<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.1.47</article-id><title-group><article-title>Natural Disinfectant Emulgel Associated with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy for Prevention Bovine Mastitis</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bispo</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Paula</surname><given-names>G. de</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J. B. da</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Balbinot</surname><given-names>R. B.</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Junior</surname><given-names>R. C. da Silva</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bragatto</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>M. S. S.</given-names></name><address><country>Brazil</country><email>msspozza@uem.br</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-8"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1">Animal Science Department, Maringa State University (UEM)</aff><aff id="AFF-2">Pharmaceutical Science Department, Maringa State University (UEM)</aff><aff id="AFF-3">Biological Science  Department (UEM), Maringa State University (UEM)</aff><aff id="AFF-4">Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura (Nupélia),  Maringa State University (UEM)</aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><author-notes><fn fn-type="coi-statement"><label>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</label><p>We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial, personal, or other relationships with other people or organizations related to the material discussed in the manuscript.</p></fn><corresp id="cor-8">Corresponding author: M. S. S. Pozza, Animal Science Department, Maringa State University (UEM).  Email: <email>msspozza@uem.br</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-3" publication-format="electronic"><day>3</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2025-12-3" publication-format="electronic"><day>3</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-7-18"><day>18</day><month>7</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2025 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/66335" xlink:title="Natural Disinfectant Emulgel Associated with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy for Prevention Bovine Mastitis">Natural Disinfectant Emulgel Associated with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy for Prevention Bovine Mastitis</self-uri><abstract><p>Conventionally, disinfectants based on iodine, hypochlorite, or lactic acid are used in post-dipping for teat hygiene on dairy farms. As a natural alternative for the prevention of bovine mastitis, jurema-preta <italic>(Mimosa tenuiflora)</italic>, copaiba oil <italic>(Copaifera martii)</italic>, and <italic>Chlorella vulgaris</italic> have antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. Associated with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT), these substances inhibit <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>. This study developed two natural emulgels containing these extracts and evaluated their stability, bioadhesiveness, texture, and cytotoxicity for post-dipping to prevent mastitis. The emulgel was developed using Carbopol 934 P (0.25% w/w), jurema extract (12.5% w/w), and <italic>Chlorella </italic>extract (0.2% w/w), which was dissolved in copaiba oil (4% w/w). Twelve Holstein and Jersey cows were treated with: T1 - control with the use of iodine, T2 - application of emulgel with black jurema and copaiba oil without lighting, and T3 - application of emulgel with black jurema, copaiba oil, and <italic>C. vulgaris</italic> with lighting. The data obtained <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> were submitted to analysis of variance. For the texture parameters of the emulgel, the formulations showed stability, pseudoplastic behavior, and elastic nature, with no cytotoxic effect. The <italic>in vitro</italic> study showed that the treatments using light were effective in reducing <italic>S. aureus</italic> and the extracts were also effective in breaking up pre-formed biofilm by this bacterium. In the <italic>in vivo </italic>test, there was no significant difference between treatments for somatic cell counts and <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> in milk and teat swabs. The emugel has antimicrobial potential and can replace iodine for use as post-dipping without cytotoxic effects.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>dairy cows</kwd><kwd>natural extracts</kwd><kwd>photoinactivation</kwd><kwd>milk quality</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link xlink:title="JATS Editor" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Therapeutic alternatives for mastitis prevention have been gaining prominence to reduce antibiotic dependence and bacterial resistance, making milk production more sustainable. Mimosa tenuiflora (jurema- preta) has antimicrobial properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Santos et al., 2022)</xref>. Copaiba oil (Copaifera martii), extracted from trees of the genus Copaifera, is known for its anti-inflammatory activities in the treatment of skin diseases <xref rid="BIBR-23" ref-type="bibr">(Símaro et al., 2020)</xref> and is also effective in the treatment of mastitis, with an antibiotic effect and tissue repair <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Oliveira et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>The microalgae Chlorella vulgaris has antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties, inhibit- ing bacteria that cause mastitis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Silva-Junior et al., 2020)</xref>. Some pigments in microalgae, such as chloro- phyll, may have photosensitizing properties, generating reactive species or singlet oxygen, which cause cell dam- age, in a treatment known as photodynamic therapy <xref rid="BIBR-5" ref-type="bibr">(Campanholi et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>Considering the problems caused by bovine mas- titis, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) uses light-activated photosensitizing compounds to generate reactive oxygen species, inhibiting microorganisms and biofilms, contributing to milk quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Teichert et al., 2002)</xref>. In situ studies confirm the aPDT efficacy in post-dipping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Silva Junior et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Rodrigues et al., 2022)</xref>. The present study evaluated a new and innova- tive formulation combined with photodynamic inacti- vation of microorganisms, proposing a photosensitive disinfectant for use as post-dipping, containing natural extracts incorporated into a polymeric matrix, aiming to reduce Staphylococcus aureus contamination in the milk and teats of animals.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Collection of Plant/Material and Extract Preparation</title><p>The copaiba oil-resin was collected in the Brazilian municipality of Bailão-PA. The copaiba oil-resin harvesting method employed a traditional 1.0-inch hand drill for mechanical drilling in the middle of the trunk. The perimeter of the tree was greater than 1.20 m (about 40 cm in diameter). The rollers were drilled at a height of about 1-1.5 m from the ground. After drilling, the holes were kept closed. The product was registered in the National System of Authorization and Information on Biodiversity (SISBIO No. 72922-1) and in the National System of Management of Genetic Heritage (SISGEN No AOFOD20). The ground bark of black-jurema (Mimosa tenuiflora) and Chlorella vulgaris were purchased in local shops.