<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.2.160</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chelated Minerals, Vitamins, and Electrolytes Improve Early Production Performance and Profitability of Broiler Chickens</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ybañez</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><address><country>Philippines</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Imlan</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name><address><country>Philippines</country><email>jcimlan@usm.edu.ph</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Science, Graduate School</institution><institution-wrap><institution>University of Southern Mindanao</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04mtcj695</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="PH">Philippines</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><author-notes><fn fn-type="coi-statement"><label>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</label><p>We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial, personal, or other relationships with other people or organizations related to the material discussed in the manuscript.</p></fn><corresp id="cor-1">Corresponding author: J. C. Imlan, Department of Animal Science, Graduate School, University of Southern Mindanao.  Email: <email>jcimlan@usm.edu.ph</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-2-11" publication-format="electronic"><day>11</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-2-11"><day>11</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>160</fpage><lpage>171</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-11-10"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date><date iso-8601-date="2026-1-12" date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>1</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-1-13"><day>13</day><month>1</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/69498" xlink:title="Chelated Minerals, Vitamins, and Electrolytes Improve Early Production Performance and Profitability of Broiler Chickens">Chelated Minerals, Vitamins, and Electrolytes Improve Early Production Performance and Profitability of Broiler Chickens</self-uri><abstract><p>Feed costs account for over half of total production costs in broiler farming; thus, minimizing them without compromising performance is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary feed additives containing zinc and manganese chelates, vitamins C and D, and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) on growth performance, carcass traits, and footpad dermatitis, and to conduct a cost-benefit analysis. A total of 144 male day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks were randomly assigned to a completely randomized design (CRD) with four treatments, each replicated four times with nine birds per replicate. The dietary treatments consist of a basal diet without any additive (T1) and the basal diet supplemented with the feed additive at three inclusion levels: 0.5 g/kg (T2), 1 g/kg (T3), and 2 g/kg (T4). These inclusion levels supplied with 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg of chelated Zn and Mn; 424.5, 849, and 1,698 mg/kg of sodium bicarbonate; 4, 8, and 16 mg/kg of vitamin C; and up to 325, 650, and 1,300 IU/kg of vitamin D, respectively. The results showed that supplementing the basal diet with 2 g of Zn and Mn chelates, vitamins C and D, and a NaHCO₃ mixture per kg significantly enhanced broiler performance, especially in body weight, feed intake, and weight gain during the second week. Clear linear effects appeared in the early production stages. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis indicated that higher supplementation was economically beneficial. Furthermore, no adverse effects were observed on carcass characteristics, skin tearing, or footpad dermatitis. In conclusion, increased supplementation with these nutrients improved broiler chicken performance during the early production phase.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>broiler performance</kwd><kwd>mineral chelates</kwd><kwd>vitamin C</kwd><kwd>vitamin D</kwd><kwd>sodium bicarbonate</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Due to the growing global population, demand for meat, particularly poultry, continues to surge rapidly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Dong et al., 2024)</xref>. Poultry meat derived from broilers is the most widely produced globally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Mramba &amp; Mapunda, 2024)</xref>. Improved genetics that contribute to a rapid growth rate and enhanced feed efficiency in broilers are considered economically advantageous. However, feed cost remains the primary determinant of profitability in broiler production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Abdalgalil, 2025)</xref>. For this reason, producers seek sustainable solutions that support efficient growth, preserve meat quality and profitability, and help broilers better withstand heat stress. More recently, broiler nutritionists have focused on alternative nutritional strategies, including the use of chelated trace minerals and vitamins in broiler diets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Alagawany et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Faghih-Mohammadi et al., 2022)</xref>. Moreover, because broilers are raised primarily for meat production, growth performance and carcass quality remain key economic traits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-65">(Tavárez &amp; Santos, 2016)</xref>.</p><p>Beyond nutrition, factors such as management, genetics, and post-slaughter handling also play essential roles in determining meat quality in broilers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Mir et al., 2017)</xref>.</p><p>Trace minerals are critical for normal physiological and metabolic function in chickens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Byrne &amp; Murphy, 2022)</xref>. Inorganic trace minerals are less digestible than their organic and chelated counterparts, despite their extensive use <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Lee &amp; Kim, 2025)</xref>. Therefore, to improve the absorption of trace minerals, the chelated form is preferred <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Broom et al., 2021)</xref>. Different trace minerals, such as manganese (Mn) and zinc (Zn), have been studied to assess their effects on broiler chickens. Manganese supports metabolism, collagen synthesis, and antioxidant defenses, helping to prevent leg deformities and improve bone health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Olgun, 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Carvalho et al., 2021)</xref>. On the other hand, zinc (Zn) plays a crucial role in the metabolism of energy, proteins, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Faghih-Mohammadi et al., 2022)</xref>. Its positive effects on growth performance are well established, and it is also involved in the regulation of key hormones such as glucagon, insulin, and sex hormones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abd El‐Hack et al., 2018)</xref>. Moreover, Zn has been shown to enhance immune function, increase daily weight gain, and improve feed utilization efficiency in broiler chickens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Hidayat et al., 2021)</xref>. When combined with manganese in organic chelated forms, these trace minerals further improve growth performance and carcass yield compared with their inorganic counterparts <xref rid="BIBR-48" ref-type="bibr">(Nguyen et al., 2025)</xref>. Meanwhile, <xref rid="BIBR-51" ref-type="bibr">(Pacheco et al., 2021)</xref> found that during the second week of production, chelated Zn and Mn considerably increased broiler body weight and feed conversion ratio. Additionally, recent research indicates that supplementing these minerals in broiler diets improves intestinal health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Bortoluzzi et al., 2020)</xref> ;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Franklin et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>Vitamins, both fat-soluble and water-soluble vitamins, are vital to broilers’ metabolic processes. As a fat-soluble vitamin, vitamin D is especially crucial for controlling the absorption of calcium and phosphorus, which supports immunological function and bone mineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Setiyaningsih et al., 2023)</xref>. On the other hand, by preventing oxidative damage and boosting immunological responses, vitamin C, a water-soluble vitamin, aids in cellular repair <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-59">(Shakeri et al., 2020)</xref>. Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Setiyaningsih et al., 2023)</xref> found that broiler development performance at the later production stage was strongly impacted by the combined supplementation of vitamins C and D. While vitamin C supplementation by itself does not always enhance growth performance, it is essential for controlling broiler reactions to different stressors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-71">(Yu et al., 2021)</xref>. Furthermore, this vitamin is essential for mitigating the adverse effects of heat stress in broilers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Attia et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Del Barrio et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Al-Khalaifah et al., 2025)</xref>. Moreover, a diet containing electrolytes, specifically sodium bicarbonate, reduces mortality and also mitigates the adverse effects of heat stress in broilers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Livingston et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>Although chelated trace minerals, vitamins, and electrolytes have individually demonstrated positive effects on broiler performance, existing studies have evaluated mainly these nutrients in isolation or in limited combinations. Moreover, no work has simultaneously assessed growth performance, carcass traits, footpad health, and economic outcomes under tropical conditions. Having said this, the mixtures of these feed additives had not been explored; thus, the authors hypothesized that higher inclusion rates of mineral chelates, vitamins, and electrolytes would improve broiler performance and provide economic benefits without detrimental effects on carcass yield or foot pad health. Hence, the objectives of this study were to investigate the growth performance, carcass traits, incidence of footpad dermatitis, and economic efficiency in broilers fed diets enriched with chelated Zn and Mn, vitamins C and D, and sodium bicarbonate.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title></sec><sec><title>Ethical Approval</title><p>The study was conducted at the Poultry Project, University of Southern Mindanao, Kabacan, Cotabato, Philippines. All handling protocols and ethical procedures for broiler chickens in this study were thoroughly reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Southern Mindanao under Protocol No. 2024-0055.</p></sec><sec><title>Preparation of Experimental Animals</title><p>This study utilized 144 male day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks, each with an average initial weight of 47.82 grams. All chicks were acquired from a recognized hatchery in Davao City, where they received vaccinations against infectious bronchitis and Newcastle disease. To help reduce transport-related stress, the chicks were given a 5% sugar solution for three hours after arriving at the experimental facility <xref rid="BIBR-12" ref-type="bibr">(Committee, 2006)</xref>.</p><p>Each chick was individually weighed to facilitate proper randomization. For identification, lightweight safety pins (1.9 cm in length) were used as wing bands, a method shown to cause minimal distress compared with conventional identification techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Dennis et al., 2008)</xref>. Each pin was fitted with a paper tag bearing a unique identification number (1–144) and secured with transparent tape. During the banding procedure, the chick was gently held in one hand, with the head kept upright and the body fully supported to minimize handling stress. After stabilizing the wing, the safety pin was inserted through the wing web from the ventral side and secured. All chicks were consistently banded on the same wing, preferably the left wing.</p><p>To minimize variation in initial body weight while preserving randomization, individual chick weights and corresponding wing-band numbers were recorded in an Excel spreadsheet. Chicks were then stratified into upper and lower weight categories. Each replicate consisted of nine birds, with an equal representation of heavier and lighter chicks to ensure comparable starting weights across replicates. After stratification, replicates were randomly assigned to their respective pens.</p><p>Sixteen pens measuring 1.0 × 0.75 m were thoroughly cleaned and disinfected two weeks prior to chick placement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Cobb-Vantress, 2021)</xref>. Each pen was equipped with a feeder trough, a waterer, and a 25-W brooder heater. To regulate airflow, a Sakoline burlap curtain was installed following the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Hidayat et al., 2021)</xref>, and newspapers were used as the initial litter material. Brooder bulbs were switched on four hours before the chicks arrived to stabilize the brooding temperature. Throughout the study, standard biosecurity protocols were strictly observed.</p></sec><sec><title>Brooding Management</title><p>Ambient temperature during the growing period was maintained between 28 and 32 °C. Continuous lighting was provided during the first two weeks to support early chick growth. After the brooding phase, the lighting program was adjusted to provide illumination from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., mimicking natural dusk– dawn conditions. This intermittent lighting schedule promoted feed intake during nighttime hours while allowing adequate rest periods, which are essential for proper digestion and overall health (Broiler Production Committee, 2006; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Hu et al., 2021)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Feeding Management</title><p>Formulated diets were provided throughout the experiment and were classified into brooder, starter, and grower phases. Broiler chicks were fed <italic>ad libitum</italic> throughout the study, with clean and potable drinking water available at all times. The feed ingredients and nutrient composition of the experimental diets are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>. The experiment was conducted with four treatment groups, each replicated four times. There were nine birds per replicate. The dietary treatments consist of a basal diet without any additives (T1) and the basal diet supplemented with the feed additives at three inclusion levels: 0.5 g/kg (T2), 1 g/kg (T3), and 2 g/kg (T4). These inclusion levels supplied with 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg of chelated Zn and Mn; 424.5, 849, and 1,698 mg/kg of sodium bicarbonate; 4, 8, and 16 mg/kg of Vitamin C; and up to 325, 650, and 1,300 IU/kg of Vitamin D, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). </p><p>The formulated basal diet samples (1 kg each) were submitted to Lipa Quality Control Center Inc. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(L.Q.C.C.I., 2025)</xref> for analysis. The proximate analysis of poultry feeds was conducted according to the official methods recommended by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(A.O.A.C., 2016)</xref> to determine crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, moisture, and ash content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Composition and nutrient profile of the basal diet formulated for booster, starter, and grower phases (in 100 kg diet) for broiler chickens</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Feedstuff</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Booster</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Starter</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Grower</th></tr><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">(1-10 days old)</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">(11-20 days old)</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">(21-30 days old)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Corn (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">57.87</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">59.17</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">62.74</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">L-Lysine (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.25</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.3</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">L-Threonine (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.18</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">DL Methionine (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.4</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.35</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.35</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">US soya HP (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">35</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">29</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Coco Oil (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3.5</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Salt (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.35</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.35</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">MDCP (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.4</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Limestone (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.15</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.2</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Toxin binder (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Choline 60% (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Vitamin concentrate premix (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Mineral premix (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.15</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Calcium formate (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.3</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" valign="top" align="left">Nutrient analysisᵃ</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">ME (kcal/kg)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2952.586</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3061.944</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3129.636</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Moisture (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">12.31</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">12.25</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">11.43</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ash (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6.55</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">05.13</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">05.27</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Crude protein (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">22.22</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">20.86</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">20.40</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude fiber (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">2.34</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">02.81</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">02.37</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude fat (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">04.38</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">05.98</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Nitrogen Free Extract (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">53.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">54.57</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">54.55</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: ᵃObtained from a laboratory analysis of samples submitted to Lipa Quality Control Center Inc. (LQCCI, 2025), except for metabolizable energy (ME).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Composition of  Zn and Mn chelates, Vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ mixtures used for broiler chickens</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Nutrient composition</th><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Amountᵃ</th><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="3">Composition per treatment</th></tr><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">0.5g/kgᵇ</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1 g/kgᵇ</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2 g/kgᵇ</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Chelated Zinc</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">10 g/kg</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5 mg/kg</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">10 mg/kg</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">20 mg/kg</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Chelated Manganese</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">10 g/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">5 mg/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">10 mg/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">20 mg/kg</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Sodium bicarbonate</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">849 g/kg</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">424.5 g/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">849 g/kg</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1.698 g/kg</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Vitamin C</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">8 g/kg</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4 mg/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8 mg/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">16 mg/kg</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Vitamin D, IU/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt; 650,000</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">up to 325</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">up to 650</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">up to 1300</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: ᵃThe compositions were based on the analysis by the Vethealth Corporation. ᵇObtained by manual computation following the formula: Nutrient/ kg feed = (Inclusion Rate in g/kg) * (Nutrient content in g/kg) / 1000000g (McDonald <italic>et al.</italic>, 2011).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Health Care and Sanitation</title><p>Strict biosecurity measures were followed throughout the study. Poultry pens were cleaned daily, with newspapers used as bedding during the first week and replaced each day. From day 10 onward, sanitized rice hulls replaced newspapers and were changed every 4 days to reduce odors and fly activity. Rice hulls were chosen due to their availability in the area and the proven positive effects on reducing ammonia and the occurrence of footpad dermatitis in broiler <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">(Şahin &amp; Çelen, 2021)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Sampling and Analysis</title><sec><title><bold>Body weight (g).</bold></title><p>The average body weight of the broiler chickens in each pen was recorded weekly using a digital scale, with a maximum capacity of 14 kg and a minimum readability of 2g.</p></sec><sec><title><bold>Weight gain</bold><bold>(g/bird). </bold></title><p>This was determined by taking the difference between the birds’ final and initial total weights, then dividing that figure by the number of birds in each cage, as illustrated in the formula below. Weight Gain (g/bird) = (Total final body weight – Total</p><p>initial body weight) / No. of birds per cage</p></sec><sec><title><bold>Average feed intake (g).</bold></title><p>Feed intake was determined by accurately recording the amount of feed offered and the feed remaining for each experimental group. These data were used to calculate total feed consumption using the following formula:</p><p>Average feed intake (g/bird) = [Feed offered (g) – Feed</p><p>refused (g)] / No. of birds per cage</p></sec><sec><title><bold>Feed conversion ratio.</bold></title><p>Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio of average weekly feed intake to average weekly weight gain, using the following formula:</p><p>Feed conversion ratio = Average feed intake (g/bird) /</p></sec><sec><title>Carcass Yield and Quantity</title><p>A total of 32 birds (2 per replication) were selected to determine the carcass characteristics listed below. The researchers ensured that the selected birds per pen were closest to the average weight, as the method described by Taylor <italic>et al</italic>. (2021). Before slaughter, all birds were fasted for 12 hours <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">(Schneider &amp; Gewehr, 2023)</xref>. By following the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Faria et al., 2010)</xref>, the birds were slaughtered by severing the carotid artery and the external jugular vein close to the occipital bone and atlas to facilitate bleeding. After bleeding, the birds were immersed in a scalding tank at approximately 60 °C for up to 2 minutes. Manual defeathering was simultaneously followed.</p><sec><title><bold>Carcass weight (g).</bold></title><p>Carcass weight was obtained after the removal of the head, neck, feathers, shank, and visceral parts except the lungs. The weight was obtained using a digital weighing scale.</p></sec><sec><title><bold>Carcass yield percentage.</bold></title><p>This was calculated using the following formula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Faria et al., 2010)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Bulkaini et al., 2022)</xref>:</p><p>Carcass percentage = (Carcass weight/Body weight at slaughter) x 100</p></sec><sec><title><bold>Percentage of offal.</bold></title><p>According to the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Bulkaini et al., 2022)</xref>, offal weight was measured by weighing the cleaned intestines, liver, heart, and gizzard. The offal percentage was calculated by dividing the total offal weight by the bird’s live weight and multiplying by 100%.</p></sec><sec><title><bold>Percentage of edible offal</bold>. </title><p>The weight of edible offal (foot, neck, and head) was determined by weighing each part individually. The edible offal percentage was determined by dividing the total weight of these parts by the bird’s live weight, then multiplying the result by 100 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Bulkaini et al., 2022)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Skin resistance test.</title><p>At the end of the study, eight birds from each treatment group were slaughtered. A 1 cm incision was made between the thigh and back, and its length was measured with a caliper before scalding and defeathering. After defeathering, the incision was measured again, and the increase in length was recorded as skin tearing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Rossi et al., 2007)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-72">(Zaghari et al., 2022)</xref>.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec><title>Occurrence of Footpad Dermatitis</title><p>Footpad dermatitis was visually assessed at slaughter in a total of 80 birds (20 birds per treatment) using the scoring system adapted from the European Union Reference Centre for Animal Welfare for Poultry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Poultry, 2020)</xref>. Lesions were scored on a scale from 0 to 2, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis</title><p>The production cost (expressed in Philippine peso, PHP) was determined by accounting for expenses for chicks, feed, and feed additives (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 5</xref>). The cost was based on local prices in the Philippines for January 2025, with an exchange rate of 58.39 PHP per US dollar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Pilipinas, 2025)</xref>. The overall production cost was computed on both a per-bird and per-kilogram basis for broilers. In addition, the extra expenses associated with the test ingredients were incorporated into the cost–benefit analysis following the method first described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Khatun et al., 2019)</xref>.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p> The footpad dermatitis scale was used in the study. The researchers randomly selected these images from slaughtered  broilers. </p><p> a.  scale  of  0  (no  lesion);  b.  scale  of  1  (mild  lesion);  c.  scale  of  2  (moderate  to  severe  lesion)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/69498/version/49939/33258/402327/Trop_Anim_Sci_J-49-2-160-g1.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Feed intake (kg/bird) and final weight (kg/bird) were determined from the average measurements collected over the 30-day feeding trial. Feed price was computed based on the composite cost of all feedstuffs used in the formulation. The cost of the feed additives was incorporated using the actual supplier pricing provided by Vethealth Corporation. The total feed cost per kilogram was obtained by adding the basal feed price and the corresponding treatment cost. Feed cost per bird was then calculated by multiplying feed intake by the total feed cost per kilogram.