Unlocking the Private Sector Role in Supporting the Sustainable Multipurpose Forest Management in Riau, Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to discover the private sector’s perspective on the sustainable transition of degraded forestlands, including the transformation of oil palm plantations in forest areas into multipurpose forests, identify current barriers in adopting sustainable multipurpose forest management practices on financing and policy aspects, and explore how the private sector can step up its role in forestland restoration. This study was based on field observations, key informant interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and literature reviews. This study aims to navigate a path for policy implementation toward decarbonization, as tenurial conflicts, particularly between oil palm plantations and forest areas, are critical for sustainable forest management in Riau. The private sector's interest in sustainable multipurpose forest management is higher when additional benefits from non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are high. This study also found that the private sector’s desire to support sustainable multipurpose forest management stems from the potential benefits of carbon trading. Regarding the carbon market, most respondents are willing to join when carbon prices are USD4–6 ton-1 of CO2e. It indicates that the private sector is willing to support the domestic carbon market as regulated under the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation 21/2022. While the private sector has complied with most transformative policies and mechanisms, respondents expect further incentives and support, particularly to resolve the forestland conflict.
Full text article
References
Arias-Arévalo, P., Martín-López, B., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2017). Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443
Astuti, R. (2020). Fixing flammable Forest: The scalar politics of peatland governance and restoration in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 61(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12267
Budiman, I., Bastoni, Sari, E. N., Hadi, E. E., Asmaliyah, Siahaan, H., Januar, R., & Hapsari, R. D. (2020). Progress of paludiculture projects in supporting peatland ecosystem restoration in Indonesia. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, Article e01084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01084
Cord, A. F., Bartkowski, B., Beckmann, M., Dittrich, A., Hermans-Neumann, K., Kaim, A., Lienhoop, N., Locher-Krause, K., Priess, J., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Schwarz, N., Seppelt, R., Strauch, M., Václavík, T., & Volk, M. (2017). Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosystem Services, 28, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012
Ekayani, E., Setiajiati, F., Nurrochmat, N. A., Tarigan, S. D., Nurrochmat, D. R., Siregar, I. Z., Adzkia U., Satria, A., Siregar, J., & Widodo, E. (2025). Policy forum: Reducing expansion of oil palm plantations into forests through land intensification, agroforestry, and added value creation of processed palm oils. 178. Forest Policy and Economics, 178, Article 103582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103582
Evers, S., Yule, C. M., Padfield, R., O’Reilly, P., & Varkkey, H. (2017). Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands–implications for policies and management. Global Change Biology, 23(2), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13422
Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F, Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T, Garcia, W. D. O., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., Ludere, G., Nemet, G. F., Rogelj, J., Smith, P., Vicente, J. L. V., Wilcox, J., Dominguez, M. D. M. Z., & Minx, J. C. (2018). Negative emissions–Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), Article 063002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f
Giesen, W., & Sari, E. N. N. (2018). Tropical peatland restoration report: the Indonesian case. Technical report. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30049.40808
Hasannudin, D. A. L., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Ekayani, M. (2022). Agroforestry management systems through landscape-landscape integration: A case study in Gowa, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 23(4), 1864–1874. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230420
Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Boer, R., Immanuel, G. S., & Masui, T. (2016). Land-based mitigation strategies under the mid-term carbon reduction targets in Indonesia. Sustainability, 8(12), Article 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121283
Himes, A., & Muraca, B. (2018). Relational values: The key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005
Januar, R., Sari, E. N. N., & Putra, S. (2021). Dynamics of local governance: The case of peatland restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 102, Article 105270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105270
Kibuacha, F. (2024, February 2). Key informant interviews: An in-depth guide for researchers. GeoPoll. Retrieved from https://www.geopoll.com/blog/key-informant-interviews/
Kimmel, K., & Mander, Ü. (2010). Ecosystem services of peatlands: Implications for restoration. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 34(4), 491–514. http://doi.org/10.1177/0309133310365595
Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2018). Corrective action: Tata kelola gambut di Indonesia menuju ekosistem gambut berkelanjutan. Jakarta: Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Retrieved from http://pkgppkl.menlhk.go.id/v0/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Book-Gambut-25jan2019.pdf.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2019). Peta jalan implementasi nationally determined contribution mitigasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2021). Kerangka kerja investasi untuk mengurangi emisi dari deforestasi dan degradasi hutan serta peran konservasi, pengelolaan hutan berkelanjutan dan peningkatan stok karbon hutan (REDD+) di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2022). Operational plan Indonesia’s FOLU Net Sink 2030. Jakarta: Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
Naylor, R. L., Higgins, M. M., Edwards, R. B., & Falcon, W. P. (2019). Decentralization and the environment: Assessing smallholder oil palm development in Indonesia. Ambio, 48(10), 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1135-7
Noor, M., Masganti, & Agus, F. (2014). Pembentukan dan karakteristik gambut tropika Indonesia. In F. Agus, M. Anda, A. Jamil, & Masganti (Eds.), Lahan gambut Indonesia: Pembentukan, karakteristik, dan potensi mendukung ketahanan pangan (pp. 7–32). Bogor: IAARD Press.
Nurida, N. L., & Wihardjaka, A. (Eds.). (2014). Panduan pengelolaan berkelanjutan lahan gambut terdegradasi. Bogor: Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian
Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Ardiansyah, M., Immanuel, G., & Purwawangsa, H. (2020). Policy forum: Reconciling palm oil targets and reduced deforestation: Landswap and agrarian reform in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 119, Article 102291. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102291
Nurrochmat, D. R., Hendroyono, B., & Suryanto. (2021a). Multiusaha kehutanan: Konsep & implementasi bisnis kehutanan berkelanjutan. Bogor: IPB Press.
