Land Redistribution and the Paradox of Rural Pluriactivity: The Case of Dukuh Kaung Hamlet in Bogor Regency, Indonesia

Authors

  • Tri Ratna Chaniyatun Nisa Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Jl. Kamper Darmaga, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Shohibuddin Centre for Agricultural and Rural Development Studies, IPB University, Jl. Raya Pajajaran, Bogor, 16144, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22500/13202563567

Keywords:

agrarian reform, land redistribution, livelihood strategies, rural pluriactivity, Sajogyo, socio-economic equity

Abstract

While land redistribution is widely recognized as a catalyst for rural economic improvement, the mere transfer of property rights frequently culminates in risk-averse survival strategies rather than sustained economic expansion. To unpack this agrarian paradox, this study anchors its analysis in Sajogyo’s “Eight Paths of Equity Plus” framework to examine the dynamic relationship between land control, employment, and business opportunities in Dukuh Kaung, Bogor Regency—a frontline of agrarian reform in Indonesia. Utilizing an exploratory sequential mixed-method design, qualitative insights were integrated with a census of 48 households controlling ex-HGU land in Pasir Kolecer Block. Spearman’s rank correlation revealed a statistically significant, moderate positive relationship between the size of land controlled and both productive employment (p = 0.022; r = 0.330) and entrepreneurial ventures (p = 0.041; r = 0.263). Although de facto redistribution successfully democratised land access and eradicated absolute landlessness for 70.8% of previously landless households, the structural transition towards rural equity remains severely stunted. The high prevalence of extremely rural pluriactivity—with 37.5% of households engaging in four or more simultaneous jobs—indicates a necessity-driven survival strategy to compensate for insufficient agricultural returns, exacerbated by emerging resource concentration via distress land sales. The study concludes that while land access provides the necessary foundational asset, it is fundamentally insufficient without a comprehensive “Agrarian Reform Plus” architecture—encompassing formal credit, training, market integration, and infrastructural support—to elevate rural livelihoods from precarious survival to sustainable commercial growth.

References

Assiyah, A. S. N., & Shohibuddin, M. (2025). Land Utilization After Land Occupation: A Case of Peasant Movement in Nanggung District, Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 887–906. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.24.02.887-906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.24.02.887-906

Chen, L., Peng, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Research on the Impact of Rural Land Transfer on Non-Farm Employment of Farm Households: Evidence from Hubei Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315587

Chipenda, C., & Adesina, J. (2025). Social Policy Dimensions of Land Reform in rural Zimbabwe. Discover Global Society, 3(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00238-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00238-w

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ellis, F. (1998). Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422553

Hartvigsen, M. (2014). Land Reform and Land Fragmentation in Central and Eastern Europe. Land Use Policy, 36, 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.016

Kousar, R., Makhdum, M. S. A., & Abbas, Q. (2018). Secured Land Rights, Household Welfare and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Rural Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55(1), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/18.5063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/18.5063

le Polain de Waroux, Y., Garrett, R. D., Chapman, M., Friis, C., Hoelle, J., Hodel, L., Hopping, K., & Zaehringer, J. G. (2021). The Role of Culture in Land System Science. Journal of Land Use Science, 16(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.1950229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.1950229

Li, T. M. (2010). Indigeneity, Capitalism, and the Management of Dispossession. Current Anthropology, 51(3), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1086/651942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651942

Maulana, I. R., & Shohibuddin, M. (2022). Zona Interaksi Politik dan Respons Aktor Pemerintah: Kasus Perjuangan Agraria di Nanggung, Kabupaten Bogor. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.75-100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.75-100

Maulana, I. R., & Shohibuddin, M. (2024). Pengaruh Gerakan Petani terhadap Trajectory Perjuangan Reforma Agraria: Kasus Desa Cisarua, Kecamatan Nanggung, Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat [JSKPM], 8(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.29244/JSKPM.V8I02.1504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jskpm.v8i02.1504

