KUALITAS SILAGE JAGUNG DI DATARAN RENDAH TROPIS PADA BERBAGAI UMUR PANEN UNTUK SAPI PERAH (Tropical lowland maize silage quality from different age of harvesting for dairy cattle)

  • Despal Despal Departemen INTP Fapet IPB
  • Putri Hidayah Departemen INTP, Fapet IPB
  • Ahmad Darobin Lubis Departemen INTP Fapet IPB


Age of harvesting determine the maize forage condition prior to ensilage which influence the quality of silage produced. Nowadays, maize silage increasingly popular among smallholder dairy farmer in tropical lowland area, however, their optimum age of harvesting to produce the best silage quality have not been intensively studied. This experiment was aimed at finding the best age of maize plant to produce the best quality silage for tropical lowland. Four treatments (age of maize at harvesting), namely 60 d (T1), 70 d (T2), 80 d (T3) and 90 d (T4) of harvesting have been tested in producing whole plant maize silage. The silage was made in 2 kg laboratory plastic bag silo capacity and ensiled for 5 weeks. Physical (color, odor, texture, moisture and spoilage), fermentative (WSC, pH, DM, dry matter degradation, VFA, PK, protein degradation, NH3 and fleigh number), utility characteristic (in vitro rumen fermentability and digestibility) characteristics have been observed. Completely randomized design were used in this experiment except for utility characteristics which used block randomized design. Physical characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while fermentative and utility characteristics were analyzed using ANOVA. Significant different among the treatments were tested using polynomial orthogonal to find the best age of plant to produce the best silage quality. The results showed that DM content of maize plant increased linearly with the ages, but CP content decreased cubically in opposite curve shape to WSC content. The best silage quality material with 30% DM were not reached even at 90 d of harvesting. However, its CP contents decreased sharply after 80 d. Physical characteristics of the silage showed that no different between the treatments except for percentage spoilage silage. The lowest spoilage percentage was achieved if the plant harvested at 68 d, while the highest spoilage percentage was at 75 d. No statistically significant different were found in fermentative characteristic of silage among the treatments. All fermentative characteristics showed the silage in very good qualities. The DM loses during ensiling were not significantly influenced by the plant ages, although there were a trend toward decreasing number of loses with increasing of maize age of harvesting. Protein loses during ensiling were not influenced by the maize age. Fleigh number of the silage significantly increased after day 80. Fermentability of protein reduced with the age, while organic fermentability remained the same. Dry matter and organic matter digestibility of the silage were the best at day 90. It is concluded that the best whole maize silage quality in tropical lowland were resulted from maize harvested at 90 d.

Keywords: maize, silage, tropical lowland, dairy, age harvesting


Download data is not yet available.


Badan Pusat statistik. 2011. Statistik Pertanian. Pusat data dan informasi pertanian. Departemen Pertanian, Jakarta

Bal, M. A., R. D Shaver, K. J Shinners, J. G Coors, J. G Lauer, R. J Straub, & R. G Koegel. 2000. Stage of maturity, processing and hybrid effects on ruminal in situ disappearance of whole-plant corn silage. J. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech. 86:83-94

Chen, Y. & Z. G. Weinberg. 2008. Changes during aerobic exposure of wheat silages. Anim. Feed Sci and Tech. 154:76-82

Cherney, D. J., H Cherney, & W. J. Cox. 2004. Fermentation characteristics of corn forage ensiled in mini silos. J. Dairy Sci. 87:4238-4246.

Church, D. C. 1991. Livestock Feeds and Feeding. 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.

Darby, H. M. & J. G. Lauer. 2002. Harvest date and hybrid influence on corn forage yield, quality and preservation. Agron. J. 94:559-566.

Davies, D. R., M. K. Theodorou, A. H. Kingston-Smith, & R. J. M. Merry. 2005. Advances in Silage Qualty in The 21st Century. Silage Production and Utilisation. Wageningen Academic Publishers. Netherlands.

