<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2354-886X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JPHPI</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2354-886X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2303-2111</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Department of Aquatic Product Technology IPB University in collaboration with Masyarakat Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia (MPHPI)</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17844/sqp7y403</article-id><article-categories></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Application of crude bacteriocins based on LC₅₀ values to prolong the shelf life of white shrimp</article-title><subtitle>Aplikasi bakteriosin kasar berdasarkan nilai LC₅₀ untuk memperpanjang daya simpan udang putih</subtitle></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0696-0400</contrib-id><name><surname>Sukmawati</surname><given-names>Sukmawati</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>sukmawati.sw91@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-5989</contrib-id><name><surname>Metusalach</surname><given-names>Metusalach</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>metuunhas@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Syahrul</surname><given-names>Syahrul</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>syharul@unhas.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Marine Science and Fisheries</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02pn4f312</institution-id></institution-wrap><city>Sorong</city><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Marine Science and Fisheries</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Hasanuddin University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00da1gf19</institution-id></institution-wrap><city>Makassar</city><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Metusalach  Metusalach. Email: <email>metuunhas@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-18" publication-format="electronic"><day>18</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2025-12-31" publication-format="electronic"><day>31</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><issue-title>Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia 28(12)</issue-title><fpage>1030</fpage><lpage>1042</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-08-15"><day>15</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-11-15"><day>15</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2025 Sukmawati Sukmawati, Metusalach  Metusalach, Syahrul Syahrul</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Sukmawati Sukmawati, Metusalach  Metusalach, Syahrul Syahrul</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jphpi/article/view/67272" xlink:title="67272"></self-uri><abstract><p>Fishery products, including white shrimp, are highly perishable due to microbial contamination during postharvest handling. To address this, natural preservatives, such as bacteriocins, which are antimicrobial compounds produced by bacteria, including those from fermented shrimp paste, are being explored. This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity and preservative potential of three bacteriocin samples (TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3) using a 24-hour LC₅₀ test on <italic>Artemia</italic> sp. and antibacterial activity based on total plate count (TPC) in shrimp during storage. A completely randomized design (CRD) was used. Toxicity levels were assessed using probit analysis with log-linear regression to determine LC₅₀ values, and TPC was measured at 3-hour intervals over 24 h. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-hoc test. TRS1 exhibited the highest toxicity, with an LC₅₀ of 0.22 µL/mL, followed by TRS3 (2.48 µL/mL) and TRS2 (4.40 µL/mL). Despite its higher toxicity, TRS1, along with TRS2, effectively suppressed microbial growth in shrimp, maintaining TPC values below the Indonesian National Standard (5×10⁵ CFU/g) throughout 24 h. In contrast, TRS3 maintained TPC below the threshold only up to 12 h, with counts nearing control levels (8×10⁶ CFU/g) by 24 h. TRS1 and TRS2 treatments initially showed fluctuating TPC patterns, followed by a sharp decline, possibly due to delayed bacteriocin activation and microbial adaptation; however, the exact reason remains unclear. Overall, TRS1 and TRS2 exhibited strong potential as natural preservatives for extending the shelf life of fresh white shrimp by effectively controlling bacterial growth during storage.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>food safety</kwd><kwd>microbe</kwd><kwd>natural preservative</kwd><kwd>probit analysis</kwd><kwd>TPC</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value>https://jatseditor.com</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2025</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec-1"><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>The search for natural antimicrobial agents has gained increasing attention over the past few decades, driven by the rising resistance of microorganisms to synthetic antibiotics and growing concerns over chemical residues in food products and aquaculture systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Amábile et al., 2024)</xref>. Common chemical preservatives, such as sodium sulfite, sodium nitrite, sodium benzoate, tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ), and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), have raised public health concerns because of their potential carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and allergenic efects when consumed over the long term <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Kalairaj et al., 2024)</xref>. One group of bioactive compounds with promising potential is bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides naturally produced by bacteria, including lactic acid bacteria (LAB) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Hernández et al., 2021)</xref>. Bacteriocins exhibit specific inhibitory activity against microorganisms, particularly food spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, without harming eukaryotic cells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Banerji et al., 2022)</xref>. These properties make them ideal candidates for use as natural preservatives in the food industry.</p><p>Traditional fermented products, such as <italic>terasi</italic> (fermented shrimp paste made from <italic>Acetes</italic> spp.), are rich in complex microbial ecosystems that remain largely underexplored. <italic>Terasi </italic>is a fermented product of shrimp or fish with the addition of salt or other ingredients as a food flavoring due to its distinctive aroma and taste <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37 BIBR-15">(Sumardianto et al., 2022; Jatmiko et al., 2025)</xref>. Terasi, a product of spontaneous fermentation, may harbor bacterial isolates with high biosynthetic capabilities, including bacteriocin production. The raw material, rebon shrimp (<italic>Acetes</italic> spp.), has a high nutrient content that supports the growth of proteolytic microorganisms and LAB during fermentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Herlina et al., 2024)</xref>. Several studies have reported that fermented products, including shrimp paste, have the potential to produce bacteriocins with strong antibacterial activity. For example, bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) demonstrate inhibitory activity against pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, <italic>Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhimurium</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Sukmawati et al., 2023)</xref>. These bacteriocins were stable across a wide range of pH values, temperatures, and NaCl concentrations, indicating their robustness as biopreservatives.</p><p>Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">Herlina et al. (2024)</xref> reported that Indonesian traditional shrimp paste (<italic>terasi</italic>) produced LAB-derived bacteriocins that efectively inhibited <italic>E. coli, Vibrio parahaemolyticus</italic>, and <italic>S. aureus</italic>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">Elayaraja et al. (2014)</xref> isolated <italic>Virgibacillus salexigens</italic> from fermented shrimp paste, which produced stable bacteriocins with strong antibacterial activity. Consistent with previous findings, <italic>Virgibacillus salexigens</italic> isolated from fermented shrimp paste (<italic>terasi</italic>) also produces heatand pH-stable bacteriocins with broadspectrum antibacterial activity, notably against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Kobayashi et al., 2016)</xref>. These findings confirm that fermented seafood products, such as rebon shrimp paste, are rich sources of bacteriocin-producing bacteria. Therefore, bacteriocins derived from fermented products possess significant antibacterial potential and can be further developed as natural food preservatives to extend the shelf life and maintain the quality of food products. A nutrient-rich environment creates optimal conditions for the synthesis of various bioactive compounds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Chai et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>In the context of seafood, particularly white shrimp (<italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>), post-harvest quality degradation is a major concern, especially when handling and storage are inadequate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Berty, 2020)</xref>. The primary factors contributing to spoilage include: a) endogenous enzyme activity (autolysis) – upon death, natural enzymes such as proteases begin breaking down muscle tissue, leading to softening and