How effective crowdsourced data during crisis emergency? A case of the 2018 Palu-Donggala earthquake

  • Zainab Ramadhanis IPB University
  • Anjar Akrimullah
Keywords: OpenStreetMap, geographic data quality, disaster relief, 2018 Palu-Donggala earthquake

Abstract

In disaster situations, updated geographic data is crucial for disaster relief efforts. OpenStreetMap (OSM) has demonstrated significant value in disaster response scenarios due to its capacity for rapid data collection and dissemination, since the 2010 Haiti earthquake. This study investigates the quality of OSM data during the 2018 Palu-Donggala earthquake, focusing on how contributor expertise affects data reliability and how effectively OSM data supports decision-making in emergencies. The research highlights the critical role of OSM in providing timely geospatial information, with 205 contributors mapping roads and buildings in Palu City and Donggala Regency within just three days of the earthquake. Our findings show that while road data exhibited substantial topological errors—7,085 errors primarily due to overshoots—building data had considerably fewer errors, with only 76 recorded. This disparity suggests that OSM data for buildings was of higher quality during the crisis. The preference of eight out of nine mapper types for building data over road data further underscores the value of OSM in emergencies, as experienced mappers tended to focus on features that were less error-prone. The study also evaluates contributor behavior, revealing that while a significant portion of contributors were inactive, a majority of experienced contributors remained engaged. This finding indicates the potential for inactive expert mappers to return and contribute in future crises. Additionally, the study assesses the rapid collection of data by OSM and its impact on decision-making. The National Disaster Management Agency of Indonesia (BNPB) and the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance (AHA Centre) effectively utilized the data to provide updates on fatalities, injuries, and displacement, facilitating a swift and equitable distribution of aid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Neis, P., & Zielstra, D. (2014). Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: The case of OpenStreetMap. Future internet, 6(1), 76-106.
[2] OpenStreetMap. (2024, August 15). Stats. https://planet.openstreetmap.org/statistics/data_stats.html
[3] Birkmann, J., & von Teichman, K. (2010). Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: key challenges—scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 171-184.
[4] de Albuquerque, J. P., Eckle, M., Herfort, B., & Zipf, A. (2016). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster management and improving urban resilience: an overview of recent developments and lessons learned. European handbook of crowdsourced geographic information, 309-321.
[5] Radford, T. (2020). Haiti 10 Years Later: Growth of a Humanitarian Mapping Community. Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. Retrieved 19 August from https://www.hotosm.org/updates/haiti-10-years-later-growth-of-a-crisis- mapping-community/.
[6] AHA Centre - Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) in cooperation with National Disaster Management Authority (BNPB; Data & Information Centre, National Assisting Post). (2018). SITUATION UPDATE NO. 15 - FINAL M 7.4 EARTHQUAKE & TSUNAMI Sulawesi, Indonesia. Retrieved 19 August from https://ahacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AHA-Situation_Update-no15-Sulawesi-EQ-rev.pdf.
[7] Ather, A. (2009). A Quality Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data, M. Eng Dissertation, Department of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering ...].
[8] International Organization for Standardization. (2013). ISO 19157 Geographic information: data quality. In. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
[9] Theobald, D. M. (2001). Topology revisited: representing spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(8), 689-705.
[10] Kainz, W. (1995). Chapter six: Logical consistency in Elements of spaital data quality by Guptill and Morrison. In. Elsevier.
[11] Van Exel, M., Dias, E., & Fruijtier, S. (2010). The impact of crowdsourcing on spatial data quality indicators. Proceedings of the GIScience 2010 Doctoral Colloquium, Zurich, Switzerland.
[12] Bégin, D., Devillers, R., & Roche, S. (2013). ASSESSING VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (VGI) QUALITY BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS' MAPPING BEHAVIOURS. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-2/W1, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W1-149-2013.
Published
2024-10-28
How to Cite
1.
Ramadhanis Z, Akrimullah A. How effective crowdsourced data during crisis emergency? A case of the 2018 Palu-Donggala earthquake. J-Sil [Internet]. 2024Oct.28 [cited 2025Jan.21];9(2):221-30. Available from: https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jsil/article/view/59024
Section
Research Articles