</p><p>Production cost included expenses for chicks, feed, and feed additives. These expenses were summed to obtain the total cost of production per broiler. The sale price per broiler was computed by multiplying the average final liveweight by the prevailing liveweight price of PHP 150/kg. Moreover, the cost of production per kilogram was determined by dividing the total production cost by the average final weight. Profit per broiler was calculated as: Profit/broiler = Sale price/ broiler − Total cost of production/broiler. On the other hand, the profit per kilogram liveweight was computed by dividing the profit per bird by the final weight. Lastly, to determine the profit PHP/kg (over control), the profit per kilogram for Treatments 2, 3, and 4 was compared with that of the control group.</p></sec><sec><title>Statistical Data Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR version 2.0.1) software developed by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(International Rice Research Institute, 2020)</xref>. The experiment followed a Completely Randomized Design (CRD), and orthogonal polynomial contrasts (linear and quadratic) were applied to evaluate treatment trends, particularly for broiler performance parameters. Mean differences among treatments were further compared using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test at the 5% and 1% levels of significance. In addition, the percent occurrence of footpad dermatitis was analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test at a 5% significance level.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>Growth performance of broilers fed diets supplemented with a mixture of chelated zinc, manganese, vitamins, and sodium bicarbonate was assessed using key performance indicators, including body weight, feed intake, livability, and feed conversion ratio. To establish baseline values, all birds were weighed upon arrival on December 6, 2024, and subsequent body weight measurements were recorded weekly up to day 30 to monitor growth patterns throughout the experimental period.</p></sec><sec><title>Body Weight and Weight Gain of Broiler Chickens (g)</title><p>During the early growth phase (1–21 days), body weight (BW) and weight gain (WG) showed a significant linear response (p&lt;0.05), with broilers receiving Treatment 4 (2 g/kg) exhibiting greater body weights. Nevertheless, neither the latter growth phase (22–30 days) nor the entire study period (1–30 days) showed any significant changes (p&gt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec><title>Feed Intake of Broiler Chicken (g)</title><p>Feed intake (FI) was monitored daily by recording the amount of feed offered and refused. A highly significant linear effect (p&lt;0.01) was observed during days 8–14, indicating increased feed consumption as the levels of Zn and Mn chelates, vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ supplementation increased (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>). In addition, a significant linear response (p&lt;0.05) was detected over the entire 30-day experimental period. During the second week, broilers in Treatment 4 consumed significantly more feed (p&lt;0.05) than those in the other treatments, with a mean intake of 433.19 g.</p></sec><sec><title>Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR)</title><p>Feed conversion ratio (FCR) exhibited a significant linear response (p&lt;0.05) during the 1–7-day and 15–21-day periods, with the lowest FCR values observed in broilers supplemented with 2 g/kg of Zn and Mn chelates, vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ (T4), averaging 1.42 and 0.97, respectively. No significant effects (p&gt;0.05) were detected outside these periods (<xref rid="table-3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec><title>Livability (%)</title><p>As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>, livability exhibited a significant linear response (p&lt;0.05) throughout the experimental period, indicating improved survival with increasing levels of supplementation.</p></sec><sec><title>Carcass Characteristics</title><p>The results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 4</xref>, which presents data on carcass weight, dressing percentage, edible offal percentage, and skin resistance to tearing. No significant differences (p&gt;0.05) were observed among treatments for carcass weight, carcass yield, offal percentage, or edible offal percentage. Mean offal and edible offal values were 8.67% and 7.87%, respectively, and did not vary significantly across treatments. Similarly, no significant differences (p&gt;0.05) were detected in skin resistance to tearing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 4</xref>). These findings indicate that dietary supplementation with Zn and Mn chelates, vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ did not adversely affect carcass characteristics in broiler chickens.</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Growth performance of broiler fed with a mixture of chelated zinc, manganese, vitamins C and D, and sodium bicarbonate in their diet</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Variables</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle"><p>TI </p><p>(Control)</p></th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3">T2+0.5g/kg</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3">T3+1g/kg</th><th rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">T4+2g/kg</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">SEM</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"><p>Tukey's</p><p>HSD Test</p></th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top"><p>Orthogonal</p><p>polynomial contrasts</p></th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">CV(%)</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">P-value</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">P-value</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Liner</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Quadratic</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="10" valign="top">1 day of age</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> IW (g)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">47.48</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">47.28</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">47.05</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">49.48</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.66</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.72</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.45</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.44</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6.94</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10">1-7 days of age</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">BW (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">135.88</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">135.02</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">138.11</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">164.15</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">8.68</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.10</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04*</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.14*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">12.11</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">FI (g)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">148.89</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">139.25</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">137.88</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">162.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">8.01</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.18</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.30</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.06</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">10.89</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">WG (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">88.39</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">87.74</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">91.05</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">114.66</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">7.59</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.03*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.13</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">15.89</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">FCR</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.71</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.60</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.53</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.42</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.12</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.02*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.96</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">9.98</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10">8-14 days of age</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">BW (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">385.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">390.14<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">400.39<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">475.15<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">21.53</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.04*</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.01*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.13</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">10.43</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">FI (g)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">369.99<sup>b</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">374.81<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">391.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">433.19<sup>b</sup></td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">11.82</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.01*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;0.01**</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.14</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6.03</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">WG (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">338.16<sup>b</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">342.86<sup>b</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">353.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">425.66<sup>b</sup></td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">20.40</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.03*</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.01*</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.12</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">11.18</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">FCR </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.11</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.10</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.11</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.02</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.25</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.14</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.30</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6.23</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10">15-21 days of age</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">BW (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">813.13</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">837.83</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">845.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">845.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">953.92</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">37.00</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.08</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.02*</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">FI (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">792.06</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">800.84</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">802.80</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">802.80</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">874.14</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">28.17</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.20</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.07*</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.29</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">WG (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">765.65</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">790.55</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">798.45</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">798.45</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">904.44</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">36.11</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.02*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.28</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">FCR </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.04</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.01</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.01</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.01</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.97</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.02</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.17</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04*</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="10" valign="top">22-30 days of age</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">BW (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1462.97</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1464.69</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1448.67</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1567.82</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">45.25</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.43</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.22</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.20</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">5.67</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">FI (g)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1440.95</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1460.91</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1440.24</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1431.17</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">16.19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.63</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.39</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2.24</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">WG (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1415.49</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1417.41</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1401.67</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1518.