<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2025.48.6.545</article-id><title-group><article-title>Morphology, Biomass, and Forage Quality of <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> cv. Bioguma-2 Treated with Soil Ameliorants on Post-Coal Mining Land</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kuswoyo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Karti</surname><given-names>P. D. M. H.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Human</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rostini</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mulyono</surname><given-names>E. E.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-5"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wawan</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-5"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1">Nutrition and Feed Science Study Program, Graduate School of IPB University</aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>IPB University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05smgpd89</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3">The National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)</aff><aff id="AFF-4">University of Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin</aff><aff id="AFF-5">PT Arutmin Indonesia Asamasam Mine, Tanah Laut Regency</aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><pub-date iso-8601-date="2025-10-13" publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>13</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2025-10-13" publication-format="electronic"><day>13</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>545</fpage><lpage>555</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-5-18"><day>18</day><month>5</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2025 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/64439" xlink:title="Morphology, Biomass, and Forage Quality of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 Treated with Soil Ameliorants on Post-Coal Mining Land">Morphology, Biomass, and Forage Quality of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 Treated with Soil Ameliorants on Post-Coal Mining Land</self-uri><abstract><p>Reclamation of post-coal mining land is a valuable opportunity for transforming the land into agricultural cultivation of forage crops for livestock feed production. We conducted an experiment in the Asamasam coal mining spot, Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, to investigate the effect of some soil ameliorant materials, and <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> cv. Bioguma-2 (Bioguma-2 sorghum) on morphological characteristics and biomass production. Seven soil ameliorant treatments were tested: control (P0), single applications of humic acid (P1, 28 L ha⁻¹), dolomite (P2, 5.8 t ha⁻¹), and organic compost (P3, 15 t ha⁻¹), and treatment combinations of humic acid + compost (P4), dolomite + compost (P5), and humic acid + dolomite + compost (P6) with the same doses of P1, P2, and P3. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and any significances between treatments were analyzed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The results indicated that the combined ameliorant materials improved morphological characteristics and biomass production. Treatment P6 showed the highest effectiveness on soil quality, plant survival rate, most morphological traits, and all yield parameters, followed by other treatments with comparatively lower performance. P6 produced the highest crude protein content across treatments. The combination of multi-ameliorants (humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost) is more effective than single ameliorants in improving soil quality, plant survival, morphological traits, and biomass yield of <italic>Sorghum bicolor</italic> cv. Bioguma-2 on post-coal mining land. These results indicate that using combined soil ameliorants is a promising strategy to enhance forage crop production on degraded mining soils. However, natural declines in plant performance during later harvest stages suggest the need for further nutrient management to sustain productivity over time.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>ameliorant</kwd><kwd>bioguma-2 sorghum</kwd><kwd>forage crops</kwd><kwd>performance</kwd><kwd>post-coal mining land</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link xlink:title="JATS Editor" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2025</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Extensive coal mining activities turn the soil into a compacted structure with low water-holding capacity and often high levels of toxic elements, like aluminum and heavy metals. As a result, soil quality is significantly degraded, leading to nutrient depletion, reduced organic matter, high acidity, poor physical structure, and low capacity to support plant growth. Empirical studies show that compared to undisturbed soils, mined lands have significantly lower total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and soil organic matter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Prathap et al., 2016)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">(Zhang et al., 2022)</xref>. In addition, subsidence areas show reduced soil water content and clay fractions, which impair microbial biomass and enzyme activities crucial for nutrient cycling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Ma et al., 2019)</xref>. Heavy metal contamination, including increased concentrations of chromium, copper, nickel, and lead, further exacerbates soil toxicity and hampers biological recovery <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Prathap et al., 2016)</xref>. Nutrient depletion on mined lands primarily results from the removal of topsoil, accelerated erosion and leaching, soil acidification, and heavy-metal toxicity, which suppress microbial functions that are essential for nutrient cycling <xref rid="BIBR-12" ref-type="bibr">(Das et al., 2024)</xref>. Soil amelioration—one of the critical strategies to restore the productivity of these degraded landscapes—is essential to address this issue. The application of organic and inorganic ameliorants such as compost, humic acid, dolomite, and biochar is reportedly capable of improving soil fertility, reducing acidity, enhancing microbial activity, and supporting vegetation establishment on marginal lands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Ivanova et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">(Zhang et al., 2022)</xref>. </p><p>revious studies have reported that coal mining significantly decreases key soil fertility indicators, including soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-59">(Wang et al., 2021)</xref> documented significant reductions in SOM, TN, and available P in subsided coalfields, influenced strongly by topographical factors. Similarly, artificial forests overlying subsided land in northern China show marked losses of soil nutrients and enzymatic activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-65">(Zhang et al., 2025)</xref>. It is mandatory for mining corporations to reclaim and repurpose post-coal mining land, such as for agriculture. As mentioned above, post-coal mining land (often known as marginal soil) suffers from low fertility, limited organic matter, poor structure, low water absorption capacity, and high aluminum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Herman et al., 2024)</xref>. These result in plant degradation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Asnawi et al., 2023)</xref>, loss of biodiversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Sukarman &amp; Abdul Gani, 2020)</xref>, and slow plant growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Lestari et al., 2019)</xref>. Despite the poor characteristics, reclaimed post-coal mining land holds promising potential to cultivate sorghum as a biomass source, to support land rehabilitation, and to achieve renewable energy and agricultural diversification goals.</p><p>Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)—known for its resilience and adaptability to suboptimal growing conditions—can stand marginal soils in reclaimed mining areas. As a versatile cereal crop with diverse applications in food, feed, and bioenergy production, sorghum can be classified into grain, energy, and silage sorghum based on its utilization traits. Furthermore, as the fifth most cultivated cereal globally, sorghum is valued for its excellent stress resistance, particularly to drought and saline-alkali conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-67">(Zheng et al., 2023)</xref>, making it a feasible forage for the future <xref rid="BIBR-32" ref-type="bibr">(Malalantang et al., 2019)</xref>. In a multiple cropping system, different sorghum varieties can be planted alongside up to 50% of the population of Indigofera <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Telleng et al., 2016)</xref>. Bioguma sorghum—a derivative variety of the Numbu sorghum plant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Nurhasanah et al., 2023)</xref>—grows to a height of 228.43 cm and produces 553.33 g of biomass per plant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Indriatama et al., 2023)</xref>. Sorghum has been analyzed in relation to an integrated crop and land management of post-mining land <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Munawwarah &amp; Sulaeman, 2023)</xref>, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">(Wulandari et al., 2024)</xref>, and hydroseeding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Anshari et al., 2023)</xref>. </p><p>Rehabilitation of non-productive post-mining land into agricultural land is essential for land productivity. Land restoration strategies may include, but are not limited to, the addition of compost<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Purnamayani et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Rosa et al., 2023)</xref>, the use of humic acid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Musfira et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Ngapiyatun et al., 2024)</xref>, and the application of dolomite lime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Firnia &amp; Rohmawati, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Calugaru et al., 2024)</xref>. Despite the important contributions, research on the restoration of former coal mining land for planting sorghum is still limited. This study is carried out to examine the effects of ameliorant materials on bioguma sorghum’s productivity in post-coal mining land.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Research Area</title><p>The research was conducted on a post-coal mining land at PT. Arutmin Indonesia Asamasam Mine, Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia (<xref rid="figure-1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>), from October 2023 to September 2024. The research area was located at approximately -3.865000 latitude and 115.104324 longitude, with extensive flatland topographic characteristics. The site used to be a coal mining operation without a land rehabilitation history. This research included land preparation, soil ameliorants application (P1 to P6) in the research plot, sorghum planting, pest control, harvesting, and soil analysis. The soil properties are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1.</xref></p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Research location (point A) in post-coal mining land of PT. Arutmin Indonesia Asamasam Mine, Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/64439/version/45495/34303/419117"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p> Chemical characteristics of the research plots' soil</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Parameters</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="7">Treatments</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2"><italic>p</italic></th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P0</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P2</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P3</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P4</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P5</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">P6</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">pH</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.35<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.36<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.36<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.47<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.99<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.41<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.45<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.171</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">KCl</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.36<sup>G</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.61<sup>F</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.98<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.93<sup>E</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.27<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.35<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.41<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.193</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">C-Organic (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.38<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.41<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.41<sup>C</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.43<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.45<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.46<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.52<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.092</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">N-Total (%)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.23<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.26<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.26<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.27<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.29<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.29<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.31<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.005</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> Potential (mg 