Determinants of Household Food Wasting Behavior: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior
Abstract
Every year, up to 1.3 trillion tons of global food produced for human use are lost or wasted. Consumer behavior is a major cause of food waste. In Indonesia, households generate approximately 38% of total food waste. The goal of this study is to evaluate at how attitudes toward behavior, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention to reduce food waste affect food waste behavior in households. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) was used to conduct the survey, which included 160 independent oil palm farmer homes. The collected data was then examined using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) with the AMOS 24 program. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the TPB model in forecasting household food waste behavior. Attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and goal to reduce food waste are the factors that influence household food waste behaviors. The study's findings show that perceived behavioral control is the most important predictor of food waste behavior. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that attitudes and subjective norms can predict the intention to reduce household food waste. Meanwhile, the desire to eliminate food waste appears to be a strong predictor of one's attitude on the amount of food waste produced.
Keywords: food waste, household behavior, SEM-AMOS, theory of planned behavior
Downloads
References
Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50(2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen I. 2015. Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review on Agricultural Economics. 70(2): 121–138.
Aktas E, Sahin H, Topaloglu Z, Oledinma A, Kalam A, Huda S, Irani Z, Sharif AM, van’t Wout T, Kamrava M. 2018. A consumer behavioural approach to food waste.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 31(5): 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2018-0051
Anggraini AK. 2020. Estimasi nilai kerugian ekonomi rumah tangga akibat pemborosan pangan (food waste): Studi kasus rumah tangga di sekitar Kampus IPB. [Undergraduate thesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Apriyanti I. 2020. Dampak berdirinya perusahaan kelapa sawit terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat sekitar. Agriprimatech. 3(2): 84–89. https://doi.org/10.34012/agriprimatech.v3i2.923
Dewi S, Santoso H. 2020. Pengaruh orientasi nilai dan religiusitas terhadap perilaku food waste rumah tangga : Penerapan teori reasoned action approach. [Undergraduate thesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
[Disnakertrans] Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Kubu Raya. 2021. Jumlah Transmigrasi menurut tahun kedatangan Kabupaten Kubu Raya.
[FAO]. 2019. The State of Food and Agriculture-Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. 2005. Theory-based behavior change interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health Psychology. 10(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305048552
Hidayat SI, Ardhany YH, Nurhadi E. 2020. Kajian food waste untuk mendukung ketahanan pangan. Agriekonomika. 9(2): 171–82. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v9i2.8787
Khusniyah, Muis ZZ, Kumalasari DA. 2022. Kajian food waste untuk meningkatkan ekonomi keluarga. Food waste study to improve family economy. Jurnal Agrotek UMMAT. 9(3): 209–221. https://doi.org/10.31764/jau.v9i3.8649
[KLHK] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2023. Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional. Jakarta (ID).
Malhotra NK, Lopes EL, Veiga RT. 2014. Modelagem de Equações estruturais com Lisrel: Uma visão inicial. Revista Brasileira de Marketing. 13(2): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2698
Roidah A. 2018. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku rumah tangga terhadap food waste. [Undergraduate thesis]. Malang (ID): Universitas Brawijaya.
Santoso S. 2014. Konsep dasar dan aplikasi SEM dengan AMOS 22. Jakarta (ID): Elax Media Komputindo.
Saputro WA, Purnomo S, Salamah U. 2021. Study of food waste of farmers’ households in Klaten to support food security. Anjoro: International Journal of Agriculture and Business. 2(2): 58–64. https://doi.org/10.31605/anjoro.v2i2.1166
Schanes K, Dobernig K, Gözet B. 2018. Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production. 182: 978–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030
Soorani F, Ahmadvand M. 2019. Determinants of consumers’ food management behavior: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Waste Management. 98(Oct): 151–159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.025
Stancu V, Haugaard P, Lähteenmäki L. 2016. Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste. Appetite. 96:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025
Stefan V, Ericavan H, Alina TA, Liisa L. 2013. Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Quality and Preference. 28(1): 375–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.
Visschers VHM. Wickli N, Siegrist M. 2016. Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Bd. 45: 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.007

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.