal of Food Processing and Preservation</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><page-range>1-14</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2024/8055063</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Exploring the effects of different bacteria additives on fermentation quality, microbial community and in vitro gas production of forage oat silage</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1122</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12091122</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>