100/g)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">11.20<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.70<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.80<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">18.00<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.60<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.80<sup>B</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">24.48<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.818</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O Potential (mg 100/g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.55<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.80<sup>CD</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.38<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">20.20<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">49.10<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">49.25<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">50.50<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.847</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">CEC (me/100 g)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">17.65<sup>G</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">21.34<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">20.52<sup>F</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">21.96<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">22.26<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">23.88<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">33.64<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.900</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Means in the same row with different superscript differ significantly (p&lt;0.01); CEC= Cation exchange capacity; P0= control; P1= humic acid; P2= dolomite; P3= organic compost; P4= humic acid and organic compost; P5= dolomite and organic compost; P6= humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Experimental Design</title><p>A completely randomized design (CRD) was applied to analyze seven treatments (P0–P6) and four replicates, totaling 28 plots. Treatments were randomized across the experimental area; a serpentine layout was set to minimize directional gradients, but rows were not considered analytical blocks. Each plot comprised seven ridges with 33 planting holes per ridge (231 plants per plot). For data analysis, plot means (based on seven randomly selected plants—one per ridge) were used as the experimental units to avoid pseudo-replication.</p></sec><sec><title>Soil Chemical Analysis</title><p>Soil samples were collected from the reclamation land at post-mining sites in five representative locations to a depth of 20 cm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">(Widawati &amp; Suliasih, 2019)</xref>. The samples were analyzed for chemical properties, including pH, organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and cation exchange capacity (CEC).</p></sec><sec><title>Soil Ameliorant Materials</title><p>Soil ameliorants used in this research included humic acid, dolomite (CaMg(CO₃)₂), and organic compost. The organic compost—made of 65% cattle manure and 35% chicken manure—was fermented for 3 weeks prior to application. The compost had a pH of 7.27, measured in a 1:5 ratio of compost to distilled water and suspended in a calibrated pH meter. The soil ameliorants were made into seven treatments and four replications, resulting in 28 soil plots (5 x 5 m). The treatments were control (P0) without ameliorants, P1 (28 l ha⁻¹ humic acid), P2 (5.8 t ha⁻¹ dolomite), and P3 (15 t ha⁻¹ organic compost). The combined treatments were P4 (28 L ha⁻¹ humic acid + 15 t ha⁻¹ organic compost), P5 (5.8 t ha⁻¹ dolomite + 15 t ha⁻¹ organic compost), and P6 (28 L ha⁻¹ humic acid + 5.8 t ha⁻¹ dolomite + 15 t ha⁻¹ organic compost). We excluded the combination of dolomite and humic acid treatment without compost to preserve the statistical power because the agronomic benefits of humic substances and liming are attenuated in low-SOC (soil organic carbon) matrices on carbon-poor post-mining soils with depauperate microbial activity. Therefore, compost was adopted as the baseline organic substrate to rebuild soil organic matter (SOM) and to support microbially mediated nutrient cycling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Heisey et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Miralles et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Miu et al., 2022)</xref></p></sec><sec><title>Land Preparation and Application of Soil Ameliorants</title><p>The land was tilled using a hand tractor before staking and forming a ridge to incorporate ameliorants uniformly. Stakes were then installed to mark the borders of the 28 research plots (at 5 x 5 m, with a 2-m interval). Each plot was divided into seven ridges with a 75-cm spacing between ridges and 15-cm spacing between seeds within each ridge, resulting in 231 planting holes per plot. Ameliorants were applied only once, four weeks before planting, manually by spreading the material over the treatment plots. A base fertilizer (organic compost) was applied at 5 t ha⁻¹ two weeks before planting.</p></sec><sec><title>Sorghum Planting and Plant Maintenance</title><p>This study used <italic>S. bicolor</italic> cv. Bioguma-2 (Bioguma-2 sorghum) developed by the Agricultural Research and Development Agency (Balitbangtan) of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia. The sorghum seeds were planted in 231 holes dug into the soil. Prior to planting, the seeds were treated with the insecticide <italic>Confidor</italic><italic><sup>®</sup></italic> to deter ant infestations. Each hole was filled with 3 to 4 seeds at approximately a 5-cm depth and then covered with composted manure. Thinning was performed on days 5 and 14 after sowing (DAS), leaving two plants in each hole.</p><p>The first fertilization—with a combination of 300 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> urea, 100 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> SP36, and 60 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> KCl—was carried out at 14 DAS. Urea was applied in ratoon 2: 100 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> on 14 DAS and 200 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> at 30 DAS. The fertilizers SP36 and KCl were applied as a single dose on 14 DAS. Fertilization was conducted at the same growth stage and in the exact dosage for each planting cycle. Pest control was initiated once the sorghum plants emerged, with biweekly applications of <italic>Regent</italic><italic><sup>®</sup></italic> insecticide to control grasshoppers (<italic>Oxya serville</italic>) and brown planthoppers (Nilaparvata lugens), and <italic>Prevaton</italic><italic><sup>®</sup></italic> to combat armyworms (<italic>Spodoptera litura</italic>). The trial was conducted under rainfed conditions, without supplemental irrigation. Soil moisture was maintained by rainfall, typical of the site during the study period. Harvesting was performed when the sorghum reached the soft dough stage at 100 DAS; subsequent harvests (stages 2 and 3) were carried out 100 days after the previous harvest. The soft dough stage marks the period after the milk stage and before the stiff dough stage, characterized by fully developed grains that have started to harden but can still be compressed by hand.</p></sec><sec><title>Variables and Data Analysis</title><p>The  Bioguma-2  sorghum  was  harvested  thrice—at  the  initial  harvest,  ratoon  1,  and  ratoon  2—100  days  after  sowing  (DAS),  corresponding  to  the  soft  dough  stage   of   the   sorghum.   We   observed   the   agronomic   parameters   (plant   survival   rate,   plant   height,   stem   diameter,  leaf  length  and  width,  leaf  number,  and  tiller  count),  the  fresh  biomass,  dry  weight  of  the  sorghum,  and Brix. The nutritional composition analyzed in this study includes dry matter content, ash content, crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber. Soil conditions before and after the research were examined for the soil pH, content  of  carbon  (C),  nitrogen  (N),  phosphorus  (P),  potassium (K), and cation exchange capacity (CEC). The obtained  data  were  subjected  to  analysis  of  variance (ANOVA),  followed  by  Duncan’s  multiple  range  test  (DMRT) for significant differences between treatments. The  analysis  was  performed  using  IBM  SPSS  Statistics  software, version 27.0.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various soil  ameliorants  on  the  chemical  properties  of  post-coal  mining  soil  and  their  subsequent  impacts  on  the  growth and biomass production of Bioguma-2 sorghum. The   results   are   presented   in   two   parts:   chemical characteristics   of   the   soil   across   treatments   and   the   morphological traits and biomass yield of sorghum.</p><sec><title>Chemical Characteristics of Research Plots Soil</title><p>This study investigated the chemical characteristics of soil in experimental plots subjected to different treatments (P0–P6) and their influence on key soil fertility parameters—soil pH, organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Table 1 shows that the soil pH measured in distilled water (pH H₂O) varied significantly across treatments (p&lt;0.001), ranging from 4.35 in P0 to 6.45 in P6. Similarly, soil pH measured in 1 N KCl showed significant variation (p&lt;0.001) in an increasing trend, from 3.36 in P0 to 6.41 in P6. A steady increase across treatments was observed in organic carbon content, from 0.38% in P0 to 1.52% in P6 (p&lt;0.001), and in total nitrogen (N-total), from 0.23% to 0.31%, with significant differences between treatments (p&lt;0.001). Similarly, potential phosphorus (P₂O₅) content increased from 11.20 mg/100 g in P0 to 24.48 mg/100 g in P6, and potential potassium (K₂O) content rose from 19.38 mg/100 g to 50.50 mg/100 g (p&lt;0.001 for both). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) also showed significant increases with treatment level (p&lt;0.001), from 17.65 me/100 g in P0 to 33.64 me/100 g in P6. </p></sec><sec><title>Plant Survival Rate</title><p>The application of soil ameliorants significantly affected (p&lt;0.01) the survival rate of Bioguma-2 sorghum grown on post-coal mining land (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2</xref>). The highest survival rate was observed in treatment P6 (80.52%), followed by P5 (60.50%), P4 (56.82%), P3 (53.79%), P2 (45.24%), and P1 (44.48%). The lowest survival rate was recorded in the control group, P0 (21.43%). Statistical grouping based on superscripts (A–E) indicates significant differences between treatments at p&lt;0.01 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2</xref>).</p><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p> The graphic survival rate of Bioguma-2 sorghum in post-coal mining land. </p></caption><p>Different superscripts (A, B, C, D, E) differ significantly (p&lt;0.01). P0= control; P1= humic acid; P2= dolomite; P3= organic compost; P4= humic acid and organic compost; P5= dolomite and organic compost; P6= humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost.</p><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/64439/version/45495/34303/419118"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Morphological Characteristics of Bioguma-2 Sorghum</title><p>The application of ameliorant treatments significantly affected the morphological performance of Bioguma-2 sorghum on post-coal mining land across the initial, ratoon 1, and ratoon 2 stages. We found that the plant height was consistently treatment-dependent (p&lt;0.001). At the initial stage, P6 and P5 produced the tallest plants (215.60 and 213.10 cm), while the control (P0) resulted in the shortest (109.80 cm). Similarly, at both ratoon stages, P6 plants remained the highest and P0 plants were the lowest (112.50 cm vs. 40.60 cm). Stem diameter also differed significantly (p&lt;0.001) at the initial stage, where P5, P6, and P4 had the thickest stems (2.23, 2.15, and 2.13 cm), while P0 had the thinnest (1.30 cm). These differences were consistent between ratoon 1 and 2.</p><p>Treatments significantly influenced leaf production at each stage. During the initial phase, P3 (11.75) had the most leaves, followed by P1 (8.50; p=0.002). In ratoon 1 and 2, P6 produced the most leaves (10.50 and 9.50, respectively), while P0 had the least (8.50 and 7.50; p&lt;0.001). Leaf length also varied (p&lt;0.001), with the longest leaves at the initial stage observed in P2 (77.00 cm), P3 (76.60 cm), and P4 (76.13 cm). P3 consistently maintained this superiority across all ratoons. A similar trend was identified in leaf width (p&lt;0.001), in which the widest leaves were P4 (8.73 cm), P6 (8.68 cm), and P5 (8.54 cm) in the initial stage, and the narrowest was P0 (7.00 cm). In the ratoons, P6 consistently produced the widest leaves (8.15 cm and 8.00 cm).</p><p>We observed significant differences in tillering across treatments in ratoon 1 (p=0.015), where P6 produced the most tillers (2.50) and P0 the fewest (1.25). In ratoon 2, the variation was not statistically significant (p=0.188), although P6 still had the most tillers (2.00). Collectively, these results showed that the ameliorant treatments—particularly P6 and P5—produced sustained improvements in plant stature, leaf growth, and tillering, indicating robust morphological advantages for revegetation or bioenergy production on degraded mining soils.</p></sec><sec><title>Yield Production and Brix Content of Bioguma-2 Sorghum</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 3 </xref>shows that across all harvest stages (ratoon 1, ratoon 2), ameliorant treatments strongly affected fresh and dry yields (all p&lt;0.001). In the initial harvest, fresh yield ranged from 6.25 t ha⁻¹ (P0) to 40.84 t ha⁻¹ (P6) and 34.64 t ha⁻¹ (P5). Fresh yield in ratoon 1 varied from 0.56 t ha⁻¹ (P0) to 18.76 t ha⁻¹ (P6), and in ratoon 2 from 0.20 t ha⁻¹ (P0) to 10.25 t ha⁻¹ (P6). Dry yield followed the same ranking: initial at 1.96–13.26 t ha⁻¹ (P0–P6), ratoon 1 at 0.17–6.10 t ha⁻¹, and ratoon 2 at 0.06–3.23 t ha⁻¹, consistently identifying P6 (and generally P5) as the top-performing treatments.</p><p>Brix also improved with ameliorants (p&lt;0.001). At the initial stage, it increased from 10.50% (P0) to 15.00% (P6), while ratoon 1 and 2 were 9.50%–14.50% and 8.50%–13.00%, respectively. P6 consistently showed the highest effect across treatments and stages. These results indicated that the combined ameliorants strategy markedly enhanced both quantity (fresh/dry yield) and quality (Brix) of Bioguma-2 sorghum on post-coal mining land across successive harvests.