Main Article Content

Maryono Maryono


The global agenda, namely sustainable development goals (SDGs), requires all businesses activities including farming to carry out a process of production that concerns on its sustainability. This study examined the extent to which of the sustainability level of rice farming in a multidimensional perspective from the three pillars of sustainability, namely economic, social, and environmental. Tasikmalaya District was purposively chosen because there was so called environmentally friendly farmer organization applying system of rice intensification (SRI) method. As much as sixty farmers were selected randomly as respondents. The analytical method used in this study refers to the Composite Index developed by OECD (2013) by comparing the index score of its pillars. The results indicate that the sustainability index of rice farming is of 0.46. The environmental dimension contributes the highest score to the total index that indicate very good performance, however, still lacking in the social and economic dimension. Therefore it is necessary to strengthen the last two pillars so that all the three pillars of sustainability can be achieved rateably.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
MaryonoM. (2018). INDEKS KEBERLANJUTAN USAHATANI PADI DI TASIKMALAYA. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia (Journal of Indonesian Agribusiness), 6(2), 107-118.


Babbie, E, 1995, The Practise of Social Research, Wadswarth, Washington 161-175.

Bell, S., dan S. Morse, 2008, Sustainability indicators: measuring the incommensurable?. Earthscan, London.

Bond, A., A. Morrison-Saunders, J. Pop, 2012, Sustainability assessment: the state of the art, Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30(1):53–6

BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik), 2017, Grafik Susenas Pertanian 2013 Indonesia,

COSCA (Committee on Sustainability Assessment), 2013, The cosa measuring sustainability report; Coffee and cocoa in 12 countries, Committee on Sustainability Assessment (COSCA), Philadelpia.

Eccles, R., I. Ioannou, and S. George, 2011, “The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance.” Working Paper 12-035. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School

Fiksel, J., T. Eason, and H. Frederick, 2012, A Framework for Sustainability Indicators at EPA EPA/600/R/12/687.

Kolk, A., 2005, “Corporate Social Responsibility in The Coffee Sector: The Dynamics of MNC Responses and Code Development.” European Management Journal 23 (2), 228–236.

Muradian, R., and W. Pelupessy, 2005, “Governing the Coffee Chain: The Role of Voluntary Regulatory Systems.” World Development 33 (12), 2029-2044.

Nicoletti G, S. Scarpetta, O. Boyland, 2000, Summary indicators of product market regulation with extension to employment protection legislation, Economics Department Working Paper No 226, ECO/WKP(99)18

OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), (2008), Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, Paris: OECD.

Petkova, I., 2006, “Shifting Regimes of Governance In The Coffee Market: From Secular Crisis to a New Equilibrium?” Review of International Political Economy 13 (2), 313–339.

Roy, R., N.W. Chan, R. Rainis, 2014, Rice Farming Sustainability Assessment in Bangladesh, Sustain Sciences 2014 9:31-44

Roy, R., N.W. Chan, S. Xenarios, 2015, Sustainability of Rice Production Systems: an Empirical Evaluation to Improve Policy, Environ Dev Sustain. DOI 10.1007/s10668-015-9638-x

UN (United Nation), 2015, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/Res/70/1. United Nation.