Kualitas Protein dan Komposisi Asam Amino Ampas Sagu Hasil Fermentasi Aspergillus niger dengan Penambahan Urea dan Zeolit
Abstract
This experiment was designed to evaluate protein quality and amino acid composition of fermented sago pulp by Aspergillus niger with urea and zeolit addition at different levels. The experiment was design in factorial completely randomized with two factors and three replicates. The first factor was levels of urea addition (0, 2.5, and 5%), the second factor was levels of zeolite addition (0, 2.5, and 5%) and used 2% A. niger on sago pulp (dry matter form). Variables observed were the levels of crude protein and amino acids. Data were tested using descriptive and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), the differences among treatments means examined by Duncan Multiple Range Test. The results howed that there was interaction between levels of addition urea and zeolite on crude protein value. The addition urea and zeolite at 5% had the high increased 15.49 ± 0.33% to crude protein content. The amino acid content of fermented sago pulp descriptively increased in urea treatment, but didn’t show increased in zeolite treatment. Based on the calculation of the score of chemical and index essential amino acids, fermented sago pulp at 5% urea treatment has a chemical score of 17.86, 18.01, and 11.85 with the essential amino acid deficient is leucine, and has an index of 38.33, 36.43, and 28.45%.
Downloads
References
Abd-aziz S. 2002. Sago starch and its utilisation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 94(6): 526-529. http://doi.org/cjwwkx
Abun. 2006. Protein dan Asam Amino Pada Unggas. Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Nutrisi Ternak Unggas dan Monogastrik. Bandung (ID): Universitas Padjadjaran.
Agustiyani D, Imamudin H, Gunawan E, Darusman IK. 2007. Proses nitrifikasi oleh kultur mikrob penitrifikasi n-sw dan zeolit. Berita Biologi. 8(5): 405-411.
[AOAC] Association Of Analytical Communities. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemicts. Gathersburg (US).
Badan Litbang Kehutanan. 2007. Potensi Hutan Sagu. Kendala pemanfaatan dan prospek pengembangannya. Jakarta (ID): Badan Litbang Kehutanan.
Block RJ, Mitchell HH. 1978. Some relationship between the amino acid contents of proteins and their nutritive values for the rat. Nutrition Reviews. 36(9): 281-283. http://doi.org/dwx2v5
Cardova AM, Ferraz A, Machuca A. 2003. Wood biodegradation and enzim production by Ceriporiopsis subvermispora during solid state fermentation of Eucalyptus grandis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 32 (1): 59-65. http://doi.org/cj3d2c
Chiou PWS, Chiu SW, Chen CR. 2001. Value of Aspergillus niger fermentation product as a dietary ingredient for broiler chicken. Animal Feed Science & Technology. 91(3-4): 171-182.
Febrina WP. 2012. Kualitas nutrien onggok yang difermentasi Aspergillus niger dengan penambahan level urea dan zeolit yang berbeda. [Skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Fuoco D. 2012. A new method for characterization of natural zeolites and organic nanostructur using atomic force microscopy. Nanomaterial. 2(1): 79-91. http://doi.org/5vw
Kasmiran A, Tarmizi. 2012. Aktivitas enzim sellulase dari kapang selulolitik pada substrat ampas kelapa. Lemtera. 12(1): 9-14.
Kiat LJ. 2006. Preparation and characterization of carboxymethyl sago waste and its hydrogel. [Thesis]. Malaysia (MY): Universitas Putra Malaysia.
Lehninger AW. 1991. Dasar-Dasar Biokimia. Volume I. Jakarta (ID): Erlangga.
Lesson S, Summers JD. 2001. Nutrition of the chicken. 4th ed. Canada (CA): University Books.
Lubis AD. 1996. Kompleks Biologis Onggok-Urea-Zeolit menggunakan Aspergillus niger. [Laporan Akhir Penelitian]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Mattjik AA, Sumertajaya IM. 2006. Perancangan Percobaan dan Aplikasi SAS dan Minitab. Jilid I. Edisi ke 2. Bogor (ID): IPB Pr.
Musnandar E. 2003. Reput hayati sabut kelapa sawit oleh jamur marasmius dan implikasinya terhadap performan kambing. [Disertasi]. Bandung (ID): Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.
Nuryono, Tahir I, Pranowo D. 2006. Petunjuk Praktikum Kimia Anorganik. Yogyakarta (ID): Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Oetari A. 2006. Mikrobiologi Dasar dan Terapan. Jakarta (ID): Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Oladapo AA, Arawomo OA, Olusegun LO. 1984. Quality changes of Nigerian traditionally procesed freshwater fish spesies. Journal Food and Technology. 19(3): 341-348.
Oser BL. 1951. Method for integrating essential amino acid content in the nutritional evaluation of protein. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 27(5): 396.
Polat E, Karaca M, Demir H, Naci-Onus A. 2004. Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. Journal of Fruit Ornamental and Plant Research. 12(Special edition): 183-189.
[PPSI] Perhimpunan Pendayagunaan Sagu Indonesia. 2011. Ketahanan Pangan dan Politik Beras. Riau Pos. Http://riaupos.co.id. February 7, 2011: Diunduh 15 Mei 2013.
Rumalatu FJ. 1981. Distribusi dan Potensi Pati Beberapa Jenis Sagu Metroxylon sp. di Daerah Seram Barat. Karya Ilmiah Fakultas Pertanian/Kehutanan Unpati yang Berafiliasi dengan Fakultas Peternakan IPB. Bogor (ID).
Samadi. 2012. Konsep ideal protein (asam amino) fokus pada ternak ayam pedaging. Rewiew Artikel. Jurnal Agripet. 12(2): 42-48.
Sitompul S. 2004. Analisis asam amino dalam tepung ikan dan bungkil kedelai. Buletin Teknik Pertanian. 9(1): 33-37.
Sultoni A, Malik A, Widodo W. 2006. Pengaruh penggunaan berbagai konsentrat pabrikan terhadap optimalisasi konsumsi pakan, hen day production dan konversi pakan. Jurnal Protein. 1(2): 103-107.
Suprijatna E, Atmomarsono U, Kartasudjana. 2005. Ilmu Dasar Ternak Unggas. Jakarta (ID): Penebar Swadaya.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.