<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2615-790X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Trop. Anim. Sci. J.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2615-790X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2615-787X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2026.49.1.71</article-id><title-group><article-title>Endoparasite and Microbial Burden in Quail Farm Systems: A Biosecurity and Water Quality Assessment in Central Java, Indonesia</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Murwani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country><email>rmurwani.undip@gmail.com</email></address><xref rid="AFF-1" ref-type="aff"></xref><xref rid="cor-0" ref-type="corresp"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dewi</surname><given-names>B. P. A.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Anggraeni</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mulyono</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="AFF-3" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ambariyanto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wiryawan</surname><given-names>Prof. Dr. Komang G</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Laboratory of Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agriculture Sciences</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Diponegoro</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/056bjta22</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Natural Product Laboratory, UPT Laboratorium Terpadu</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Diponegoro</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/056bjta22</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Laboratory of Nutrition and Feed Science, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agriculture Sciences</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Diponegoro</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/056bjta22</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Tropical Animal Science Journal</aff><author-notes><fn fn-type="coi-statement"><label>CONFLICT OF INTEREST</label><p>R. Murwani serves as an editor of the Tropical Animal Science Journal but has no role in the decision to publish this article. We declare no conflict of interest with any financial, personal, or other relationships with other people or organizations related to the material discussed in the manuscript.</p></fn><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: R. Murwani, Laboratory of Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Animal Science,  Faculty of Animal and Agriculture Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro.  Email: <email>rmurwani.undip@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-3"><day>3</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2025-12-3" publication-format="electronic"><day>3</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Tropical Animal Science Journal</issue-title><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>78</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-7-14"><day>14</day><month>7</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2025-9-26"><day>26</day><month>9</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-9-29"><day>29</day><month>9</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2025 Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Tropical Animal Science Journal</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" license-type="open-access"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/66209" xlink:title="Endoparasite and Microbial Burden in Quail Farm Systems: A Biosecurity and Water Quality Assessment in Central Java, Indonesia">Endoparasite and Microbial Burden in Quail Farm Systems: A Biosecurity and Water Quality Assessment in Central Java, Indonesia</self-uri><abstract><p>Quail farming is vital for smallholder farmers in Central Java, Indonesia; however, productivity often declines due to poor biosecurity, inadequate water quality, and parasitic infections. This study aims to examine biosecurity practices, water quality, and endoparasite loads in ten quail farms (L1-L10) located in Semarang City and nearby regencies. Data were collected through observations, interviews, water sampling, and analysis of quail droppings. Biosecurity scores (maximum 18) were categorized into three groups: Group-1 (scores 13-18), Group-2 (scores 7-12), and Group-3 (scores 1-6). Water quality was assessed based on pH, <italic>E. coli</italic>, and coliform counts using triplicate samples from each site. The biosecurity score showed that three farms are in Group-1 (L1, L7, L9), five are in Group-2, and two are in Group-3 (L8, L10). The water pH ranged from 4.8 to 8.0; the highest <italic>E. coli</italic> count was 19.33 CFU/mL (L9), and the highest Coliform count was 89.67 CFU/mL (L5). L1 had the highest parasite load, with Coccidia, Strongyloides, and <italic>Ascaridia</italic> sp. at 1000 oocysts/g (OPG), 100 OPG, and 33.33 OPG, respectively. Meanwhile, L7 showed no endoparasites or water contamination. Egg production ranged from 64.29% to 90.00%. Although no significant differences in endoparasite prevalence were found among biosecurity groups or water quality (p&gt;0.05), Coliform levels differed significantly (p&lt;0.05), with the highest levels in conventional well-water. This study revealed that only about one-third of smallholder quail farms in Semarang and its surrounding regencies adhere to proper biosecurity measures. It was also the first to document quail endoparasite burdens as well as <italic>E. coli</italic> and coliform contamination in drinking water.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>biosecurity</kwd><kwd>Coliform</kwd><kwd>E. coli</kwd><kwd>endoparasites</kwd><kwd>smallholder farmers</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Quail farming is a growing and dynamic part of the global poultry industry, driven by rising consumer demand for lean meat and nutrient-rich eggs<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Entrance, 2025)</xref>. The global quail meat market, valued at $75.85 million in 2024, is projected to reach $81.97 million in 2025<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Insight, 2025)</xref>. Domesticated quails, particularly the Japanese quail (<italic>Coturnix japonica</italic>), are now raised worldwide, with the Asia-Pacific region leading the market at 35% share in 2024<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Quail meat market size, 2025)</xref>. In Indonesia, quail farming is vital for smallholder farmers, providing income and nutrition. The national quail population reached 24.28 million in 2024<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Statistik, 2024)</xref>, producing approximately 25,770 tons of eggs annually, with Central Java contributing over 8,800 tons from 4.6 million birds<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Animal Husbandry &amp; Kesehatan Hewan, 2022)</xref>. This sector is crucial for ensuring food security, generating employment opportunities, and supporting low-income rural households.</p><p>Although quail farming in Indonesia is gaining importance, it faces constant challenges that hinder its productivity and long-term sustainability. These challenges include feed quality<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Gao et al., 2021)</xref>;<xref rid="BIBR-22" ref-type="bibr">(Ibrahim et al., 2020)</xref>, environmental stressors<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(El Sabry et al., 2022)</xref>, and suboptimal poultry management practices<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Ratriyanto et al., 2020)</xref>. Among these, biosecurity has become a key element of an effective strategy for maintaining flock health and preventing the spread of infectious diseases. Effective biosecurity encompasses a set of conceptual, structural, and operational measures that aim to minimize the risk of pathogen entry and transmission within and between flocks and farms<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Tilli et al., 2022)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Delpont et al., 2023)</xref>. When implemented consistently, biosecurity is not only the most cost-effective way to protect flock health, cut economic losses, and reduce zoonotic risks to farm workers and nearby communities, but also a key strategy for promoting animal welfare, food safety, and environmental sustainability.</p><p>Water quality greatly influences poultry health and productivity. Contaminated drinking water may contain microbial pathogens, such as <italic>E. coli</italic> and Coliform bacteria, indicating fecal contamination<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Mohamed et al., 2025)</xref>. These pathogens can spread disease, cause stress, and reduce feed efficiency. Combining water quality management and hygiene practices with biosecurity measures lowers infection risk and boosts farm resilience<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Jimenez et al., 2023)</xref>;<xref rid="BIBR-37" ref-type="bibr">(Paramitadevi et al., 2023)</xref>. Moreover, endoparasitic infections, often overlooked, present serious threats in quail farming. Parasites such as Eimeria, Ascaridia, Strongyloides, and <italic>Capillaria</italic> spp. have been found in the small intestine and feces of quail worldwide, including in India<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(D’souza et al., 2022)</xref>, Nigeria<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Onyeabor &amp; Uwalaka, 2022)</xref>, Egypt<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Ahmed et al., 2017)</xref>, Brazil<xref rid="BIBR-34" ref-type="bibr">(Neiva et al., 2024)</xref>, and the Amazon<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Monte et al., 2018)</xref>. These parasites damage the gastrointestinal tract, impair nutrient absorption, and reduce productivity. However, studies on the prevalence of endoparasites in Indonesian quails are limited, with most research focusing on chickens<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Murwani et al., 2022)</xref>;<xref rid="BIBR-44" ref-type="bibr">(Setyowati et al., 2022)</xref>, highlighting a significant knowledge gap regarding the parasitic burdens of quails.