structural damage that accelerate spoilage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Das et al., 2023)</xref>; b) microbial spoilage – spoilage bacteria such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and other Gram-negative species proliferate rapidly under moist, room-temperature conditions, producing of-odors such as trimethylamine (TMA), ammonia, and sulfur compounds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Luqman et al., 2024)</xref>; c) improper storage temperature – suboptimal temperature accelerates microbial growth and enzymatic reactions. Even under cool conditions without ice, shrimp quality declines significantly within 24–48 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Gökoğlu, 2021)</xref>. d) Lipid oxidation: Although the fat content in shrimp is low, existing lipids are prone to oxidation, generating rancid odors and degrading sensory quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Feng et al., 2021)</xref>; and e) cross-contamination: Poor hygiene during harvesting, processing, or transportation may introduce microbial contaminants that accelerate product spoilage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Akinsemolu et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><p>Shrimp spoilage is commonly characterized by abnormal discoloration (e.g., grayish or reddish tints), strong ofensive odor, excessive surface slime, and soft, nonelastic texture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Whittle et al., 2002)</xref>. Given the health risks associated with synthetic preservatives and the growing need to preserve seafood quality, exploring safer and more environmentally friendly alternatives, such as bacteriocins, is critical. Bacteriocins ofer several advantages: they are natural and safe for use in seafood products, do not alter the taste or aroma when used at optimal concentrations, and can be applied via spraying, immersion, or coating. Moreover, they are efective when combined with cold storage using a hurdle technology approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Lahiri et al., 2022)</xref>. Bacteriocins can extend shelf life, control foodborne pathogens, and contribute to public health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Parada et al., 2025)</xref>. Their environmentally friendly nature and favorable safety profiles position them as promising candidates for future food preservation, with minimal adverse efects on humans or animals (Madoramae <italic>et al</italic>., 2025). These compounds also demonstrate significant thermal stability, maintain antimicrobial activity in the acidic to neutral pH range, and are efective against Salmonella typhimurium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Makhlouf et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><p>Previous research successfully isolated and identified three bacteriocinproducing bacteria from shrimp paste: TRS1 (<italic>Bacillus tropicus</italic> strain MCCC 1A01406), TRS2 (<italic>Bacillus nitratireducens</italic> strain MCCC 1A00732), and TRS3 (Bacillus paramycoides strain MCCC 1A04098). These isolates produced bacteriocins with varying antimicrobial potencies, as reflected by their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, which ranged from 0.19% to 0.78% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Sukmawati et al., 2025)</xref>. Based on this background, this study aimed to: (1) characterize bacteriocins produced by bacterial isolates from terasi udang rebon by determining their <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values to assess their relative toxicity against <italic>Artemia</italic> sp.; and (2) evaluate the eficacy of bacteriocins as a natural preservative on white shrimp based on <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-2"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> findings</p><p><italic>Artemia</italic> sp. (brine shrimp) is widely recognized as a reliable model organism for the preliminary toxicity testing of bioactive compounds, including bacteriocins and bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances. Its high sensitivity, short life cycle, low maintenance cost, and lack of ethical restrictions make it suitable for determining <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-3"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values in ecotoxicological assessments. Previous studies have demonstrated that <italic>Artemia salina</italic> exhibits consistent and quantifiable responses to both natural and synthetic toxicants, making it an eficient bioindicator for evaluating environmental and food safety <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Chan et al., 2021)</xref>. Recent studies have confirmed the validity of this method for assessing the toxicity of marine natural products and microbial metabolites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6 BIBR-24">(Chan et al., 2021; Mahmud et al., 2023)</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="sec-2"><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec id="sec-3"><title>Time and Location of the Study</title><p>This study was conducted from September 2024 to January 2025 at the Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Muhammadiyah Sorong, Indonesia. The samples used were bacteriocins produced by bacterial isolates obtained from <italic>terasi udang rebon</italic>, a traditional fermented shrimp paste produced at a household industry scale in Southwest Papua, Indonesia. The bacterial strains used in this study were previously identified as Bacillus tropicus strain MCCC 1A01406 TRS1, Bacillus nitratireducens strain MCCC 1A00732 TRS2, and <italic>Bacillus paramycoides</italic> strain MCCC 1A04098 TRS3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Sukmawati et al., 2025)</xref>. White shrimp (<italic>L. vannamei</italic>) used for bacteriocin application were sourced from South Sorong through PT UD Piala in Sorong City.</p></sec><sec id="sec-4"><title>Bacteriocin Production</title><p>Each bacteriocin-producing bacterial isolate was inoculated into 500 mL of MRS Broth (Perez <italic>et al</italic>., 2022), supplemented with 0.5% <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-4"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { C a C O } _ { 3 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (Ooi <italic>et al</italic>., 2015), and incubated at <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-5"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 8 ^ { \circ } \mathrm { C } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for 24 h. After incubation, the culture was centrifuged at 4,500 rpm for 15 min to separate the supernatant from the bacterial pellet. The supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22 µm Millipore membrane filter to obtain a crude cell-free bacteriocin extract <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Hoover &amp; Steenson, 2014)</xref>. The presence of bacteriocin in the supernatant was supported by its characteristic stability under heat treatment, varying concentrations of NaCl, and a wide pH range, consistent with findings reported in previous studies. This evidence strongly suggests that the observed antimicrobial activity is attributable to bacteriocins rather than other compounds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Sukmawati et al., 2022)</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="sec-5"><title>\mathsf { L C } _ { 5 0 } Toxicity Test</title><p>The lethal concentration for 50% mortality <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-6"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { ( L C ~ } _ { 5 0 } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> was determined using a 24- hour exposure assay on 2-day-old <italic>Artemia</italic> sp. larvae. Ten larvae were used per replicate for each concentration of the test substance. Toxicity was evaluated using probit analysis, applying the regression equation <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-7"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \mathsf { y } = \mathtt { a x } + \mathsf { b } . } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Probit analysis determines the relative toxicity of a substance based on the relationship between the logarithm of the concentration and the mortality percentage (expressed in probit units) of the test organism, which follows a linear function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(de Almieda et al., 2023)</xref>. The <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-8"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value was calculated from the mortality data using Microsoft Excel, probit values derived from standard probit tables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Raj et al., 2013)</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="sec-6"><title>Application of Bacteriocin as a Natural Preservative on White Shrimp</title><p>Bacteriocin application was based on the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-9"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> evaluation results. Crude bacteriocin samples with potential as natural preservatives were applied to fresh white shrimp. Shrimp samples (550 g) were immersed in bacteriocin solution (e.g., TRS1 at 158.4 µL/720 mL) for 10 min to allow difusion into the shrimp tissue and inhibit microbial activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Franciska et al., 2018)</xref>. After immersion, the samples were drained to remove excess filtrate, sealed in sterile packaging, and stored at room temperature <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-10"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( 2 8 ^ { \circ } \mathrm { C } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for 24 h. Microbial contamination on the shrimp surface was monitored every 3 h (at 11:00, 14:00, 17:00, 20:00, 23:00, 02:00, 05:00, and 08:00) using the total plate count (TPC) method according to the Indonesian National Standard (SNI, 2008). Each treatment was performed in triplicates. The same procedure was applied to TRS2 (3168 µL/720 mL), TRS3 (1785 <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-11"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mu \mathrm { L } / 7 2 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> mL) bacteriocin samples, and control as well as to the control. The control treatment consisted of white shrimp samples processed under identical conditions but without the addition of crude bacteriocins.