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">41.79</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.92</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.14</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5.81</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">FCR</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.03</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1.03</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.94</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.21</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.11</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.19</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6.47</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10">1-30 days of age</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">FW (g)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1462.97</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1464.69</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1448.67</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1567.82</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.08</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.08</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.22</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.20</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">5.76</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">FI (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2751.81</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2775.81</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2772.24</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2900.59</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.09</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.09</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.03*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.23</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">2.93</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">WG (g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1417.04</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1417.04</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1401.61</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1519.23</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.22</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.22</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.14</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.19</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">5.81</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">FCR</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.95</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1.96</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.98</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.910.03</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.54</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.46</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.28</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3.51</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">L (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">91.67</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">94.44</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">100.00</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">100.00</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3.10</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.20</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04*</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.66</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6.43</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: ᵃ<italic>P</italic>-value less than 0.05 is significantly different; Means with the same letter are not significantly different; <italic> means significant (p&lt;0.05) linear effect; </italic>* means highly significant (p&lt;0.01) linear effect; IW (g) – initial weight; FW (g) – final weight; BW (g) – body weight; FI (g) – feed intake; WG (g) – weight gain; g – gram; FCR – feed conversion ratio; L (%) – livability; SEM – standard error of the means; CV – coefficient of variation. The dietary treatments consist of a basal diet without any additives (T1) and the basal diet supplemented with the feed additives at three inclusion levels: 0.5 g/kg (T2), 1 g/kg (T3), and 2 g/kg (T4).  </p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Carcass characteristics of broiler fed with a diet with a mixture of chelated zinc, manganese, vitamins, and sodium bicarbonate</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Variables</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="7">Treatments</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">T1 (Control)</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">T2 + 0.5 g/kg</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">T3 + 1 g/kg</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">T4 + 2 g/kg</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">SEM</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">CV (%)</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">P-value ns</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Carcass weight, g</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1147.75</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1137.00</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1069.25</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1180.00</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">56.17</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">9.90</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.58</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Carcass percentage</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">74.57</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">74.66</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">73.63</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">74.11</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.35</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.95</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.20</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Percentage of offal</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">9.14</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8.20</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8.46</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8.88</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.50</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">11.60</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.57</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Percentage of edible offal</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">7.63</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">7.54</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8.00</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.26</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6.51</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Skin resistance test, cm</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1.62</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.39</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.05</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">27.42</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.22</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note:  ns – no significant difference (p&gt;0.05); SEM – standard error of the means; g – gram; cm – centimeter. The dietary treatments consist of a basal diet without any additives (T1) and the basal diet supplemented with the feed additives at three inclusion levels: 0.5 g/kg (T2), 1 g/kg (T3), and 2 g/kg (T4).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Footpad Dermatitis Assessment</title><p>A total of 80 birds (20 per treatment) were used to assess the presence of footpad dermatitis using the scale shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>. In the visual assessment conducted, the percentage of birds with footpad dermatitis (mild to severe) in each Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant difference (p&gt;0.05) with mean values of 75% (T1), 75% (T2), 80% (T3), and 85% (T4) in all treatments, as shown in <xref rid="figure-2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>. </p><p>For moderate to severe cases, a notably high incidence was observed in birds fed 1 g of Zn and Mn chelates, Vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ mixture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>), but no significant difference (p&gt;0.05) was observed among the treatments. The same significance levels were observed in mild cases. Results revealed that supplementation with the said nutrients is comparable to the control treatment in terms of footpad health in broiler chickens.</p></sec><sec><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis</title><p>Cost-benefit analysis revealed that higher supplementation at 2 g/kg provided the highest profitability, achieving a net profit of ₱117.86 per bird and ₱75.07 per kg liveweight. At an exchange rate of 58.39 pesos per US dollar in January 2025, the net profit per bird is 2.02 US dollars, and 1.29 US dollars per kg liveweight. Lower supplementation levels (0.5 and 1 g/ kg) failed to improve profitability compared with the control, mainly because feed costs increased without a corresponding increase in final body weight. Thus, the addition of 2 g of Zn and Mn chelates, Vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ mixture per kg was economically advantageous (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 5</xref>). </p></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>Chelated minerals are widely recognized for their higher bioavailability compared with inorganic sources, resulting in improved nutrient absorption and enhanced growth performance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Bhagwat et al., 2021)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Meshreky et al., 2015)</xref> further demonstrated that zinc and manganese supplementation markedly enhanced both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, highlighting the advantages of chelated minerals over inorganic forms. In the present study, treatment effects became most evident after the first week of growth, a period characterized by rapid physiological development. During this stage, broilers have increased nutritional demands to support skeletal growth, immune maturation, and metabolic activity. Zinc plays a crucial role in bone mineralization and collagen synthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-74">(Zhang et al., 2018)</xref>, and its supplementation has been demonstrated to enhance feed efficiency and average daily gain by supporting enzymatic processes involved in protein synthesis and energy metabolism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Hidayat et al., 2019)</xref>. Likewise, manganese is essential for carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, contributing to the energy requirements of broilers during the early rapid growth phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">(Shokri et al., 2021)</xref>. Organic chelated forms of Zn and Mn are more efficiently absorbed and utilized than inorganic sources, particularly during periods of accelerated growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-63">(Sunder et al., 2013)</xref>. In addition, Mn is critical for cartilage development and bone matrix formation, although its direct impact on overall growth may be less pronounced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Pacheco et al., 2017)</xref>. The significant linear increases in body weight and weight gain observed during the second and third weeks of production suggest that higher inclusion levels of these feed additives enhance economically important traits, consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Carvalho et al., 2021)</xref> on different manganese sources in broilers.</p><fig id="figure-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p> Percent occurrence of footpad dermatitis in broilers fed a diet with a mixture of chelated zinc, manganese, vitamins, and sodium bicarbonate. </p></caption><p>Note: </p><p>No lesion;  Mild;  Moderate to severe;  All with lesion. The dietary treatments consist of a basal diet without any additives (T1) and the basal diet supplemented with the feed additives at three inclusion levels: 0.5 g/kg (T2), 1 g/ kg (T3), and 2 g/kg (T4).</p><graphic mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/69498/version/49939/33258/402328/Trop_Anim_Sci_J-49-2-160-g2.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 5</label><caption><p> Cost-benefit analysis for feeding diets supplemented with chelated zinc and manganese, vitamins, and sodium bicarbonate in broiler chickens. The cost was based on local prices in the Philippines in January 2025 and expressed in Philippine peso</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Variables</th><th align="center" colspan="4" valign="top">Treatments</th></tr><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">T1 (Control)</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">T2 + 0.5 g/kg</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">T3 + 1 g/kg</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">T4 + 2 g/kg</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Feed intake (kg/bird)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2.75</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.78</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">2.77</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2.91</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Final weight (kg/bird)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.46</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.46</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.45</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.57</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Feed price (kg)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">26.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">26.14</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">26.22</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">26.36</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Treatment useda</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.00</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.17</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Total feed cost/kg</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">26.07</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">26.31</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">73.53</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">27.02</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Total feed cost/bird</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">71.69</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">73.15</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">39.00</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">78.64</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Chick price (PHP)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">39.00</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">39.