</p><p>This study aims to fill the gap by assessing biosecurity implementation, water quality, and endoparasite prevalence in small-scale quail farming systems in key quail-producing areas in Semarang and its surrounding regions. Using field observations, interviews, laboratory diagnostics, and statistical analysis, the study highlights significant challenges related to biosecurity practices, water quality, and parasite burdens. The results are expected to provide data to help develop targeted interventions that improve farm management, promote animal health, and strengthen the economic resilience of smallholder farmers involved in quail production. Additionally, the findings could offer valuable insights applicable to similar poultry systems worldwide, supporting broader efforts to strengthen biosecurity and disease control in small-scale operations and helping to build resilience and sustainability in smallholder agriculture globally.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>This study was conducted in Semarang City, Semarang Regency, Demak Regency, and Kendal Regency, areas known for their quail farms and regional development potential (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>). The study included ten existing quail farms (L1-L10) selected through purposive random sampling based on available quail farms. The interview data were analyzed descriptively, while quantitative data on water quality, endoparasite types, and counts were analyzed statistically. All farms housed quails in five-tier cages, with each tier holding approximately 25 to 30 birds.</p><sec><title>Water Quality Test (pH, <italic>E.coli</italic>, and Coliform)</title><p>Drinking water samples were collected from ten quail farms (L1-L10) in Semarang City and the Regencies of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>). The sources of the quails’ drinking water were recorded and tabulated. Water samples were taken in three independent replicates, each 50 ml, and placed in sterile Falcon tubes. Water quality tests were conducted for pH, <italic>E. coli</italic>, and Coliform<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Khan &amp; Gupta, 2020)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Kristanti et al., 2022)</xref>. The pH of the drinking water was measured with a pH meter (Merck, Germany). Total <italic>E. coli</italic> and Coliform counts were determined using 3M Petrifilm <italic>E. coli</italic>/Coliform count plates (3M Petrifilm Plates, Canada). The procedure involved placing the plate on a flat surface, aseptically opening the top layer, and evenly distributing 1 ml of the water sample onto the medium. The plates were then incubated for 24 to 48 hours. <italic>E. coli</italic> colonies were identified by counting blue colonies, and Coliform colonies by counting red colonies. To evaluate the effect of different water sources on water quality, water from springs, artesian wells, and conventional wells was assigned numeric values of 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Sampling locations of ten quail farms in Semarang City, the Regency of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="Trop_Anim_Sci_J-49-1-71-g1.png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Biosecurity Implementation (ASEAN, 2021)</title><p>Farm biosecurity in poultry farming involves three main components: conceptual, structural, and operational (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(A.S.E.A.N., 2021)</xref>. The conceptual part focuses on selecting the appropriate farm location, ideally at least 200 meters away from populated areas, with suitable temperature, humidity, terrain, water sources, enough land, and easy access to transportation. There should also be restrictions on keeping other livestock near the quails. The structural part involves designing the farm layout, maintaining proper distances between cages, and installing fences to prevent unauthorized access by people or animals. Other essential facilities include a protected drum area with safety doors, a feed storage area, changing rooms, bathrooms, clean water sources free of pathogens, and a designated area for disposing of quail carcasses. The operational component includes regulating limited access to the farm area, routine sanitation and disinfection of cages, disinfection before entering the cage area, controlling rats that often roam around the drums and feed warehouses, and conducting periodic laboratory tests on the drinking water used at the farm<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(A.S.E.A.N., 2021)</xref>. Biosecurity was recorded and tabulated. Each biosecurity component implemented in each quail farm scored 1, culminating in a total score for each quail farm location (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>). The maximum attainable score for biosecurity is 18. To evaluate the effect of biosecurity on the fecal-endoparasite burden, the recorded scores were subsequently categorized into three distinct groups: scores ranging from 13 to 18 were classified as Group-1; scores from 7 to 12 were designated as Group-2; and scores between 1 and 6 were categorized as Group-3 (the lowest group). This systematic scoring enabled a refined analysis of biosecurity practices across the evaluated quail farms.</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Biosecurity components and their implementation scores of ten quail farms in Semarang City, the Regency of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">No</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">Parameters</th><th align="center" colspan="10" valign="top">Location</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L1</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L2</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L3</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L4</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L5</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L6</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L7</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L8</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L9</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L10</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="12" valign="top">Conceptual biosecurity</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">The distance of the quail farm from settlements is more than 200 meters.</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Selecting the appropriate livestock location involves considering factors such as temperature, humidity, topography, water sources, and land area.</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Close to transportation access</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Restrictions on a quail farm when keeping other livestock.</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="12" valign="top">Structural biosecurity</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Cage layout arrangement</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Setting the distance between cage units</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Fencing livestock areas to prevent entry by people or animals from outside</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Fencing off the drum area with a safety door to minimize animal entry and limit operator movement to other drums</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Warehouse service facilities (medicine and equipment), changing rooms, and restrooms.</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Availability of a warehouse for feed</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Availability of clean water free of pathogenic agents (chlorine or other peroxides)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">A designated area for disposing of quail carcasses.</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="12" valign="top">Operational biosecurity</td></tr><tr><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Traffic management with limited access to the farm area</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Cage sanitation (cleaning excreta and cage floor)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Cage disinfection (Disinfectant spray)</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Traffic control and disinfection before entering the cage area</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Exterminate rats that often roam in drums and warehouses</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Conduct regular aboratory testing of drinking water used  for livestock</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>TOTAL</bold></td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">13</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">10</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">9</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">9</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">9</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">11</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">13</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">6</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">15</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">6</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: 1: Implemented, -: Not Implemented</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>Endoparasite Examination from Quail Droppings</title><p>Quail droppings were sampled in three independent replicates, collected from randomly selected five-tier cages. From each cage, the droppings from each tier were pooled and mixed, then sampled and placed into bottles containing 15 mL of 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF)<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Murwani et al., 2022)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Murwani et al., 2024)</xref>. These samples were analyzed at the Parasitology Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Health, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta. Endoparasites were identified using the centrifugal fecal flotation method<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Globokar et al., 2017)</xref>. Samples in 10% NBF were centrifuged (Hittech 320R) at 5,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the sediment was placed on a glass slide, covered with a cover slip, and examined under a microscope at 100x magnification to observe the morphology of the worm eggs and identify the type of endoparasite. Endoparasites were quantified using the McMaster method<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Lozano et al., 2021)</xref>. The number of worm eggs was counted using a McMaster counting chamber, and the following formula was applied to calculate the egg count<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Imran &amp; Alsayeqh, 2022)</xref>: Oocyte Per Gram (OPG) = (dropping sample volume/counting chamber volume).