<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.2.150</article-id><title-group><article-title>Kedu Chickens Exhibit Better Resilience to Thermal Stress During the Two Weeks Prior to Market Age Compared to Broiler Chickens</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tiya</surname><given-names>N. A. D.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Suprijatna</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mangisah</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Agusetyaningsih</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pandupuspitasari</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country><email>sgh_undip@yahoo.co.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-5"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="EDITOR-AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Diponegoro</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/056bjta22</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-5">Corresponding author: S. Sugiharto, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro.  Email: <email>sgh_undip@yahoo.co.id</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-2-11"><day>11</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date iso-8601-date="2026-2-11" publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection"><day>11</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>150</fpage><lpage>159</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-10-7"><day>7</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" license-type="open-access"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/68882" xlink:title="Kedu Chickens Exhibit Better Resilience to Thermal Stress During the Two Weeks Prior to Market Age Compared to Broiler Chickens">Kedu Chickens Exhibit Better Resilience to Thermal Stress During the Two Weeks Prior to Market Age Compared to Broiler Chickens</self-uri><abstract><p>Information about resilience to thermal stress is important for establishing the optimum rearing temperature for chickens. This study investigated the effects of heat stress on the physiological and hematological responses of Kedu and broiler chickens. Based on a 2×2 factorial arrangement, 192 male Kedu and broiler chickens were raised at temperatures of 23.83 ± 0.23°C or 35.33 ± 1.78°C. Sampling and data measurement were conducted after two weeks of rearing. Heat stress had no effect on the weight gain of the Kedu chickens, whereas the broiler weight gain fell (p≤0.05). Heat stress reduced feed consumption, while increasing water intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), rectal temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate (p≤0.05). The heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of the Kedu chickens was higher than that of broilers (p≤0.05), while heat stress increased glucose and uric acid levels in the broilers (p≤0.05), but not in the Kedu chickens. Heat stress also increased heterophils. In addition, mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin levels were higher in the Kedu chickens than in the broilers, while platelet counts were higher in the broilers (p≤0.05). Erythrocyte, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels decreased during heat stress (p≤0.05), while platelet distribution width (PDW) in the broilers increased (p≤0.05). Blood proportion to live chicken body weight was higher in the Kedu chickens than in the broilers, while heat stress reduced the blood and feather proportions in the broilers (p≤0.05). Heat stress also reduced the liver weight of the Kedu chickens, as well as that of the thymus and <italic>Bursa of Fabricius</italic> in both types of chicken (p≤0.05). The Kedu chickens had higher gizzard, spleen, and <italic>Bursa of Fabricius</italic> weights than the broilers (p≤0.05). In conclusion, compared to the broilers, the Kedu chickens demonstrated greater tolerance to heat stress, as indicated by their unaffected weight gain, blood glucose levels, PDW, and feather proportion.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>broiler</kwd><kwd>immune</kwd><kwd>native chicken</kwd><kwd>physiological response</kwd><kwd>stress</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Climate change has negatively impacted poultry production in tropical regions, primarily due to increases in temperature, which cause heat stress. Poultry exhibit a rapid metabolic rate and limited capacity to dissipate excess body heat due to the lack of sweat glands, which makes them highly sensitive to heat stress <xref rid="BIBR-32" ref-type="bibr">(Nawaz et al., 2021)</xref>. Economically, climate change has significant impacts, as heat stress can compromise growth rates and reduce feed efficiency. In this case, energy derived from feed, normally used to support growth, is diverted to restoring and maintaining homeostasis under stressful conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Vandana et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>Heat stress in poultry can trigger an imbalance between heat production and the body’s ability to dissipate heat. Under these conditions, chickens demonstrate various adaptive physiological and hematological changes, including increased rectal temperature, respiratory and heart rates, blood glucose levels, and changes in their erythrocyte, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and differential leukocyte count <xref rid="BIBR-7" ref-type="bibr">(Brugaletta et al., 2022)</xref>. When these changes exceed the physiological range, chickens can be highly susceptible to health problems, weakened immune function, decreased productivity, and compromised welfare <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Oluwagbenga &amp; Fraley, 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Indonesia is a country with abundant and diverse genetic resources, one of which is the native chicken. The Kedu is a type of native chicken with potential as a meat producer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Setiaji et al., 2025)</xref>. In the current poultry industry, feed efficiency and environmental sustainability have recently become important trends and are a shared concern for farmers. Although the growth rate of the Kedu chicken is relatively slower than that of modern broiler chickens, the advantage of this local chicken breed is its better adaptability to local environmental conditions (a hot and humid tropical climate). This ability is invaluable in ensuring sustainable production in the face of climate change and the increasingly serious threat of disease in commercial breeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Maharani et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Kpomasse et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>To mitigate the adverse effects of heat stress on the growth performance and health of modern broiler chickens, producers typically construct chicken houses with controlled internal environmental conditions. However, the cost of constructing these is very high. This situation makes it unaffordable for indigenous chicken farmers, who typically operate on a small scale with very minimal capital. With specific regard to Kedu chickens, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Mushawwir et al., 2024)</xref> note that they demonstrate excellent tolerance to high tropical temperatures. Owing to this characteristic, they are likely to require different environmental conditions than modern broiler strains. Chicken body weight is one factor that determines the severity of heat stress during rearing. Under typical conditions, higher body weight increases the risk of heat stress. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Gogoi et al., 2021)</xref> document that commercial broiler chickens with higher body weights are more vulnerable to heat stress compared to those with lower weights. In line with this, native chickens with higher body weights have also been shown to be more vulnerable to heat stress <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Boonkum et al., 2024)</xref>. More specifically, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Malila et al., 2022)</xref> found that chickens approaching market age (harvesting age) were more prone to heat stress than younger chickens.</p><p>A number of studies have been conducted to compare the resilience to heat stress and physiological changes between native chicken breeds from tropical countries and modern broiler chickens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Tirawattanawanich et al., 2011)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Malila et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Malila et al., 2023)</xref>. However, to date, little research has focused on the comparative effect of heat stress on Kedu and modern demonstrate various adaptive physiological and hematological changes, including increased rectal temperature, respiratory and heart rates, blood glucose levels, and changes in their erythrocyte, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and differential leukocyte count <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Brugaletta et al., 2022)</xref>. When these changes exceed the physiological range, chickens can be highly susceptible to health problems, weakened immune function, decreased productivity, and compromised welfare <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Oluwagbenga &amp; Fraley, 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Indonesia is a country with abundant and diverse genetic resources, one of which is the native chicken. The Kedu is a type of native chicken with potential as a meat producer <xref rid="BIBR-38" ref-type="bibr">(Setiaji et al., 2025)</xref>. In the current poultry industry, feed efficiency and environmental sustainability have recently become important trends and are a shared concern for farmers. Although the broiler chickens. Therefore, a study comparing the impact of heat stress on the two strains as a basis for considering whether or not it is necessary to build environmentally controlled broiler houses for Kedu chickens is vital. Taking all these facts into consideration, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of thermal stress during the two weeks prior to market age on the physiological and hematological responses of Kedu and broiler chickens.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title></sec><sec><title>Ethical Approval</title><p>The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia (Approval No. 61-08/A-17/KEP-FPP).</p><sec><title>In Vivo Trial</title><p>The study was conducted using a 2×2 factorial design, with chicken type (Kedu and modern broiler strains) as the first factor, and temperature (23.83 ± 0.23 °C and 35.33 ± 1.78 °C) as the second. A total of 192 male chickens were used, consisting of 96 Kedu chickens aged 10 weeks (body weight 1090.89 ± 13.47 g/chick) and 96 3-week-old modern broiler strains (Cobb; body weight 854.01 ± 2.17 g/chick). Given that chickens approaching market age are highly susceptible to heat stress <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Malila et al., 2022)</xref>, the Kedu chickens and broiler strains were both studied two weeks before market age. Typically, Kedu chickens are harvested at 12 weeks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Setiaji et al., 2025)</xref>, and modern broiler strains at 5 weeks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Gogoi et al., 2021)</xref>. The chicks were raised in an environmentally controlled broiler house facility at the Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro (Semarang, Indonesia) for two weeks under two different environmental temperature conditions; that is, 23.83 ± 0.23 °C (no temperature-induced heat stress) and 35.33 ± 1.78 °C (temperature-induced heat stress). The broiler house was divided into two rooms for the trial. To maintain a temperature of 23.83 ± 0.23 °C (throughout the day), one room was equipped with air conditioning, while the other was equipped with only a blower fan. To reach and establish a temperature of 35.33 ± 1.78 °C, heating lamps were placed in the room. To ascertain the established microclimatic conditions inside the broiler house, temperature and humidity were regularly monitored using a digital thermometer and hygrometer.