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">112.53</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">39.00</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Total cost of production PHP/broiler</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">110.69</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">112.15</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">77.61</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">117.64</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Total cost of production PHP/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">75.81</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">76.81</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">217.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">74.93</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Sale price PHP/broiler at 150/kg liveweight</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">219.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">219.00</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">104.97</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">235.50</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Profit PHP/broiler</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">108.31</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">106.85</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">72.39</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">117.86</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Profit PHP/kg</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">74.19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">73.19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">75.07</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Profit PHP/kg (over control)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">-1.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">-1.79</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.89</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: ᵃ Zn and Mn chelates, Vitamins D and C, and NaHCO₃ mixture;  PHP – Philippine peso; / - per; kg – kilogram. The dietary treatments consist of a basal diet without any additives (T1) and the basal diet supplemented with the feed additives at three inclusion levels: 0.5 g/kg (T2), 1 g/kg (T3), and 2 g/kg (T4).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Sodium bicarbonate has also been reported to increase feed consumption in broiler chickens by helping maintain optimal physiological conditions that encourage feeding behavior <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Osman et al., 2015)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-67">(Turner et al., 2025)</xref>. Earlier research indicates that supplementing with sodium bicarbonate can improve feed intake, promote weight gain, and enhance the feed conversion ratio. However, exceeding recommended levels can have adverse effects, including increased mortality rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-70">(Yasoob &amp; Tauqir, 2017)</xref>. In broilers, sodium bicarbonate acts as a buffer, maintaining blood pH and counteracting metabolic acidosis, particularly under stress or when diets are high in protein or certain minerals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Martínez et al., 2021)</xref>. Chicks during the first 14 days of life are less efficient at thermoregulation, and sodium bicarbonate can improve their ability to cope with heat stress by promoting water intake and supporting electrolyte balance, thus reducing stress-related mortality and improving overall viability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Osman et al., 2015)</xref>.</p><p>Another factor contributing to the observed responses during early growth may be the inclusion of vitamins C and D in the dietary treatments. The first 14 days of a broiler’s life are characterized by rapid growth, organ development, and immune system maturation, making this stage particularly responsive to nutritional interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Ferronato et al., 2024)</xref>. During the starter phase, chicks undergo intensive skeletal and metabolic development, processes that rely heavily on adequate vitamin D for calcium and phosphorus utilization, as well as vitamin C for antioxidant protection and immune support <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">(Shojadoost et al., 2021)</xref>. Most studies evaluating vitamin C supplementation in broiler diets have focused on its role under heat stress conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-68">(Hieu et al., 2022)</xref> or its interaction with other feed additives <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Hajati et al., 2015)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Attia et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Jahejo et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Kumar et al., 2021)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Amer et al., 2021)</xref> reported that dietary ascorbic acid at 400 mg/kg significantly improved growth performance during the starter phase, although greater benefits were observed when vitamin C was combined with safflower oil during the grower and finisher phases. These findings generally align with the present study, except for differences in feed intake responses. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Chand et al., 2014)</xref> demonstrated that combined supplementation of vitamin C and zinc enhanced growth performance and health status in broilers. Variations between previous studies and the present results may be partly explained by differences in environmental conditions; in the current study, uniform ventilation likely reduced heat stress, whereas birds in the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Chand et al., 2014)</xref> were subjected to heat stress during the fourth and fifth weeks of production.</p><p>Overall, no notable differences in growth performance parameters, including body weight, weight gain, and feed conversion ratio, were observed across treatments over the entire experimental period. These findings are consistent with several studies reporting limited or no effects of dietary zinc <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">(Salim et al., 2012)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-63" ref-type="bibr">(Sunder et al., 2013)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-73">(Zakaria et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-69">(Yang et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Foltz et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-74">(Zhang et al., 2018)</xref>, manganese <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Ghosh et al., 2016)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Khakpour Irani et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">(Sun et al., 2021)</xref>, or mineral chelates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-69">(Yang et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Pacheco et al., 2017)</xref> on overall broiler growth performance. In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-75">(Zhao et al., 2010)</xref> reported significant improvements in body weight following supplementation with chelated copper, zinc, and manganese. This discrepancy may be attributed to differences in mineral composition and experimental duration, as the present study evaluated chelated zinc and manganese in combination with vitamins and sodium bicarbonate, without copper, over a shorter 30-day period, whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-75">(Zhao et al., 2010)</xref> conducted a 52-day trial. Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-53">(Rezapour et al., 2024)</xref> observed significant improvements in body weight during the brooder phase when broilers were supplemented with a mixture of zinc and manganese. Similarly, the present study detected significant responses during the early growth stage, with higher inclusion levels of chelated zinc and manganese outperforming lower levels. Despite differences in mineral sources, inclusion rates, and experimental conditions, these findings consistently indicate that the benefits of mineral chelates are more pronounced during the early stages of broiler growth.</p><p>The chelated trace minerals and vitamins used in this study had no adverse effect on carcass characteristics, particularly yield, offal percentage, and skin-tear resistance. This finding is consistent with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-75">(Zhao et al., 2010)</xref>, which revealed that chelated trace minerals did not significantly improve carcass quality in broilers. Similarly, <xref rid="BIBR-62" ref-type="bibr">(Sun et al., 2021)</xref> reported that manganese supplementation had no notable impact on carcass traits. In the current study, the average carcass weight was 1133.50 g, with an average dressing percentage of 74.24%, indicating that the birds maintained uniform carcass quality across treatments. Moreover, this result aligns with the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Amer et al., 2021)</xref>, which also found that ascorbic acid supplementation had no significant effect on carcass yield. Regarding zinc supplementation, previous studies have shown that it can significantly enhance skin collagen, with male broilers exhibiting thicker skin compared to females <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">(Salim et al., 2012)</xref>. However, the same study noted that zinc supplementation did not affect the skin’s resistance to tearing, suggesting that while zinc contributes to skin development, other factors may also influence skin strength and integrity.</p><p>Footpad health is widely recognized as an indicator of both nutritional adequacy and effective management practices in broiler production. In the present study, the footpad condition did not differ significantly among treatments, indicating that all inclusion levels of the feed additives produced outcomes comparable to those of the control group. This finding is consistent with the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-75">(Zhao et al., 2010)</xref>, who likewise observed no significant effect of chelated trace minerals on footpad lesion incidence. However, these results contrast with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Chen et al., 2017)</xref>, who demonstrated that higher dietary concentrations of certain trace minerals, particularly zinc and manganese, enhanced protection against footpad dermatitis by promoting lesion healing and reducing severity over time. The discrepancy between studies may be partly explained by differences in mineral balance, as the present study did not include additional trace minerals that may support tissue repair. Interactions among dietary minerals are complex, and both antagonistic and synergistic effects can influence the absorption and utilization of zinc and manganese <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">(Swiatkiewicz et al., 2017)</xref>. Elevated levels of certain nutrients may impair mineral bioavailability, potentially limiting their effectiveness in supporting lesion healing. In addition to nutritional factors, litter management plays a critical role in the development of footpad dermatitis. In this study, frequent litter replacement was implemented following the recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Alabi et al., 2023)</xref>, who emphasized that regular litter management, regardless of litter type, is essential for minimizing the incidence and severity of footpad lesions in broilers.</p><p>The economics of using Zn and Mn, Vitamin C and D, and sodium bicarbonate were presented in the costbenefit analysis table (<xref rid="table-4" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>). Results revealed that a higher inclusion rate of these feed additives in a 2 g/kg diet provided an economic advantage compared to the control and other inclusion levels. This treatment has the highest selling price of 235.50 pesos or 4.03 dollars. The use of organic trace minerals in microchelated forms has consistently shown economic advantages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Khatun et al., 2019)</xref>. Although Treatment 4 slightly increased feed cost per kilogram, the resulting gain in productivity lowered the overall production cost per kg and yielded the highest profit per bird (₱117.86). This agrees with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Levy, 2017)</xref>, who reported that profitability in broiler systems rises when biological performance, especially FCR, growth rate, and survival, improves, as feed accounts for most production costs.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Higher supplementation (2 g/kg) of broiler diets with a mixture of Zn and Mn chelates, Vitamins C and D, and NaHCO₃ led to improved broiler chicken performance during the early stages of production. It also increased broiler survivability throughout the production cycle. Additionally, these nutrients did not negatively affect carcass characteristics or the occurrence of footpad lesions. Moreover, this inclusion rate provides an economic benefit to farmers. Significant linear effects indicate that higher inclusion levels offer advantages in growth performance during early stages, along with economic benefits. Therefore, we recommend that future studies investigate supplementation levels beyond 2 g/kg and include assessments of intestinal morphology to better understand the physiological mechanisms behind these responses.</p></sec></body><back><ack><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>The researchers would like to express their sincere gratitude to Vethealth Corporation for funding this research and to the Poultry Project, University of Southern Mindanao, for providing the study area. This study would not have been possible without their generous support and assistance.</p></sec></ack><sec sec-type="ai-statement"><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used Grammarly v4 to improve the readability and language of the manuscript. After using these tools, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of dietary supplementation of organic zinc on laying performance, egg quality and some biochemical parameters of laying hens</article-title><source>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</source><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd El‐Hack</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alagawany</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amer</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arif</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahdan</surname><given-names>K.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>El‐Kholy</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>542</fpage><lpage>549</lpage><page-range>542-549</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.12793</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>A comparative economic analysis of broiler production costs: selected Arab countries, Turkey, and The United States compared to global standards</article-title><source>World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences</source><volume>13</volume><issue>04</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdalgalil</surname><given-names>F.