</p></sec><sec><title>Data Analysis</title><p>Data from interviews and observations on the biosecurity implementation for quail farmers are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref> and <xref rid="figure-1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>, which are analyzed descriptively. To assess the effect of biosecurity on endoparasite scores in bird droppings and the effect of water sources on water quality (pH, <italic>E. coli</italic>, Coliform), the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used. If significant effects were found, a Mann-Whitney test was conducted to assess the differences. All statistical analyses were performed at a confidence level of greater than 95%. The statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 15.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>There were three brands of layer feed used by the quail farmers (B, C, F). Despite using different brands, the nutritional composition of the feed during the layer phase is nearly the same (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). The highest crude protein content was found in L2 (21%).</p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p> Quail feed nutritional content used by ten quail farms in Semarang City, the Regency of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="top"></th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="10">Location</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Average</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L2</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L3</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L4</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L5</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L6</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L7</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L8</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L9</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L10</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Water (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">12</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">13</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">12.8</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude protein (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">21</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">19.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">19.5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">19.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.8</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Crude fiber (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Crude fat (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ash (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Calcium (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Phosphor (%)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.8</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.8</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.8</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.8</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Metabolizable energy (Kcal/kg)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2800</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2818.4</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2800</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2853.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2853.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2853.5</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2853.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2853.5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2800</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2853.5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2833.9</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Metabolizable energy (ME) is calculated using the Bolton formula<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Sutrisno et al., 2013)</xref>. ME = 40.81 (0.87 (crude protein + 2.25 crude fat + nitrogen-free extract)) + 4.9. Nitrogen-free extract = 100% - (ash + crude protein + crude fat + crude fibre). Layer quail feed brands: L1, L3, L9 = Brand C; L2 = Brand B; L4 – L8, L10 = Brand F.  Brand C and brand F are different brands but have similar nutritional content except for water content.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref> shows that the quail population at the sampling sites ranges from 1,100 to 6,750 birds. Egg production across the 10 locations varies from 64.29% to 90.00%, depending on the age of the birds. The drinking water sources at L3, L7, and L9 are from an artesian well. L2 and L8 use a conventional well, while L1, L4, L5, L6, and L10 source their water from springs. The best biosecurity practices are observed at L1, L7, and L9, with scores ranging from 13 to 15. Biosecurity at L2, L3, L4, and L5 scored lower, between 9 and 10, while L8 and L10 scored the lowest at 6. Water quality shows an average pH of 4.8 to 8, with <italic>E. coli</italic> levels at 19.33 CFU/mL. Notably, L5 had the highest Coliform count at 89.67 CFU/mL. The quail droppings from L1 have the highest number of endoparasites, with Coccidia at 1.000 OPG, Strongyloides at 100 OPG, and <italic>Ascaridia</italic> sp. at 33.33 OPG. In contrast, no endoparasites are detected in L7 quail droppings.</p><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>The characteristics of ten quail farms in Semarang City, the Regency of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Parameters</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="10">Quail farm location</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L1</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L2</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L3</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L4</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L5</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L6</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">L7</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">L8</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L9</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">L10</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Temperature (°C)</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">22-28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">22-28</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">23</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">22-28</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">22-27</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">23</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">25-26</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">21-22</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">23-29</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">21-22</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Humidity (%)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">64-95</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">64-95</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">88-91</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">64-95</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">64-95</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">88-92</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">83-84</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">94-97</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">61-91</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">94-97</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Elevation (msl)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">587</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">414</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">469</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">537</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">398</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">290</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">13</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">323</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">343</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">327</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Population (birds)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2,500</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">3,500</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">4,250</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">3,500</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">2,500</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2,000</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1,200</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1,100</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">6,750</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">2,500</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Age (weeks)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">16</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">40</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">35</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">32</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">37</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">12</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">10</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">33</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">16</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">17</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Egg production (%)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">88.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">64.29</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">70.59</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">74.29</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">68.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">80.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">79.17</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">75.