</p><p>The jurema-preta extract was prepared by infu- sing 200 g of ground bark in 1000 mL of water at 60 °C, under stirring for 2 hours, followed by filtration. For quantification, 10 g of black jurema were infused in 50 mL of water and dried to a constant mass. The emulgel was developed using Carbopol 934 P (0.25% w/w) dis- solved in 100 g of jurema extract (12.5% w/w), stirred for 5 hours, and adjusted to pH 7.0 with triethanolamine. Chlorella extract (0.2% w/w), rich in chlorophyll and sensitive to light, was dissolved in copaiba oil (4% w/w) and added to the polymer under agitation for 10 mi- nutes. The formulation was stored at 4 °C. The emulgel subjected to illumination was named EJOC, while the non-illuminating emulgel was named EJO.</p></sec><sec><title>Emulgel Analysis</title><p>The formulations were submitted to previous stability tests, using centrifugation (BioTek/Elx808, Synergy), accelerated stability test, and shelf-life test <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(ANVISA, 2004)</xref>. Texture profile analysis (TPA) was performed in the TAXTplus module (Stable MicroSystems, UK), using a 10 mm diameter polycarbonate probe. The probe was inserted twice into the sample, at a depth of 15 mm and at a rate of 2 mm/s<sup>-1</sup>, with 15 s of rest between compressions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Borghi-Pangoni et al., 2016)</xref>. The bioadhesive strength of emulgel has been proven using pig ear skin. The skin was introduced into a probe, which was pressed against the emulgel with a force of 0.1 N for 30 s. Next, the probe was raised to 1.0 mm/s, measuring the force required to detach the skin. Tests were performed at least six repetitions, using the texture analyzer TAXT plus (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, United Kingdom) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Campanholi et al., 2018)</xref>.</p><p>The determination of total phenols was performed using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, which used gallic acid as a standard. The measurement of total flavonoids in the extract was performed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Agilent Technologies/Cary 60) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Zhishen et al., 1999)</xref>. For rheological analysis of continuous shear, the samples were analyzed in a MARS</p><p>II rheometer (Haake, Newington, Germany), using a cone-plate parallel geometry of 35 mm in diameter and an angle of 2°, separated by 0.105 mm, at 38 ± 1°C. A shear gradient from 0 to 2000 s<sup>-1</sup> was applied for 150 seconds. Rheological analysis of oscillatory shear was performed using the MARS II rheometer with cone- plate geometry. The linear viscoelastic region (LVR) was determined at 38 ± 1 °C, applying a voltage gradient of 0.01 to 20 Pa at 1 Hz. Then, a frequency gradient of 0.1 to 10 Hz was applied under constant voltage, with analysis of the oscillatory parameters in the RheoWin program <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Campanholi et al., 2018)</xref>.</p><p>The cytotoxicity of the formulations was evalu- ated in murine fibroblasts (L-929 cells) using the cell viability assay based on MTT reduction (3-4,5-dimethyl- thiazole-2-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Mosmann, 1983)</xref>. L-929 cells were cultured in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 hours. After monolayer formation, the formulas were added at concentrations of 188 to 12,000 µg/mL and incubated for 48 hours. After treatment, the cells were washed and incubated with MTT for 4 hours. The formazan crystals were solubilized in dimethyl sulf- oxide and absorbance was measured at 570 nm. The per- centage of viable cells was calculated in relation to the control, and the CC50 values (50% cytotoxic concentra- tion) were determined by nonlinear regression analysis, with the results expressed as mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Campanholi et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>For the analysis of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), each compound and the mix (jurema-preta + Chlorella + copaiba oil) were tested against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) at concentrations of 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 mg/mL, without illumination and with illumination, using a 665 nm red LED light source for 30 minutes at a distance of 15 cm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Campanholi et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>The phototoxic potential of C. vulgaris as a photosensitizer (PS) was evaluated in 10% reconstituted skimmed milk (LDR 10%). After inoculation, the milk samples were refrigerated (4°C) in the dark for 10 min and were illuminated at a distance of 15 cm for 5, 10, and 15 min, sown in Baird Parker Agar. Controls were performed with inoculated milk and PS to evaluate the antimicrobial activity in the dark. The biofilm-breaking capacity of natural extracts was determined according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Saini et al., 2023)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title><italic>In Vivo</italic> Trial in Lactating Caflle Using Emulgel as Post-Dipping</title><p>In vivo assay in lactating cattle using emulgels as post-dipping: all experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals in Experimentation (CEUA/UEM), under Protocol No. 6646060323. The experiment was carried out at the Iguatemi Experimental Farm, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. Before milking, the teats of the animals were washed with water and dried with disposable paper towels. After mechanical milking, the post-dipping procedure was performed. For the application, 12 Holstein animals in different stages of lactation were used, with an average weight of 500 kg and an average production of 20 liters/day, kept on pasture and supplemented with corn silage and corn grain concentrate, for 71 days. The animals were distributed in a 3x3 quadruple Latin square design, with 7 days of adaptation and 21 days of collection. The treatments were: T1-control, iodine application as post-dipping; T2-application of EJO emulgel without illumination (jurema-preta and copaiba oil); T3- application of EJOC emulgel with illumination (jurema- preta, Chlorella vulgaris, and copaiba oil). The teats were irradiated with 665 nm red LED light, irradiance of 3.40 x 10³ W cm-², at a distance of 3 cm for 1 min. Microbiological evaluations and milk analyses were performed on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Staphylococcus spp. counts were performed by collecting swabs and milk at sowing on Baird Parker Agar (BP). For the somatic cell count (SCC), the Ekomilk Scan (CapLab) was used.</p><p>Blood samples were collected on days 0 and 28, after the first morning milking by means of jugular puncture using disposable needles and Vacutainer<sup>®</sup> tubes with the addition of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). The blood samples were kept in a cooler with ice until they arrived at the laboratory, where, within 24 hours, the blood count was performed with the analysis of global red blood cell count, determination of cell volume, hemoglobin content, absolute hematimetric indexes, global leukocyte count, and differential leukocyte count <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Viana et al., 2002)</xref>.