</p><p>Both chicken breeds were allotted equally into the two temperature groups, with 48 birds per group. Each treatment was replicated six times, with eight birds per replication. The heat-stress treatment was applied daily from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (the hottest time of day in the Semarang area), after which the temperature was returned to tropical levels (28-30 °C). This heat-stress regimen was continuously applied for two weeks. The chickens were housed in 1×1 m<sup>2</sup> pens. Feed was provided in mash form  <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>, without antibiotics, antioxidants, enzymes, coccidiostats, or antifungal agents. The crude protein content in the feed for the Kedu chickens and broiler strains was formulated differently, with consideration of the lower crude protein requirements of indigenous chickens compared to those of modern broiler strains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Kingori et al., 2003)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Manyelo et al., 2020)</xref>. Throughout the experimental period, both feed and drinking water were offered <italic>ad libitum</italic>.</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Ingredients and nutritional composition of diets for Kedu and broiler chickens</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"></th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top">Proportion (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Kedu chickens¹</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler strains²</th></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Ingredients</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Yellow corn</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">65.05</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">60.44</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Palm oil</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Soybean meal</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">28.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">33.25</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">DL-methionine</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.20</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.20</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Bentonite</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.75</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Limestone</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.35</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Calcium monophosphate</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.55</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Premix³</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.27</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.34</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Choline chloride</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Salt</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.40</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.40</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Nutrient Composition</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ME⁴ (kcal/kg)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3000</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3000</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Crude protein</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">18.0</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">20.0</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Crude fat</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.80</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.12</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Crude fiber</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.03</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Ca</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.31</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.05</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">P (available)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.64</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.53</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Lysine</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.88</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.02</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Methionine</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.44</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.49</td></tr></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: ¹The ingredients and composition of diets for Kedu chickens were taken from Sugiharto <italic>et al.</italic> (2021). ²The ingredients and composition of diets for broiler chickens were taken from Tentrawinata <italic>et al</italic>. (2023). ³Vitamin and mineral composition per kg premix: 50,000 IU vitamin D₃; 0.5 mg vitamin B₁₂; 32.5% calcium (Ca); 1% phosphorus (P); 6 g iron (Fe); 4 g manganese (Mn); 0.075 g iodine (I); 0.3 g copper (Cu); 3.75 g zinc (Zn). ⁴Metabolizable energy (ME) was calculated according to the formula: 40.81 {0.87 (crude protein + 2.25 crude fat + nitrogenfree extract) + 2.5}</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec><title>Sample Collection and Analysis</title><p>Body weight, feed consumption, and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) were recorded throughout the study. At the end of the period (when the Kedu chickens were 12 weeks old and the broiler chickens 5 weeks old), two chickens in each replication or pen with body weights close to the average pen weight were selected. The rectal temperature of these chickens was measured using a digital rectal thermometer inserted into the chicken’s cloaca. The respiratory rate of the selected chickens was also measured by counting chest movements over a minute, while heart rate was measured directly using a stethoscope placed on the left-hand side chest of the birds. Subsequently, the same chickens had blood drawn from the brachial vein on the wings. The sample collections were conducted at around 1:00 p.m.</p><p>A 1 mL blood sample was placed in a blood tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for complete blood count analysis, and 2 mL of blood was placed in a non-EDTA blood tube for serum glucose and uric acid analysis. Complete blood counts were analyzed using a Prima fully automated hematology analyzer, manufactured by PT. Prima Alkesindo Nusantara, Jakarta, Indonesia. The non-EDTA blood was centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 minutes to produce serum. The levels of glucose were determined using spectrophotometric techniques, while uric acid analysis was conducted based on enzyme-based colorimetric techniques according to the manufacturer’s protocols (DiaSys Diagnostic System GmbH, Holzheim, Germany).</p><p>After the final body weight was measured, the chicken from which blood had been drawn was slaughtered following halal convention. The blood was collected in a special container and weighed to determine the percentage of blood in the chicken’s body. The feathers were then plucked and their weight measured to determine their percentage to live weight. The chicken was then dissected, and the internal organs were removed and weighed to determine their relative weight to the chicken’s live weight.</p></sec><sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were treated according to a 2 (Kedu and broiler chickens) × 2 (23.83 ± 0.23 °C and 35.33 ± 1.78 °C) factorial arrangement on the basis of the general linear models procedure in SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Significant interactions between the main factors were included in the statistical model, whereas any insignificant interaction effect was eliminated. The results are presented as least-squares means (LSMEANS) and standard error (SE) for the treatment groups. Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was conducted to show the differences in LSMEANS (p≤0.05).</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title></sec><sec><title>Growth Performance of the Chickens</title><p>The data on the growth performance of the Kedu and broiler chickens raised in temperatures of 23.83 ± 0.23 °C and 35.33 ± 1.78 °C are presented in  <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 2</xref>. There was a significant interaction (p≤0.05) between chicken type and temperature for the final BW, weight gain, feed intake, and water intake, while no interaction was observed between the two factors concerning the FCR of the broiler chickens. In addition, there was no significant difference in weight gain between the Kedu chickens raised at the two temperatures, while the weight gain in the broiler chickens was significantly lower (p≤0.05) at 35.33 ± 1.78 °C compared to 23.83 ± 0.23 °C. At 35.33 ± 1.78 °C, feed consumption decreased (p≤0.05) and water intake increased (p≤0.05) for both types of chicken. The broiler chickens had a lower FCR (p≤0.05) than the Kedu ones, while the temperature of 35.33 ± 1.78 °C significantly increased (p≤0.05) FCR values for both.</p><table-wrap id="table-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Growth performance of Kedu and broiler chickens at normal (23.83 ± 0.23 °C) and high (35.33 ± 1.78 °C) temperatures</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Variables</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top">23.83 ± 0.23°C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">35.33 ± 1.78°C</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">SE</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">P-value</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Kedu</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Kedu </th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C*T</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Final BW (g/bird)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1503<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2055<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1391<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1705<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">28.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Weight gain (g/bird)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">412<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1201<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">300<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">851<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">29.4</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Feed intake (g/bird)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1087<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1880<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">990<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1670<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Water intake (mL/bird)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3419<sup>d</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4595<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3957<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5779<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">110</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.05</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">FCR</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.73</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.57</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.55</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.19</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.49</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: <sup>a,b,c,d</sup> Means within the same row with different superscripts differ significantly at p≤0.05. BW = body weight; FCR = feed conversion ratio; SE = standard error; C = chicken type; T = temperature; C*T = interaction between chicken type and temperature.