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">82.50</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">90.00</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Water sources</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">3</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">2</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Drinking water-additive*</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">herbs/two weeks</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">herbs/day</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">herbs/3 days</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">herbs/3 days</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">herbs/two weeks</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">herbs/day</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">vita stress/3 days</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">-</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">vita stress/3 days</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Biosecurity</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">2</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">2</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">3</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">3</td></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="11" valign="top">Water quality</th></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">pH</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">7.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">7.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">7.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">7.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">6.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">7.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">8.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">4.80</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.53</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">5.37</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><italic>Escherichia coli  </italic>(CFU/mL)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">19.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.67</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">1.67</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.33</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">19.33</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">3.33</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><italic>Coliforms </italic>(CFU/mL)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">21.33</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">43.67</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">3.33</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.33</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">89.67</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">2.67</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">44.33</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">23.33</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">34.33</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Primary data were obtained from interviews and observations. The numerical water quality values are the average of three independent replicates with no SD. For statistical analysis, the biosecurity scores obtained in Table 1 were categorized into three groups: scores 13–18 were assigned to Group-1, 7–12 to Group-2, and 1–6 to Group-3. Drinking water from a spring, an artesian well, and a conventional well was assigned values of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, for statistical analysis. *Herbs: L1= <italic>Tinospora crispa L. Miers, Curcuma longa Linn, Piper betle L., Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb</italic>.; L2= <italic>Curcuma longa </italic>L., <italic>Curcuma xanthorrhiza </italic>Roxb., <italic>Moringa oleifera</italic>, <italic>Carica papaya </italic>L. leaves, <italic>Annona muricata </italic>L. leaves, <italic>Andrographis paniculata </italic>(Burm.f.) <italic>Nees </italic>leaves, <italic>Morinda citrifolia L., Tinospora crispa (L.) Miers., Kaempferia galanga, Curcuma aeruginosa Roxb., Zingiber officinale</italic>, <italic>Allium sativum</italic>, <italic>Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum</italic>, <italic>Curcuma heyneana, Cymbopogon citratus, Panax</italic>; L3= <italic>Curcuma longa L., Zingiber officinale, Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb., Andrographis paniculata</italic>; L5= <italic>Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb</italic>, palm sugar; L6= <italic>Curcuma longa Linn, Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb, Kaempferia galanga, Carica papaya L. </italic>leaves, <italic>Moringa oleifera</italic>; L7= <italic>Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb</italic>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis (p&lt;0.05) showed that biosecurity did not affect the number of Coccidia (p-value= 0.16), Strongyloides (p-value= 0.40), and <italic>Ascaridia</italic> sp. (p-value= 0.67) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). There were no significant differences observed in water pH and <italic>E. coli</italic> levels across different water sources. However, Coliform levels varied significantly depending on the water source (p&lt;0.05) (<xref rid="table-5" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Biosecurity effect on endoparasites of ten quail farms in Semarang City, The Regency of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2">Biosecurity</th><th colspan="2" valign="top" align="center">Coccidia</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2"><italic>p-value</italic></th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="top">Strongyloides</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><italic>p-value</italic></th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2"><italic>Ascaridia</italic> sp.</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p-value</italic></th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Min-max</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">x̄(SD)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Min-max</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">x̄(SD)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Min-max</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">x̄(SD)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Biosecurity (Group-1)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0-2,800</td><td colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">372.22(918.94)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">0.16</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0-350</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">33.33(82.92)</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="center">0.40</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0-100</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">11.11(33.33)</td><td rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.67</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Biosecurity (Group-2)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0-1,450</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">143.33(364.92)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0-150</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">23.33(45.77)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0-50</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">6.67(17.59)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Biosecurity (Group-3)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0-850</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">333.33(310.91)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.00(0.00)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.00(0.00)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: Data were tested using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric statistics. To evaluate the effect of biosecurity on the fecal-endoparasite burden, the biosecurity scores were categorized into three groups: 13 to 18 as Group-1, 7 to 12 as Group-2, and 1 to 6 as Group-3 (the lowest group).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Water source effect on water  quality (pH, Escherichia coli, and coliform) of ten quail farms in Semarang City, the Regency of Semarang, Demak, and Kendal</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Water source</th><th colspan="2" valign="top" align="center">pH</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle"><italic>p-value</italic></th><th colspan="2" valign="top" align="center"><italic>E. coli</italic></th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><italic>p-value</italic></th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Coliform</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2"><italic>p-value</italic></th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Min-max</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">x̄(SD)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Min-max</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">x̄(SD)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Min-max</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">x̄(SD)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Spring</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.20-7.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">6.49(0.67)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3">0.21</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0-32</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">4.80(8.81)</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="center">0.30</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0-96 ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">30.67(33.40)</td><td rowspan="3" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">0.01*</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Artesian well</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.30-8.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">6.84(1.08)</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0-22</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">7.11(9.49)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">0-27 ᵇ</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">8.89(11.44)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Conventional well</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">4.50-7.00</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.90(1.22)</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">3-9</td><td valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">5.50(2.17)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">18-63 ᵃ</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">44.00(14.87)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: The sample from each farm consisted of three independent replicates. *Coliform: Different subscripts with different letters indicate significant differences. Statistical significance at p&lt;0.05. To evaluate the effect of different water sources on water quality, water from springs, artesian wells, and conventional wells was assigned numeric values of 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>Biosecurity implementation across farms revealed varying degrees of compliance. Conceptual biosecurity was well implemented in L2, L5, and L9, which were located over 200 meters from settlements. However, L7 lacked proper site selection based on environmental parameters. Structurally, most farms (L1–L7, L9) maintained cage layout and spacing, but several (L4, L6, L7, L8, L10) lacked dedicated feed storage, potentially compromising feed quality over time. Operational biosecurity practices were consistently implemented, with all farms conducting sanitation and disinfection procedures. However, only L7 implemented traffic control measures, such as hand disinfection and the use of protective clothing. This farm also had the lowest bird population, suggesting that smaller-scale operations may facilitate more rigorous biosecurity enforcement.