</p></sec><sec id="sec-7"><title>Total Plate Count (TPC) Analysis</title><p>Shrimp samples (25 g) were aseptically placed in sterile containers. Each sample was then mixed with 225 mL of sterile bufered peptone water (BPW) 0.1% in a sterile stomacher bag and homogenized using a stomacher for approximately one–two minutes. This initial mixture represented a <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-12"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 0 ^ { - 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> dilution of the sample. Subsequently, 1 mL of the homogenate was aseptically transferred into a test tube containing 9 mL of sterile BPW to obtain a <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-13"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 0 ^ { - 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> dilution. Further serial dilutions were prepared up to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-14"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 0 ^ { - 3 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , depending on the required analysis range.</p><p>From each dilution, 1 mL of suspension was pipetted into sterile Petri dishes in duplicate. Approximately 15–20 mL of plate count agar (PCA), which had been cooled to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-15"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 4 5 { \pm } 1 ^ { \circ } \mathrm { C } , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> was poured into each dish containing the suspension. The Petri dishes were then gently rotated in a forward–backward motion or a figure-eight pattern to ensure that the sample and medium were thoroughly mixed. The agar was then allowed to solidify. The solidified plates were incubated in an inverted position at a temperature of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-16"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 3 4 – 3 6 ^ { \circ } \mathrm { C } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for 24 to 48 hours. After incubation, the number of colonies formed on each dilution plate was counted, excluding the plates with spreader colonies. The results were recorded, and the TPC value was marked with an asterisk to indicate that the count was obtained outside the standard counting range (SNI, 2008).</p></sec><sec id="sec-8"><title>Data Analysis</title><p>Data for the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-17"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values were analyzed descriptively. To assess diferences in the efectiveness of bacteriocins in preserving white shrimp, the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 95% confidence level <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-18"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left( \mathtt { a } = 0 . 0 5 \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> was used with the help of SPSS software. When significant diferences were detected, Dunn’s post-hoc test was applied to identify the treatment groups that difered.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec-9"><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><p>The 24-hour LC₅₀ toxicity test of bacteriocins produced by TRS1 (<italic>Bacillus tropicus </italic>strain MCCC 1A01406), TRS2 (<italic>Bacillus nitratireducens </italic>strain MCCC 1A00732), and TRS3 (<italic>Bacillus paramycoides</italic> strain MCCC 1A04098) revealed distinct <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-19"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values, representing the lethal concentration of bacteriocins required to cause 50% mortality in the test organisms within a 24-hour period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>). The bioassay was performed using <italic>Artemia</italic> sp. as the test organism, which is recognized as a reliable biological model for the preliminary toxicity evaluation of bioactive compounds. This organism was selected because of its high sensitivity and consistent response to a wide range of natural and synthetic toxic substances. This parameter is commonly used to assess the acute toxicity of bioactive compounds and provides a quantitative measure of their safety for potential applications in food and environmental systems.</p><p>Regression analysis indicated that the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-20"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value of the bacteriocins was concentration-dependent and followed a linear relationship. The coeficient of determination (R²), which indicates the goodness of fit of the linear regression model between the logarithm of concentration and probit values, the higher the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-21"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { R } ^ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value, the more accurate and reliable the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-22"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The 24-hour <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-23"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> toxicity assay of crude bacteriocins produced by TRS1 (<italic>Bacillus tropicus</italic> strain MCCC 1A01406), TRS2 (<italic>Bacillus nitratireducens</italic> strain MCCC 1A00732), and TRS3 (Bacillus paramycoides strain MCCC 1A04098) was conducted to evaluate their relative toxicity toward <italic>Artemia</italic> sp.. The <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-24"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value represents the lethal concentration of bacteriocins required to cause 50% mortality in the test organisms within a 24-hour exposure period, serving as an important parameter for assessing the safety of bioactive compounds. The results revealed distinct <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-25"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values among the three isolates, indicating diferences in their bioactivities and toxicological profiles. Bacteriocins from TRS1 exhibited the lowest <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-26"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value, suggesting stronger biological potency with relatively low acute toxicity, whereas TRS2 and TRS3 showed higher <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-27"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values, indicating lower toxicities. These variations are likely associated with diferences in the structural and functional characteristics of the bacteriocins produced by each <italic>Bacillus</italic> species. Following the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-28"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> assessment, the antibacterial efectiveness of</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-29"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values of bacteriocin samples</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col">Bacteriocin sample type</th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-30"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle LC_{50} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> 24-hour value ( <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-31"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mu L/mL \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> )</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TRS1</td><td>0.22</td></tr><tr><td>TRS2</td><td>4.40</td></tr><tr><td>TRS3</td><td>2.48</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>TRS1 = bacteriocin produced by Bacillus tropicus strain MCCC 1A01406; TRS2 = Bacillus nitratireducens strain MCCC 1A00732; TRS3 = Bacillus paramycoides strain MCCC 1A04098.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Regression between log concentration and probit value of LC₅₀ (24 h) for TRS1 bacteriocin</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jphpi/article/download/67272/version/54150/34397/419648" mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 1</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Regression between log concentration and probit value of LC₅₀ (24 h) for TRS2 bacteriocin.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jphpi/article/download/67272/version/54150/34397/419649" mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 2</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Regression between log concentration and probit value of LC₅₀ (24 h) for TRS3 bacteriocin</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jphpi/article/download/67272/version/54150/34397/419650" mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 3</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3 was further evaluated by testing their ability to inhibit spoilage bacteria in white shrimp (<italic>L. vannamei</italic>). Fresh shrimp samples were treated with bacteriocins based on their respective <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-32"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> concentrations, ensuring safe yet efective exposure levels.