</p><p>The data obtained in vitro and in vivo were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significant difference between the means (p&lt;0.05) was determined using Tukey’s test using the SAS 9.3 Software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(SAS, 2012)</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>The formulations were considered stable in the pre- liminary and accelerated stability studies, without phase separation and with adequate incorporation of copaiba oil. The emulgel EJO maintained structural stability, coloration, and absence of phase separation for up to eight months. The formulations demonstrated desirable viscosity, consistent appearance, physical stability, and satisfactory adhesion. For texture analysis, a significant difference was observed in the variables (p&lt;0.0001) except for elasticity. The required strength for hardness (N), compressibility (N.mm), and adhesiveness (N.mm) was higher for the EJO emulgel. In the accelerated stabil- ity test, the EJOC showed instability, possibly due to the photodegradation of C. vulgaris.</p><p>There was a significant difference for the variables analyzed regarding bioadhesion in the ex vivo skin (p&lt;0.0001). The bioadhesiveness of the EJOC was higher, demonstrating greater compatibility with cutaneous adhesiveness <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 1</xref>.The mean values for total polyphenols were 16.976 mg EAG/L for jurema-preta and 16.1571 mg EAG/L for</p><p>C. vulgaris. The flavonoid values were 983.941 µg/mL equivalent quercetin and 134.2084 µg/mL equivalent quercetin, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Mechanical characterization of the type of post-dipping agent copaiba (<italic>Copaifera martii</italic>), black jurema (<italic>Mimosa tenuiflora</italic>), <italic>Chlorella </italic>oil emulgels, and bioadhesiveness on <italic>ex vivo </italic>skin</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Properties</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4">Type of post-dipping agent</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">EJO</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">EJOC</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">IODINE</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Hardness(N)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.155 ± 0.003ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.067 ± 0.000ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.034 ± 0.013<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Compressibility (N.mm)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.305 ± 0.086ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.363 ± 0.069ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.079 ± 0.011<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Adhesiveness(N.mm)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.736 ± 0.044ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.232 ± 0.010ᵇ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.000 ± 0.000<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Elasticity (mm)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.995 ± 0.001</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.998 ± 0.000</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.980 ± 0.06</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&gt;0.9534</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Cohesiveness(dimensionless)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.218 ± 0.072ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.000 ± 0.000ᵃ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.005 ± 0.133ᵇ</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Bioadhesiveness</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Maximum strength(N)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.063 ± 0.009<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.069 ± 0.005<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Biodadhesion work(N.mm)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.009 ± 0.000<sup>a</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.011 ± 0.000<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.0001</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: EJO= jurema-preta and copaiba oil, EJOC= jurema-preta, copaiba oil and <italic>Chlorella </italic>vulgaris. Values indicate significance (p&lt;0.01) by Tukey's test at 1% probability.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The emulgels showed pseudoplastic behavior and nonlinear viscosity (non-Newtonian, n&lt;1) of the thixotropic type, presenting a small hysteresis area of 714.60 Pa.s (EJO) and 4414.33 Pa.s (EJOC), characterized by the ability to increase the material viscosity after application of tension. EJO presented the yield stress. There was a significant difference for the K and n variables (p&lt;0.05) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>. </p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Continuous shear rheology of the emulgel systems. EJOC= jurema-preta, copaiba oil, <italic>Chlorella vulgaris</italic>; EJO= jurema-preta, copaiba oil at 38 °C. The orange symbol represents the outward curve and the blue symbol the return curve.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/66335/version/46938/33995/415466"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>The emulgels showed G’&gt;G’’ behavior, presenting an elastic nature, conferring viscoelastic properties, and presenting themselves as a structured system, with interactions between their constituents <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>. A dose-dependent effect was observed in citotoxicity analysis <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><fig id="figure-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Elastic modulus (G’, orange) and viscous modulus (G”, blue) as a function of the frequency of the emulgel systems. EJOC=</p><p>jurema-preta, copaiba oil, <italic>Chlorella vulgaris</italic>; EJO= jurema-preta, copaiba oil at 38 °C.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/66335/version/46938/33995/415467"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of the formula against L-929 fibroblasts.  ■ EJOC = Jurema-preta emulgel, copaíba oil, and <italic>Chlorella </italic></p><p><italic>vulgaris</italic>; ■■ EJO = Jurema-preta emulgel and copaíba oil.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/66335/version/46938/33995/415468"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Regarding the photoinactivation of these isolates in milk, the results showed significant differences between the strains (p&lt;0.0001) and for the exposure times (p&lt;0.0001) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 4</xref>, with the light exposure time of 10 minutes being more efficient for isolates 1, 4, 9, and 10.</p><fig id="figure-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Photodynamic inactivation of 12 strains of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> in milk – strains count (log₁₀) after times of exposure to light: 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min. Strains count in the dark (without using photoactivation): with and without <italic>Chlorella</italic>.  ■ 5 min  ■ 10 min  ■ 15 min  ■ With <italic>Chlorella</italic> ■ Without <italic>Chlorella</italic></p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/66335/version/46938/33995/415469"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>For the in vitro evaluation against S. aureus, the mix of extracts reduced 100% microbial count at a concentration of 25 mg using light. The standard strain (S. aureus ATCC 25923) submitted and not submitted to illumination presented values of 7.90 and 8.00 Log CFU/ mL, respectively. When testing different concentrations of C. vulgaris and jurema-preta extract, the one that most inhibited growth was 12.5 mg with light, and the decimal reduction value of the control strain was 5.33 Log CFU/mL and 5.34 Log CFU/mL for both compounds. For copaiba oil, the concentration of 100 mg with light had the greatest reduction, with 4.92 Log CFU/mL. C. vulgaris has great antimicrobial potential, varying with the type of solvent and the bacterial species tested.