</p><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p> Morphological characteristics of Bioguma-2 Sorghum at harvest age</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">Parameters</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Harvest stages</th><th align="center" colspan="7" valign="top">Treatments</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">p</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">P0</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P2</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P3</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P4</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P5</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P6</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="left">Plant height (cm)</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Initial</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">109.80<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">142.40<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">150.70<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">183.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">187.10<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">213.10<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">215.60<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7.789</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">112.50<sup>F</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">120.40<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">130.50<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">140.70<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">146.00<sup>B</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">195.00<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">198.70<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.170</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">40.60<sup>G</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60.30<sup>F</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">75.50<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">80.20<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">95.60<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">185.00<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">192.80<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.746</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="left">Stem diameter (cm)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.30<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.45<sup>C</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.70<sup>B</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.78<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.13<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.23<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.15<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.068</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.10<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.30<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.18<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.38<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.03<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.13<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.08<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.836</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ratoon 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.00<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.15<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.05<sup>B</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.30<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.95<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.00<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.08<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.089</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="left">Number of leaves</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.75<sup>BC</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.50<sup>C</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">10.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.75<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.75<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.230</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.002**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.50<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.50<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.75<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.75<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.158</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.50<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.50<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.75<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.75<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.50<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.158</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Leaf length (cm)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Initial</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60.78<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">65.50<sup>BC</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">77.00<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">76.60<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">76.13<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">74.00<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">72.90<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.298</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Ratoon 1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">60.00<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">65.25<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">70.00<sup>BC</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">75.00<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">70.18<sup>BC</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">72.00<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">68.00<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.898</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ratoon 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">58.00<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">63.25<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">68.00<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">73.00<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">68.18<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">70.00<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">66.00<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.898</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Leaf width (cm)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Initial</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7.00<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.10<sup>D</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7.53<sup>CD</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.90<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.73<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.54<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.68<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.143</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.48<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.70<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.18<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.18<sup>C</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7.75<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.45<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.15<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.106</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.25<sup>b</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.38<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.00<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.00<sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.18<sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.13<sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.155</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.041*</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Number of tillers</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.25<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.75<sup>bc</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.00<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.25<sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.00<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.25<sup>ab</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.50<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.103</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.015*</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ratoon 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.00</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.50</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.50</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.50</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.50</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.75</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.095</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.188*</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: 	Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly at p&lt;0.05 (*) or p&lt;0.01 (**). Single asterisk (*) indicates significance at p&lt;0.05, and double asterisks (**) indicate significance at p&lt;0.01. P0= control; P1= humic acid; P2= dolomite; P3= organic compost; P4= humic acid and organic compost; P5= dolomite and organic compost; P6= humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Yield production and Brix content of Bioguma-2 Sorghum in post-coal mining land</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">Parameters</th><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Harvest stages</th><th colspan="7" valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">p</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">P0</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P2</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P3</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P4</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P5</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P6</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Fresh yield (t/ha)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.25<sup>G</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.82<sup>F</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.22<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">18.22<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">21.03<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">34.64<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">40.84<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.326</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.56<sup>G</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.16<sup>F</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.03<sup>E</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.76<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.04<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.56<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">18.76<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.164</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.20<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.90<sup>DE</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.30<sup>DE</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.50<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.00<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.00<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.25<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.651</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Dry yield (t/ha)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.96<sup>G</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.15<sup>F</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.51<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.86<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.69<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.10<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.26<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.757</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.17<sup>G</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.01<sup>F</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.28<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.77<sup>D</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.20<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.66<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.10<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.377</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ratoon 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.06<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.25<sup>DE</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.37<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.42<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.22<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.88<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.23<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.206</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Brix (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.00<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.50<sup>CD</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.50<sup>CD</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.50<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.00<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">15.00<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.285</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ratoon 1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.50<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.00<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.50<sup>CD</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.50<sup>CD</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.50<sup>BC</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.50<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.50<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.313</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.50<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.00<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.75<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.00<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.306</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001**</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: 	Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p&lt;0.01). P0= control; P1= humic acid; P2= dolomite; P3= organic compost; P4= humic acid and organic compost; P5= dolomite and organic compost; P6= humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Nutritional Composition of Bioguma-2 Sorghum</title><p>The nutritional composition of Bioguma-2 sorghum varied across treatments (P0–P6) and harvest stages (initial, ratoon 1, and ratoon 2), as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>. The dry matter (DM) content generally increased across treatments, with the highest values consistently found in P6 at all stages (32.47%, 32.49%, and 31.63%, respectively). The ash content exhibited significant variation among the treatments across all harvest stages (p&lt;0.001). At the initial stage, P4 had the highest ash percentage at 14.67%, while P1 had the lowest at 12.42%. A similar pattern was found in the ratoon stages, where P0 and P1 had higher ash values compared to P3 and P4 in the second ratoon. Crude protein content significantly increased with the application of ameliorant across all stages (p&lt;0.001). The highest crude protein was consistently recorded in P6 (13.47%, 14.04%, and 14.04%), while P0 had the lowest (11.64%, 12.00%, and 11.61%). Crude fat content was also significantly affected by treatments (p&lt;0.001). During the initial stage, P3, P4, and P5 recorded the highest crude fat values, while P6 was the lowest. In the first ratoon, fat content peaked in P0 and P5, while the lowest was in P3 and P6. In ratoon 2, fat values remained consistent across treatments, ranging from 5.71% to 6.72%. Crude fiber content varied significantly across treatments and growth stages (p&lt;0.001). Generally, the highest fiber values were recorded in treatments P0 and P3, while the lowest values were observed in treatment P6 during both the initial and first ratoon stages. In ratoon 2, P0 had the highest fiber content (36.76%), whereas P4 and P5 had the lowest.</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Nutritional composition of Bioguma-2 sorghum based on harvest stage</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">Parameters</th><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Harvest stages</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="7">Treatments</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">SEM</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">p</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">P0</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P2</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">P3</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P4</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">P5</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">P6</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Dry matter (%)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Initial</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">31.41</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">31.29</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">32.04</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">32.18</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">31.83</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">32.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">32.47</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.121</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.084</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">30.26</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">31.92</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">31.66</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">32.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">31.87</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">32.01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">32.49</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.227</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.219</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">26.80</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">27.91</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">29.23</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">29.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">30.63</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">31.33</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">31.63</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.879</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.777</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Ash (%DM)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Initial</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.68<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.42<sup>E</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.03<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.96<sup>BC</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.67<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.33<sup>AB</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.96<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.144</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.27<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.56<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.96<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.90<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.79<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.22<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.77<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.128</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.22<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.20<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.50<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.35<sup>D</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">12.24<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.75<sup>BC</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.94<sup>ABC</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.153</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Crude protein (%DM)</td><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.64<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.81<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.06<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.46<sup>ABC</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.01<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.07<sup>AB</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.47<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.153</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.00<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.38<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.46<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.22<sup>ABC</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.39<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.91<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.04<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.174</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="left">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.61<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.28<sup>CD</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">12.44<sup>CD</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.98<sup>BC</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13.45<sup>AB</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.60<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.04<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.167</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Crude fat (%DM)</td><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Initial</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.35<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.35<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.59<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.92<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.84<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.85<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.06<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.066</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Ratoon 1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.86<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.50<sup>A</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.69<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.90<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.28<sup>AB</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.85<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.87<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.088</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.65<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.39<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.42<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.24<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.59<sup>A</sup></td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.71<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.72<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.075</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Crude fiber (%DM)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="middle">Initial</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">35.67<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">34.19<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">34.53<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">37.49<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">34.57<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.67<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">33.81<sup>C</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.231</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="left">Ratoon 1</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.62<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">33.27<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">36.22<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">34.74<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.01<sup>CD</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.42<sup>BC</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">33.56<sup>E</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.198</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1">Ratoon 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">36.76<sup>A</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.04<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">35.05<sup>B</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">34.55<sup>C</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">33.70<sup>D</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">33.86<sup>D</sup></td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">35.16<sup>B</sup></td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.185</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p&lt;0.01). P0= control; P1= humic acid; P2= dolomite; P3= organic compost; P4= humic acid and organic compost; P5= dolomite and organic compost; P6= humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Comparison of morphological characteristics of Bioguma-2 sorghum</p></caption><p> P0= control; P1= humic acid; P2= dolomite; P3= organic compost; P4= humic acid and organic compost; P5= dolomite and organic compost; P6= humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/download/64439/version/45495/34303/419119" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><sec><title>Enhancement of Soil Chemical Properties by Ameliorant Treatments</title><p>Soil chemical quality improvements depend on the quantity of ameliorants applied to it and the functional complementarity of these substances. In acidic soils with low organic matter (SOM), a three-way combination of ameliorants offers synergistic benefits. First, dolomite neutralizes soil acidity and supplies Ca–Mg, thus raising pH and base saturation. Then, compost adds soil organic matter (SOM) that increases CEC, buffers pH, and delivers slow-release nutrients while supporting microbial activity. Lastly, humic acid complexes nutrients, enhances root physiological responses, and promotes aggregation, which increases nutrient availability and retention <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Alsudays et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Rose et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">(Stewart-Wade, 2020)</xref>. Compost efficacy is highly contingent upon the type of feedstock and maturity. The combination of well-matured plant manure with moderate carbon to nitrogen (C:N) typically yields the most consistent gains; therefore, quality testing prior to field use is recommended. For field conditions, base-dressing rates of ~10–15 t ha⁻¹ are generally effective on acidic, low-SOM soils. In addition, dolomite has reportedly improved soil conditions by supplying essential cations and elevating soil pH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Krismawati et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">(Wahyudi et al., 2019)</xref>.</p><p>Consistent with this synergy, treatment P6 (humic acid + compost + dolomite) in our study produced the largest, statistically robust improvements in soil chemical properties (p&lt;0.001), including pH (from 4.35 in P0 to 6.45), organic carbon (from 0.38% to 1.52%), total nitrogen (from 0.23% to 0.31%), available phosphorus and potassium, and CEC (from 17.65 to 33.64 me/100 g). Mechanistically, the liming effect of dolomite shifted pH into a range that reduces Al³⁺ toxicity and enhances phosphate availability; compost increased exchange sites and buffering through added soil organic matter (SOM); and humic substances improved nutrient complexation and root uptake—yielding greater nutrient availability than any single or two-way ameliorants.