</p><p>The results demonstrated that bacteriocin-treated shrimp exhibited a slower increase in total bacterial count than the untreated control, indicating that bacteriocins efectively suppressed the proliferation of spoilage-associated microorganisms. Among the treatments, TRS1 showed the most pronounced inhibitory efect, consistent with its stronger antimicrobial potency observed during the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test. These findings confirmed that bacteriocins derived from <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolated from fermented shrimp paste could prolong the shelf life of white shrimp by inhibiting spoilage-associated microorganisms, thereby maintaining product freshness and safety <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Sukmawati et al., 2025)</xref>. The results showed significant bacterial suppression at various time points over a 24-hour observation period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>The total bacterial count (TBC) analysis revealed distinct inhibitory efects of each bacteriocin treatment on microbial growth in white shrimp during 24 h of storage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). Among the treatments, the TRS1 bacteriocin exhibited the most pronounced antimicrobial activity, maintaining bacterial counts well below the SNI threshold <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-33"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( 5 . 0 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g) throughout the observation period, with only a modest increase from <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-34"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 4 . 4 \times 1 0 ^ { 4 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-35"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { C F U / g } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at hour 3 to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-36"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 . 3 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g at hour 24. Similarly, the TRS2 bacteriocin treatment demonstrated efective bacterial suppression, although slightly higher counts were recorded compared to TRS1, reaching <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-37"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 . 5 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g at hour 24. In contrast, the TRS3 bacteriocin-treated samples exhibited a steady increase in TBC from 7.9×10⁴ CFU/g at hour 3 to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-38"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 8 . 0 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 5 } \mathrm { C F U / g } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at 24 h. Although TRS3 initially inhibited microbial growth, maintaining bacterial levels below the SNI limit until hour 12-its overall antimicrobial performance was less efective than that of TRS1 and TRS2. Meanwhile, the untreated control group showed exponential microbial proliferation, with bacterial counts exceeding</p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-39"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 3 . 1 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g as early as hour 3 and reaching <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-40"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 8 . 0 \times 1 0 ^ { 6 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g by hour 24, far surpassing the acceptable microbial limit. Based on the Kruskal-Wallis test (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>), a significant diference (p&lt;0.001) was observed among the bacteriocin treatment groups, indicating strong statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis. These findings confirmed that the three bacteriocins (TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3) had significantly diferent efects on bacterial growth inhibition, with TRS1 showing the highest preservative eficacy in maintaining shrimp quality during storage. This finding is supported by the data patterns presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>Owing to the significant diference, a follow-up analysis using Dunn’s post hoc test was conducted. The results indicated that all bacteriocin treatments (TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3) showed significant diferences compared with the control group, confirming the efectiveness of bacteriocin application. However, no significant diferences were observed between TRS1 and TRS2 or between TRS2 and TRS3, suggesting that these treatments elicited relatively similar responses in the plants. Significant diferences were primarily evident between TRS1 and TRS3, as well as consistently across all treatments compared to the control, highlighting the variation in efects among treatments. These findings suggest that while all bacteriocin treatments efectively inhibited bacterial growth compared to the untreated control, the degree of inhibition varied depending on the bacterial strain that produced the bacteriocin. TRS1, derived from <italic>Bacillus tropicus</italic>, exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, likely due to its lower <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-41"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value and higher potency, as observed in previous toxicity and MIC assessments. In contrast, TRS3, produced by <italic>Bacillus paramycoides</italic>, showed weaker inhibition, possibly due to diferences in peptide structure, molecular weight, or stability under ambient conditions. The absence of significant diferences between TRS1 and TRS2 indicates that the bacteriocins produced by <italic>Bacillus tropicus</italic> and <italic>Bacillus nitratireducens</italic> may share similar functional characteristics or antimicrobial mechanisms. Overall, the statistical results support the hypothesis that bacteriocins can serve as efective natural preservatives by suppressing spoilage bacteria and maintaining shrimp quality during storage.</p><table-wrap id="table-2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Total bacterial counts (TBC) in white shrimp preserved with bacteriocins</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" rowspan="2">Observation time (h)</th><th scope="col" colspan="3">Mean of total bacterial count (CFU/g)</th><th scope="col" rowspan="2">Control</th><th scope="col" rowspan="2"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-42"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle SNI^a \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th></tr><tr><th scope="col">TRS1</th><th scope="col">TRS2</th><th scope="col">TRS3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3</td><td>4.4×104</td><td>9.0×104</td><td>7.9×104</td><td>3.1×105</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>1.2×105</td><td>1.3×105</td><td>9.8×104</td><td>6.2×105</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>1.0×105</td><td>1.2×105</td><td>1.0×105</td><td>7.4×105</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>9.1×104</td><td>1.1×105</td><td>3.4×105</td><td>1.7×106</td><td rowspan="5">5.0×105</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>5.1×104</td><td>8.7×104</td><td>6.2×105</td><td>2.6×106</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>6.8×104</td><td>1.1×105</td><td>6.5×105</td><td>4.1×106</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>1.2×105</td><td>1.3×105</td><td>7.2×105</td><td>6.1×106</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>1.3×105</td><td>1.5×105</td><td>8.0×105</td><td>8.0×106</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>aSNI (Indonesian National Standard) TRS1 = bacteriocin produced by Bacillus tropicus strain MCCC 1A01406; TRS2 = Bacillus nitratireducens strain MCCC 1A00732; TRS3 = Bacillus paramycoides strain MCCC 1A04098.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Results of Kruskal-Wallis test on the efectiveness of bacteriocin treatments on total bacterial count in pacific white shrimp</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col">Total N</th><th scope="col">96</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Test statistic</td><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-43"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 57.234^a \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td>Degree of freedom</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Asymptotic</td><td>&lt;.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The Kruskal-Wallis test on the TRS1 of bacteriocin efectiveness based on observation time (every 3 h until 24 h) showed a significant diference (p = 0.042) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>The results of the analysis indicated that bacteriocin significantly afected bacterial colony counts across diferent time points. That is, TRS1 was efective in inhibiting bacterial growth at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 h. However, no diferences were observed among the time points of observation, as shown by Dunn’s post hoc test.</p><p>The results of Dunn’s post hoc test on the efectiveness of bacteriocin TRS1 in <italic>Pacific</italic><italic>white shrimp</italic> across diferent observation times showed that most pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant. Although some diferences were observed at the early observation points, particularly between 3 and 6, 9, 21, and 24 h, as well as between 15 and 21 and 24 h <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-44"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( \mathtt { p } < 0 . 