Morris, W., Henley, A., & Dowell, D. (2017). Farm Diversification, Entrepreneurship and Technology Adoption: Analysis of Upland Farmers in Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.014

Musyoka, P. K., Onjala, J., & Mureithi, L. P. (2021). Determinants of Distress Sales of Farmland in Rural Kenya. Development Studies Research, 8(1), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2021.1974918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2021.1974918

Netshipale, A. J., Oosting, S. J., Mashiloane, M. L., van Reenen, C. G., de Boer, I. J. M., & Raidimi, E. N. (2020). Agriculture in Land Reform Farms: Impact on Livelihoods of Beneficiaries in the Waterberg District, South Africa. Land Use Policy, 97, 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104710

Niemelä, T., & Häkkinen, R. (2014). The Role of Pluriactivity for Continuity and Survival in Family Farm Firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 10(4), 7-44. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=283954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7341/20141041

Sajogyo. (1985, April). Indikator Pemerataan Pendapatan dan Pemilikan. Paper for a Seminar on “Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat dan Sistem Pelayanan Data untuk Monitoring Perkembangan Wilayah Kecil, “ Jakarta, 22-24 April 1985.

Sajogyo. (1990). Upaya Pemerataan dalam Pembangunan dan Memerangi Kemiskinan. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia & World Bank Representative Jakarta.

Sajogyo, & Wiradi, G. (1983). Data BPS untuk Pengarahan “Delapan Jalur Plus” Pemerataan. Paper for a Seminar on “Penggunaan Data Sosial Ekonomi untuk Perencanaan dan Kebijakan Pembangunan Sumber Daya Manusia,” Jakarta, 31 October-2 November 1983.

Salmi, P. (2005). Rural Pluriactivity as a Coping Strategy in Small-Scale Fisheries. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(1-2), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00288.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00288.x

Sani, S. (2017). Rural Households Towards Off-farm and Non-farm Employment Opportunities in Assosa Zone, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, 5(1), 579–589.

Shohibuddin, M., Priyanto, P., Rusniarsyah, L., & Bahri, A. D. (2025). Agroforestri Berbasis Wakaf untuk Optimalisasi Lahan di Lokasi Eks HGU PT Hevindo, Desa Nanggung, Kabupaten Bogor. Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 8(3), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.24198/kumawula.v8i3.60688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/kumawula.v8i3.60688

Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitaif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

To-The, N., Linh Nguyen-Thi-Thuy, Bui-Thi-Thu, P., Shah, A. A., Dao-Mong, A., Pham-Ngoc-Huong, Q., Pham-Thi, L., & Nguyen-Thi-Lan, H. (2024). Livelihood adaptation strategies of farming households to land acquisition: A case study in Vietnam. Journal of Water and Land Development, (63), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2024.151792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2024.151792

Wahyono, N. D., Hasanah, N., Parmawati, R., & Wong, W. K. (2023). Improving Economic Welfare through Capital Development: Case Study of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Pujon District. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118453

White, B. (1991). Economic Diversification and Agrarian Change in Java, 1900-1990. In P. Alexander, P. Boomgaard, & B. White (Eds.), In the Shadow of Agriculture: Non-Farm Activities in the Javanese Economy, Past and Present (pp. 41–69). Royal Tropical Institute. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/18817/wp96.pdf

Wiradi, G. (2009). Seluk Beluk Masalah Agraria, Reforma Agraria dan Penelitian Agraria (M. Shohibuddin, Ed.; 1st ed.). STPN Press, Sajogyo Institute.

Zhao, X., Lan, F., Guo, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). Differences in the Impact of Land Transfer on Poverty Vulnerability among Households with Different Livelihood Structures. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1425762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1425762

Zimkhitha, F. J. (2024). Forging Pathways to Equity: The Nexus between Land Redistribution, Health, and Healthcare Access. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 750–760. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG949

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Nisa, T. R. C., & Shohibuddin, M. . (2026). Land Redistribution and the Paradox of Rural Pluriactivity: The Case of Dukuh Kaung Hamlet in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 13(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.22500/13202563567

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>