</p></sec><sec><title>Relationship Between Soil Quality and Plant Survival</title><p>lant survival is closely related to soil chemical quality. In this study, survival rate increases with the soil pH, indicating that ameliorant treatments have resulted in a more optimal pH. It is aligned with previous studies that the optimal range of soil pH allows more plants to survive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Crespo-Mendes et al., 2019)</xref> and that the survival rate of sorghum ranges from 60% to 80%, depending on the variety <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-63">(Yartsev et al., 2024)</xref>. In this study, the highest survival rate is 80.52%, observed in treatment P6, with the highest pH and nutrient content, whereas P0 (control) was only 21.43% (p&lt;0.01). These results indicated a strong positive correlation between the use of ameliorant and plant viability.</p><p>Treatments incorporating different ameliorant materials showed increased survival rates. In this study, humic acid acted as a plant regulator and contributed to significant quantities of plant growth hormones. It was in line with previous studies that growth hormones can stimulate root and crown growth, thus maintaining plants in stressful conditions <xref rid="BIBR-22" ref-type="bibr">(Khan et al., 2023)</xref>. In addition, organic compost can enhance stress resilience in plants by gradually providing nutrients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Ahmed et al., 2023)</xref> and promote robust plant growth and development by serving as a slow-release source of essential nutrients, including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-53">(Suvendran et al., 2025)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Morphological Performance of Sorghum in Response to Ameliorants</title><p>The improvement in soil quality has been reported to positively correlate with the morphological characteristics of the plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Cuiyun et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Drăghici et al., 2024)</xref>, including plant height <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Maftuchah et al., 2021)</xref>. In general, we observed that the combination of ameliorant materials (humic acid, organic compost, and dolomite) resulted in the best morphological characteristics of Bioguma-2 sorghum (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 2</xref>). First, plant height in P6 reached 215.60 cm at the initial stage, remained superior during ratoon stages, and was significantly higher than P0 (109.80 cm) (p&lt;0.001). It has been reported that the determining factors for plant morphological characteristics include the availability of macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Khalofah et al., 2022)</xref> reported that increasing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels significantly improved plant height, leaf length, and leaf width. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) enhances nutrient availability in the soil, reduces the competition effects between cations such as Ca, Mg, and K <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">(Yang et al., 2024)</xref>, and affects plant height. Secondly, we observed a statistically significant relationship between plant height and stem diameter, where taller plants in P5 and P6 also had thicker stems (2.23 cm and 2.15 cm, respectively). This finding confirms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abdullah et al., 2024)</xref>, who found a positive correlation between height and stem diameter.</p><p>The third morphological characteristic is the number of leaves. Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) in dolomite stimulate cell turgor and chlorophyll formation, which enhances the products of photosynthesis<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Sambi et al., 2023)</xref>. At the same time, dolomite supplies phosphorus nutrients that promote plant growth, which is evident in the increased number of leaves and taller plants. Composting, through the decomposition of organic materials, positively influences leaf parameters. These findings confirm a previous study that compost improves leaf characteristics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Kortei, 2016)</xref> and that organic fertilizers improve soil health by increasing soil organic matter (SOM), boosting nutrient uptake, enhancing water-holding capacity, and improving cation exchange capacity (CEC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Liu et al., 2024)</xref>. Therefore, enhancing soil health can naturally support better plant growth.</p><p>We found that water availability influenced the next morphological characteristic, the number of tillers in sorghum plants. A significant difference was observed in ratoon 1 (p=0.015), where P6 had 2.50 tillers while P0 only had 1.25 in P0, highlighting the role of improved soil structure and moisture retention. Despite all plants receiving the same irrigation, we discovered that different ameliorant treatments influenced soil conditions, resulting in varying water absorption capacities among the plants. It confirms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Dariah et al., 2021)</xref>, who reported that soil ameliorant treatment positively affected water aggregate stability. Under water stress, ameliorants positively affect yields, suggesting improved water retention and nutrient availability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Ismail et al., 2025)</xref>. </p></sec><sec><title>Biomass Yield and Juice Quality (Brix)</title><p>Healthy soils improve nutrient availability, water retention, and root development, all of which are essential for strong crop yields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Srivastava et al., 2024)</xref>. In our study, yields declined across harvest stages in every treatment (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 3</xref>). Even in the top treatment (P6), the fresh yield decreased from 40.84 t ha⁻¹ (initial) to only 46% or 18.76 t ha⁻¹ in ratoon 1 and to 25% or 10.25 t ha⁻¹ in ratoon 2. A similar pattern was observed in dry matter yields, where they decreased from 13.26 t ha⁻¹ (initial stage) to 6.10 t ha⁻¹ (ratoon 1) to 3.23 t ha⁻¹ (ratoon 2), marking 46% and 24% of the initial stage in the respective ratoons. Brix values—an indicator of juice quality—were the highest in P6 across all stages (15.00%, 14.50%, and 13.00% for the initial stage, ratoon 1, and ratoon 2, respectively). It indicated a greater biomass and improved juice quality, relevant for both silage and bioethanol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Costa et al., 2021)</xref>.</p><p>From a physiological standpoint, ratoon regrowth depends on non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) reserves stored in stubble and roots; repeated cutting and an aging root system reduce regrowth vigor. Biomass recovery of the rainfed, acidic, low-SOM post-mining land in this study was further limited by the nutrient drawdown—especially N and K—together with water stress and untilled rhizosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Wang et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-68">(Zhou et al., 2022)</xref>. These constraints explain the consistent decline from the initial harvest to ratoon 1 and ratoon 2 across treatments. Conversely, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Leavitt et al., 2023)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Qi et al., 2024)</xref> reported that the second cuts, which equaled or exceeded the first, usually occurred in well-managed stands with adequate N split/top-dressing and an appropriate cutting height that preserves basal buds, often under favorable moisture. Such conditions were nonexistent on our site, which explained the low ratoon yields. Consistent with these agronomic limitations, soil acidification has been shown to depress growth and yield in related ratooning systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Pang et al., 2025)</xref>. Here, poorer crop performance is frequently accompanied by modest declines in Brix, thus reinforcing Brix as a practical product-quality indicator <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Costa et al., 2021)</xref>.</p><p>To mitigate ratoon decline on acidic post-mining soils, future management should consider light post-harvest tillage to refresh the rhizosphere, supplemental organic fertilization to sustain nutrient supply, and optimized N management (rate and split/top-dressing). Where feasible, maintaining an appropriate cutting height (to protect basal buds) and improving soil moisture availability are also recommended <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Wang et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-68">(Zhou et al., 2022)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Nutritional Composition of Bioguma-2 Sorghum</title><p>The nutritional composition of Bioguma-2 sorghum was influenced by ameliorant treatments (P0–P6) across all harvest stages. The most consistent gain occurred in crude protein (CP), where P6 (humic acid + dolomite + organic compost) had the highest CP at each harvest (13.47–14.04% DM). This percentage is slightly above the figure reported for brown-midrib (BMR) forage sorghum, which averaged at 10.4%, 9.4%, 8.2%, and 8.1% DM at boot, flower, and milk and soft-dough stages, respectively (stage-specific means), and where the BMR trait primarily improves fiber digestibility rather than CP per se <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Lyons et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(McCary et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Pupo et al., 2022)</xref>. In sorghum–sudangrass hybrids (SSG) in pasture settings, CP frequently remained less than 13% of DM across seasons and systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Guretzky et al., 2021)</xref>. In this study, CP in P6 exceeded 10% of DM, which was similar to the whole-plant sweet-sorghum silage/fresh material <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-66">(Zhang et al., 2015)</xref> but markedly higher than the physiologically mature grain sorghum stover CP at 3.2–5.4% of DM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">(Tulu et al., 2025)</xref>. It is evident that combined organic-inorganic ameliorants have raised CP concentration optimally, confirming previous findings that mixed ameliorants enhance N status and overall forage quality with possible fiber/lignin trade-offs affecting digestibility<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Colombini et al., 2012)</xref>.</p><p>Dry matter (DM) content also increased with ameliorant application, with P6 consistently having the highest values across stages, although not significantly different from other treatments (p&gt;0.05). This increase may be attributed to improved nutrient availability and soil structure, which enhances biomass production and physiological maturity. These results are consistent with de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Silva et al., 2020)</xref>, who found that modern sorghum hybrids respond positively to nitrogen fertilization with increased dry matter production and nutrient accumulation. This indicates that the water content of sorghum across treatments was relatively similar. In other words, the application of soil ameliorants enhanced total biomass production, thereby increasing the absolute dry matter yield, but did not alter the proportion of water retained in the plant tissues. Similar DM percentages across treatments suggest that the physiological water status of the plants remained stable despite differences in growth and biomass accumulation.</p><p>Ash content, reflecting total mineral accumulation, was significantly affected by treatment and harvest stages. Higher ash concentrations in P4 and P5 during the initial harvest and in P0 and P1 during the second ratoon suggested variations in nutrient uptake dynamics, likely influenced by organic matter interactions and nutrient release rates. These observations align with reports by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Koláčková et al., 2020)</xref> that sorghum thrives under variable fertility conditions and that nutrient uptake can be modulated by soil properties and ameliorant types.</p><p>Crude fat content showed inconsistent trends across treatments and stages. In the initial harvest, treatments P3–P5 exhibited higher fat content, whereas P6 had comparatively lower values. This suggests that fat synthesis may respond differently to ameliorant combinations, potentially linked to variations in metabolic allocation or plant stress response. By ratoon 2, differences in fat content diminished, indicating stabilization across treatments. Crude fiber (CF) content was the highest in P0 and P3 during the early stages but generally lower in the combined treatments of P4–P6, indicating improved forage quality and potential digestibility benefits. However, Sher et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Sher et al., 2022)</xref>insist that increased organic input can sometimes raise lignin levels, which may offset digestibility gains despite lower fiber concentrations. </p><p>In addition to nutrient composition, the broader adaptability of sorghum should be acknowledged. Sorghum is known for its resilience in suboptimal environments, including dry and nutrient-poor soils  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Koláčková et al., 2020)</xref>. The use of brown midrib (BMR) mutant lines, such as GH2.3, has shown the potential to improve forage digestibility <xref rid="BIBR-56" ref-type="bibr">(Wahyono et al., 2023)</xref>. </p><p>These genetic improvements, combined with effective soil management strategies like P6 in this study, could further enhance forage value. Furthermore, while potassium is the most absorbed nutrient by sorghum, it may be unnecessary in soils with adequate K levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Silva et al., 2020)</xref>, suggesting the importance of site-specific fertilization strategies.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>The combined application of humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost significantly improved soil chemical properties, plant survival, growth, biomass yield, and nutritional composition of Bioguma-2 sorghum, which was planted on the post-coal mining land in South Kalimantan. Enhanced soil pH, nutrient availability, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) were closely linked to better morphological traits and higher crude protein content. These findings underscore the significance of integrated soil ameliorants in restoring degraded lands and enhancing the forage quality. Further research should explore long-term impacts and genotype-specific responses to optimize sorghum productivity under various environmental conditions.