0 5 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , these results did not remain significant after adjustment (Adj. Sig. &gt; 0.05). These findings indicate that the efectiveness of bacteriocin TRS1 remained relatively stable throughout the observation period, with variations across time points not strong enough to be considered statistically significant.</p><p>The Kruskal-Wallis test results showed that the efectiveness of the TRS2 bacteriocin was similar across the time points of observation (every 3 h until 24 h) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). Meanwhile, TRS3 bacteriocin showed diferences in its efectiveness across the time points of observation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). However, the diferences existed only between hours 3 and 23 and hours 3 and 24, as indicated by Dunn’s post hoc test.</p><table-wrap id="table-4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Kruskal-Wallis test on the efectiveness of bacteriocin TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3 in pacific white shrimp across observation time</p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col" colspan="4">Type of bacteriocin</th></tr><tr><th scope="col"></th><th scope="col">TRS</th><th scope="col">TRS2</th><th scope="col">TRS3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Total N</td><td>24</td><td>24</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>Test statistic</td><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-45"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 14.59^a \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-46"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 13.11^{ab} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-47"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 22.20^a \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td>Degree of freedom</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Asymptotic</td><td>&lt;.042</td><td>.070</td><td>.002</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>TRS1 = bacteriocin produced by Bacillus tropicus strain MCCC 1A01406; TRS2 = Bacillus nitratireducens strain MCCC 1A00732; TRS3 = Bacillus paramycoides strain MCCC 1A04098.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The results of Dunn’s post hoc test indicated that the diferences in the efectiveness of TRS3 bacteriocin across observation times were largely not significant after adjustment (Adj. Sig. &gt;0.05). However, significant diferences were observed at certain time comparisons, particularly between 3 and 21 h <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-48"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( \mathtt { p } = 0 . 0 4 2 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and between 3 and 24 h <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-49"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( \mathtt { p } = 0 . 0 1 0 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . This finding suggests that the efectiveness of TRS3 undergoes a notable change during the early observation period (3 h) compared to later periods (21–24 h).</p><p>Overall, although some variation in efectiveness was observed across diferent times, most diferences were not statistically significant after correction, suggesting that the activity of TRS3 bacteriocin remained relatively stable throughout the observation period, with significant changes only evident between the earliest and latest time points.</p><p>TRS1 bacteriocin showed an <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-50"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value of 0.22 µL/mL against <italic>Artemia</italic>, indicating a very high level of toxicity. Meanwhile, TRS2 and TRS3 had <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-51"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values of 4.40 and 2.48 µL/ mL, respectively, which also fall into the highly toxic category, although they are less toxic than TRS1. These <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-52"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values are classified as highly toxic based on toxicity categories, where compounds with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-53"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values &lt;100 µL/ mL are considered highly toxic; 100–500 µL/ mL toxic; 500–1,000 µL/mL moderately toxic; 1,000–2,500 µL/mL slightly toxic; and &gt;2,500 µL/mL are regarded as practically non-toxic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25 BIBR-29">(Meyer et al., 1982; USEPA, 2022; Pohan et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Among the tested bacteriocins, TRS1 (produced by <italic>B. tropicus</italic>) exhibited the lowest concentration (0.22 µL/mL), indicating the highest toxicity to <italic>Artemia</italic> sp. In contrast, the bacteriocins of TRS2 and TRS3 had much higher LC ₈₀ values (4.40 and 2.48 µL/mL, respectively). These <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-54"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> findings are critical for the development of bacteriocins as natural preservatives in fishery products, particularly shrimp products. Ideally, bacteriocins used for preservation should exhibit high toxicity against microorganisms to enable the use of very low concentrations but with high efectiveness. The three bacteriocins isolated from the shrimp paste in this study are promising candidates for further applications, either as antimicrobial coatings or as preservatives/additives in shrimp processing.</p><p>The observed toxicity was much higher than that reported in previous studies. For example, bacteriocin from <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> exhibited inhibitory activity against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic>, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranging from 2–4 µL/mL when applied to processed meat products (Sobrino-Lopez &amp; Martin-Belloso, 2008). Meanwhile, a liquid filtrate containing bacteriocin-like substances from <italic>Bacillus</italic> subtilis inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at concentrations of 1–3 µL/mL (Wahyudi <italic>et al</italic>., 2010). Enterocin, a bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium, showed an <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-55"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value against <italic>Artemia</italic> salina in the range of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-56"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 5 \mathrm { - } 1 0 \mu \mathrm { L } / \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> mL (Delgado <italic>et al</italic>., 2007). Bacteriocins from Streptomyces isolated from the gut of milkfish (<italic>Chanos chanos</italic>) demonstrated extracellular metabolite activity against <italic>Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium</italic>, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic>, and <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, with an <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-57"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> value of 0.227 µL/mL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Kurnianto et al., 2021)</xref>. Bacteriocin P7 from <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>, isolated from a mangrove endophyte, has an MIC value of 30.35 µL/mL (Li <italic>et al</italic>., 2025). Another study found that a crude extract from <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> strain PD9 was efective against MRSA, with an MIC value of 125 µL/mL (Baharuddin <italic>et al</italic>., 2021). Bacteriocins produced by <italic>Lactococcus</italic> spp.. HY449 inhibited the growth of S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, <italic>S. aureus</italic> ATCC 65389, <italic>Streptococcus. pyogenes</italic> ATCC 21059, and<italic> P. acnes </italic>ATCC 6919, with an estimated <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-58"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of approximately 50 mg/mL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Oh et al., 2006)</xref>.</p><p>Following the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-59"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> assessment, the efectiveness of bacteriocins isolated from TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3 in inhibiting spoilage bacteria in white shrimp was further evaluated. This involved applying bacteriocins to shrimp and monitoring the total bacterial count (TBC) at regular intervals. The results showed significant efectiveness in bacterial suppression at various time points over a 24-hour observation period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). TRS1 demonstrated the highest efectiveness in inhibiting bacterial growth. Even at the 24- hour mark, the TBC remained relatively low <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-60"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( 1 . 3 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 5 } \mathrm { C F U / g } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , far below both the control <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-61"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( 8 . 0 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 6 } \mathrm { C F U / g } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) threshold <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-62"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( 5 . 0 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 5 } \mathrm { C F U / g } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Bacteriocins from TRS2 and TRS3 also exhibited inhibitory efects. At 24 h, the TBC of TRS2 bacteriocin reached <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-63"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 . 