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Physiological Variables of the Chickens</title><p>Data on the physiological variables of the chickens are presented in <xref rid="table-3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>. Significant interactions (p≤0.05) were observed for rectal temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, and glucose levels. Rectal temperature and heart rate increased significantly (p≤0.05) in both chicken species due to exposure to the temperature of 35.33 ± 1.78 °C for two weeks of rearing. The respiratory rate increased (p≤0.05) by approximately 2.68 times in the Kedu chickens and 4.40 times in the broiler chickens following exposure to 35.33 ± 1.78 °C. No significant interaction (p&gt;0.05) was observed between the two factors in terms of the H/L ratio. However, the ratio of the Kedu chickens was higher (p≤0.05) than that of broiler chickens, irrespective of rearing temperature. Rearing at 35.33 ± 1.78 °C increased (p≤0.05) glucose levels in the broiler chickens, but these levels did not change in the Kedu chickens. Regardless of chicken type, uric acid levels increased (p≤0.05) due to the high temperatures.</p><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Physiological variables of Kedu and broiler chickens at normal (23.83 ± 0.23 °C) and high (35.33 ± 1.78 °C) temperatures</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Variables</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top">23.83 ± 0.23°C</th><th colspan="2" valign="top" align="center">35.33 ± 1.78°C</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SE</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">P-value</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Kedu</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Kedu</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">C*T</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Rectal temperature(°C)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">41.3<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">40.7<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">41.6<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">42.0<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.53</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Respiratory rate (breaths/min)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.1<sup>c</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">46.1<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">94.2<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">203<sup>a</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7.41</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Heart rate(beats/min)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">259<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">247<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">304<sup>b</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">331<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.54</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.16</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">H/L ratio</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.05</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.68</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Glucose (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">259<sup>c</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">286<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">277<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">355<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.22</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Uric acid (mg/dL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.52</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.18</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.12</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.35</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.23</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.88</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.39</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: <sup>a,b,c,d</sup> Means within the same row with different superscripts differ significantly at p≤0.05. H/L ratio = heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; SE = standard error; C = chicken type; T = temperature; C*T = interaction between chicken type and temperature.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Hematological Profiles of the Chickens</title><p>The hematological profiles of the Kedu and broiler chickens raised under the two temperatures are presented in<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2"> Table 4</xref>. A significant interaction (p≤0.05) was observed for PDW, but other parameters showed no interaction between the two factors. Heterophils, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) levels were higher (p≤0.05) in the Kedu chickens compared to the modern broilers, while platelet counts were higher (p≤0.05) in the broilers than in the Kedu chickens. Irrespective of chicken type, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit decreased (p≤0.05) with exposure to 35.33 ± 1.78 °C. Platelet distribution width (PDW) in the broiler chickens increased (p≤0.05) at 35.33 ± 1.78 °C, but not in the Kedu chickens.</p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Hematological profiles of Kedu and broiler chickens at normal (23.83 ± 0.23 °C) and high (35.33 ± 1.78 °C) temperatures ...</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Variables</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="middle">28.83 ± 0.23°C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">35.33 ±1.787°C</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">SE</th><th align="center" colspan="3" valign="top">p-value</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Kedu</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Broiler</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Kedu</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Broiler</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C*T</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Leukocytes (×10³/µL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">83.98</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">84.46</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">84.08</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">82.92</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.57</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.88</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.75</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.72</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Lymphocytes (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">79.53</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">80.76</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">79.02</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">79.29</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.49</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.72</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.64</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.82</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Heterophils (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.69</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.63</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.37</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.61</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Erythrocytes (×10⁶/µL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.24</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.13</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.12</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Hemoglobin (g/dL)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.88</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.92</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.73</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.24</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.27</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.04</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.20</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Hematocrit (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">36.63</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">37.14</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">33.84</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">34.90</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.56</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Platelets (×10³/µL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.75</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">21.42</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">20.42</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">25.89</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.19</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.27</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCV (fL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">169.35</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">166.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">167.50</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">164.55</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.76</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.11</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">MCH (pg)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">40.98</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">39.89</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">43.13</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">39.18</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.67</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.15</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MCHC(g/dL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">23.70</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">23.57</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">25.27</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">23.34</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.39</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.23</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.11</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">RDW-SD (fL)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">50.50</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">47.45</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">48.33</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">46.56</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.91</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.25</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.62</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">RDW-CV (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.86</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.98</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.77</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.17</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.22</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.43</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.66</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">MPV (fL)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.86</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.36</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.72</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.03</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.15</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.08</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.29</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.67</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">PDW (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.04<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.06<sup>b</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.18<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.78<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: <sup>a,b</sup> Means within the same row with different superscripts differ significantly at p≤0.05. MCV = Mean Corpuscular Volume; MCH = Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin; MCHC = Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration; RDW-SD = Red Cell Distribution Width – Standard Deviation; RDW-CV = Red Cell Distribution Width – Coefficient of Variation; MPV = Mean Platelet Volume; PDW = Platelet Distribution Width; SE = standard error; C = chicken type; T = temperature; C*T = interaction between chicken type and temperature.