Sistem Pengembangan Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi/Kerbau di Provinsi Aceh

  • Rahmat Fadhil Program Studi Teknik Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Jl. Tgk. Hasan Krueng Kalee No. 3, Kompelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-1599
  • Zuraida Hanum Program Studi Teknik Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Jl. Tgk. Hasan Krueng Kalee No. 3, Kompelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111
  • Muhammad Yunus Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Jl. Tgk. Hasan Krueng Kalee No. 3, Kompelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111

Abstract

Cow/buffalo-business insurance (AUTS/K) is a form of risk mitigation for livestock businesses run by farmers. Various risks that are often occurred include livestock death, natural disasters, disease outbreaks, and livestock theft. If not handled properly, it can threaten the sustainability of this business, especially the small-scale livestock-business sector. This study aimed to formulate a developing system of cattle/buffalo-livestock insurance using the soft-systems methodology (SSM) approach. This research was conducted in Aceh Province from December 2020 to February 2021 using an expert survey by collecting data and information through parties who have competence or expertise in the field being studied. The development of this insurance system can be said to be an effort to improve and a solution to any problems currently being experienced in the implementation of AUTS/K. The result of improvements includes optimizing the roles of each party involved and program innovation to intensify AUTS/K products among breeders. The results showed that the SSM approach could describe the problem well and form a conceptual model for the AUTS/K system in Aceh province. Improvements to policies, assistance, and promotion systems are recommended as solutions to the problems related to livestock-insurance system implemented.

 

Keywords: breeders, conceptual model, insurance system, soft-systems methodology, syariah insurance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir M, Rilda M. 2004. Lembaga Keuangan dan Pembiayaan. Bandung (ID): PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Abdulkadir M. 2006. Hukum asuransi di Indonesia. Bandung (ID): PT Citra Aditya.

Ainul FNA, Susyanti J, Mardani RM. 2017. Pengaruh premi, klaim, hasil underwriting, investasi dan profitabilitas terhadap pertumbuhan aset pada perusahaan asuransi jiwa syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Manajemen 6 (2): 97-110.

Amam A, Harsita PA. 2019. Efek domino performa kelembagaan, aspek risiko, dan pengembangan usaha terhadap SDM peternak sapi perah. Sains Peternakan. 17(1): 5-11. https://doi.org/10.20961/ sainspet.v17i1.24266

Anam DS. 2018. Evaluasi pelaksanaan program asuransi usaha ternak sapi/kerbau (auts/k)-studi pada dinas peternakan dan kesehatan hewan Kabupaten Lamongan dan dinas perikanan dan peternakan Kabupaten Tuban [Skripsi]. Surabaya (ID): Universitas Airlangga.

An-nisa NS, Syarief R, Suprayitno G. 2015. Strategi Pengembangan Asuransi Ternak Sapi. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis. 12(1): 27-35. https://doi. org/10.17358/JMA.12.1.27

Arbi P. 2009. Analisa kelayakan dan strategi pengembangan usaha ternak sapi potong-studi kasus: Desa Jati Kesuma, Kecamatan Nano Rambe, Kabupaten Deli Serdang [Skripsi]. Medan (ID): Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Arsih CC, Madarisa F, Thaib G. 2021. Proses adopsi program asuransi usaha ternak sapi/kerbau (AUTS/K) di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. Jurnal Niara. 14(2): 91-100. https://doi.org/10.31849/nia ra.v14i2.5999

Asadi S. 2020. Soft systems methodology approach to is change management. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science. 7(1): 66-80.

Augustsson H, Churruca K, Braithwaite J. 2019. Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: the case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice. BMC Health Research Service. 19: 666-678. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12913-019-4508-0

Cangara H. 2013. Perencanaan dan Strategi Komunikasi. Jakarta (ID): PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Checkland P, Scholes J. 1990. Soft System Methodology in Action. England (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Checkland P, Poulter, J. 2010. Learning for Action: a Short Definitive Account of Soft System Methodology, and It’s Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. New York (US): Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_5

Daellenbach H, McNickle D. 2005. Management science: decision making through system thinking. Hampshire (UK): Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-0-230-80203-2_11

Dewi KACJ. 2018. Peranan asuransi ternak sapi pada kelompok pelaksana SIMANTRI di Kabupaten Buleleng. DwijenAGRO. 8: 139-146.

Diaz-Parra O, Ruiz-Vanoye JA, Barrera-Camara RA, Fuentes-Penna A, Sandoval N. 2014. Soft systems methodology for the strategic planning of the enterprise computer Security. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimizations Problems and Informatics. 5(1): 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/201 4/848129

Emil HA. 2020. Pelaksanaan asuransi usaha ternak sapi/kerbau di kabupaten tanah datar [Tesis]. Padang (ID): Universitas Andalas.

Fadhil R, Maarif SM, Bantacut T, Hermawan A. 2017. Model strategi pengembangan sumber daya manusia agroindustri kopi Gayo dalam menghadapi masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi. 16(2): 141-156. https://doi.org/10.126 95/jmt.2017.16.2.3

Fadhil R, Qanytah Q, Hastati DY, Maarif MS. 2018. Development strategy for a quality management system of gayo coffee agro-industry using soft systems methodology. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. 26(2): 168-178. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.11341

Fadhil R, Yusuf MY, Bahri TS, Maulana H. 2021. Agricultural insurance policy development system in Indonesia: a meta-analysis. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science). 48(2): 121-133.