5 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g, whereas that of TRS3 exceeded the SNI limit with a TBC of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-64"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 8 . 0 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g. In contrast, the control group showed a sharp increase in TBC from <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-65"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 3 . { \overset { - } { 1 } } { \times } { 1 0 ^ { 5 } } \mathrm { C F U / g } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at 3 h to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-66"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 8 . 0 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 6 } \mathrm { C F U / g } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at 24 h, illustrating rapid microbial growth in the absence of bacteriocins. Only TRS1 and TRS2 bacteriocins maintained TBC values below the SNI threshold throughout the 24- hour period. The TRS3 was efective only up to 12 h, after which the TBC values surpassed the permitted maximum limit.</p><p>During the 24-hour observation period, the TRS1 and TRS2 bacteriocintreated shrimps showed fluctuations in their total bacterial counts. Initially, there was an increase in TBC from <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-67"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 4 . 4 \times 1 0 ^ { 4 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-68"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 9 . 0 \times 1 0 ^ { 4 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-69"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { C F U } / \mathrm { g } , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , respectively, at hour 3 to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-70"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 . 2 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-71"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1 . 3 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 5 } \ \mathrm { C F U } / \mathrm { g } , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> respectively, at hour 6. This early increase may be attributed to the adaptive phase of microorganisms adjusting to the bacteriocin environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Negash &amp; Tsehai, 2020)</xref>, during which not all microbes are immediately inhibited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Todorov et al., 2022)</xref>. The difusion and penetration times required for bacteriocins to act within shrimp tissues may also influence their initial efectiveness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Silva et al., 2018)</xref>. From hours 6 to 15, a gradual decline in TBC was observed, indicating optimal antimicrobial activity. Bacteriocins likely disrupt bacterial cell membranes, interfere with metabolic processes, and ultimately lead to cell death <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31 BIBR-34">(Sharma et al., 2021; Soltani et al., 2021)</xref>. Interestingly, a rebound in bacterial growth occurred from 18 to 24 h, possibly due to the development of microbial resistance or regrowth from previously suppressed or dormant populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Telhig et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>In contrast, the TRS3 bacteriocintreated samples exhibited a steady increase in TBC from <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-72"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 7 . 9 { \times } 1 0 ^ { 4 } \mathrm { C F U } / \mathrm { g } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at hour 3 to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-73"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 8 . 0 \times 1 0 ^ { 5 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> CFU/g at hour 24. Although TRS3 showed some early inhibition (with TBC under the SNI threshold at hour 12), its overall antimicrobial performance was less efective than that of TRS1 and TRS2. The untreated control group showed exponential microbial growth, confirming the necessity of antimicrobial interventions for shrimp preservation.</p></sec><sec id="sec-10"><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>This study concluded that crude bacteriocins TRS1, TRS2, and TRS3 exhibited 24-hour <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-74"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { L C } _ { 5 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> values of 0.22, 4.40, and 2.48 µL/mL, respectively, indicating that all three were highly toxic to <italic>Artemia</italic> sp. larvae based on standard toxicity categories. In terms of application, crude bacteriocins of TRS1 and TRS2 efectively inhibited microbial growth in fresh Pacific white shrimp over a 24-hour storage period, with total bacterial counts (TBC) consistently remaining below the SNI threshold. In contrast, the TRS3 crude bacteriocin efectively suppressed microbial growth only up to 12 h, after which the TPC exceeded the acceptable limit. Therefore, TRS1 and TRS2 are the most promising candidates for use as natural preservatives in white shrimp, ofering superior microbial inhibition during storage. On the other hand, the TRS3 crude bacteriocin might require a higher concentration to sustain long-term eficacy, which requires further analysis.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>REFERENCES</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Microorganisms associated with food spoilage and foodborne diseases</article-title><source>Food Safety and Quality in the Global South</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akinsemolu</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Onyeaka</surname><given-names>H.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>489</fpage><lpage>531</lpage><page-range>489-531</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-97-2428-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Non-canonical aspects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance</article-title><source>Antibiotics</source><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amábile-Cuevas</surname><given-names>C.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lund-Zaina</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>565</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics13060565</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacteriocins against foodborne pathogens</article-title><source>Applied Biochemistry and</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banerji</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karkee</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saroj</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><source>Microbiology</source><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>518</fpage><lpage>539</lpage><page-range>518-539</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S0003683822050052</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bioactive peptides from food fermentation: A comprehensive review of their sources, bioactivities, applications, and future development</article-title><source>Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety</source><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>K.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Voo</surname><given-names>A.Y.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>W.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>3825</fpage><lpage>3885</lpage><page-range>3825-3885</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1541-4337.12651</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The validity of brine shrimp (Artemia sp.) toxicity assays to assess the ecological function of marine natural products</article-title><source>Journal of Chemical Ecology</source><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaughnessy</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berg</surname><given-names>C.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garson</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheney</surname><given-names>K.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>834</fpage><lpage>846</lpage><page-range>834-846</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-021-01264-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A comprehensive review of the spoilage of shrimp and advances in various indicators/sensors for shrimp spoilage monitoring</article-title><source>Food Research International</source><volume>173</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>H.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>113270</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113270</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Influence of diferent concentrations of plasticizer diethyl phthalate (DEP) on toxicity of Lactuca sativa seeds</article-title><source>Artemia salina and Zebrafish. Heliyon</source><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Machado</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>G.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>G.A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>H.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maciel Costa Veloso</surname><given-names>D.