Penilaian dan Pemetaan Status Keberlanjutan Kota di Provinsi Banten
Abstract
The world population is proliferating, and the proportion of people living in urban areas is also increasing. It is challenging to achieve the SDGs, especially SDG 11, which aims to make cities and communities more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. Meeting the needs of urban residents, such as housing, public infrastructure, a clean environment, security, jobs, and other basic needs to live comfortably in a city with limited resources, is a problem. Sustainable cities are becoming increasingly important today to facilitate the growth of sustainable cities that integrate economic, sociocultural, environmental, ICT/transverse, and urban dimensions. Effective evaluation of urban sustainability is essential for sustainable development. Banten Province is one of the regions that has committed to achieving the SDGs. This commitment is contained in Banten Governor Regulation Number 47 of 2019 concerning the Regional Action Plan for the Sustainable Development Goals of Banten Province for 2020‒2022. Therefore, this study aims to assess and map the sustainability status of cities in Banten Province using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) analysis and processed with PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization METHods for Enrichment Evaluation). The number of criteria for a sustainable city in 2012 was 82 criteria and 109 criteria in 2022, where the highest number of criteria is on the sociocultural and economic dimensions. The PROMETHEE results show that the cities in Banten Province with the best sustainability levels are Tangerang City and South Tangerang City. City governments with low sustainability status or experiencing a decrease in sustainability status need to improve the performance of sustainable city indicators so that development can be sustainable.
Keywords: ecology, economics, evaluation, preference ranking organization methods for enrichment evaluation, social
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Gufran DD, Pertiwi N. 2017. Sustainability of ecology and economic of urban farming development: case study in Makassar City, South Sulawesi Province. Eco. Env. & Cons. 23(1): 125–130.
Aubry C, Ba A, Dabat MH, Ramamonjisoa J. 2010. Urban agriculture and sustainable urban landscape. An applied research on two case studi (Madagascar and Senegal). 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4–7 July 2010, Vienna (Austria). p: 2013 – 2026.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten. 2023. Provinsi Banten dalam Angka 2023. Pandeglang (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten. 2013. Provinsi Banten dalam Angka 2023. Pandeglang (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Tangerang. 2023. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2023. Tanggerang (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Tangerang Selatan. 2023. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2023. Tanggerang (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Cilegon. 2023. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2023. Cilegon (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Serang. 2023. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2023. Banten (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Tangerang. 2013. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2013. Tanggerang (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Tangerang Selatan. 2013. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2013. Tanggerang (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Cilegon. 2013. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2013. Cilegon (ID).
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Serang. 2013. Kota Tangerang dalam Angka 2013. Serang (ID).
Burhan AB. 2018. Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi untuk Pengembangan Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan. 16(2): 233‒247. https://doi.org/10.46937/16201826338
Colapinto C, Jayaraman R, Abdelaziz FB, La Torre D. 2020. Environmental sustainability and multifaceted development: multi-criteria decision models with applications. Annals of Operations Research. 293(2): 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03403-y
De Zeeuw H. 2003. Community Development. p. 212 – 243. In Annotated Bibliography on Urban and Periurban Agriculture. ETCNetherlands Urban Agriculture Programme.
De Zeeuw H. 2011. Cities, climate change and urban agriculture. Urban Agriculture Magazine. 25: 39–42.
Deshpande PC, Skaar C, Brattebø H, Fet AM. 2020. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway. Science of the Total Environment. 719: 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137353
Fauzi A. 2014. Teknik Analisis Keberlanjutan. Jakarta (ID): PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2019. FAO Framework for the Urban Food Agenda. Rome (IT): FAO.
Fu Y, Zhang X. 2017. Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: A 35-year bibliometric analysis. Cities. 60: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.003
Garfi M, Ferrer Marti, L, Bonoli A, Tondelli S. 2011. Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management. 92: 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.007
[ITU] International Telecommunication Union. About. Source: U4SSC. [internet]. Tersedia pada: https://u4ssc.itu.int/. Diakses pada: 2 Mei 2023.
Khalili NR, Duecker S. 2013. Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management systems. Journal of Cleaner Production. 47: 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.044
Langemeyer J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D, Scheuer S, Elmqvist T. 2016. Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science & Policy. 62: 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013
Lombardi NA, Salomon VA, Ortiz-Barrios MA, Florek-Paszkowska AK, Petrillo A, De Oliveira OJ. 2021. Multiple criteria assessment of sustainability programs in the textile industry. International Transactions in Operational Research. 28(3): 1550–1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12871
Lovell ST. 2010. Multifunction Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Land Use Planning in the US. Sustainability. 2010(2): 2499–2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082499
Mendoza G, Prabhu R. 2003. Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing kriterias of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management. 174: 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00044-0
Morfoulaki M, Papathanasiou J. 2021. Use of PROMETHEE MCDA method for ranking alternative measures of sustainable urban mobility planning. Mathematics. 9(6): 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060602
Mukhtar R, Nazir E, Hindratmo B, Nelson R, Pitalokasari OD, Syofyan Y, Masitoh S, Dainah A. 2021. Asesmen Kualitas Lingkungan di PSIKLH Kawasan Puspiptek Serpong Tangerang Selatan. ECOLAB 15(2): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.20886/jklh.2021.15.2.133-144
Patrão C, Moura P, de Almeida AT. 2020. Review of Smart City Assessment Tools. Smart Cities. 3: 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities 3040055
Peraturan Gubernur Banten Nomor 47 Tahun 2019 tentang Rencana Aksi Daerah Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Provinsi Banten Tahun 2020–2022. Pandeglang (ID).
Pothukuchi K. 2004. Community food assessment—A first step in planning for community food security. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 23: 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04264908
Rafiaani P, Kuppens T, Van Dael M, Azadi H, Lebailly P, Van Passel S. 2018. Social sustainability assessments in the biobased economy: Towards a systemic approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 82: 1839–1853.
Specht K, Siebert R, Hartmann I, Freisinger UB, Sawicka M, Werner A, Thomaier S, Henckel DH, Walk A,. Dierich DH. 2014. Urban agriculture of the future: an overview of sustainabilityaspects of food production in and on buildings. Agric Hum Values. 31: 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9448-4
Trump BD, Kadenic M, Linkov I. 2018. A sustainable arctic: Making hard decisions. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research. 50(1): e1438345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2018.1438345
[UU] Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2000 tentang Pembentukan Provinsi Banten. Pandeglang (ID).
United Nations. 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: World Urbanization Prospects-The 2018 Revision. [internet]. Tersedia pada: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf. Diakses pada: 10 April 2023.
United Nations. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on the Environment and Development. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
United Nations. 2022. Goal 11—Sustainable Cities and Communities. [internet]. Tersedia pada: https://www.undp. org/sustainable-development-goals?c_src=CENTRAL&c_src2=GSR#sustainable-cities-and-communities. Diakses pada: 10 Mei 2023.
[UNEP] United Nations Environment Programme. Environmental Moments: A UN75 Timeline. [internet]. Tersedia pada: https://www.unep.org/ news-and-stories/story/environmental-moments-un75-timeline. Diakses pada: 10 Mei 2023.
Wang MH, Ho YS, Fu HZ. 2019. Global performance and development on sustainable city based on natural science and social science research: A bibliometric analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 666: 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.139
Zheng J, Egger C, Lienert J. 2016. A scenario-based MCDA framework for wastewater infrastructure planning under uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Management. 183: 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.027
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
View JIPI StatsCounter