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Blood, Feather, and Internal Organ of the Chickens</title><p>The proportions of blood and feathers, and the relative weight of the chickens subjected to the two temperatures are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 5</xref>. A significant interaction (p≤0.05) between chicken type and temperature was observed for the proportions of feathers and liver relative weight, while no interaction was observed for the other parameters. The proportion of blood was higher (p≤0.05) in the Kedu chickens than in the broilers, while rearing at 35.33 ± 1.78 °C significantly decreased (p≤0.05) the proportion of blood in the chickens’ bodies. Rearing at 35.33 ± 1.78 °C caused a decrease (p≤0.05) in the proportion of feathers in the broilers, but this did not occur in the Kedu chickens. The higher rearing temperature reduced (p≤0.05) the relative weight of the liver in the Kedu chickens, but not in the modern broilers. Irrespective of rearing temperature, the Kedu chickens had a higher relative gizzard weight (p≤0.05) compared to the broilers. The high temperature decreased (p≤0.05) the relative weight of the thymus and <italic>Bursa of Fabricius</italic> in both chicken species. Compared to broiler chickens, the Kedu type had higher relative spleen and <italic>Bursa of Fabricius </italic>weights (p≤0.05).  </p><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Proportion of blood, feathers, and internal organs (% of body weight) of Kedu and broiler chickens at normal (23.83 ± 0.23 °C) and high (35.33 ± 1.78 °C) temperatures</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Variables (% live BW)</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top">23.83 ± 0.23°C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">35.33 ± 1.78°C</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SE</th><th align="center" colspan="3" valign="middle">P-value</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Kedu</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Kedu</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Broiler</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">C</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">C*T</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Blood</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.39</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.65</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.65</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.58</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.10</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Feathers</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.81<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.71<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.43<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.99<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.17</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.84</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.01</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Heart</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.48</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.47</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.43</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.02</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.38</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.24</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.48</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Liver</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.95<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.72<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.78<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.85<sup>ab</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.04</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.65</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Gizzard</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.20</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.69</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.63</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.05</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.17</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.62</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Proventriculus</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.36</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.40</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.37</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.37</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.24</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.60</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Thymus</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.25</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.30</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.15</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.25</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.03</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.07</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.52</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Spleen</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.38</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.09</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.26</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.08</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.03</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.11</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"><italic>Bursa of Fabricius</italic></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.08</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.05</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.04</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.00</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: <sup>a,b,c</sup> Means within the same row with different superscripts differ significantly at p≤0.05. SE = standard error; C = chicken type; T = temperature; C*T = interaction between chicken type and temperature.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>In general, poultry are highly susceptible to heat stress due to their limited ability to dissipate excess body heat <xref rid="BIBR-32" ref-type="bibr">(Nawaz et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Oluwagbenga &amp; Fraley, 2023)</xref>. However, unlike modern broiler strains, native chickens have better tolerance to high temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Mushawwir et al., 2024)</xref>. The study found no significant difference in weight gain between the Kedu chickens raised at 23.83 ± 0.23 °C and 35.33 ± 1.78 °C. Unlike the Kedu chickens, weight gain in the broilers decreased with increased rearing temperature. The study data further indicate that Kedu chickens, a native Indonesian breed, have a higher tolerance to heat stress due to their innate genetic adaptation to hot tropical environmental conditions, as evidenced by their more effective and efficient physiological stress responses and physical structures that facilitate heat loss <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Tirawattanawanich et al., 2011)</xref>. In contrast, modern broiler chickens lack a thermoregulatory system that aligns with their rapid growth. As a result, as they age and gain weight, broiler chickens become increasingly sensitive and vulnerable to heat because their heat dissipation area decreases relative to their body mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Malila et al., 2022)</xref>. Heat stress is a factor that can alter homeostasis in poultry. Loss of body fluids is a consequence of heat stress due to increased panting frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Sugiharto, 2020)</xref>. To compensate for this fluid loss, both chicken species studied increased their water intake at high rearing temperatures. Interestingly, broiler chickens had a higher increase in drinking water consumption (20.5%) compared to the Kedu type (13.6%). Reduced feed consumption during heat stress is a way for chickens to reduce their metabolic heat production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Nawaz et al., 2021)</xref>. Consistent with Nawaz et al., both chicken species in our study reduced their feed consumption under high temperature conditions. One interesting finding was that the broiler chickens displayed a greater decrease in feed consumption (11.17%) than the Kedu ones (8.92%). Although increased water consumption and reduced feed intake can be indicators of stress in poultry, it was difficult to establish which type of chicken was more stressed at temperatures of 35.33 ± 1.78 °C, as the Kedu type exhibited a higher water-to-feed ratio (4.00) than the broiler chickens (3.46). The FCR value in this study increased in reaction to high temperatures, indicating that feed efficiency decreased due to heat stress. The increase in the FCR value in the Kedu chickens was significantly greater (23.09%) than that of the broiler chickens (21.90%). This seems to be associated with the relatively smaller decrease in feed intake in the Kedu chickens caused by heat stress compared to the broilers. Overall, the conditions discussed above suggest that although heat stress did not notably affect weight gain, it compromised feed efficiency in the Kedu chickens.</p><p>Many parameters are commonly used to indicate heat stress in chickens, one of which is rectal temperature. In this study, rectal temperature in both chicken breeds increased in response to high temperatures during two weeks of rearing. However, the increase was greater in the broilers (1.3 °C increase) compared to the Kedu chickens (0.3 °C increase). This suggests that modern broiler strains are more prone to heat stress. Indeed, increased body temperature in chickens can indicate an imbalance between metabolic heat production and heat dissipation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Oke et al., 2021)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Rostagno, 2020)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Sugiharto, 2020)</xref>. Respiration rates also increased significantly in response to heat stress, especially in the broilers. This suggests that these chickens are more responsive to heat stress than native ones. In line with our study, <xref rid="BIBR-14" ref-type="bibr">(He et al., 2019)</xref> noticed an elevation in respiratory rate from 47.8 breaths/min at 23 °C to 127 breaths/min at 32 °C. In addition, <xref rid="BIBR-18" ref-type="bibr">(Kim et al., 2025)</xref> found an increase from 59.1 breaths/min at 21 °C to 104.0 breaths/min at 25 °C, and even up to 162.7 breaths/min at 33 °C. In poultry, an increased respiration rate (panting) is the principal evaporative mechanism for cooling the body <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Oluwagbenga &amp; Fraley, 2023)</xref>. In line with this rate, the heart rate also increased in both chicken types following the increase in environmental temperature, with a greater increase found in the modern broilers compared to the Kedu chickens. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Xu et al., 2018)</xref> demonstrated that heat-stressed chickens had respiratory rates of 120-160 breaths/min, in conjunction with elevated heart rates. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Kim et al., 2021)</xref> also observed that the heart rate rose from 253-287 beats/min at 22 °C to 327-352 beats/min at 32 °C. Such an increase is a physiological response by chickens to increased oxygen demand during stress and their effort to maintain homeostasis conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Gogoi et al., 2021)</xref>. In addition to the effects of high temperatures during two weeks of rearing, increases in rectal temperature, respiratory rate, and heart rate in chickens may also indicate physiological responses to elevated body temperatures caused by high protein levels in feed, potentially exacerbating heat stress. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Furlan et al., 2004)</xref> reported that high-protein feeds are often attributed to increased heat gain (heat increments) and metabolic heat production, suggesting that such diets may lead to higher body heat production. In our study, the crude protein content in the broiler feed was 2% higher than that in the Kedu feed. Considering all of these facts, the observed increases in rectal temperature, respiratory rate, and heart rate in the broilers at a rearing temperature of 35.33 ± 1.78 °C were likely to have been influenced not only by the hot ambient temperature but also by the increased crude protein content in their feed.</p><p>As a physiological response to high temperatures, blood glucose levels increased significantly in the broiler chickens, although these remained unchanged in the Kedu chickens after exposure to high temperatures. Increased blood glucose levels indicate activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the release of glucocorticoids, which stimulate glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis activities to supply more energy during stressful conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Siddiqui et al., 2021)</xref><xref rid="BIBR-51" ref-type="bibr">(Zmrhal et al., 2023)</xref>. In line with our findings, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Mohammadizad et al., 2025)</xref> reported an increase in glucose levels from 253.2 mg/dL at 21-22 °C to 261.0 mg/dL after three days at 33-34 °C, whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abuajamieh et al., 2025)</xref> noted an increase from 254.0 mg/dL at 22.6 °C to 292 mg/dL after seven days’ rearing at 33.7 °C. When considering the potential effects of differing crude protein levels in diets on the blood glucose levels of broiler and Kedu chickens, it seems quite likely that variations in protein content may not have had a major impact. Supporting this view, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Son et al., 2024)</xref> demonstrated that reducing the dietary crude protein levels (by up to 4%) in broilers did not significantly alter their blood glucose levels. Uric acid levels also increased under heat stress conditions in both chicken types. This was closely related to increased protein catabolism to supply amino acids for gluconeogenesis (energy production) in the liver during thermal stress. Indeed, protein catabolism during heat stress may cause higher levels of uric acid as a byproduct of protein breakdown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Zeng et al., 2024)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Gharib et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Heat stress is typically associated with an increased H/L ratio in poultry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Sugiharto et al., 2017)</xref>. However, data from our study did not show such an impact on either chicken species during rearing. The exact explanation for this condition is unknown, but it is likely that the two-week heat stress treatment accustomed the chickens to high temperature conditions, rendering the impact of heat stress on the H/L ratio insignificant. Consistent with this inference, Ogundeji and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Ogundeji &amp; Ayo, 2025)</xref> reported that heat-habituated chickens showed no change in their H/L ratio during rearing at high temperatures. Irrespective of heat stress treatment, Kedu chickens had a higher H/L ratio compared to broiler chickens. Typically, the H/L ratio in chickens is strongly influenced by genetics (species/ strain) and the environment. In addition to being an indicator of stress, the ratio also indicates the capacity of the chicken’s immune system, as this is defined by the proportion of heterophils and lymphocytes in the blood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Stefanetti et al., 2023)</xref>. As an indicator of stress, the proportion of heterophils will increase and that of lymphocytes will decrease in line with the stress experienced by chickens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Sugiharto et al., 2017)</xref><xref rid="BIBR-41" ref-type="bibr">(Stefanetti et al., 2023)</xref>. In this study, the impact of heat stress was not seen on the H/L ratio, so it can be inferred that the high H/L ratio in the Kedu chickens was due to a higher proportion of heterophils (irrespective of stress treatment, there was no difference in lymphocytes between the two types of chicken). Consequently, it had an impact on improving the innate immune system (first line of defense) in the chickens.</p><p>Heat stress showed varying effects on the hematological profiles of the Kedu and broiler chickens. Leukocyte counts did not change for either under high temperature conditions. Likewise, the lymphocyte percentage in both types of chicken were unaffected by thermal stress. These results are different from those reported by <xref rid="BIBR-42" ref-type="bibr">(Sugiharto, 2020)</xref>, which indicated that heat stress was associated with the lower counts of leukocytes and lymphocytes. In this context,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Molnár et al., 2021)</xref> revealed that the leukocyte and lymphocyte count of chickens may vary in response to heat stress, depending on its length and extent. Regardless of the heat stress response, the heterophil proportion was significantly different between the two chicken types, with Kedu chickens having higher values than those of the broilers. As a critical part of the innate immune system, high heterophil implies that Kedu chickens exhibit stronger immune competence than broilers. Similar findings were also made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Malila et al., 2023)</xref>, who found that Thai native chickens exhibited a better innate immune system than modern broiler types. However, in contrast to our study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Anoh et al., 2025)</xref> noted no difference between Philippine native chickens and broilers with respect to the heterophil count in the blood. In another study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Duangjinda et al., 2017)</xref> reported that native chickens had lower heterophil counts than modern broilers. Overall, the above variations seemed to be closely related to the genetic potential of each indigenous chicken <xref rid="BIBR-8" ref-type="bibr">(Duangjinda et al., 2017)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Anoh et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>Irrespective of chicken type, the values of erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit decreased in response to heat stress. In such cases, heat stress inhibits the production of the hormone erythropoietin, thereby inhibiting erythrocyte production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Ayo &amp; Ogbuagu, 2021)</xref>. This causes a decrease in hematocrit and hemoglobin in chickens exposed to heat stress. Regardless of heat stress treatment, MCV and MCH levels were higher in the Kedu chickens than in the modern broilers. Similarly, the levels of MCV and MCH were found to be higher in indigenous Vanaraja chickens than in broiler chickens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Mohanty &amp; Acharya, 2020)</xref>. In contrast to our findings, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Baudouin et al., 2021)</xref> reported that indigenous chickens had lower MCV and MCH values than broilers. MCV is a parameter used to indicate the size of erythrocytes, while MCH is used to measure the amount of hemoglobin per blood cell. Although the values of both parameters vary between chicken species, they remain within the normal physiological range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Odunitan-Wayas et al., 2018)</xref>. Irrespective of high temperature treatment, platelet counts were higher in the modern broilers than in the Kedu chickens. In agreement with our findings, <xref rid="BIBR-23" ref-type="bibr">(Mabelebele et al., 2017)</xref> reported that Ross 308 broilers had higher platelet counts than indigenous Venda chickens. Platelets can indicate potential inflammation in chickens. This is because they release inflammatory mediators and are involved in the immune response, with levels increasing under conditions of stress and infection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Ferdous &amp; Scott, 2023)</xref>. Based on this, it can be assumed that broiler chickens have a higher potential for stress than native types. In our study, PDW increased significantly in the broiler chickens due to heat stress, but this was not observed in the Kedu chickens. PDW shows heterogeneity of platelet morphology due to the presence of large platelets alongside normal-sized ones. Under conditions of heat stress, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Farran et al., 2025)</xref> also reported an increase in PDW in laying hens. This is because heat stress can induce inflammation and platelet activation, encouraging the chicken’s body to produce younger and activated platelets, which vary more in size, thereby increasing PDW <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Farran et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>The blood proportion (relative to live body weight) was higher in the Kedu chickens than in the modern broilers. Generally, blood volume in chickens varies, largely determined by their body weight. Chickens with smaller weights typically have a higher blood percentage than those with larger body weights. Despite the Kedu chicken’s smaller body weight, their higher blood percentage indicates that this type of chicken has better oxygen transport and greater heat dissipation capacity, thus significantly supporting its resilience to heat stress <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Beckford et al., 2020)</xref>. In both types of chicken, heat stress caused a decrease in the blood percentage relative to the chicken’s body weight. Consistent with our study, <xref rid="BIBR-18" ref-type="bibr">(Kim et al., 2025)</xref> noted a decrease in whole blood volume in broiler chickens reared at 33 °C for 31 days, compared to broiler chickens reared at 21 °C for the same period. In this context, heat stress can cause significant loss of body fluids, primarily through increased panting frequency, which releases water vapor. Unlike Kedu chickens, high temperatures during rearing reduced the proportion of feathers in the broiler chickens. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Wasti et al., 2020)</xref> reported that heat stress causes broiler chickens to lose their feathers because, when heat-stressed, they frequently flap their wings to cool their bodies. Over time, this activity can potentially damage the chicken’s feathers. In contrast to studies reporting an increase in relative liver weight in broiler chickens due to fat accumulation under heat stress <xref rid="BIBR-22" ref-type="bibr">(Ma et al., 2022)</xref>, the relative liver weight of Kedu chickens in fact decreased due to heat stress over the two-week rearing period. The precise reason for this decrease remains unclear, but it is highly likely that the heat stress treatment did not cause fat accumulation in the liver of Kedu chickens. Furthermore, the reduction in final body weight (although not statistically significant) in the Kedu chickens may further explain the decrease in relative liver weight, as the live body weight of the Kedu chickens serves as the denominator during calculations. This condition causes a decrease in the relative liver weight in these chickens exposed to heat stress. Although heat stress did not affect relative gizzard weight, the Kedu chickens exhibited a higher relative weight than the broilers. The higher crude fiber content in Kedu chicken feed compared to that in broiler feed was likely responsible for the greater relative gizzard weight in the Kedu chickens. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Jha &amp; Mishra, 2021)</xref> explain that crude fiber in feed can stimulate the physical grinding activity of the gizzard, thereby stimulating more intensive muscle layer development and ultimately resulting in increased gizzard weight. Our study shows that Kedu chickens have a higher relative weight of immune organs, especially the spleen and bursa of Fabricius, compared to broilers, indicating that they have superior immune competence. Although no research has directly compared the relative weight of immune organs in native and broiler chickens, the higher relative weight of the spleen and bursa of Fabricius in the Kedu chickens indicates that native chickens, especially the Kedu type, have stronger immune competence than broilers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Lola et al., 2016)</xref>. Specifically related to heat stress treatment, high temperatures during the two-week rearing period significantly reduced the relative weight of the immune organs, especially the thymus and bursa of Fabricius, in both chicken types. The relative weight reduction of the two organs at high temperatures represents a thermal stress response of the immune system in both chicken species. These primary lymphoid organs are susceptible to stress, and their relative weight reduction is indicative of immunosuppression or a decrease in the proliferative capacity of T and B lymphocytes. This is consistent with the literature, which shows that heat stress can trigger the release of corticosterone, which induces atrophy in the thymus and bursa of Fabricius, potentially reducing the chicken’s immune capacity against pathogens<xref rid="BIBR-15" ref-type="bibr">(Huang et al., 2024)</xref> ;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Kim et al., 2025)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Heat stress for two weeks prior to market age impaired the physiological and hematological variables of the chickens, as indicated by the increases in rectal temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, and blood levels of glucose, uric acid levels and MCHC, alongside reductions in erythrocytes, hemoglobin and hematocrit, the proportions of blood and feathers to live body weight, and the relative weights of the thymus and Bursa of Fabricius. Compared to broilers, Kedu chickens showed more tolerance to heat stress, as indicated by the absence of an effect on their weight gain, blood glucose levels, PDW, and feather proportion. Therefore, farmers do not need to build environmentally controlled broiler houses for Kedu chickens, as they do not require the same environmental conditions as commercial broiler types.</p></sec></body><back><sec><title>CONFLICTS OF INTEREST</title><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>This work was supported by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM), Universitas Diponegoro, under the Professorship Research (RP) Scheme (Contract No. 222-300/UN7.D2/PP/IV/2025).</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>We state that generative AI and AI-assisted technologies were used for language refinement. All the content has been critically reviewed and edited by the authors.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of β-glucan on the performance and gut integrity of broilers under acute heat stress conditions</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>104</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abuajamieh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Qaisi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahasneh</surname><given-names>Z.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Istatieh</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abedal-Majed</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdelqader</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Fataftah</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>105065</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2025.105065</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Changes in stress markers and thermoregulatory response of broilers, noilers, and native chickens to transportation stress</article-title><source>Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences</source><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anoh</surname><given-names>K.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Halilu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogar</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paul</surname><given-names>J.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anthony</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><page-range>49-56</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/gjass.v24i1.6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heat stress, haematology and small intestinal morphology in broiler chickens: insight into impact and antioxidant-induced amelioration</article-title><source>World’s Poultry Science Journal</source><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ayo</surname><given-names>J.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogbuagu</surname><given-names>N.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>949</fpage><lpage>968</lpage><page-range>949-968</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00439339.2021.1959279</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Hematological profile of broilers and local chickens in Korhogo, Cote d’Ivoire</article-title><source>International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch</source><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baudouin</surname><given-names>K.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soualio</surname><given-names>K.A.M.A.G.A.T.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathieu</surname><given-names>B.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Angoue</surname><given-names>Y.A.P.O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><page-range>14-23</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35410/IJAEB.2021.5618</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of heat stress on performance, blood chemistry, and hypothalamic and pituitary mRNA expression in broiler chickens</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>99</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beckford</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellestad</surname><given-names>L.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Proszkowiec-Weglarz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farley</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brady</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Angel</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>H.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Porter</surname><given-names>T.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>6317</fpage><lpage>6325</lpage><page-range>6317-6325</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.052</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heat stress effects on the genetics of growth traits in Thai native chickens (Pradu Hang dum</article-title><source>Animal Bioscience</source><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boonkum</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chankitisakul</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kananit</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kenchaiwong</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>16</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><page-range>16-27</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ab.23.0165</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A review of heat stress in chickens. Part I: Insights into physiology and gut health</article-title><source>Frontiers in Physiology</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brugaletta</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Teyssier</surname><given-names>J.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rochell</surname><given-names>S.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dridi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sirri</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>934381</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2022.934381</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Hsp70 genotypes and heat tolerance of commercial and native chickens reared in hot and humid conditions</article-title><source>Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola</source><volume>19</volume><issue>01</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duangjinda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tunim</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duangdaen</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boonkum</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>07</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>07-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0245</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of dietary Lactiplantibacillus plantarum probiotics and postbiotics on gut health and immunity of layers under heat stress conditions</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition</source><volume>1</volume><issue>aop</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farran</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaouk</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Masry</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaib</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><page-range>1-14</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/2049257x-20251017</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The immunological capacity of thrombocytes</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>24</volume><issue>16</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferdous</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>12950</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms241612950</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Does low-protein diet improve broiler performance under heat stress conditions?</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>6</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Furlan</surname><given-names>R.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faria Filho</surname><given-names>D.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>P.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Macari</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><page-range>71-79</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1516-635X2004000200001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Using curcumin (Curcuma longa) as a dietary supplement modulates performance, behavior, blood metabolites, antioxidant status, and histomorphological changes in heat-stressed broiler chickens</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>104144</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gharib</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdelaty</surname><given-names>A.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomaa</surname><given-names>W.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouda</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amer</surname><given-names>H.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>R.