</p><p>The extract of jurema-preta and C. vulgaris promoted bactericidal activity against the isolates in preformed biofilm <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 2</xref>. These compounds inhibit the synthesis of polysaccharides, altering the integrity of the bacterial membrane and causing the rupture of the preformed biofilms. This strategy may be promising for the development of natural treatments against bacterial infections in biofilms, especially in veterinary settings. Highlight for the lowest concentrations of tested extracts (0.78125 µg), which were efficient in breaking 70.36% and 66.62% of preformed biofilm. It was observed that the milk parameters evaluated did not present a statistically significant difference, except for the Staphylococcus count in the teats <xref rid="table-3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Bactericidal activity of jurema-preta and <italic>Chlorella vulgaris </italic>extract on <italic>Staphylococcus aureus </italic>isolates present in biofilm (%)</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Bacteria</th><th align="center" colspan="4" valign="top">Biofilm inhibition (%)</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">Jurema-preta extract (µg)</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top"><italic>Chlorella vulgaris </italic>extract (µg)</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">100</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.78125</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">100</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.78125</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">CP</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">73.24 ± 0.018</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">61.60 ± 0.313</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">73.14 ± 0.082</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">61.19 ± 0.356</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Sv1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">76.78 ± 0.026</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">64.88 ± 0.331</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">78.36 ± 0.061</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">65.36 ± 0.369</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Sv3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">74.96 ± 0.004</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">68.94 ± 0.016</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">75.40 ± 0.009</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">66.62 ± 0.042</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Sv5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">72.78 ± 0.061</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">70.36 ± 0.161</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">71.04 ± 0.005</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">52.97 ±0.007</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: CP: standard strain of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus </italic>(ATCC 25923); Sv1, Sv3, and Sv5 are strains of <italic>S. aureus</italic>; the highest concentration of extract tested is 100 and the lowest is 0.78125; values represent the mean (± standard deviation).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Somatic cell count, physicochemical and microbiological composition of milk and teats of cows subjected to the application</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Variables</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">T1 (Iodine)</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">T2 (Emulgel)</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">T3 (Emulgel + Light)</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">SE</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="3">p - value</th></tr><tr><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">T1 x T2</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T1 x T3</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">T2 x T3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">SSC Log10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.27</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.28</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.16</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.1331</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.979</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.554</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.536</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">F</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.84</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.44</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.61</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.1902</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.158</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.413</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.537</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">ST</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.69</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.64</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.82</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.2105</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.874</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.672</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.553</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">D</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.0334</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.0335</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.0342</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.6949</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.884</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.417</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.503</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.55</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.52</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.62</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.0798</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.777</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.519</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.22</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.18</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.30</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.0961</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.798</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.588</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.427</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">SL</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.80</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.79</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.82</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.0163</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.701</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.490</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.287</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Swab_Log10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.18</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.0822</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.001**</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.212</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.025*</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Milk_Log10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.78</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.66</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.2272</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.137</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.254</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.713</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Milk