</p><p>The quail farms surveyed in Semarang and its surrounding areas showed bird populations ranging from 1,100 to 6,750 individuals. Egg production varied with age, reaching 79.17% at 10 weeks (L7), 80% at 12 weeks (L6), and peaking between 82.50% and 90% at 16–17 weeks (L1, L9, L10). A decline was seen between 32 and 40 weeks (L3–L5, L8), with the lowest rate of 64.29% at 40 weeks (L2). These patterns align with previous studies reporting egg production rates between 55.78% and 91% for quails aged 10 to 32 weeks<xref rid="BIBR-19" ref-type="bibr">(Gül et al., 2022)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Hossain et al., 2024)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Lokapirnasari et al., 2017)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Murwani et al., 2024)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Silva et al., 2020)</xref>, confirming that the observed performance remains within expected physiological norms.</p><p>Water quality assessments showed pH values ranging from 4.8 to 8.0. The ideal pH range for drinking water suitable for broilers is 5.5-6.5<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Hubbard, 2025)</xref>. However, since quail are smaller than chickens, they may be more sensitive to water pH, with a target of 6.0-6.8<xref rid="BIBR-38" ref-type="bibr">(Trends, 2023)</xref>. Ideal water pH supports optimal digestion, nutrient absorption, gut microbial balance, palatability, and water intake. A pH below 5 could irritate the digestive lining, while a pH above 6.8 could reduce mineral solubility and promote the growth of harmful bacteria. <italic>E. coli </italic>levels varied from 0 to 19.33 CFU/mL, and Coliform counts ranged from 0 to 89.67 CFU/mL. Acceptable limits for <italic>E. coli</italic> and Coliform are 0 CFU/100 mL. The presence of these bacteria indicates fecal contamination, likely from human, animal, or environmental sources<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(W.H.O., 2017)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Reitter et al., 2021)</xref>. While <italic>E. coli</italic> is often non-pathogenic, certain strains, such as APEC, can cause <italic>colibacillosis</italic> and <italic>colisepticemia</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Samanta et al., 2018)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Ananda et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Endoparasites identified in this study included <italic>Coccidia</italic>, <italic>Strongyloides</italic>, and <italic>Ascaridia</italic> sp., marking a novel contribution to the Indonesian poultry health literature. To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting endoparasitic infections in quail farms in Indonesia. Among the sampled locations, farm L1 exhibited the highest parasite burden, while farm L7 showed no detectable endoparasites. This contrast underscores the crucial role of traffic control and sanitation in mitigating parasite transmission<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Talazadeh et al., 2024)</xref>. Additionally, the smaller flock size at L7 may have facilitated more effective management and biosecurity practices. Coccidia oocysts are transmitted via contaminated equipment, footwear, feed, water, and personnel. The pathogenicity of Coccidia, specifically <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp., is well-documented, with lesions in the intestinal mucosa leading to hemorrhage, dehydration, and impaired nutrient absorption<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Belete et al., 2016)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Blake et al., 2021)</xref>;<xref rid="BIBR-11" ref-type="bibr">(Das, 2021)</xref>. In contrast, <italic>Strongyloides</italic> and <italic>Ascaridia</italic> sp. are associated with metabolic disorders, reduced growth, and poor feed conversion<xref rid="BIBR-35" ref-type="bibr">(Ombugadu et al., 2021)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Afia et al., 2019)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">(Zulmi et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed no significant differences in endoparasite prevalence across biosecurity groups (p&gt;0.05), indicating that infections may originate from breeder-level sources. Quails are typically introduced to farms at approximately one month of age, just before the onset of egg laying, and may already harbor endoparasites at the time of arrival. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in water pH and <italic>E. coli</italic> levels across different water sources. However, Coliform levels varied significantly depending on the water source (p&lt;0.05). Notably, artesian wells exhibited significantly lower Coliform contamination (p&lt;0.05), likely attributable to natural soil filtration and deeper construction (100–200 m), which limits exposure to surface pollutants<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Santos et al., 2023)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Somaratne &amp; Hallas, 2015)</xref>. In contrast, conventional wells and springs are more susceptible to contamination due to their shallow depth (10–20 m) and frequent absence of protective casings. This increases vulnerability to runoff, flooding, and proximity to waste sources<xref rid="BIBR-39" ref-type="bibr">(Putri et al., 2024)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Somaratne &amp; Hallas, 2015)</xref>. Properly constructed artesian systems also reduce direct contact with contaminants compared to open springs or inadequately sealed conventional wells. Elevated Coliform levels observed in this study may be further exacerbated by contamination from animal and human waste, as well as increased rainfall, which can intensify surface water infiltration<xref rid="BIBR-6" ref-type="bibr">(Bagordo et al., 2024)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Mondal &amp; Mishra, 2024)</xref>.</p><p>These findings highlight the importance of integrated biosecurity and water management strategies. Regular sanitation, controlled access, and clean water sources are essential for reducing microbial and parasitic threats. Future interventions should also focus on breeder-level health screening and promoting farmer education to improve disease prevention and farm sustainability.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Coliform levels are affected by the quality of the water source. Although no statistically significant difference exists between biosecurity and endoparasite prevalence, farms practicing better traffic control and sanitation (such as L7) had lower endoparasite loads. These results underscore the importance of targeted actions, including improved water source management, regular testing for bird droppings and drinking water, and enhanced biosecurity measures. Improving these practices can significantly enhance quail health, productivity, and farm sustainability.</p></sec></body><back><ack><sec><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>This study was funded by RPI-grant number 222-457/UN7.D2/PP/IV/2025 from the LPPM of Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, awarded to R. Murwani as the principal investigator.</p></sec></ack><sec><title>DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS</title><p>During the preparation of this work, the author(s) ut ilized the “Premium Grammarly” program to improve the readability and clarity of the English language, including correcting spelling errors and refining sentence structure. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the publication’s content.</p></sec><ref-list><title>REFERENCES</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in local and broiler chickens in Ibesikpo Local Government Area, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria</article-title><source>American Journal of Zoological Research</source><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Afia</surname><given-names>U.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Usip</surname><given-names>L.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Udoaka</surname><given-names>U.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><page-range>1-7</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Prevalence and morphological identification of Eimeria species in quails</article-title><source>Egyptian Veterinary Medical Society of Parasitology Journal</source><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>B.A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nada</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anter</surname><given-names>R.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><page-range>55-63</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/evmspj.2017.37467</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Colisepticemia infection in a 20 days old broiler chicken in Timuhun Village, Klungkung</article-title><source>Veterinary Science and Medicine Journal</source><volume>5</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ananda</surname><given-names>B.E.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Besung</surname><given-names>I.N.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adi</surname><given-names>A.A.A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><page-range>197-210</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24843/vsmj.2023.v5.i09.p09</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>ASEAN biosecurity management manual for commercial poultry farming</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>A.S.E.A.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AMAF-33-Biosecurity-Manual.