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104144</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of heat stress on broilers with varying body weights: Elucidating their interactive role through physiological signatures</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>97</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gogoi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolluri</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tyagi</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marappan</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manickam</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Narayan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>102840</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102840</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of dietary N-acetylcysteine on rectal temperature, respiratory rate, growth performance and blood redox parameters in 22-to 42-day old broilers exposed to chronic heat stress</article-title><source>European Poultry Science</source><volume>83</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><page-range>1-11</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1399/eps.2019.288</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Mechanisms of Heat Stress on Neuroendocrine and Organ Damage and Nutritional Measures of Prevention and Treatment in Poultry</article-title><source>Biology</source><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>926</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology13110926</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: a review</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology</source><volume>12</volume><issue>51</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jha</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><page-range>1-16</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-021-00576-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Physiological and behavioral responses of laying hens exposed to long-term high temperature</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>99</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Y.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>K.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>103017</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103017</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of heat stress on growth performance, physiological responses, and carcass traits in broilers</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>127</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>H.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seong</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seol</surname><given-names>K.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>J.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>103994</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103994</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Protein requirements of growing indigenous chickens during the 14-21 weeks growing period</article-title><source>South African Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kingori</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tuitoek</surname><given-names>J.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muiruri</surname><given-names>H.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wachira</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><fpage>78</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><page-range>78-82</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/sajas.v33i2.3759</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The productivity and resilience of the indigenous chickens in the tropical environments: improvement and future perspectives</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Animal Research</source><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kpomasse</surname><given-names>C.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kouame</surname><given-names>Y.A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>N’nanle</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Houndonougbo</surname><given-names>F.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tona</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oke</surname><given-names>O.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>456</fpage><lpage>469</lpage><page-range>456-469</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09712119.2023.2228374</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heat stress induces histopathological changes in lymphoid organs of broiler and Philippine native chickens</article-title><source>Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences</source><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lola</surname><given-names>M.S.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paraso</surname><given-names>M.G.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Divina</surname><given-names>B.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobonseng</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bombio</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Collantes</surname><given-names>T.M.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><page-range>85-90</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Chronic heat stress causes liver damage via endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis in broilers</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>101</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>102063</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2022.102063</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Blood profiles and histo-morphometric analysis of the gastrointestinal tracts of Ross 308 broiler and indigenous Venda chickens fed the same diet</article-title><source>Applied Ecology and Environmental Research</source><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mabelebele</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginindza</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ng’Ambi</surname><given-names>J.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Norris</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mbajiorgu</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>1373</fpage><lpage>1385</lpage><page-range>1373-1385</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15666/aeer/1504_13731386</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Phenotypic characterization and principal component analyses of indigenous chicken breeds in Indonesia</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maharani</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustofa</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>A.P.Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fathoni</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasongko</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hariyono</surname><given-names>D.N.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1665</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2021.1665-1676</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influences of thermal stress during three weeks before market age on histology and expression of genes associated with adipose infiltration and inflammation in commercial broilers, native chickens, and crossbreeds</article-title><source>Frontiers in Physiology</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malila</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanpinit</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thongda</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jandamook</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Srimarut</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Phasuk</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunhareang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>858735</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2022.858735</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Thermal impacts on transcriptome of Pectoralis major muscle collected from commercial broilers, Thai native chickens and its crossbreeds</article-title><source>Animal Bioscience</source><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malila</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uengwetwanit</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanpinit</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Songyou</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Srimarut</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunhareang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>61</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ab.23.0195</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Local chicken breeds of Africa: their description, uses and conservation methods</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manyelo</surname><given-names>T.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Selaledi</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>Z.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mabelebele</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>2257</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani10122257</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Supplementing advanced chelated trace minerals beyond recommended inorganic levels improve growth performance and physiological stress responses in broiler chickens under heat stress</article-title><source>Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology</source><volume>127708</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohammadizad</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Taherpour</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghasemi</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shirzadi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tavakolinasab</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nazaran</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtemb.2025.127708</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparative haematology and biochemical parametrs of indigenous and broiler chicken</article-title><source>International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research</source><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohanty</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Acharya</surname><given-names>S.M.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>972</fpage><lpage>977</lpage><page-range>972-977</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of heat stress on the immune responses of chickens subjected to thermal manipulation in the pre-hatch period</article-title><source>Acta Veterinaria Hungarica</source><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Molnár</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kőrösi</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balázs</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gáspárdy</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><page-range>67-72</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1556/004.2021.00003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Modulation of growth-related protein expression of native chicken in low altitude in West Jawa, Indonesia</article-title><source>Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research</source><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mushawwir</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adriani</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Permana</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arifin</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vega</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>880</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5455/javar.2024.k839</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Poultry response to heat stress: Its physiological, metabolic, and genetic implications on meat production and quality including strategies to improve broiler production in a warming world</article-title><source>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</source><volume>8</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nawaz</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amoah</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leng</surname><given-names>Q.