production</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">15.16</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">16.54</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">15.73</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.0093</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.636</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.846</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.779</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: SCC= somatic cell count; Treatment 1= iodine; Treatment 2= emulgel; Treatment 3= emulgel light; F= Fat (%); ST= deffated solids; D= Density (g/ mL); L= Lactose (%); SL= minerals (%); P= Protein (%); Swab log10= staphylococcal count on the ceiling; Milk_Log10= staphylococcal count in milk; Milk production= milk production/L. SE= average standard error. *Values indicate significance (p&lt;0.05) by Tukey's test at 5% probability;</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>In the accelerated stability test, the EJOC formulation showed instability due to photodegradation. Light radiation can alter the color and odor of the emulgel components, and evaporation by heating results in a more fluid texture, which is reversed with cooling.</p><p>For texture analysis, adhesiveness favors the emulgel permanence in the teats. The emulgel cohesiveness affects the ability to maintain its integrity; however, adhesion to the skin depends more on the adhesiveness of the emulgel than on its cohesiveness. Therefore, the EJOC lack of cohesiveness does not necessarily preclude its adhesion. Cohesiveness indicates greater viscosity and structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Oliveira et al., 2021)</xref>. EJOC has higher bioadhesive properties compared to EJO, which are related to its mechanical characteristics and ability to interact with the skin surface. This ensures that the active ingredients are released at the application site, increasing contact time and, consequently, efficacy. Studies about bioadhesive gels with herbal principles, using polymers such as Carbopol and natural bioactive substances, such as oils and chlorophyll, show great therapeutic potential <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Campanholi et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>The high concentration of flavonoids and tannins in jurema-preta confers antimicrobial properties, inhibiting the growth of several bacteria, highlighting its potential as a natural antimicrobial agent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Santos et al., 2022)</xref>. The values reported in the literature were: jurema-preta extract 5.4989 µg/mL of flavoids, a value lower than the present study, for total phenolics of 50.584 µg/mL <xref rid="BIBR-22" ref-type="bibr">(Silva et al., 2021)</xref>, and for C. vulgaris of 24.95 mg/100 g for total phenolics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Miranda et al., 2001)</xref>.</p><p>The materials analyzed showed pseudoplastic behavior, with adequate viscosity for topical application, facilitating spreadability and adhesion to the skin. They also showed thixotropic behavior. In oscillatory rheology, the emulgels showed an elastic predominance over viscous (G’ &gt; G’’) at low frequencies, indicating adequate mechanical stability. The transition from elastic to viscous behavior was observed at a critical frequency. These results suggest that the formulation has cohesive and stable structures reinforced by the presence of bioactive compounds, such as polysaccharides and phenolic compounds, which contribute to its efficacy and stability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Narvaes et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Regarding toxicity, a dose-dependent effect was observed, i.e., with the increase in the concentration of the extracts, there was a decrease in cell viability. However, this decrease only occurred more prominently at concentrations greater than 1,500 µg/mL <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3</xref>. Copaiba oil is recognized for its anti-inflammatory and healing properties, and is generally safe in moderate concentrations, but high doses can cause cytotoxicity in some cells. The addition of C. vulgaris to the EJOC emulgel seems to have reduced the toxic effects, increasing cell viability at intermediate concentrations, which is in line with the evidence that C. vulgaris can increase the stability of formulations and offer cellular protection due to the presence of chlorophyll and polysaccharides, which promote tissue repair and reduce oxidative stress <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Latif et al., 2021)</xref>. EJOC emulgel shows advantages in cell viability at higher concentrations, making it suitable for topical applications with low toxicity. These results highlight the importance of combining plant extracts with synergistic activities, such as copaiba oil and C. vulgaris, to optimize the efficacy and safety of formulations.</p><p>All 12 isolates amplified the nuc gene, only two isolates for the hla and hlb genes, and three for the sea gene. The presence of the nuc gene is used to characterize the species S. aureus. The presence of the sea gene is essential to produce toxins and contributes to their virulence. The genes hla and hlb encode hemolysins that increase the ability of S. aureus in the host to aggravate infections such as mastitis.</p><p>Formation of biofilms by S. aureus is a challenge in the treatment of infections due to the resistance of Gram-positive bacteria. Thus, studies aiming at the bactericidal activity of different compounds against preformed biofilms become necessary. The fractions of the C. urucarana extract eradicated S. aureus in biofilms in a manner equivalent to the antibiotic vancomycin, where the extract (5 mg/mL) was able to inhibit 88.94% of the formation of the bacterial matrix of S. aureus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Nader et al., 2018)</xref>. These studies demonstrate the importance of several natural extracts in the inhibition and eradication of S. aureus biofilms, indicating the development of new antibacterial agents.