</p></sec><sec><title>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title><p>L. Abdullah serves as editor of the Tropical Animal Science Journal but has no role in the decision to publish this article. The authors also declare that they have no conflicts of interest—financial, personal, or otherwise—that could have influenced or be perceived to influence the content of this manuscript.</p></sec><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT </title><p>The author gratefully acknowledges the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia for the financial support provided through the 2025 Doctoral Dissertation Research Grant Scheme (Penelitian Disertasi Doktor/PDD) under the Grant Number 006/C3/DT.05.00/PL/2025. This support has been essential for the successful implementation and completion of this research. Sincere gratitude is also extended to PT Arutmin Indonesia, Asamasam Mine, for granting access to the research site.</p></sec><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Scopus AI strictly to support literature discovery (e.g., surfacing relevant papers and refining search queries), and Grammarly to check grammar, clarity, and concision. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="how-to-cite"><title>How to Cite</title><p>Kuswoyo, A., Abdullah, L., Karti, P. D. M. H. ., Human, S., Rostini, T., Mulyono, E. E., &amp; Wawan, E. (2025). Morphology, Biomass, and Forage Quality of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 Treated with Soil Ameliorants on Post-Coal Mining Land. <italic>Tropical Animal Science Journal</italic>, <italic>48</italic>(6), 545-555. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2025.48.6.545</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Correlation analysis between watering interval, stem height, stem diameter, and number of leaves in jackfruit seedlings (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lamk</article-title><source>JERAMI: Indonesian Journal of Crop Science</source><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>U.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurfaizah</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yana</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akbar</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilis</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><page-range>10-17</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25077/jijcs.7.2.13-16.2024</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Fertilization of microbial composts: a technology for improving stress resilience in plants</article-title><source>Plants</source><volume>12</volume><issue>20</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Noman</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shahid</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussain</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Masood</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Negm</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Kott</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>3550</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12203550</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Applications of humic and fulvic acid under saline soil conditions to improve growth and yield in barley</article-title><source>BMC Plant Biology</source><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alsudays</surname><given-names>I.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alshammary</surname><given-names>F.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alabdallah</surname><given-names>N.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alatawi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alotaibi</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alwutayd</surname><given-names>K.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alharbi</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alghanem</surname><given-names>S.M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alzuaibr</surname><given-names>F.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gharib</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Awad-Allah</surname><given-names>M.M.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>191</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-024-04863-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Screening potential local seed species for hydroseeding of post-coal mining land multilayering revegetation</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anshari</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>A.A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leksono</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arisoesilaningsih</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>1</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2023.111.4969</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Secondary succession of vegetation in the former coal mine area PT</article-title><source>Bukit Asam Tbk. Journal of Smart Agriculture and Environmental Technology</source><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Asnawi</surname><given-names>A.S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Windusari</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harun</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.60105/josaet.v1i3.39</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Activation of dolomite for passive treatment of mine drainage in a circular economy perspective with zero-waste objective</article-title><source>IJERMCE</source><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Calugaru</surname><given-names>I.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouafif</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Etteieb</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faraji</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><page-range>44-51</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Milk production, nitrogen balance, and fiber digestibility prediction of corn, whole plant grain sorghum, and forage sorghum silages in the dairy cow</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>95</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Colombini</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Galassi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Crovetto</surname><given-names>G.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rapetti</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>4457</fpage><lpage>4467</lpage><page-range>4457-4467</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2011-4444</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>UltraBrix: A device for measuring the soluble solids content in sugarcane</article-title><source>Sustainability</source><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>M.V.A.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontes</surname><given-names>C.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Júnior</surname><given-names>E.C.D.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1227</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13031227</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Relationships between plant species richness and soil pH at the level of biome and ecoregion in Brazil</article-title><source>Ecological Indicators</source><volume>98</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crespo-Mendes</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laurent</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruun</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hauschild</surname><given-names>M.Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>266</fpage><lpage>275</lpage><page-range>266-275</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.004</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Correlation between soil environment and yield and quality of sharen (Amomi fructus) under different planting patterns</article-title><source>Digital Chinese Medicine</source><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cuiyun</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yihang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jing</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hongyou</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhaoyou</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deying</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oo</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lixia</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>221</fpage><lpage>233</lpage><page-range>221-233</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dcmed.2023.07.011</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The use of soil ameliorants to improve soil quality and crop productivity of degraded semi-arid upland in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>648</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dariah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurida</surname><given-names>N.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salma</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurjaya</surname></name><name><surname>Santi</surname><given-names>L.P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>012159</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012159</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacterial biofilm-mediated environmental remediation: Navigating strategies to attain Sustainable Development Goals</article-title><source>Journal of Environmental Management</source><volume>370</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pradhan</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panda</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Behera</surname><given-names>A.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumari</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mallick</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>122745</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122745</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of green cowpea manure on the quality properties of sandy soils under the specific conditions of the dry climate in Romania</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drăghici</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nanu</surname><given-names>Ștefan</given-names></name><name><surname>Diaconu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bîrsoghe</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Netcu</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paraschiv</surname><given-names>A.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dima</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>2474</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14112474</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Chemical properties of acid soil after amelioration of dolomite, coal, and microbes</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>978</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Firnia</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rohmawati</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>012010</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/978/1/012010</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Interseeding annual warm‐season grasses into pastures: Forage nutritive value and yields</article-title><source>Agronomy Journal</source><volume>113</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guretzky</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harmoney</surname><given-names>K.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moyer</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Volesky</surname><given-names>J.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stephenson</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>2544</fpage><lpage>2556</lpage><page-range>2544-2556</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/agj2.20653</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A single application of compost can leave lasting impacts on soil microbial community structure and alter cross-domain interaction networks</article-title><source>Frontiers in Soil Science</source><volume>2</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heisey</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ryals</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maaz</surname><given-names>T.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>N.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>749212</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsoil.2022.749212</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Variation in soil characteristics of ex-coal mining areas in Sawahlunto, West Sumatra</article-title><source>BIO Web of Conferences</source><volume>99</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herman</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Iskandar</surname><given-names>Budi</given-names></name><name><surname>W.</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pulunggono</surname><given-names>H.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syaputra</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Kurniati</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>05010</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/bioconf/20249905010</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Ciri agronomi dan serat delapan varian sorgum sebagai pakan</article-title><source>Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia</source><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Indriatama</surname><given-names>W.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Puspitasari</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Teguh Sasongko</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nur Anggraeny</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Human</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sihono</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurniawan</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutiyoso</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayu Wulandari</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahyono</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>344</fpage><lpage>351</lpage><page-range>344-351</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18343/jipi.28.3.344</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Impact of soil ameliorants on soil chemical characteristics, sugar beet water productivity, and yield components in sandy soils under deficit irrigation</article-title><source>Sustainability</source><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Almulhim</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sedky</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Cossy</surname><given-names>S.A.