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>699081</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2021.699081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Haematological and serum biochemical responses of ovambo chickens fed provitamin a biofortified maize</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Odunitan-Wayas</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolanisi</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chimonyo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>425</fpage><lpage>434</lpage><page-range>425-434</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0444</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Habituation mitigates adverse effects of heat stress in broiler chicken during the hot-dry season</article-title><source>Folia Veterinaria</source><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogundeji</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayo</surname><given-names>J.O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>41</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><page-range>41-48</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/fv-2025-0006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Environmental stress and livestock productivity in hot-humid tropics: Alleviation and future perspectives</article-title><source>Journal of Thermal Biology</source><volume>100</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oke</surname><given-names>O.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uyanga</surname><given-names>V.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iyasere</surname><given-names>O.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oke</surname><given-names>F.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Majekodunmi</surname><given-names>B.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Logunleko</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abiona</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nwosu</surname><given-names>E.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abioja</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Daramola</surname><given-names>J.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Onagbesan</surname><given-names>O.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>103077</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103077</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heat stress and poultry production: a comprehensive review</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>102</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oluwagbenga</surname><given-names>E.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fraley</surname><given-names>G.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>103141</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2023.103141</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of heat stress on the gut health of poultry</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Science</source><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rostagno</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>1-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/skaa090</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Growth curve evaluation for Indonesian indigenous Red Kedu chicken by using non-linear models</article-title><source>Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies</source><volume>14</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Setiaji</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lestari</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pandupuspitasari</surname><given-names>N.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agusetyaningsih</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutopo</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamaningrum</surname><given-names>T.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Philco</surname><given-names>T.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alfaruq</surname><given-names>M.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raza</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>01</fpage><lpage>07</lpage><page-range>01-07</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Altered relationship between gluconeogenesis and immunity in broilers exposed to heat stress for different durations</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>100</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siddiqui</surname><given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belal</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shim</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>101274</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2021.101274</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of dietary crude protein reduction levels on performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, blood parameters, meat quality, and welfare index of broilers in welfare-friendly environments</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>14</volume><issue>21</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Son</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>W.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>C.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>E.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>H.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>3131</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani14213131</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of rearing systems on immune status, stress parameters, intestinal morphology, and mortality in conventional and local chicken breeds</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>102</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stefanetti</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mancinelli</surname><given-names>A.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pascucci</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Menchetti</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castellini</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mugnai</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiorilla</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Miniscalco</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiattelli</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Franciosini</surname><given-names>M.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Proietti</surname><given-names>P.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>103110</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2023.103110</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Alleviation of heat stress in broiler chicken using turmeric (Curcuma longa)-a short review</article-title><source>Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology</source><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>215</fpage><lpage>222</lpage><page-range>215-222</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31893/jabb.20028</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Dietary supplementation of probiotics in poultry exposed to heat stress-a review</article-title><source>Annals of Animal Science</source><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Isroli</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kusumanti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>591</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/aoas-2016-0062</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Performances of crossbred chickens fed fermented papaya leaf and seed powder at high stocking density</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahyuni</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sartono</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pratama</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>316</fpage><lpage>326</lpage><page-range>316-326</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2021.44.3.316</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Turning eggshell waste into an organic calcium source for broiler chickens</article-title><source>Livestock Research for Rural Development</source><volume>35</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tentrawinata</surname><given-names>Z.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahyuni</surname><given-names>H.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudiarti</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiastuti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agustyaningsih</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sartono</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugiharto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd35/9/3584sgh.html" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="9">9</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effects of tropical environmental conditions on the stress and immune responses of commercial broilers, Thai indigenous chickens, and crossbred chickens</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tirawattanawanich</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chantakru</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nimitsantiwong</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tongyai</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><fpage>409</fpage><lpage>420</lpage><page-range>409-420</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/japr.2010-00190</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Heat stress and poultry production: impact and amelioration</article-title><source>International Journal of Biometeorology</source><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vandana</surname><given-names>G.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sejian</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lees</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pragna</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silpa</surname><given-names>M.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maloney</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>163</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><page-range>163-179</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00484-020-02023-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performances, and potential mitigation strategies</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wasti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sah</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>1266</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani10081266</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of chronic heat stress on some physiological and immunological parameters in different breed of broilers</article-title><source>Poultry Science</source><volume>97</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>4073</fpage><lpage>4082</lpage><page-range>4073-4082</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pey256</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Metabolomics analysis to interpret changes in physiological and metabolic responses to chronic heat stress in Pekin ducks</article-title><source>Science of The Total Environment</source><volume>912</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>X.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Javid</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>K.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>S.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>X.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xuan</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Q.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>169382</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169382</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The influence of heat stress on chicken immune system and mitigation of negative impacts by Baicalin and Baicalein</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zmrhal</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Svoradova</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Venusova</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Slama</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2564</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani13162564</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>