</p><p>It was observed that the milk parameters evaluated did not present a statistically significant difference. This suggests that the different treatments applied did not influence the composition or physicochemical quality of the milk, since the animals did not present mastitis during the application of the products. In contrast analysis, it was observed that the control treatment showed significantly lower levels of Staphylococcus contamination in the teats compared to the emulgel without illumination (p&lt;0.001). The contrast between emugel treatments proves the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in reducing the microbial load, since the application of light generated singlet oxygen on the surface of the teats, contributing to the reduction of microorganisms (p=0.025). The SCC values obtained were lower than the limits established by IN 77 <xref rid="BIBR-12" ref-type="bibr">(Agricultura et al., 2018)</xref>, which establishes a maximum count of 5.70 log10 (500.000 cells/mL) <xref rid="table-3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>. As in the present study, <xref rid="BIBR-9" ref-type="bibr">(Silva Junior et al., 2019)</xref> demonstrated that the use of an SF hydrogel (photosensitizer) was equivalent to iodine, ensuring microbiological quality and low SCC in milk. The emulgels acted as an antiseptic product, providing adequate teat coverage and as a physical barrier. The addition of carbopol provided better adhesiveness, stability, and consistency, since it is a synthetic hydrophilic polymer derived from polyacrylic acid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Campanholi et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>For the blood analysis, there was no significant dif- ference for the parameters evaluated (p&gt;0.05). However, at 28 days, the animals showed a significant reduction in the values of eosinophils (p&lt;0.024) and for the Days x Treatment interaction for the eosinophil variable (%), the lowest count was for the emulgel containing copaiba oil (EJOC) (6.67<sup>b</sup>), followed by EJO (12.67<sup>a</sup>) and control (9.00<sup>a</sup>). In the present study, the values obtained were in accordance with the reference limits for eosinophils; lower values may indicate stress, acute infections, use of corticosteroids, pregnancy, lactation, or severe allergic reactions. In cases of mastitis, the immune response tends to prioritize neutrophil activation, resulting in decreased eosinophil count <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Braun et al., 2021)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>The emulgels tested showed adequate characteristics of stability, bioadhesiveness, and pseudoplastic behavior, making them a promising option for therapeutic applica- tions. The association of natural extracts combined with photodynamic therapy proved to be effective in reducing Staphylococcus aureus, without presenting cytotoxic effects and with anti-biofilm capacity, reinforcing its potential to fight bacterial infections. In the context of post-dipping application, the tested formulations have efficacy similar to iodine in the SCC maintenance and staphylococci con- trol, evidencing their potential as an antiseptic alternative to prevent bovine mastitis.</p></sec></body><back><ack><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>This research is funded by CNPQ 2024-2025 (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) for the financial support through the scholarship, and the National Institute of Science and Technology of the Milk Production Chain (INCT Leite).</p></sec></ack><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>No AI tools were used in this work.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>Política atual de regulação de medicamentos no Brasil</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>ANVISA</surname><given-names>A.N.d V.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><comment>Retrieved from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/anvisa/manual_politica_medicamentos.pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Anvisa">Anvisa</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Screening and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive thermoresponsive system containing methylene blue for local photodynamic therapy of colorectal cancer</article-title><source>Pharmaceutical research</source><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borghi-Pangoni</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Junqueira</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souza Ferreira</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rabello</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diniz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11095-015-1826-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Haematological findings in 158 cows with acute toxic mastitis with a focus on the leukogram</article-title><source>Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica</source><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braun</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerspach</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Riond</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oschlies</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Corti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bleul</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>11</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13028-021-00576-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Biomedical platform development of a chlorophyll-based extract for topic photodynamic therapy: mechanical and spectroscopic properties</article-title><source>Langmuir</source><volume>34</volume><issue>28</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Braga</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>N.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Francisco</surname><given-names>L.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>E.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro-Hoshino</surname><given-names>L.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hioka</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>8230</fpage><lpage>8244</lpage><page-range>8230-8244</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00658</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Thermo and photoresponsive emulgel loaded with Copaifera reticulata ducke and chlorophylls: rheological, mechanical, photodynamic and drug delivery properties in human skin</article-title><source>Pharmaceutics</source><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.D.S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Junior</surname><given-names>R.C.D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jaski</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.B.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>M.C.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>R.S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>M.S.D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro-Hoshino</surname><given-names>L.V.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baesso</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cardozo-Filho</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>2798</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pharmaceutics14122798</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Thermal stimuli-responsive topical platform based on copaiba oil-resin: Design and performance upon ex-vivo human skin</article-title><source>Journal of Molecular Liquids</source><volume>361</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.D.S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonçalves</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souza Ferreira</surname><given-names>S.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro-Hoshino</surname><given-names>L.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balbinot</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazarin-Bidoia</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baesso</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>C.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>119625</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119625</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Design and optimization of a natural medicine from Copaifera reticulata ducke for skin wound care</article-title><source>Polymers</source><volume>14</volume><issue>21</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.D.S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva Junior</surname><given-names>R.C.