-N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahmoud</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1513</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su17041513</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of coal mining activities on soil’s agrochemical and biochemical properties</article-title><source>Qubahan Academic Journal</source><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ivanova</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vesnina</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fotina</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prosekov</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>387</fpage><lpage>399</lpage><page-range>387-399</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.58429/qaj.v3n4a229</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The impact of NPK fertilizer on growth and nutrient accumulation in juniper (Juniperus procera) trees grown on fire-damaged and intact soils</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khalofah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghramh</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Qthanin</surname><given-names>R.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>L’taief</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>0262685</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0262685</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Defensive role of plant hormones in advancing abiotic stress-resistant rice plants</article-title><source>Rice Science</source><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>M.I.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumari</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nazir</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khanna</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chhillar</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>15</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><page-range>15-35</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rsci.2022.08.002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of variety, sowing date and location on yield and nutritional characteristics of sorghum</article-title><source>Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis</source><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koláčková</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baholet</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gruberová</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smutný</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elzner</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Horký</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Skládanka</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rábek</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>529</fpage><lpage>537</lpage><page-range>529-537</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11118/actaun202068030529</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of compost prepared from household waste and poultry manure in compost- soil mixtures on the growth and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L</article-title><source>Scientia Agriculturae</source><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kortei</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15192/PSCP.SA.2016.13.3.163167</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="conf-paper"><article-title>Effectiveness of dolomite on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays l</article-title><source>in dry land. International Conference on Tropical Agrifood, Feed and Fuel (ICTAFF 2021</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krismawati</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Latifah</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Sugiono</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><publisher-loc>Samarinda, Indonesia</publisher-loc><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2991/absr.k.220102.002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of water management and ratoon rice cropping on methane emissions and yield in Arkansas</article-title><source>Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment</source><volume>356</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leavitt</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreno-García</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Reavis</surname><given-names>C.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Reba</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Runkle</surname><given-names>B.R.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>108652</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2023.108652</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Growth evaluation of native tree species planted on post coal mining reclamation site in East Kalimantan, Indonesia</article-title><source>Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity</source><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lestari</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiqa</surname><given-names>A.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fauziah</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Budiharta</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>134</fpage><lpage>143</lpage><page-range>134-143</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d200116</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Multifaceted ability of organic fertilizers to improve crop productivity and abiotic stress tolerance: review and perspectives</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1141</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14061141</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimal harvest timing for brown midrib forage sorghum yield, nutritive value, and ration performance</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>102</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lyons</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ketterings</surname><given-names>Q.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Godwin</surname><given-names>G.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherney</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherney</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amburgh</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meisinger</surname><given-names>J.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kilcer</surname><given-names>T.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>7134</fpage><lpage>7149</lpage><page-range>7134-7149</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2019-16516</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Land subsidence in a coal mining area reduced soil fertility and led to soil degradation in arid and semi-arid regions</article-title><source>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</source><volume>16</volume><issue>20</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>3929</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16203929</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Morphological diversity and heritability of nine local sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genotypes in East Java, Indonesia</article-title><source>Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity</source><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maftuchah</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Febriana</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sulistyawati</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Reswari</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Septia</surname><given-names>E.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d220330</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Agronomy characteristics of several types of sorghum from radiation mutations as a ruminant animal feed provide</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>399</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malalantang</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karti</surname><given-names>P.D.M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Permana</surname><given-names>I.G.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Nurmahmudi</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>012031</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Graduate Student Literature Review: Current perspectives on whole-plant sorghum silage production and utilization by lactating dairy cows</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>103</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McCary</surname><given-names>C.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vyas</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faciola</surname><given-names>A.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferraretto</surname><given-names>L.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>5783</fpage><lpage>5790</lpage><page-range>5783-5790</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2019-18122</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Functional and taxonomic effects of organic amendments on the restoration of semiarid quarry soils</article-title><source>mSystems</source><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miralles</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ortega</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Comeau</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>00752</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><page-range>00752-21</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00752-21</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bringing life back into former mining sites: a mini-review on soil remediation using organic amendments</article-title><source>Sustainability</source><volume>14</volume><issue>19</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miu</surname><given-names>B.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pop</surname><given-names>C.-E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Crăciun</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deák</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>12469</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su141912469</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A technology package to improve growth and yield of sweet sorghum in ex-coal mining land, East Kalimantan, Indonesia</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Munawwarah</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sulaeman</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2023.102.4281</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Application of humic substances and bottom ash compounds in improving soil quality in limestone post-mining land</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>807</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Musfira</surname><given-names>Jayadi</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>022038</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/807/2/022038</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Increasing the potential of the quality of ex-mining land for oil palm plants with composting and humic acid methods as soil remedies</article-title><source>International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT</source><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ngapiyatun</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aziza</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mirasari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarie</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sukariyan</surname></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Wartomo</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1001</fpage><lpage>1010</lpage><page-range>1001-1010</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV1090</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Penentuan parameter desain mesin perontok sorgum berdasarkan karakteristik fisik dan mekanik tanaman sorgum</article-title><source>Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nurhasanah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hermawan</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Unadi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>T.J.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Susanto</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arif</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hidayat</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suparlan</surname><given-names>Amalia</given-names></name><name><surname>F.</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Teguh</surname><given-names>W.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uning</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>P.D.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adji</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19028/jtep.011.1.76-87</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Soil acidification reduces flavonoids and key metabolites in sugarcane roots and rhizosphere leading to yield decline</article-title><source>Rhizosphere</source><volume>33</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>101028</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rhisph.2025.101028</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Assessment of soil characteristics in the vicinity of open cast coal mine and its suitability for vegetative reclamation in Charhi and Kuju of Jharkhand, India</article-title><source>Journal of Environmental Biology</source><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prathap</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kujur</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chakraborty</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>523</fpage><lpage>528</lpage><page-range>523-528</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of season, variety type, and trait on dry matter yield, nutrient composition, and predicted intake and milk yield of whole-plant sorghum forage</article-title><source>Journal of Dairy Science</source><volume>105</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pupo</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wallau</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferraretto</surname><given-names>L.