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.wjpsonline.com/index.php/wjps/article/view/1979" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.wjpsonline.com/index.php/wjps/article/view/1979</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The synergistic effect of vitamin C supplementation and early feed withdrawal on heat stress mitigation in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>15</volume><issue>20</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Khalaifah</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamel</surname><given-names>N.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gabr</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouda</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>2996</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani15202996</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of litter management systems on incidence and severity of footpad dermatitis among broilers at finisher stage</article-title><source>Translational Animal Science</source><volume>8</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alabi</surname><given-names>O.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Olagunju</surname><given-names>S.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aderemi</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lawal</surname><given-names>T.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oguntunji</surname><given-names>A.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayoola</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oladejo</surname><given-names>O.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adeleye</surname><given-names>B.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adewumi</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tarta</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alabi</surname><given-names>B.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/tas/txad145</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Nutritional significance of amino acids, vitamins and minerals as nutraceuticals in poultry production and health–a comprehensive review</article-title><source>Veterinary Quarterly</source><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alagawany</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elnesr</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farag</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tiwari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yatoo</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karthik</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Michalak</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dhama</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><page-range>1-29</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01652176.2020.1857887</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Changes in the growth, ileal digestibility, intestinal histology, behavior, fatty acid composition of the breast muscles, and blood biochemical parameters of broiler chickens by dietary inclusion of safflower oil and vitamin C</article-title><source>BMC Veterinary Research</source><volume>17</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amer</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>W.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gharib</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Gabri</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouda</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elabbasy</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abd El-Rahman</surname><given-names>G.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>1-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-021-02773-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists</article-title><source>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>A.O.A.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><edition>20th</edition></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Enhancing tolerance of broiler chickens to heat stress by supplementation with vitamin E, vitamin C and/or probiotics</article-title><source>Annals of Animal Science</source><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Attia</surname><given-names>Y.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Harthi</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Shafey</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rehab</surname><given-names>Y.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>W.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>1155</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/aoas-2017-0012</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Philippine Peso per US Dollar Exchange Rate</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pilipinas</surname><given-names>Bangko Sentral</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><comment>Retrieved from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.bsp.gov.ph/statistics/external/tab12_pus_data.aspx" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.bsp.gov.ph/statistics/external/tab12_pus_data.aspx</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Cocktail of chelated minerals and phytogenic feed additives in the poultry industry: A review</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhagwat</surname><given-names>V.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balamurugan</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rangesh</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>364</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2021.364-371</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Influence of dietary zinc, copper, and manganese on the intestinal health of broilers under Eimeria challenge</article-title><source>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</source><volume>7</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bortoluzzi</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vieira</surname><given-names>B.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Applegate</surname><given-names>T.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>13</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2020.00013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Philippines recommends for broiler production</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Committee</surname><given-names>Broiler Production</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><comment>PCARRD Philippines Recommends Series (Philippines), (10).</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122430/records/647248922c1d629bc979a4aa" ext-link-type="uri">https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122430/records/647248922c1d629bc979a4aa</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Recent advances in understanding the influence of zinc, copper, and manganese on the gastrointestinal environment of pigs and poultry</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broom</surname><given-names>L.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Monteiro</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piñon</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1276</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11051276</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Carcass characteristics and pure meat production of broiler chickens in traditional markets on Lombok and Sumbawa Islands</article-title><source>Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bulkaini</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutaryonoi</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kisworo</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sukirno</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rozi</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1602</fpage><lpage>1610</lpage><page-range>1602-1610</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17582/journal.aavs/2022/10.7.1602.1610</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Relative bioavailability of trace minerals in production animal nutrition: A review</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>12</volume><issue>15</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Byrne</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12151981</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Performance traits and immune response of broiler chicks treated with zinc and ascorbic acid supplementation during cyclic heat stress</article-title><source>International Journal of Biometeorology</source><volume>58</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chand</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Naz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>R.U.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>2153</fpage><lpage>2157</lpage><page-range>2153-2157</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00484-014-0815-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Impact of trace minerals on wound healing of footpad dermatitis in broilers</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tellez</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Escobar</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vazquez-Anon</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>1894</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-02026-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Cobb broiler management guide</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Cobb-Vantress</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><publisher-name>Cobb-Vantress, Inc</publisher-name><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cobbgenetics.com/assets/Cobb-Files/Broiler-Guide_English-2021-min.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.cobbgenetics.com/assets/Cobb-Files/Broiler-Guide_English-2021-min.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In-feed organic and inorganic manganese supplementation on broiler performance and physiological responses</article-title><source>Animal Bioscience</source><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>B.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruz Ferreira</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva Viana</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alves</surname><given-names>W.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muniz</surname><given-names>J.C.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rostagno</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pettigrew</surname><given-names>J.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hannas</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1811</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ab.20.0797</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of mineral and vitamin C mix on growth performance and blood corticosterone concentrations in heat-stressed broilers</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Del Barrio</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mansilla</surname><given-names>W.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Navarro-Villa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mica</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smeets</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Den Hartog</surname><given-names>L.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Ruiz</surname><given-names>A.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><page-range>23-33</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.japr.2019.11.001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Different effects of individual identification systems on chicken well-being</article-title><source>Poultry science</source><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dennis</surname><given-names>R.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fahey</surname><given-names>A.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>H.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><fpage>1052</fpage><lpage>1057</lpage><page-range>1052-1057</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2007-00240</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Improving quality of poultry and its meat products with probiotics, prebiotics, and phytoextracts</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>103287</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2023.103287</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>European Union Reference Centre for Animal Welfare for Poultry. Foot Pad Dermatitis (FPD) in Broiler Chicken</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poultry</surname><given-names>E.U.R.C.F.A.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><comment>Retrieved November 07, 2024, from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://sitesv2.anses.fr/en/system/files/EURCAW-Poultry-SFA_DL.%202022_2.2.3.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://sitesv2.anses.fr/en/system/files/EURCAW-Poultry-SFA_DL.%202022_2.2.3.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The effects of chelated micro-elements feeding in broiler breeder hens and their progeny: A review</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Health and Production</source><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faghih-Mohammadi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seidavi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouyeh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>323</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-022-03317-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Carcass and parts yield of broilers reared under a semi-extensive system</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faria</surname><given-names>P.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bressan</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souza</surname><given-names>X.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rossato</surname><given-names>L.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Botega</surname><given-names>L.M.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gama</surname><given-names>L.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>159</lpage><page-range>153-159</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300004</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of combinations of dietary vitamin C and acetylsalicylic acid on growth performance, carcass traits and, serum and immune response parameters in broilers</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferronato</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tavakoli</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouyeh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seidavi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suárez Ramírez</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prandini</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>649</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani14040649</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of supplemental zinc source and corn particle size on 40-day broiler performance</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foltz</surname><given-names>K.