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonçalves</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morais</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vilsinski</surname><given-names>B.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>G.L.M.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>M.S.D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saraiva</surname><given-names>B.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>C.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>4483</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/polym14214483</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Photothermal stimuli-responsive hydrogel containing safranine for mastitis treatment in veterinary using phototherapy</article-title><source>ACS Applied Bio Materials</source><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva-Junior</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.d S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morais</surname><given-names>F.v A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>M.S.d S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro-Hoshino</surname><given-names>L.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baesso</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>581</fpage><lpage>596</lpage><page-range>581-596</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsabm.0c01143</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Development and applications of safranine-loaded Pluronic® F127 and P123 photoactive nanocarriers for prevention of bovine mastitis: In vitro and in vivo studies</article-title><source>Dyes and Pigments</source><volume>167</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva Junior</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.d S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morais</surname><given-names>F.A.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos Pozza</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>G.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hioka</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>204</fpage><lpage>215</lpage><page-range>204-215</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.04.037</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Thermoresponsive hydrogel-loading aluminum chloride phthalocyanine as a drug release platform for topical administration in photodynamic therapy</article-title><source>Langmuir</source><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>E.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>S.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro-Hoshino</surname><given-names>L.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Campanholi</surname><given-names>K.d S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calori</surname><given-names>I.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morais</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kimura</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva Junior</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruschi</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hioka</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>3202</fpage><lpage>3213</lpage><page-range>3202-3213</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00148</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Protective role of Chlorella vulgaris with Thiamine against Paracetamol induced toxic effects on haematological, biochemical, oxidative stress parameters and histopathological changes in Wistar rats</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Latif</surname><given-names>A.A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Assar</surname><given-names>D.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elkaw</surname><given-names>E.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamza</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alkhalifah</surname><given-names>D.H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hozzein</surname><given-names>W.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamouda</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>3911</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-83316-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Instrução Normativa no 77, de 26 de novembro de 2018. Estabelece os critérios e procedimentos para a produção, acondicionamento, conservação, transporte, seleção e recepção do leite cru em estabelecimentos registrados no Serviço de Inspeção Oficial</article-title><source>Diário Oficial da União: seção</source><volume>1</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agricultura</surname><given-names>Ministério</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Pecuária</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Abastecimento</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>32-80,</page-range><publisher-loc>Brasília, DF</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antioxidant activity of the microalga Chlorella vulgaris cultered on special conditions</article-title><source>Bollettino chimico farmaceutico</source><volume>140</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miranda</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mancini-Filho</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2001</year><fpage>165</fpage><lpage>168</lpage><page-range>165-168</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11486607/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="11486607">11486607</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays</article-title><source>Journal of immunological methods</source><volume>65</volume><issue>1-2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mosmann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1983</year><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><page-range>55-63</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Atividade antibiofilme de substâncias de Croton urucurana em Staphylococcus aureus isolado de mastite bovina</article-title><source>Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira</source><volume>38</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nader</surname><given-names>T.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coppede</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Taleb-Contini</surname><given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amaral</surname><given-names>L.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>A.M.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>1713</fpage><lpage>1719</lpage><page-range>1713-1719</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5034</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Evaluation of the effectiveness of Chamomilla recutita L. in the treatment of cutaneous lesions</article-title><source>Research, Society and Development</source><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Narvaes</surname><given-names>J.V.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laverde</surname><given-names>L.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pegoraro</surname><given-names>K.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishiwaki</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chueiri</surname><given-names>G.d A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreti</surname><given-names>A.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pacheco</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoscheid</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>21312441300</fpage><lpage>21312441300</lpage><page-range>21312441300-21312441300</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41300</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antimicrobial potential of copaiba oil (Copaifera multijuga Hayne-Leguminosae) against bubaline mastitis multiresistant isolates</article-title><source>Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências</source><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>D.F.