Departemen Pertanian. 2011. Budidaya jagung. http://epetani.deptan.go.id [8 Juli 2012]

Despal, I. G. Permana, S. N. Safarina, & A. J. Tatra. 2011. Penggunaan berbagai sumber karbohidrat terlarut air untuk meningkatkan kualitas silase daun rami. Med. Pet. 67-69

Despal, I.G. Permana, T. Toharmat and D.E. Amirroennas, 2017. Silase Pakan Sapi Perah. IPB Press, Bogor, Indonesia.

Despal, I.G. Permana, T. Toharmat and D.E. Amirroennas, 2017. Pemberian Pakan Sapi Perah. IPB Press, Bogor, Indonesia.

Elfrink, S. J. W. H. O., F. Driehuis, J. C. Gottschal, & S. F. Speolstra. 2000. Silage fermnetation processes and their manipulation. In Proceeding of the FAO Electronic conference on Tropical Silage 1 September to 15 December 1999.

Idikut, L., B.A. Arikan, M. Kaplan, I. Guven, A.I. Atalay and A. Kamalak, 2009. Potential nutritive value of sweet corn as a silage crop with or without corn ear. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 734-741.Kim, S. C. & A. T Adesogan. 2006. Influence of ensilage temperature, simulated rainfall and delayed sealing on fermentation charachteristics and aerobics stability of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 89:3122-3132.

Lee, C. 2012. Corn growth and development. http://www.uy.edu/Ag/GrainCrops [8 mei 2012]

Marco, O. N. D., M. A. Ressia, S. Arias, M. S. Aello, & M. Arzadun. 2009. Digestibility of forage silages from grain, sweet and bmr sorghum types: comparison of in vivo, in situ and in vitro data. Anim. Feed Sci. And Tech. 153:161-168

McDdonald, P., R. Edwards, & J. Greenhalgh. 2002. Animal Nutrition. 6th. New York

McDonald, P., R. Edwards, & J. Greenhalgh. 1991. The Biochemistry of silage. 2nd Ed. Chalcombe Publications. Marlow, Bucks SL7 3PU.

Muck, R. E. 2011. The Art and Science of Making Silage. Plant Science Departement, University of California. California.

Orskov, E. R. & M. Ryle. 1990. Energy Nutrition in Ruminant. London: Elseivier.

Ozturk, D., M. Kizilsimsek, A. Kamalak, O. Canbolat, & C. O. Ozkan. 2005. Effects of ensiling alfalfa with whole-crop maize on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage mixtures. Departement of Crop Science, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Turkey.

Parakkasi, A. 1995. Ilmu Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak Ruminan. Universitas Indonesia Press. Jakarta.

Saun, R. J. V. & A. J Heinrich. 2008. Trouble Shooting silage problem. In Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Conference: Pensylvania, 26 May 2008. Pen State’s Collage. Hlm 2-10.

Suryapratama, W. 1999. Efek suplementasi asam lemak volatile bercabang dan kapsul lisin serta treonin terhadap nutrisi protein sapi holstein. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Tilley, J. M. A. & R. A. Terry. 1963. Two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassland Soc. 18:104-11

Umiyasih, U. & E. Wina. 2008. Pengolahan dan nilai nutrisi limbah tanaman jagung sebagai pakan ternak ruminansia. Wartazoa Puslitbang Peternakan. 18(3)

Wang, C., Q. Liu, W. J. Huo, W. Z Yang, & G. Guo. 2009. Effects of glycerol on rumen fermentation, urinary excretion of purine derivatives and feed digestibility in steers. Livestock Science. 121:15-20

Zamudio, D. M., J. M Pinos-Rodriguez, S. S Gonzalez, P. H Robinson, J. C Garcia, & O. Montanez. 2009. Effects of agave salmania otto ex salm-dyck silage as forage on ruminal fermentation and growth in goats. Anim Feed Sci and Tech. 148:1-11