<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:1cm;"><em><span style="font-size:10pt;" lang="in" xml:lang="in">This article reported risk preferences and the consequences on tobacco farming in Pamekasan. <span> </span>Frontier production function model with heteroskedastic error structure estimated by maximume likelihood estimation developed by Kumbhakar<span>  </span>was adopted to<span>  </span>analyze the goals. <span> </span><span style="color:#000000;">This model can capture the effect of risk preference on input allocation, inefficiency and productivity. <span> </span>Four hundred fifty samples were drawn by cluster sampling method. <span> </span>The results show that risk preferences were not depended on agroecosystem and farming system, but they were determined by farm size. <span> </span>Most of the farmers prefered to avoid production risk. <span> </span>The consequences were input allocation under optimum condition, technical and allocative efficiencies at a low level, and depleted productivity.</span></span></em></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-size:10pt;" lang="in" xml:lang="in"> </span></em></p> <em><span style="font-size:10pt;" lang="in" xml:lang="in">Key words: productivity, production risk, risk preference, inefficiency</span></em><span style="font-size:10pt;" lang="in" xml:lang="in"> </span>

  • Elys Fauziyah
  • Sri Hartoyo
  • Nunung Kusnadi
  • Sri Utami Kuntjoro

Abstract

This article reported risk preferences and the consequences on tobacco farming in Pamekasan.  Frontier production function model with heteroskedastic error structure estimated by maximume likelihood estimation developed by Kumbhakar  was adopted to  analyze the goals.  This model can capture the effect of risk preference on input allocation, inefficiency and productivity.  Four hundred fifty samples were drawn by cluster sampling method.  The results show that risk preferences were not depended on agroecosystem and farming system, but they were determined by farm size.  Most of the farmers prefered to avoid production risk.  The consequences were input allocation under optimum condition, technical and allocative efficiencies at a low level, and depleted productivity.

 

Key words: productivity, production risk, risk preference, inefficiency

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elys Fauziyah
Staf pengajar pada Jurusan Agribisnis, Faperta, Univ. Trunojoyo
Sri Hartoyo
Staf pengajar pada Dept. Ekonomi dan Sumberdaya Lingkungan, FEM IPB
Nunung Kusnadi
Staf pengajar pada Dept. Ekonomi dan Sumberdaya Lingkungan, FEM IPB
Sri Utami Kuntjoro
Staf pengajar pada Dept. Ekonomi dan Sumberdaya Lingkungan, FEM IPB