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Glover</surname><given-names>B.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moritz</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>209</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><page-range>209-218</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/japr/pfw064</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The impact of different sources of zinc, manganese, and copper on broiler performance and excreta output</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franklin</surname><given-names>S.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciacciariello</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1067</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12091067</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of supplementation of manganese with or without phytase on growth performance, carcass traits, muscle and tibia composition, and immunity in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Livestock Science</source><volume>191</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghosh</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandal</surname><given-names>G.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Patra</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>80</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><page-range>80-85</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.014</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The effect of grape seed extract and vitamin C feed supplementation on some blood parameters and HSP70 gene expression of broiler chickens suffering from chronic heat stress</article-title><source>Italian Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hajati</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassanabadi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Golian</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nassiri-Moghaddam</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nassiri</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><page-range>3273</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4081/ijas.2014.3273</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of zinc on the immune response and production performance of broilers: a meta-analysis</article-title><source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hidayat</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayanegara</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wina</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>465</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.19.0146</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Supplementation of dietary nano Zn-phytogenic on performance, antioxidant activity, and population of intestinal pathogenic bacteria in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hidayat</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sumiati</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayanegara</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wina</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>90</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><page-range>90-99</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2021.44.1.90</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of dietary energy level on performance, plasma parameters, and central AMPK levels in stressed broilers</article-title><source>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</source><volume>8</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>681858</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2021.681858</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>International Rice Research Institute</article-title><year>2020</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://education.irri.org/science-courses/basic-experimental-design-and-data-analysis-using-star/" ext-link-type="uri">https://education.irri.org/science-courses/basic-experimental-design-and-data-analysis-using-star/</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Immunomodulatory and growth promoting effects of basil (Ocimum basilicum) and ascorbic acid in heat stressed broiler chickens</article-title><source>Pakistan Journal of Zoology</source><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jahejo</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rajput</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen-xia</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Naeem</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalhoro</surname><given-names>D.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaka</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Niu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>F.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>801</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.3.801.807</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluation of chemical characteristics and effects of different manganese sources on kinetics of manganese absorption and performance of broiler chickens</article-title><source>Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science</source><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khakpour Irani</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Janmohammadi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kianfar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahraei</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>463</fpage><lpage>471</lpage><page-range>463-471</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://journals.iau.ir/article_667581.html" ext-link-type="uri">https://journals.iau.ir/article_667581.html</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Comparative effects of inorganic and three forms of organic trace minerals on growth performance, carcass traits, immunity, and profitability of broilers</article-title><source>Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research</source><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khatun</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>B.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dey</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Haque</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandran</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>66</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5455/javar.2019.f313</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Nutritional and physiological responses of broiler chicken to the dietary supplementation of Moringa oleifera aqueous leaf extract and ascorbic acid in tropics</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Health and Production</source><volume>53</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>P.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinha</surname><given-names>R.R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><page-range>1-7</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-021-02864-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Availability of trace minerals in feed ingredients and supplemental sources (inorganic, organic, and nano) in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science and Technology</source><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>805</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5187/jast.2024.e43</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Profit analysis of broiler rearing in Nueva Ecija, Philippines under climate controlled housing and conventional housing</article-title><source>International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management</source><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levy</surname><given-names>K.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>518</fpage><lpage>533</lpage><page-range>518-533</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/51031.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/51031.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of heat stress, dietary electrolytes, and vitamins E and C on growth performance and blood biochemistry of the broiler chicken</article-title><source>Frontiers in Animal Science</source><volume>3</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Livingston</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pokoo-Aikins</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Frost</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laprade</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoang</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nogal</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cowieson</surname><given-names>A.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>807267</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fanim.2022.807267</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Lipa Quality Control Center Inc</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>L.Q.C.C.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><publisher-loc>Bocaue, Bulacan</publisher-loc><comment>Retrieved March 8, 2025, from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.lqcci.com/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.lqcci.com/</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of acetic acid and sodium bicarbonate supplemented to drinking water on water quality, growth performance, organ weights, cecal traits and hematological parameters of young broilers</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martínez</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Almendares</surname><given-names>C.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernández</surname><given-names>C.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Avellaneda</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Urquía</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Valdivié</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1865</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11071865</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Diet formulation</article-title><source>Animal Nutrition</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McDonald</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenhalgh</surname><given-names>J.F.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinclair</surname><given-names>L.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilkinson</surname><given-names>R.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><fpage>614</fpage><lpage>628</lpage><page-range>614-628</page-range><publisher-name>Prentice Hall</publisher-name><edition>7th</edition><ext-link xlink:href="https://eliasnutri.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/animal-nutrition-7th-edition.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://eliasnutri.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/animal-nutrition-7th-edition.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of dietary supplemental zinc source and level on growth performance, digestibility coefficients and immune response of New Zealand white rabbits</article-title><source>Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds</source><volume>18</volume><issue>2 Special</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meshreky</surname><given-names>S.Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Allam</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Manilawi</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>H.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>383</fpage><lpage>390</lpage><page-range>383-390</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/ejnf.2015.104497</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review</article-title><source>Journal of Food Science and Technology</source><volume>54</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mir</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rafiq</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shukla</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>2997</fpage><lpage>3009</lpage><page-range>2997-3009</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13197-017-2789-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Management factors associated with the survival and market weight of broiler chickens among small-scale farmers in the Dodoma City of Tanzania</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>10</volume><issue>13</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mramba</surname><given-names>R.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mapunda</surname><given-names>P.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33907</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of feeding methionine hydroxyl analogue chelated zinc, copper, and manganese on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, mineral excretion and welfare conditions of broiler chickens: Part 1: performance aspects</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>H.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moss</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romero-Sanchez</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dao</surname><given-names>T.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>421</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani15030421</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Manganese in poultry nutrition and its effect on performance and eggshell quality</article-title><source>World’s Poultry Science Journal</source><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olgun</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><page-range>45-56</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0043933916000891</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of sodium bicarbonate levels on the performance of broiler chickens under Sudan condition</article-title><source>Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences</source><volume>3</volume><issue>01</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Osman</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamed</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muna</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mysara</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAFS/article/view/1895" ext-link-type="uri">https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAFS/article/view/1895</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of partial replacement of inorganic zinc and manganese with zinc methionine and manganese methionine on live performance and breast myopathies of broilers</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pacheco</surname><given-names>W.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Patiño</surname><given-names>D.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vargas</surname><given-names>J.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gulizia</surname><given-names>J.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Macklin</surname><given-names>K.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Biggs</surname><given-names>T.