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishizawa</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>18855</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18855</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Production, purification and characterization of bacteriocin from Lactobacillus murinus AU06 and its broad antibacterial spectrum</article-title><source>Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine</source><volume>4</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elayaraja</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Annamalai</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mayavu</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balasubramanian</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>305</fpage><lpage>311</lpage><page-range>305-311</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C537</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The relationship between flavor formation, lipid metabolism, and microorganisms in fermented fish products</article-title><source>Food &amp; Function</source><volume>12</volume><issue>13</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>5685</fpage><lpage>5702</lpage><page-range>5685-5702</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/D1FO00692D</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Crustacean shellfish</article-title><source>Shellfish processing and preservation</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gökoğlu</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><page-range>7-127</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://10.1007/978-3-030-60303-8" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="978 3 030 60303 8">978 3 030 60303 8</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Terasi, exploring the Indonesian ethnic fermented shrimp paste</article-title><source>Journal of Ethnic Foods</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herlina</surname><given-names>V.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Setiarto</surname><given-names>R.H.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>7</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s42779-024-00222-w</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. A powerful alternative as antimicrobials, probiotics, and immunomodulators in veterinary medicine</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hernández-González</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez-Tapia</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazcano-Hernández</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Pérez</surname><given-names>B.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castrejón-Jiménez</surname><given-names>N.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>979</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11040979</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoover</surname><given-names>D.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Steenson</surname><given-names>L.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Cambridge, Massachusetts</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Detection and molecular identification of Salmonella spp. in traditional shrimp paste (terasi): insights from multiplex PCR and 16S rDNA sequencing</article-title><source>Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia</source><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jatmiko</surname><given-names>Y.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Melianti</surname><given-names>R.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prihanto</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>378</fpage><lpage>391</lpage><page-range>378-391</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17844/jphpi.v28i4.62964</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A comprehensive review on preparation of silver nanoparticles from a bacteriocin for the natural preservation of food products</article-title><source>Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalairaj</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rajendran</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karthikeyan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panda</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Senthilvelan</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><page-range>1-34</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12010-024-05122-y</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Production of bacteriocin by Virgibacillus salexigens isolated from “terasi”: a traditionally fermented shrimp paste in Indonesia</article-title><source>World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology</source><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kobayashi</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agustini</surname><given-names>T.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamei</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kajiwara</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ooka</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Terahara</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Imada</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><page-range>47</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-015-1991-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Partial purification and characterization</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kurnianto</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kusumaningrum</surname><given-names>H.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lioe</surname><given-names>H.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chasanah</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>of bacteriocin‐like inhibitory substances produced by Streptomyces sp. isolated from the gut of Chanos chanos</article-title><source>BioMed Research International</source><volume>1</volume><page-range>7190152</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2021/7190152</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacteriocin: anatural approach for food safety and food security</article-title><source>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</source><volume>10</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lahiri</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nag</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dutta</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarkar</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pati</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdul Kari</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>L.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smaoui</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen Goh</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>1005918</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005918</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Post-harvest bacterial contamination of fish, their assessment and control strategies</article-title><source>Brazilian Journal of Biology</source><volume>84</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luqman</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>H.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghafar</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bilal</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanwal</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raza</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kabir</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fadladdin</surname><given-names>Y.A.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rafiq</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibáñez-Arancibia</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ríos-Escalante</surname><given-names>P.D.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Siddique</surname><given-names>M.A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>282002</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1519-6984.282002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Investigating the production and synergistic antibacterial activity of bacteriocin-like substance from Brevibacillus laterosporus SA-14 (TISTR 2453) for enhanced wound healing</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madoromae</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Atipairin</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tayeh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lertcanawanichakul</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>42510</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42510</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Purification and characterization of plantaricin PQ12: A novel bacteriocin from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from fermented cucumbers, with inhibitory activity against foodborne pathogens</article-title><source>ACS Food Science &amp; Technology</source><volume>4</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makhlouf</surname><given-names>F.Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bramki</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smati</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Merouane</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barkat</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>3088</fpage><lpage>3096</lpage><page-range>3088-3096</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00663</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Klebsiella pneumoniae volatile organic compounds (VOCs) protect Artemia salina from fish pathogen Aeromonas sp.: a combined in vitro, in vivo, and in silico approach</article-title><source>Microorganisms</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahmud</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Biswas</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mortuza</surname><given-names>M.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paul</surname><given-names>G.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uddin</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaghloul</surname><given-names>N.