Nurrochmat, D. R., Jaya, I. N. S., Santoso, N., & Purwawangsa, H. (2024). Strategi penguatan tata kelola melalui digitasi data dan peta spasial kebun sawit rakyat [Bahan Presentasi Monev Riset BIMA]. IPB Bogor.
Nurrochmat, D. R., Pribadi, R., Siregar, H., Justianto, A., & Park, M. S. (2021b). Transformation of agro-forest management policy under the dynamic circumstances of a two-decade regional autonomy in Indonesia. Forests, 12(4), Article 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040419
Nurrochmat, D. R., Sahide, M. A. K, & Fisher, M. R. (2022). Making sustainable forest development work: Formulating an idea for a more appropriate green policy paradigm. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.783718
Nurrochmat, D. R., Suryanto, Nurrochmat, N. A., Tarigan, S., Siregar, I. Z., Rizki, D., Radjawali, I., & Sulistio, H. (2023). Indonesia's options in becoming a high-income country: Accelerating the turning point in deforestation? Forest Policy and Economics, 148, Article 102905. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102905
Osaki, M., Nursyamsi, D., Noor, M., Wahyunto, & Segah, H. (2016). Peatland in Indonesia. In M. Osaki, & N. Tsuji (Eds.,). Tropical peatland ecosystems (pp. 49–58). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55681-7_3
Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Banks, C. J. (2011). Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Global Change Biology, 17(2), 798–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.x
Pauw, W. P., Moslener, U., Zamarioli, L. H., Amerasinghe, N., Atela, J., Affana, J. -P. B., Buchner, B., Klein, R. J. T., Mbeva, K, L., Puri, J., Roberts, J. T., Shawoo, Z., Watson, C., & Weikmans, R. (2022). Post-2025 climate finance target: How much more and how much better? Climate Policy, 22(9–10), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2114985
Pribadi, R., Nurrochmat, D. R., Suhendang, E., & Siregar, H. (2020). Enhancing the role of the district government in decentralized forest management. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 26(2), 114–122. http://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.26.2.114
Puspitaloka, D., Kim, Y. -S., Purnomo, H., & Fulé, P. Z. (2021). Analysis of challenges, costs, and governance alternative for peatland restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Trees, Forest and People, 6, Article 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100131
Puspitaloka, D., Kim, Y. S., Purnomo, H., & Fulé, P. Z. (2020). Defining ecological restoration of peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Restoration Ecology, 28(2), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13097
Rahajoe, J. S., Alhamd, L., Atikah, T. D., Pratama, B. A., Shiodera, S., & Kohyama, T. S. (2016). Floristic diversity in the peatland ecosystems of Central Kalimantan. In M. Osaki, & N. Tsuji (Eds.), Tropical peatland ecosystems (pp. 167–196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55681-7_11
Rahmani, T. A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Hero, Y., Park, M. S., Boer, R., & Satria, A. (2021). Evaluating the feasibility of oil palm agroforestry in Harapan Rainforest, Jambi, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), 458–477. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.10375
Rahmani, T. A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Park, M. S., Boer, R., Ekayani, M., & Satria, A. (2022). Reconciling conflict of interest in the management of forest restoration ecosystem: A strategy to incorporate different interests of stakeholders in the utilization of the Harapan Rainforest, Jambi, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 13924. http://doi.org/10.3390/su142113924
Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Long-term strategy on low carbon and climate resilience 2050 (LTS-LCCR 2050). Jakarta.
Rossita, A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Boer, R., Hein, L., & Riqqi, A. (2021). Assessing the monetary value of ecosystem services provided by Gaung-Batang Tuaka Peat Hydrological Unit (KHG), Riau Province. Heliyon, 7(10), Article e08208. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08208
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., Faturachmat, F., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120, Article 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
Sheriffdeen, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Perdinan, & di Gregorio, M. (2020). Indicators to evaluate the institutional effectiveness of national climate financing mechanisms. Forest and Society, 4(2), 358–378. http://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i2.10309
Sheriffdeen, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Abubakar, H. K. A. (2023). Effectiveness of emerging mechanisms for financing national climate actions; example of the Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund. Climate and Development, 15(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2022.2057905
Silalahi, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Harrison, R. D., Mansur, I., Walsh, T. A., & Habibi. (2025). Reconciling different interests in the Hutan Harapan rainforest ecosystem restoration management in Sumatra. Trees, Forests and People, 20, Article 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100823
Suwarno, A., Hein, L., & Sumarga, E. (2016). Who benefits from ecosystem services? A case study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Environmental Management, 57(2), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0623-9
Tan, Z. D., Carrasco, L. R., Sutikno, S., & Taylor, D. (2022). Peatland restoration as an affordable nature-based climate solution with fire reduction and conservation co-benefits in Indonesia. Environmental Research Letters, 17(6), Article 064028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6f6e
Ward, C., Stringer, L. C., Warren-Thomas, E., Agus, F., Hamer, K., Pettorelli, N., Hariyadi, B., Hodgson, J., Kartika, W. D., Lucey, J., McClean, C., Nurida, N. L., Saad, A., & Hill, J. K. (2020). Wading through the swamp: What does tropical peatland restoration mean to national-level stakeholders in Indonesia? Restoration Ecology, 28(4), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13133
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.