Social Dynamics in the Determination of Doi Balanca in Bugis Marriage Traditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22500/12202457755Keywords:
Bugis Society, Doi Balanca, marriage customsAbstract
This article aims to systematically examine the social and cultural dynamics of the Doi Balanca practice in Bugis marriage traditions, as well as its impact on the sanctity of marriage amid shifting social values. The primary objective of this study is to understand the function of Doi Balanca as a social mechanism, the factors influencing its monetary value, and the conflicts that may arise from its rejection. This research adopts a qualitative case study approach, employing observation and in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that Doi Balanca is perceived as a symbol of a man's commitment to his prospective wife, with its value and meaning shaped largely by Bugis society’s social constructs. It serves to uphold family honor and ensure social stability, yet the amount is determined by various factors such as social class, customary traditions, the role of the families involved, and inter-family communication. Rejection of this practice may lead to serious consequences, including family disputes, emotional tensions, and social exclusion—often culminating in broken engagements, elopements, or premarital pregnancies. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of understanding the social and cultural complexities surrounding Doi Balanca in order to develop inclusive solutions to emerging conflicts. It recommends strengthening inter-family communication in determining the amount of Doi Balanca and promoting more flexible approaches that mitigate potential conflicts without eroding traditional values.
References
Abbas, I. (2013). Pappaseng: Kearifan Lokal Manusia Bugis yang Terlupakan. Sosiohumaniora, 15(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v15i3.5752
Abbas, I., Bunga, M., Salmawati, S., Puji, N. P., & Djanggih, H. (2018). Hak Penguasaan Istri terhadap Mahar Sompa Perkawinan Adat Bugis Makassar (Kajian Putusan PA Bulukumba Nomor 25/Pdt.P/2011/PABlk). Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i2.10659
Abdullah, I. (2015). Konstruksi dan reproduksi kebudayaan. Pustaka Pelajar.
Aini, N. (2017). Potensi Konflik dalam Proses Perkawinan Adat Bugis (Kasus Uang Panai pada 5 Keluarga di Desa Lipukasi Kecamatan Tanete Rilau Kabupaten Barru). UNIVERSITAS HASANUDIN.
Alamsyah, A. H. (2022). Implementasi Budaya Siri’ Na Pacce di Tengah Arus Kebudayaan Populer. Ad-Dariyah: Jurnal Dialektika, Sosial Dan Budaya, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55623/ad.v3i1.106
Badewi, M. H. (2015). Relasi Antarmanusia dalam Nilai-Nilai Budaya Bugis: Perspektif Filsafat Dialogis Martin Buber. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.12581
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard University Press.
Cristian Pelras. (1996). Manusia Bugis. Penerbit Nalar.
Elvira, R. (2014). Ingkar janji atas kesepakatan uang belanja (uang panai) dalam perkawinan suku Bugis Makassar. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Fajarni, S. (2020). Integrasi Tipologi Paradigma Sosiologi George Ritzer dan Margaret M. Poloma. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI), 1(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v1i2.554
Firda, F., Sari, N., & Dasila, R. A. (2023). Konsep Tradisi Uang Panai’ Dilihat Dari Sudut Pandang Akuntansi. Jesya, 6(2), 1436–1446. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v6i2.1121
Fitriani. (2022). Tradisi Adat Perkawinan Suku Bugis. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/q2mh6
Goody, J. (1967). The Social Organization of the LoWiili. Oxford University Press.
Hanafi, D., Sabara, S., & Patimah, P. (2024). Social Media Usage Deviation and Impact on Muslim Family Dynamics in Makassar City, South Sulawesi. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(3), 1597. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.24113
Ilyas, M. (2019). Peran Perempuan Bugis Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 19(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i1.9687
Kahar, K., Sani, Y., Tang, M., & Nadjib, Muh. (2018). Contemporary Bugis Weddings in the Regency of Soppeng: an Analysis of Cultural Semiotics. European Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(6), 11–11.
Kamriani. (2020). Personal Interview at the informant’s residence, Barru Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia on March, 10 2020.
Kesuma, A. I., Kesuma, A. I., & Nurlela, N. (2015). Mappaenre Doi: Studi Tentang Rangkaian Perkawinan di Kecamatan Ujung Bulu, Bulukumba. Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Lestari, S. (2023). Psikologi Keluarga : Penanaman Nilai & Penanganan Konflik dalam Keluarga. Kencana.
Mansour Fakih. (2010). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial (13th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Mattulada. (2000). Latoa: Satu Lukisan Analitis terhadap Antropologi Politik Orang Bugis. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Megawati, M., Basri, R., Suhartina, S., & Muchsin, A. (2022). The Phenomenon of Silariang in Legal Sociology Review. Jurnal Marital: Kajian Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.35905/marital_hki.v1i2.3365
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Munirah. (2020). Personal Interview at the informant’s residence, Barru Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia on March, 10 2020.
Muslih, M., Rohman, A., Manaanu, Y. Al, & Aziz, A. (2021). Pengembangan Ilmu Sosial Model Fenomenologi dan Hermeneutika. Jurnal Hermeneutika, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/hermeneutika.v7i1.10160
Rahim, A., Susono, J., Amiruddin K, A. K., Habibah, S., & Markuna, M. (2020). Uang Panai dan Investasi (studi pada nilai-nilai kearifan lokal dalam perkawinan Suku Bugis Makassar). Al-Ulum, 20(2), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v20i2.1280
Rinaldi, R., Hufad, A., Komariah, S., & Masdar, M. (2022). Uang Panai Sebagai Harga Diri Perempuan Suku Bugis Bone (Antara Tradisi dan Gengsi). Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.26618/equilibrium.v10i3.8411
Saleh, A. A. (2020). Psikologi Sosial. IAIN Pare-Pare Nusantara Press.
Samsudin, S. (2017). Sosiologi Keluarga: Studi Perubahan Fungsi Keluarga. Pustaka Pelajar.
Saraswati, V. P., & Subudi, M. (2017). Pengaruh Konflik Pekerjaan-Keluarga dan Stres Kerja terhadap Turnover Intention. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 6(6), 2995–3021.
Soetomo. (2013). Masalah Sosial dan Upaya Pemecahannya. Masalah Sosial Dan Upaya Pemecahannya. Yogjakarta Pustaka Pelajar.
Tawakkal, G. T. I., & Subekti, T. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Dasar. Universitas Brawijaya Press. https://doi.org/10.11594/ubpress9786232967496
Veranita, S., & Dwirakhmawatia, S. A. (2023). Sistem Pernikahan Suku Bugis dan Suku Minang “Tradisi Uang Panai.” Journal of Digital Communication Science, 1(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.56956/jdcs.v1i1.184
Walidin, W., & Saifullah, T. (2021). Buku Pintar Pemikiran Tokoh-tokoh Sosiologi dari Klasik Sampai Modern. Hukum Perumahan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suriyani Suriyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