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>100204</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.japr.2021.100204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Dietary levels of zinc and manganese on the performance of broilers between 1 to 42 days of age</article-title><source>Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola</source><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pacheco</surname><given-names>B.H.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakagi</surname><given-names>V.D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kobashigawa</surname><given-names>E.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caniatto</surname><given-names>A.R.D.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faria</surname><given-names>D.E.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faria Filho</surname><given-names>D.E.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>171</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><page-range>171-178</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0323</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of organic mineral chelates of zinc, manganese, and chromium on growth performance, physiological, hematological, intestinal microflora, immunological, and bone traits in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>26</volume><issue>04</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rezapour</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gharahveysi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khorshidi</surname><given-names>K.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdolahpour</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>-2024</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2024-1992</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Influence of graded levels of organic zinc on growth performance and carcass traits of broilers</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rossi</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rutz</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anciuti</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rech</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zauk</surname><given-names>N.H.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><page-range>219-225</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/japr/16.2.219</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The Effect of different litter materials and season on litter pH, atmospheric ammonia and foot burn</article-title><source>Journal of Poultry Research</source><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Şahin</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Çelen</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>4</lpage><page-range>1-4</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34233/jpr.1059710</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of sex and dietary organic zinc on growth performance, carcass traits, tissue mineral content, and blood parameters of broiler chickens</article-title><source>Biological Trace Element Research</source><volume>147</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salim</surname><given-names>H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>H.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jo</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>B.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>120</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><page-range>120-129</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12011-011-9282-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Pre-slaughter fasting times for broiler chickens</article-title><source>Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia</source><volume>75</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gewehr</surname><given-names>C.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>1136</fpage><lpage>1142</lpage><page-range>1136-1142</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1678-4162-11764</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of a vitamins D and C supplement on performance, hatchability, and blood profiles of broiler breeders</article-title><source>Journal of World’s Poultry Research</source><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Setiyaningsih</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayanegara</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wardani</surname><given-names>W.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><page-range>71-80</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36380/jwpr.2023.7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Strategies to combat heat stress in broiler chickens: Unveiling the roles of selenium, vitamin E and vitamin C</article-title><source>Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shakeri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oskoueian</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shakeri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>71</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vetsci7020071</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Centennial review: Effects of vitamins A</article-title><source>C on the chicken immune system. Poultry Science</source><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shojadoost</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yitbarek</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alizadeh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kulkarni</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Astill</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boodhoo</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharif</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>D</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>and</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>100930</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.027</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of different sources and contents of dietary manganese on the performance, meat quality, immune response, and tibia characteristics of broiler chickens</article-title><source>Livestock Science</source><volume>253</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shokri</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghazanfari</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Honarbakhsh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>104734</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104734</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-62"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of manganese hydroxychloride on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, tibia parameters and manganese deposition of broilers</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Geng</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>3470</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11123470</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-63"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of supplemental organic Zn and Mn on broiler performance, bone measures, tissue mineral uptake and immune response at 35 days of age</article-title><source>Current Research in Poultry Science</source><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sunder</surname><given-names>G.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>C.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panda</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raju</surname><given-names>M.V.L.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rao</surname><given-names>S.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><page-range>1-11</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/crpsaj.2013.1.11</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-64"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The nutrition of poultry as a factor affecting litter quality and foot pad dermatitis–an updated review</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition</source><volume>101</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swiatkiewicz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arczewska‐Wlosek</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jozefiak</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>14-20</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.12630</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-65"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Impact of genetics and breeding on broiler production performance: a look into the past, present, and future of the industry</article-title><source>Animal Frontiers</source><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tavárez</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><page-range>37-41</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/af.2016-0042</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-66"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>What are the limits to feed intake of broilers on bulky feeds?</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakkas</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kyriazakis</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>100825</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.008</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-67"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of sodium bisulfate or sodium sesquicarbonate as a sodium source in broiler chicken diets with or without a coccidiosis challenge</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname><given-names>B.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jespersen</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suarez</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coufal</surname><given-names>C.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>104680</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2024.104680</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-68"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The application of ascorbic acid as a therapeutic feed additive to boost immunity and antioxidant activity of poultry in heat stress environment</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hieu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guntoro</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qui</surname><given-names>N.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Quyen</surname><given-names>N.T.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al Hafiz</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>685</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2022.685-693</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-69"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of zinc bearing palygorskite supplementation on the growth performance, hepatic mineral content, and antioxidant status of broilers at early age</article-title><source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>1006</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.16.0551</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-70"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of Adding Different Levels of Dietary Electrolyte in Broiler Rations using Sodium Bicarbonate as a Source of Electrolyte</article-title><source>Pakistan Journal of Zoology</source><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yasoob</surname><given-names>T.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tauqir</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.6.2161.2171</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-71"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of stocking density and dietary vitamin C on performance, meat quality, intestinal permeability, and stress indicators in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science and Technology</source><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>D.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Namgung</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Won</surname><given-names>S.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>W.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kil</surname><given-names>D.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>815</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5187/jast.2021.e77</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-72"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluation of an innovative Zn source on feed efficiency, growth performance, skin and bone quality of broilers suffering heat stress</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>12</volume><issue>23</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zaghari</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mehrvarz</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hajati</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moravej</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>3272</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12233272</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-73"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of sources and levels of dietary zinc on the performance, carcass traits and blood parameters of broilers</article-title><source>Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola</source><volume>19</volume><issue>03</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zakaria</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jalal</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Titi</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souad</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>519</fpage><lpage>526</lpage><page-range>519-526</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0415</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-74"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of dietary zinc levels on the growth performance, organ zinc content, and zinc retention in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola</source><volume>20</volume><issue>01</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>T.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>H.X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xi</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>132</lpage><page-range>127-132</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0409</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-75"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of chelated trace minerals on growth performance, breast meat yield, and footpad health in commercial meat broilers</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shirley</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vazquez-Anon</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dibner</surname><given-names>J.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Richards</surname><given-names>J.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fisher</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hampton</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Christensen</surname><given-names>K.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Allard</surname><given-names>J.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Giesen</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>372</lpage><page-range>365-372</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/japr.2009-00020</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>