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AMAF-33-Biosecurity-Manual.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Peternakan Dalam Angka</article-title><volume>9</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Statistik</surname><given-names>Badan Pusat</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://assets.dataindonesia.id/2025/06/25/1750840224873-87-24.-peternakan-dalam-angka-2024.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://assets.dataindonesia.id/2025/06/25/1750840224873-87-24.-peternakan-dalam-angka-2024.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Factors influencing microbial contamination of groundwater: a systematic review of field-scale studies</article-title><source>Microorganisms</source><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bagordo</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brigida</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Grassi</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caputo</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Apollonio</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Savino</surname><given-names>A.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Triggiano</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Turturro</surname><given-names>A.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Donno</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Montagna</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Giglio</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>1-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms12050913</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Review on major gastrointestinal parasites that affect chickens</article-title><source>Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare</source><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Belete</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Addis</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayele</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>11</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><page-range>11-21</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234662019.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234662019.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Spotlight on avian pathology: Eimeria and the disease coccidiosis</article-title><source>Avian Pathology</source><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blake</surname><given-names>D.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marugan-Hernandez</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomley</surname><given-names>F.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>209</fpage><lpage>213</lpage><page-range>209-213</page-range><publisher-name>Taylor and Francis Ltd</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079457.2021.1912288</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Quail meat market size, share, growth, and industry analysis, by types (Inorganic, Organic), by applications (Dealer/retailer, supermarkets and hypermarkets, direct selling), and regional forecast to 2032</article-title><source>Business Research Insight</source><year>2025</year><comment>Retrieved July 1, 2025, from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/quail-meat-market-117260" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/quail-meat-market-117260</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Incidence of gastrointestinal parasites in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) in a hot and humid tropical environment</article-title><source>Applied Veterinary Research</source><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>D’souza</surname><given-names>N.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rakesh</surname><given-names>G.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cattavarayane</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Christopher</surname><given-names>A.F.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><page-range>1-5</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31893/avr.2022015</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Diversity of Eimeria species in backyard poultry of subtropical hilly region of Meghalaya, India</article-title><source>Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies</source><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>360</fpage><lpage>365</lpage><page-range>360-365</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.entomoljournal.com" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.entomoljournal.com</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Monitoring biosecurity in poultry production: an overview of databases reporting biosecurity compliance from seven European countries</article-title><source>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</source><volume>10</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delpont</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salazar</surname><given-names>L.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dewulf</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zbikowski</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Szeleszczuk</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dufay-Lefort</surname><given-names>A.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rousset</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Spaans</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amalraj</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tilli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piccirillo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devesa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sevilla-Navarro</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meirhaege</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kovács</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jóźwiak</surname><given-names>Á.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guérin</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paul</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>1231377</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2023.1231377</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan Kementerian Pertanian RI</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Animal Husbandry</surname><given-names>Directorate General</given-names></name><name><surname>Kesehatan Hewan</surname><given-names>Animal Health Statistik Peternakan</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://satudata.pertanian.go.id/assets/docs/publikasi/Statistik_Peternakan_dan_Kesehatan_Hewan_2022_compressed.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://satudata.pertanian.go.id/assets/docs/publikasi/Statistik_Peternakan_dan_Kesehatan_Hewan_2022_compressed.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Stocking density: a clue for improving social behavior, welfare, health indices, along with productivity performances of quail (Coturnix coturnix</article-title><source>a review. Tropical Animal Health and Production</source><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El Sabry</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>S.S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaki</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stino</surname><given-names>F.K.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>0-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-022-03083-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Quail Farming: A Growing Industry</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Entrance</surname><given-names>Farmers</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><comment>Retrieved July 3, 2025, from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.farmersentrance.com/quail-farming-a-growing-industry/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.farmersentrance.com/quail-farming-a-growing-industry/</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of oils in feed on the production performance and egg quality of laying hens</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>3482</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11123482</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Quail meat market size, share, growth, and industry analysis, by types (Papua quail, California quail, Others), by applications (roasting and grilling, soups and stews, stuffing, others), and regional insights and forecast to 2033</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Insight</surname><given-names>Global Growth</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><comment>Retrieved July 1, 2025, from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/quail-meat-market-102768#driversTab" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/quail-meat-market-102768#driversTab</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Occurrence of endoparasites in captive birds between 2005 to 2011 as determined by faecal flotation and review of literature</article-title><source>Berliner Und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift</source><volume>130</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Globokar</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pantchev</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2376/0005-9366-16094</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Use of maca powder (Lepidium meyenii) as feed additive in diets of laying quails at different ages: its effect on performance, eggshell quality, serum, ileum, and bone properties</article-title><source>Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gül</surname><given-names>E.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Olgun</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yıldız</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tüzün</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarmiento-García</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><page-range>1-17</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vetsci9080418</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Housing and dietary effects on production performance, quality index, and chemical composition of Japanese quail eggs</article-title><source>Veterinary and Animal Science</source><volume>23</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hossain</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahbub</surname><given-names>A.S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belal</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>100340</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vas.2024.100340</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Water quality for breeders and broilers</article-title><source>Technical Bulletin</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Hubbard</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.hubbardbreeders.com/media/ps-technical-bulletin-global-water-quality-in-poultry-production-en.