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>172</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:title="CrossRef">CrossRef</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Brine shrimp: a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents</article-title><source>Planta medica</source><volume>45</volume><issue>05</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>B.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrigni</surname><given-names>N.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Putnam</surname><given-names>J.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobsen</surname><given-names>L.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nichols</surname><given-names>D.E.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>McLaughlin</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1982</year><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><page-range>31-34</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Current applications of bacteriocin</article-title><source>International Journal of Microbiology</source><volume>2020</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Negash</surname><given-names>A.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsehai</surname><given-names>B.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>4374891</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/4374891</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Efect of bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus sp. HY 449 on skininflammatory bacteria</article-title><source>Food and chemical toxicology</source><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sim</surname><given-names>J.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>K.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><fpage>552</fpage><lpage>559</lpage><page-range>552-559</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fct.2005.08.030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Toward safer and sustainable food preservation: a comprehensive review of bacteriocins in the food industry</article-title><source>Bioscience Reports</source><volume>45</volume><issue>04</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parada Fabián</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Álvarez Contreras</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Natividad Bonifacio</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernández Robles</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vázquez Quiñones</surname><given-names>C.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Quiñones Ramírez</surname><given-names>E.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vázquez Salinas</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>20241594</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/BSR20241594</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Toxicity test of strong drug using the BSLT (brine shrimp lethality test) method</article-title><source>International Journal of Health Sciences and Research</source><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pohan</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marantuan</surname><given-names>R.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Djojosaputro</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><page-range>203-209</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52403/ijhsr.20230228</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Determination of median lethal dose of combination of endosulfan and cypermethrin in wistar rat</article-title><source>Toxicology international</source><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raj</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandra</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dogra</surname><given-names>T.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pahuja</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raina</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><page-range>1</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/0971-6580.111531</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Classification and mechanism of bacteriocin induced cell death: a review: bacteriocin classification and their mode action</article-title><source>Journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences</source><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>3733</fpage><lpage>3733</lpage><page-range>3733-3733</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15414/jmbfs.3733</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>C.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>S.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ribeiro</surname><given-names>S.C.</given-names></name></person-group></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Application of bacteriocins and protective cultures in dairy food preservation</article-title><source>Frontiers in microbiology</source><volume>9</volume><year>2018</year><page-range>594</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00594</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacteriocins as a new generation of antimicrobials: toxicity aspects and regulations</article-title><source>FEMS microbiology reviews</source><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soltani</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammami</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cotter</surname><given-names>P.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rebufat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Said</surname><given-names>L.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudreau</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bédard</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Biron</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Drider</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fliss</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>039</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsre/fuaa039</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Identification of bacteriocinproducing bacteria from shrimp paste using 16S rRNA gene method and assay for MIC of their bacteriocin</article-title><source>Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity</source><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sukmawati</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Metusalach</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syahrul</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>3367</fpage><lpage>3377</lpage><page-range>3367-3377</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d260728</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Analysis of bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermentation of rebon shrimp (Acetes sp.) in South Sorong, Indonesia as antibacterial agents</article-title><source>Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity</source><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sukmawati</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sipriyadi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yunita</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dewi</surname><given-names>N.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Noya</surname><given-names>E.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>3852</fpage><lpage>3859</lpage><page-range>3852-3859</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d230763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Karakteristik terasi udang rebon (Acetes sp.) dengan penambahan pewarna alami ubi jalar ungu (Ipomoea batatas L.) yang berbeda</article-title><source>Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia</source><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sumardianto</surname><given-names>Azizi</given-names></name><name><surname>Q.</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Purnamayati</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>494</fpage><lpage>503</lpage><page-range>494-503</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17844/jphpi.v25i3.43432</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bacteriocins to thwart bacterial resistance in gram negative bacteria</article-title><source>Frontiers in microbiology</source><volume>11</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telhig</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ben Said</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zirah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fliss</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rebufat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>586433</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.586433</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Use of bacteriocins and bacteriocinogenic beneficial organisms in food products: benefits, challenges, concerns</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>11</volume><issue>19</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Todorov</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Popov</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Weeks</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chikindas</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>3145</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods11193145</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Efluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms</article-title><source>US Environmental Protection Agency US EPA</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>U.S.E.P.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><publisher-loc>Washington, DC, USA</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Glossary of fish technology terms</article-title><source>Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</source><volume>63</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whittle</surname><given-names>K.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Howgate</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>