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>5776</fpage><lpage>5785</lpage><page-range>5776-5785</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2021-21706</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of ameliorant application in abundance of soil microbiology on coal mine reclamation land at Muaro Jambi Regency of Jambi Province</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source><volume>393</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Purnamayani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hendri</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cahyana</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>012053</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/393/1/012053</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Mowing and nitrogen management guidelines for superior rice ratoon yields</article-title><source>Field Crops Research</source><volume>308</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harrison</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>109302</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109302</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bioremediation of ex-mining soil with the biocompost in the incubation experiments</article-title><source>Applied and Environmental Soil Science</source><volume>2023</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sufardi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syafruddin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rusdi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>4129909</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2023/4129909</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Open windrow composting of lignocellulosic crop residues and neem litter: Accounting for reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions</article-title><source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source><volume>478</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jain</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Misra</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prasad</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Purakayastha</surname><given-names>T.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhatia</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sethi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>143964</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143964</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of dolomite and pig manure on growth and production of carrots (Daucus carota</article-title><source>Nusantara Bioscience</source><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sambi</surname><given-names>N.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Limbongan</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pata’Dungan</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/nusbiosci/n150103</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Combined application of organic and inorganic amendments improved the yield and nutritional quality of forage sorghum</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sher</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adnan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sattar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ul-Allah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ijaz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>M.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manaf</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qayyum</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elesawy</surname><given-names>B.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>K.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gharib</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>El Askary</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>896</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12040896</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Potassic and nitrogen fertilization in a modern hybrid of sorghum for biomass production cultivated in an Oxisol</article-title><source>Australian Journal of Crop Science</source><volume>14</volume><issue>01</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>F.D.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavalcante</surname><given-names>T.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barbosa</surname><given-names>K.D.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castoldi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Freiberger</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>F.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><page-range>179-186</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21475/ajcs.20.14.01.p2163</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Advancements in soil management: Optimizing crop production through interdisciplinary approaches</article-title><source>Journal of Agriculture and Food Research</source><volume>18</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Srivastava</surname><given-names>R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Purohit</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>101528</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101528</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Efficacy of organic amendments used in containerized plant production: Part 1 – Compost-based amendments</article-title><source>Scientia Horticulturae</source><volume>266</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stewart-Wade</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>108856</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108856</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Ex-coal mine lands and their land suitability for agricultural commodities in South Kalimantan</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sukarman</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdul Gani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>2171</fpage><lpage>2183</lpage><page-range>2171-2183</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2020.073.2171</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Soil fertility and plant growth enhancement through compost treatments under varied irrigation conditions</article-title><source>Agriculture</source><volume>15</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suvendran</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Acevedo</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smithers</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>S.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>734</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture15070734</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Forage production and nutrient composition of different sorghum varieties cultivated with indigofera in intercropping system</article-title><source>Media Peternakan</source><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telleng</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>K.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karti</surname><given-names>P.D.M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Permana</surname><given-names>I.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><page-range>203-209</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/medpet.2016.39.3.203</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Stover yield, morphological fractions and nutrient composition of five stay-green sorghum (Sorghum biochar L.) varieties at the physiological maturity stage</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tulu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diribsa</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gadisa</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Temesgen</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>41753</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41753</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Forage-yield and nutrient quality of new brown midrib (BMR) mutant lines of sorghum</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wahyono</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Indriatama</surname><given-names>W.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasongko</surname><given-names>W.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shafira</surname><given-names>E.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hidayat</surname><given-names>T.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widodo</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Widiawati</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rofiq</surname><given-names>M.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anggraeny</surname><given-names>Y.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurniawati</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dasumiati</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><page-range>63-73</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2023.46.1.63</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effects of doses and methods of lime placement to</article-title><source>Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science</source><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wahyudi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma’as</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanudin</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Utami</surname><given-names>S.N.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>N</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>K</surname><given-names>Ca</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>166</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22146/ipas.30097</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Close correlation between sugarcane ratoon decline and rhizosphere ecological factors</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zuo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>20738</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-024-70613-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of environmental factors on soil nutrient loss under conditions of mining disturbance in a coalfield</article-title><source>Forests</source><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1370</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f12101370</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Role of indigenous nitrogen-fixing bacteria in promoting plant growth on post tin mining soil</article-title><source>Makara Journal of Science</source><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Widawati</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suliasih</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><page-range>28-38</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7454/mss.v23i1.10801</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Nauclea orientalis for potential reclamation of tropical coal mining areas</article-title><source>Environmental Advances</source><volume>15</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wulandari</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nufus</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Faridah</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maulana</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tawaraya</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>100462</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100462</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of balancing exchangeable cations Ca, Mg, and K on the growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on increased soil cation exchange capacity</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>629</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14030629</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Productivity of sorghum crops in the southern chernozems of the Orenburg region</article-title><source>BIO Web of Conferences</source><volume>108</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yartsev</surname><given-names>G.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gulyanov</surname><given-names>Yu A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baikasenov</surname><given-names>R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aimuratov</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolmatov</surname><given-names>A.P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>05001</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/bioconf/202410805001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Changes in soil quality over time focusing on organic acid content in restoration areas following coal mining</article-title><source>CATENA</source><volume>218</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>106567</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2022.106567</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Coal mining subsidence on soil nutrients and enzymes of artificial forest in Northern China</article-title><source>Ciência Rural</source><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>20230348</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0103-8478cr20230348</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value, fermentation and methane characteristics</article-title><source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source><volume>206</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaudhry</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Osman</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>C.Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names>G.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dewhurst</surname><given-names>R.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><page-range>29-38</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.05.006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Sorghum: a multipurpose crop</article-title><source>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</source><volume>71</volume><issue>46</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sui</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>17570</fpage><lpage>17583</lpage><page-range>17570-17583</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04942</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Border effect on ratoon crop yield in a mechanized rice ratooning system</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>262</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12020262</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>