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>T.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname><given-names>C.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Batista</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>T.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Medeiros</surname><given-names>E.S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mota</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>R.M.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Porto</surname><given-names>T.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Porto</surname><given-names>C.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Porto</surname><given-names>A.L.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>20200521</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0001-3765202020200521</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Safranine-O incorporated in F127 nanocarriers reduces the contamination of Staphylococcus aureus in sheep’s milk</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Junior</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saraiva</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perez</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maia</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>C.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abreu Filho</surname><given-names>B.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>M.S.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>474</fpage><lpage>481</lpage><page-range>474-481</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2022.45.4.474</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antimicrobial potency of Punica granatum peel extract: Against multidrug resistant clinical isolates</article-title><source>Gene Reports</source><volume>30</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saini</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balhara</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutta</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghosh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaudhuri</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>101744</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.genrep.2023.101744</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Antimicrobial properties of jurema-preta (Mimosa tenuiflora (wild.) Poir.) pear extracts</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal of Development</source><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>R.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>A.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>L.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>T.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>16915</fpage><lpage>16930</lpage><page-range>16915-16930</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34117/bjdv8n3-094</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>SAS 9.3 for Windows</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>SAS</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><publisher-name>SAS Institute</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>Evaluation of the potentials of jurema preta (Mimosa tenuiflora) and cajueiro (Anacardium occidentale L.) extracts for use in antimicrobials and antioxidants active packaging</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>I.D.d L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>F.S.M.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrade</surname><given-names>M.F.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Brito</surname><given-names>A.M.S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hallwass</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinhas</surname><given-names>G.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><comment>Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 26, e12924.</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/s1517-707620210001.1224</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>In vivo study of anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of Copaifera pubiflora Benth oleoresin</article-title><source>Natural Product Research</source><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Símaro</surname><given-names>G.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lemos</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.J.M.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Cunha</surname><given-names>W.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carneiro</surname><given-names>L.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ambrósio</surname><given-names>S.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cunha</surname><given-names>N.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Andrade</surname><given-names>S.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arruda</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banderó-Filho</surname><given-names>V.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasse</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sheridan</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bastos</surname><given-names>J.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>M.L.A.e</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1129</fpage><lpage>1133</lpage><page-range>1129-1133</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14786419.2020.1855639</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Treatment of oral candidiasis with methylene blue-mediated photodynamic therapy in an immunodeficient murine model</article-title><source>Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology</source><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Teichert</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Usacheva</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Biel</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>160</lpage><page-range>155-160</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1067/moe.2002.120051</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of pregnancy and puerperium in the leucogram of Saanen goats (Capra hircus), bred in the state of São Paulo</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal Of Veterinary Research and Animal Science</source><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Viana</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Birgel Junior</surname><given-names>E.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayres</surname><given-names>M.C.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Biojoni</surname><given-names>F.d S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souza</surname><given-names>M.d C.C.d</given-names></name><name><surname>Birgel</surname><given-names>E.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><fpage>196</fpage><lpage>201</lpage><page-range>196-201</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1413-95962002000400006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals</article-title><source>Food chemistry</source><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhishen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mengcheng</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jianming</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1999</year><fpage>555</fpage><lpage>559</lpage><page-range>555-559</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>