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.hubbardbreeders.com/media/ps-technical-bulletin-global-water-quality-in-poultry-production-en.pdf</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of dietary supplementation of full-fat canola seeds on productive performance, blood metabolites, and antioxidant status of laying Japanese quails</article-title><source>Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola/Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>N.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabic</surname><given-names>E.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abu-Taleb</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdel-Moneim</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>1-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1175</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Anticoccidial efficacy of citrus sinensis essential oil in broiler chicken</article-title><source>Pakistan Veterinary Journal</source><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Imran</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alsayeqh</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>461</fpage><lpage>466</lpage><page-range>461-466</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29261/pakvetj/2022.082</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Biosecurity and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in animal agricultural settings for reducing infection burden, antibiotic use, and antibiotic resistance: a One Health systematic review</article-title><source>Lancet Planet Health</source><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jimenez</surname><given-names>C.E.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Keestra</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tandon</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cumming</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pickering</surname><given-names>A.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moodley</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandler</surname><given-names>C.I.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>418</fpage><lpage>434</lpage><page-range>418-434</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00049-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Escherichia coli (E. coli) as an indicator of fecal contamination in groundwater: a review</article-title><source>Sustainable development of water and environment. ICSDWE 2020. Environmental Science and Engineering</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>F.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Jeon</surname><given-names>H.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>235</lpage><page-range>225-235</page-range><publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-45263-6_21</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Microbiological contaminants in drinking water: current status and challenges</article-title><source>Water, Air, and Soil Pollution</source><volume>233</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kristanti</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadibarata</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syafrudin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yılmaz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-022-05698-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of probiotic supplementation on organic feed to alternative antibiotic growth promoter on production performance and economics analysis of quail</article-title><source>Veterinary World</source><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lokapirnasari</surname><given-names>W.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dewi</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fathinah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hidanah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harijani</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soeharsono</surname><given-names>Karimah</given-names></name><name><surname>B.</surname></name><name><surname>Andriani</surname><given-names>A.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>1508</fpage><lpage>1514</lpage><page-range>1508-1514</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/vetworld.2017.1508-1514</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Diagnosis of coccidiosis by Eimeria spp. in free-range chickens using Mini-FLOTAC and McMaster techniques-preliminary results</article-title><source>Scientia Parasitologica</source><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lozano</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anaya</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rinaldi</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cringoli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomes</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paz-Silva</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rebelo</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>13</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>13-18</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The effect of drinking ionized water on the productive performance, physiological status, and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soliman</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Sabrout</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani15020229</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Quantifying the precipitation, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture network’s interaction over global land surface hydrological cycle</article-title><source>Water Resources Research</source><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mondal</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2023WR034861</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Parasitic profiling of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) on two farms with conventional production system in the Amazon region</article-title><source>Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira</source><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monte</surname><given-names>G.L.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavalcante</surname><given-names>D.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>J.B.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>847</fpage><lpage>851</lpage><page-range>847-851</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5274</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Egg production, blood profile, and histopathology in japanese quail with phytogenic additives</article-title><source>Tropical Animal Science Journal</source><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murwani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anggraeni</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muslih</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yogantara</surname><given-names>A.O.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Mulyono</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>321</fpage><lpage>332</lpage><page-range>321-332</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5398/tasj.2024.47.3.321</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Areca catechu L. and Anredera cordifolia (Ten) steenis supplementation reduces faecal parasites and improves caecal histopathology in laying hens</article-title><source>International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine</source><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murwani</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kusumanti</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Naumova</surname><given-names>E.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><page-range>52-63</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23144599.2022.2090732</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Anatomopathological changes in laying quails</article-title><source>Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias</source><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neiva</surname><given-names>D.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Candido</surname><given-names>M.J.do S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Assis</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tavares</surname><given-names>T.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>M.P.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souza</surname><given-names>E.A.d O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Donatele</surname><given-names>D.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruz</surname><given-names>I.C.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>I.V.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boeloni</surname><given-names>J.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>1-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/0001-3765202420230815</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>A post-mortem evaluation of coccidiosis and helminthiasis of poultry birds slaughtered at Lafia Ultra Modern Market, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria</article-title><source>Transactions on Science and Technology</source><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ombugadu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayasi</surname><given-names>B.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>H.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aliyu</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aimankhu</surname><given-names>O.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uzoigwe</surname><given-names>N.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pam</surname><given-names>V.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adejoh</surname><given-names>V.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ajah</surname><given-names>L.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lapang</surname><given-names>P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maikenti</surname><given-names>J.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Attah</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dogo</surname><given-names>K.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nkup</surname><given-names>C.