DAMPAK RUMPUT ALAM DAN RUMPUT UNGGUL DALAM RANSUM SERTA PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP ERFORMA TERNAK (Influence of forage sources on ration quality and dairy cattle performances)
Abstract
Forage offers to lactating cows by KPSBU Lembang cooperatives member mainly cultivated grass or natural grass with/without agricultural byproduct (non-cultivated). The different sources of forage offered influence the ration quality and nutrient intake of dairy cattle which may affect their performances (milk production and quality, body weight, Body condition (BCS) and manure score). A study to evaluate the influence of different forage sources on lactating cows’ performances have been conducted. Eight lactating cows were used to study 2 types of forage sources (cultivated forage and non-cultivated forage) as treatments with each treatment was repeated four times. The amount of feed offers have been weight, their nutrient contents and utilities (proximate composition, structural carbohydrate, mineral Ca and P, fermentability and digestibility) have been determined in laboratory, their metabolizable and net energy for lactation have been estimated. The animal performances have been measured and observed. The results showed that the source of forage significantly influence the nutrients offers. Farmers who used cultivated forage offered higher nutrients (crude lipid, crude protein, nitrogen free extract and digested crude protein) to their cows which resulted in higher milk production (14.8 vs. 11.9 l h-1 d-1) and BCS (2.6 vs. 2.3).
Keywords : cultivated, dairy cattle, forage, intake, nutrient
Downloads
References
[AOAC] Associaton of Official Analitycal Chemist. 2003. Official Method of Analysis of The Association of Official Analytical of Chemist. Arlington, Virginia, USA: Published by The Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Inc
Deptan. 2013. Basis Data Statistik Pertanian. http://www.deptan.go.id/Indikator/tabel-4-pop-prod-nak.pdf
Despal, Lestari A, Abdullah L. 2014. Dairy cattle nutrient sufficiency kept under traditional farming practice during rainy and drought seasons. Proceeding 16th AAAP International Seminar 218 D 827 ID
Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. 1987. Body condition scoring chart for holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 72:68-78
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1970 . Forege fiber analisys . Agricultural Hand Book379. USA: Agricultural Research Sevice
Hutjens M, 1999. Evaluating manure on the farm. Extension Dairy Specialist, University of Illinois, Urbana. http://livestocktrail.illinois.edu/dairynet/paperDisplay.cfm?ContentID=550
Jung HG, Deetz DA.1993. Cell wall lignification and degradability. American Society of Agronomi : 315-346
McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA. 2002. Animal Nutrition. 6th Edition. Pearson Education Limited. England (UK): Harlow
[NRC] National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle, 7 th Ed. Washington D.C: National Academy Press
Penn State. 2004. Begginer’s Guide to Body Condition Scoring: ATool for Dairy Herd Management. Revised Edition. Washington DC (US): National Academy Pr
Steel RGD,Torrie JH. 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika Suatu Pendekatan Biometrik. Diterjemahkan : Bambang Sumantri. Jakarta (ID) : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sutardi T. 1977. Ikhtisar Ruminologi. Bahan Khusus Peternakan Sapi Perah. Kayu Ambon Lembang. Bandung (ID) : Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan-FAO
Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A twostage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. British Grasslan Soc. 18: 104-111
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methode for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstrarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrittion. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597
Varga GA, Dann HM, Ishler VA. 1998. The use fiber concentration for ration formulation. J. Dairy Sci. 81:3063-3074
Williamson G, Payne WJA. 1993. Pengantar Peternakan di Daerah Tropis. Yogyakarta (ID): Gajah Mada University Pr
Wiseman J. 1984. Fats In Animal Nutrition. London (UK) : Butterworth