The Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping of Stakeholders Related to the Measured Fishing Policy (In Southeast Sulawesi)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22500/13202555185Keywords:
fuzzy cognitive mapping, measured fishing policy, stakeholder perceptionsAbstract
The issuance of the Measured Fishing Policy (PIT) has sparked controversy among fishing communities, particularly due to its mechanism, which is seen as granting greater opportunities for the fishing industry to exploit marine resources. In contrast, small-scale and traditional fishers are perceived to be at a disadvantage in the long run. This study aims to examine the perceptions of fisheries stakeholders regarding the implementation of PIT, with research conducted in Fisheries Management Area (WPP) 714, especially in Southeast Sulawesi. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining primary data from Focus Group Discussions (FGD), questionnaires, and in-depth interviews, alongside secondary data sourced from scientific articles, research reports, online media, and other references. The analysis using fuzzy cognitive mapping indicates that the PIT policy is negatively associated with fishermen’s income, fish stock sustainability, conservation efforts, and community involvement. Furthermore, the study reveals stakeholder perspectives on seven key characteristics of measurable fishing policies, with the quota system emerging as the most prominent concern among fisheries practitioners and observers. In conclusion, the fuzzy cognitive mapping results highlight that PIT is largely perceived as having adverse impacts on small-scale fisheries.
References
Adhiem, MA. (2023). Tantangan Penerapan Kebijakan Penagkapan Ikan Terukur. Badan keahlian DPR RI. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XV-10-II-P3DI-Mei-2023-1904.pdf
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Anderson, C. M., Krigbaum, M. J., Arostegui, M. C., Feddern, M. L., Koehn, J. Z., Kuriyama, P. T., Morrisett, C., Allen Akselrud, C. I., Davis, M. J., Fiamengo, C., Fuller, A., Lee, Q., McElroy, K. N., Pons, M., & Sanders, J. (2019). How commercial fishing effort is managed. Fish and Fisheries, 20(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12339
Aprian, M., Adrianto, L., Boer, M., & Kurniawan, F. (2023). Re-thinking Indonesian marine fisheries quota-based policy: A qualitative network of stakeholder perception at fisheries management area 718. Ocean and Coastal Management, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106766
Aryo, M. A., & Mahendra Wiswayana, W. (2020). Orientasi Baru Kebijakan di Laut oleh Pemerintah Indonesia: Pergeseran dari Deterensi ke Strategi Ekonomi. Jurnal Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia, 8(2). 56-74. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v8i2.309
Asche, F., Bjørndal, M. T., & Bjørndal, T. (2014). Development in fleet fishing capacity in rights based fisheries. Marine Policy, 44, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.018
Basurto, X., Virdin, J., Smith, H., & Juskus, R. (2017). Strengthening Governance of Small-Scale Fisheries: An Initial Assessment of Theory and Practice. Oak Foundation: www.oakfnd.org/environment.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
FAO. (2018). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018: Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/8d6ea4b6-en
Free, C. M., Mangin, T., Molinos, J. G., Ojea, E., Burden, M., Costello, C., & Gaines, S. D. (2020). Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries. PLOS ONE, 15(3), e0224347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. In Strategic Management: A Stakeholder https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Fujitani, M., McFall, A., Randler, C., & Arlinghaus, R. (2017). Participatory adaptive management leads to environmental learning outcomes extending beyond the sphere of science. Science Advances, 3(6), e1602516. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602516
Gray, S. R. J., Gagnon, A. S., Gray, S. A., O’Dwyer, B., O’Mahony, C., Muir, D., Devoy, R. J. N., Falaleeva, M., & Gault, J. (2014). Are coastal managers detecting the problem? Assessing stakeholder perception of climate vulnerability using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping. Ocean and Coastal Management, 94, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.11.008
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Halim, A., Wiryawan, B., Loneragan, N. R., Hordyk, A., Sondita, M. F. A., White, A. T., Koeshendrajana, S., Ruchimat, T., Pomeroy, R. S., & Yuni, C. (2019). Developing a functional definition of small-scale fisheries in support of marine capture fisheries management in Indonesia. Marine Policy, 100, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.11.044
Halimatussadiah, A., Yamazaki, S., Nichols, R., Muawanah, U., Afifi, F. A. R., & Adriansyah, M. (2023). Co-management of large-scale and medium-scale fisheries: An assessment of the fishery tax system in Indonesia. Marine Policy, 148, 105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105458
Hapsari, D. R., Kinseng, R. A., Sarwoprasodjo, S., Putri Simanjuntak, A., Anam, K., Sarifuddin, A., & Sulistiyowati, I. (2020). Fishermen Social Movements in West Sumatra: Issues, Actors, and Tactics of the Movement. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 8(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.22500/8202028692
Heazle, M., & Butcher, J. G. (2007). Fisheries depletion and the state in Indonesia: Towards a regional regulatory regime. Marine Policy, 31(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2006.08.006