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dakul</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>654</fpage><lpage>666</lpage><page-range>654-666</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="http://tost.unise.org/" ext-link-type="uri">http://tost.unise.org/</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Endoparasitism in commercial quails around Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria</article-title><source>Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences</source><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Onyeabor</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Uwalaka</surname><given-names>E.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>214</fpage><lpage>217</lpage><page-range>214-217</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/sokjvs.v19i4.10</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Integration of water, sanitation, and hygiene program with biosecurity: A One Health approach to reduce the prevalence and exposure of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the livestock community</article-title><source>International Journal of One Health</source><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paramitadevi</surname><given-names>Y.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Priadi</surname><given-names>C.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rahmatika</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rukmana</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moersidik</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>181</fpage><lpage>193</lpage><page-range>181-193</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14202/IJOH.2023.181-193</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Importance of pH in drinking water</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trends</surname><given-names>Poultry</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><comment>Retrieved July 1, 2025, from</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.poultrytrends.in/importance-of-ph-in-drinking-water/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.poultrytrends.in/importance-of-ph-in-drinking-water/</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Investigating dominant factors of coliform contamination in shallow groundwater: A logistic regression and AHP approach</article-title><source>Groundwater for Sustainable Development</source><volume>27</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Putri</surname><given-names>E.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Notodarmojo</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Utami</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>101384</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101384</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Nutrient digestibility, performance, and egg quality traits of quails raised in different stocking densities and ascorbic acid supplementation in a hot, tropical environment</article-title><source>Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences</source><volume>44</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ratriyanto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Firmanda</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Purwanti</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murjoko</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>350</fpage><lpage>357</lpage><page-range>350-357</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/vet-1909-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Seasonal dynamics in the number and composition of coliform bacteria in drinking water reservoirs</article-title><source>Science of the Total Environment</source><volume>787</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reitter</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petzoldt</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Korth</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwab</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stange</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hambsch</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tiehm</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lagkouvardos</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gescher</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hügler</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>147539</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147539</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Biosecurity strategies for backyard poultry: a controlled way for safe food production</article-title><source>Food control and biosecurity</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samanta</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Joardar</surname><given-names>S.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>Pradip K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>481</fpage><lpage>517</lpage><page-range>481-517</page-range><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-811445-2.00014-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Water quality monitoring in southern Brazil and the assessment of risk factors related to contamination by coliforms and Escherichia coli</article-title><source>Journal of Water and Health</source><volume>21</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>N.G.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>L.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guidone</surname><given-names>G.H.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Montini</surname><given-names>V.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliva</surname><given-names>B.H.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>A.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sousa</surname><given-names>D.N.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuroda</surname><given-names>E.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S.P.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>1550</fpage><lpage>1561</lpage><page-range>1550-1561</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2166/wh.2023.182</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Diversity and prevalence of endoparasites in domestic chickens across an elevation gradient</article-title><source>Biodiversitas</source><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Setyowati</surname><given-names>E.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santoso</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rokhmani</surname></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Rochmatino</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>3936</fpage><lpage>3942</lpage><page-range>3936-3942</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d230810</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Metabolisable energy partition for Japanese quails</article-title><source>Animal</source><volume>14</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>E.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castiblanco</surname><given-names>D.M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Artoni</surname><given-names>S.M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nogueira</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakomura</surname><given-names>N.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>285</lpage><page-range>275-285</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731120001445</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Review of risk status of groundwater supply wells by tracing the source of coliform contamination</article-title><source>Water</source><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Somaratne</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hallas</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>3878</fpage><lpage>3905</lpage><page-range>3878-3905</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w7073878</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Kecernaan protein kasar dan pertumbuhan broiler yang diberi pakan single step down dengan penambahan acidifier asam sitrat</article-title><source>Animal Agriculture Journal</source><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sutrisno</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yunianto</surname><given-names>V.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suthama</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><page-range>49-60</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/aaj/article/view/11607/11265" ext-link-type="uri">https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/aaj/article/view/11607/11265</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Investigation of enteric parasites with a focus on zoonotic parasites in the feces of galliformes</article-title><source>Archives of Razi Institute</source><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Talazadeh</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Razijalali</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manesh</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khajeh</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>379</fpage><lpage>386</lpage><page-range>379-386</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32592/ARI.2024.79.2.379</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessing biosecurity compliance in poultry farms: a survey in a densely populated poultry area in North East Italy</article-title><source>Animals</source><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tilli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laconi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Galuppo</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mughini-Gras</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piccirillo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12111409</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>W.H.O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Identification and prevalence of endoparasites in lovebird (Agapornis Fischeri) sold in Banda Aceh</article-title><source>Jurnal Medika Veterinaria</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zulmi</surname><given-names>M.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferasyi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farida</surname><given-names>Winaruddin</given-names></name><name><surname>Eliawardani</surname></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Zuhrawaty</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><page-range>19-26</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21157/j.med.vet..v14i1.13354</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>