Perilaku Komunikasi Anggota Komisi IV DPR RI dalam Rapat Dengar Pendapat dengan Kementerian Pertanian tahun 2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46937/1020129059Abstract
Abstract
One function of Parliament is to defend the interests of the people in any government program. Function is reflected in the communication behavior of members of Parliament in the event of a hearing. This study aims to describe the communication behavior of members of the Komisi IV DPR RI in a hearing with the Ministry of Agriculture 2010. Communication behavior is observed from the content of the communication messages that include: contents of interests, substance, orientation, type of reason, evidence, clarity, accommodative, and speak act. This study uses content analysis methods and all hearing documents used as research material. The study result (66.1%) a message containing the public interest, the messages (80.1%) according to the substance of the meeting, orientation (42.1%) solution of the problem, type reasons (62.2%) using a factual, a form of evidence (45 , 5%) narrative, willingness to accept (65.1%) accommodative, sentences (89.9%) are clear and type speak act (51.9%) using assertive.
Keywords: message contents, strategy, hearing.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