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Karr, K. A., Fujita, R., Carcamo, R., Epstein, L., Foley, J. R., Fraire-Cervantes, J. A., Gongora, M., Gonzalez-Cuellar, O. T., Granados-Dieseldorff, P., Guirjen, J., Weaver, A. H., Licón-González, H., Litsinger, E., Maaz, J., Mancao, R., Miller, V., Ortiz-Rodriguez, R., Plomozo-Lugo, T., Rodriguez-Harker, L. F., … Kritzer, J. P. (2017). Integrating science-based co-management, partnerships, participatory processes and stewardship incentives to improve the performance of small-scale fisheries. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00345
Liu, H., Peng, D., Yang, H. J., Mu, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2022). A Proposed Scheme of Fishing Quota Allocation to Ensure the Sustainable Development of China’s Marine Capture Fisheries. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.881306
Muawanah, U., Yusuf, G., Adrianto, L., Kalther, J., Pomeroy, R., Abdullah, H., & Ruchimat, T. (2018). Review of national laws and regulation in Indonesia in relation to an ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy, 91, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.027
Nurani, T. W., Wahyuningrum, P. I., Wisudo, S. H., Gigentika, S., & Arhatin, R. E. (2018). Model designs of Indonesian tuna fishery management in the Indian Ocean (FMA 573) using soft system methodology approach. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 44(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2018.06.005
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Özesmi, U., & Özesmi, S. L. (2004). Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: A multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling, 176(1–2), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027
Pascoe, S., Hoshino, E., Hutton, T., & Hobday, A. J. (2022). Conflicting perceptions of quota-based systems in Australian fisheries. Marine and Freshwater Research, 73(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21227
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Pemrintah (PP) nomor 11 tahun 2023 tentang Penangkapan Ikan Terukur. Jakarta. Indonesia
Pemerintan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Kelautan Perikanan Nomor 28 tahun 2023 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penangkapan Ikan Terukur. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemrintah (PP) nomor 85 tahun 2021 Tentang Jenis dan Tarif atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang Berlaku pada Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Nomor 1 tahun 2015 tentang Penangkapan Lobster (Panulirus spp.), Kepiting (Scylla spp.), Dan Rajungan (Portunus Pelagicus spp.). Jakarta. Indonesia.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Nomor 2 tahun 2015 tentang Larangan Penggunaan Alat Penangkapan Ikan Pukat Hela (Trawl) dan Pukat Tarik (Seine Nets) di Wilayah Pengelolaan Perikanan Indonesia. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Pemerintan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan No. 56 tahun 2014 tentang tentang Penghentian Sementara (Moratorium) Perizinan Usaha Perikanan Tangkap Di Wilayah Pengelolaan Perikanan Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Pemerintan Republik Indonesia. (2014). PermenKP No. 57 tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Menteri Kelautan Dan Perikanan Nomor PER.30/MEN/2012 Tentang Usaha Perikanan Tangkap Di Wilayah Pengelolaan Perikanan Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Rochwulaningsih, Y., Sulistiyono, S. T., Masruroh, N. N., & Maulany, N. N. (2019). Marine policy basis of Indonesia as a maritime state: The importance of integrated economy. Marine Policy, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103602
Romero, P., & Melo, O. (2021). Can a Territorial Use Right for Fisheries management make a difference for fishing communities? Marine Policy, 124, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104359
Santiago, J. L., & Surís-Regueiro, J. C. (2018). An applied method for assessing socioeconomic impacts of European fisheries quota-based management. Fisheries Research, 206, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.05.010
Schutter, M. S., Hicks, C. C., Phelps, J., & Waterton, C. (2021). The blue economy as a boundary object for hegemony across scales. Marine Policy, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104673
Sumaila, U. R. (2010). A Cautionary Note on Individual Transferable Quotas. Ecology and Society, 15(3). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26268177
Suman, A., Satria, F., Nugraha, B., Priatna, A., Amri, K., Mahiswara, dan, Riset Perikanan Laut, B., Raya Bogor Km, J., Mekar, N., & Barat, J. (2018). The Stock Status Of Fish Resources In 2016 At Fisheries Management Area Of Indonesian Republic (Fmas) And Its Management Alternative. http://ejournal-balitbang.kkp.go.id/index.php/jkpi
Uluputty, S. (2023). Saadiah Nilai Kebijakan Penangkapan Ikan Terukur Harus Perhatikan Keadilan bagi Nelayan. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/43760/t/Saadiah%20Nilai%20Kebijakan%20Penangkapan%20Ikan%20Terukur%20Harus%20Perhatikan%20Keadilan%20bagi%20Nelayan
Villasante, S., Macho, G., Silva, M. R., Lopes, P. F., Pita, P., Simón, A., Balsa, J. C., Olabarria, C., Vázquez, E., & Calvo, N. (2022). Resilience and Social Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts in Small-Scale Fisheries. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 802762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.802762
Zhang, H., Song, J., Su, C., & He, M. (2013). Human attitudes in environmental management: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and policy option simulations analysis for a coal-mine ecosystem in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.032
Zhou, S., Smith, A. D., & Knudsen, E. E. (2015). Ending overfishing while catching more fish. Fish and Fisheries, 16(4), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12077
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Robin, Muhammad Taswin Munie, Eddy Hamka, La Ode Mansyur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
