Ethanol Productivity of Ethanol-Tolerant Mutant Strain Pichia kudriavzevii R-T3 in Monoculture and Co-culture Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Nurfadhilla Rahmadhani Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Dramaga Campus, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Rika Indri Astuti Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Dramaga Campus, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Anja Meryandini Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Dramaga Campus, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Abstract

We previously developed ethanol-tolerant P. kudriavzevii R-T3 (P.ku R-T3) mutant from its parental strain P.ku R-WT by evolutionary adaptation method. Hence, we further analyze the ethanol productivity of the particular isolates in a monoculture and co-culture with industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 at various inoculum ratio. Based on the spot assay, R3 mutant yeast showed better cell viability under 10% ethanol stress than the wild type, potentially due to the high expression level of PKINO1 gene involved in the synthesis of inositol. In the monoculture fermentation, S. cerevisiae could use glucose, while P.ku could use mixed glucose and xylose as carbon sources for ethanol fermentation. P.ku R-T3 performed the most potential ethanol kinetics parameters, including the highest ethanol production (10.10 g/L), ethanol productivity (0.21 g/L/h), and fermentation efficiency (84.36%). Upscaling the inoculum of P.ku R-T3 by ten times resulted in 10% higher ethanol production. However, the highest substrate utilization rate did not indicate an increase in ethanol production. Indeed, P.ku R-T3 showed a low mixed substrate use but produced higher ethanol production than S. cerevisiae, as much as 21-31%, depending on the initial inoculum. Interestingly, the co-culture of P.ku R-T3 and BY4741 did not substantially produce higher ethanol production than the monoculture technique. About 30% reduction of ethanol production was found by co-culturing BY4741 with P.ku R-T3 than P.ku R-T3 alone. Taken together, the monoculture fermentation of P.ku R-T3 remains the promising fermentation technique than that of the co-culture with industrial yeast S. cerevisiae.

Downloads

Published
2022-03-30
How to Cite
RahmadhaniN., AstutiR. I., & MeryandiniA. (2022). Ethanol Productivity of Ethanol-Tolerant Mutant Strain Pichia kudriavzevii R-T3 in Monoculture and Co-culture Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae . HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 29(4), 435-444. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.29.4.435-444
Section
Articles
Crossref
3
Scopus
5
PEDRO HENRIQUE F. RODRIGUES, ELIZABETH G. DA SILVA, ALEX S. BORGES, GABRIEL LUIS CASTIGLIONI, CARLOS ALBERTO G. SUAREZ, INTI DORACI C. MONTANO (2024)
Bioethanol production by immobilized co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Scheffersomyces stipitis in a novel continuous 3D printing microbioreactor. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 96( suppl 1),
10.1590/0001-3765202420230633
Irawan Ibnu, Budiarto Hairil, Nabil Ridwan, A. Ma'arif, A. Amzeri, W. Caesarendra, I. Suwarno (2024)
The effect of bio activator em-4 and yeast addition on biogas characteristics using pineapple skin waste as raw material. BIO Web of Conferences, 146, 01095.
10.1051/bioconf/202414601095
Husnul Khotimah, Rika Indri Astuti, Mohamad Rafi, Nancy Dewi Yuliana (2023)
Metabolomics Study Reveals Biomarker L-Proline as Potential Stress-Protectant Compound for High-Temperature Bioethanol Fermentation by Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii 1P4. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 195(8), 5180.
10.1007/s12010-023-04554-2
Fathiah M.F. (2024)
Bi oet hanol Product i on f rom Non-Convent i onal Yeast s Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala) and Detection of ADH1 Gene. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 31(2), 221-228.
10.4308/hjb.31.2.221-228
Latif M.N. (2023)
Recent Advances in the Technologies and Catalytic Processes of Ethanol Production. Catalysts, 13(7),
10.3390/catal13071093