Fountas S, Sorensen CG, Tsiropoulos Z, Cavalaris C, Liakos V, Gemtos T. 2015. Farm machinery management information system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 110: 131-138. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.11.011

Haryastuti R, Pasaribu SM, Aidi MN, Sumertajaya IM, Sutomo VA, Kusumaningrum D, Anisa R. 2021. Determination of critical productivity level on cluster-based area of rice crop insurance in Java. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 39(1): 1-13.

Hidayat D. 2014. Media Public Relations. Yogyakarta (ID): Graha Ilmu.

Kang S, Shim D, Pack PH. 2015. A Study on the problems and policy implementation for open-source software industry in Korea: soft system methodology approach. Journal of Society for e-Business Studies. 20(4): 193-208. https://doi.org /10.7838/jsebs.2015.20.4.193

Karami M, Rastgar A, Azar A, Feiz D, Esfidani M. 2020. Identifying the factors affecting the selection of B2B online market entry strategies using soft system methodology (case study: it industry knowledge-based companies). Journal of System Management. 6(2): 55-80.

Kusumaningrum DE, Sumarsono RB, Gunawan I. 2019. Professional ethics and teacher teaching performance: measurement of teacher empowerment with a soft system methodology approach. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. 5(4): 611-624.

Lame G, Jouini O, Cardinal JS. 2020. Combining soft systems methodology, ethnographic observation and discrete-event simulation: a case study in cancer care. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 71(10): 1545-1562. https://doi.org/10.1080 /01605682.2019.1610339

Liu WB, Meng W, Mingers J, Tang N, Wang W. 2012. Developing a performance management system using soft systems methodolgy: A Chinese case study. European Journal of Operational Research. 223 (2): 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.20 12.06.029

Moriarty S, Mitchell N, Wells W. 2011. Advertising. Jakarta (ID): Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nguyen TTN, Scognamillo DG, Comer CE. 2019. Revealing community perceptions for ecological restoration using a soft system methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 32: 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-946 3-x

Papilo P, Marimin M, Hambali E, Sitanggang IS. 2021. institutional analysis on palm oil-based bioenergy for rural community electricity development in Indonesia: a hybrid of soft system and hard system approach. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. 29(1): 40-63. https://doi. org/10.3311/PPso.12995

Patel NV. 1995. Application of soft system methodology to the real-world process of teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Management. 9(1): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1108 /09513549510075998

Prakoso D. 2004. Hukum Asuransi Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): PT Rineka Cipta.

Prasetyaningtyas SW, Maarif MS, Sobir R, Hermawan A. 2019. The use of soft system methodology in evaluating the business strategies in organic farming: the case from Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education. 2(2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v2i2.556

Prayoga IF, Agustin Y, Nurhasanah S. 2018. Pelaksanaan program asuransi usaha ternak sapi-studi pada PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero). Pactum Law Journal. 2(1): 451-462.

Qanun Nomor 11 Tahun 2018 tentang Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah.

Saputra H. 2009. Strategi pengembangan ternak sapi potong berwawasan agribisnis di Provinsi Aceh. [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor

Setiawati NS. 2018. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang polis asuransi dalam menyelesaikan sengketa klaim asuransi. Jurnal Spektrum Hukum. 15(1): 150-168. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v2i 2.556

Shahabi A, Azar A, Radfar R, Asadifard RA. 2020. Combining soft systems methodology with interpretive structural modelling and system dynamics for network orchestration: case study of the formal science and technology collaborative Network in Iran. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 33: 453-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1 1213-019-09490-z

Sonatha Y, Prayama D. 2011. Penerapan soft systems methodology dalam mengatasi permasalahan home monitoring. Poli Rekayasa. 6: 154-160.

Suriya S, Mudgal BV. 2013. Soft systems methodology and integrated flood management: a study of the Adayar watershed, Chennai, India. Water and Environment Journal. 27(4): 462-473. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00365.x

Suryaningsih DU. 2018. Tinjauan yuridis asuransi usaha ternak sapi dalam menanggulangi risiko [Skripsi]. Mataram (ID): Universitas Mataram.

Susanto MH, Azwar W, Marwa MHM. 2021. Asuransi usaha ternak sapi: implementasi dan tinjauan hukum asuransi. Indonesia Law Reform Journal. 1(2): 228-240. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v1i2.17 098

Syukur S, Musdalipah M, Sirajuddin SN, Fitriani N. 2021. Faktor-faktor eksternal pada peternak sapi potong yang mengikuti program AUTS di Kabupaten Sinjai, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science). 11(1): 12-21. https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v11i1.123

Wijayanti AE. 2019. pelaksanaan asuransi bagi usaha tani dan ternak sapi berbasis kesejahteraan petani dan peternak [Skripsi]. Semarang (ID): Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Yadin A. 2013. Soft systems methodology in an educational context-enhancing students perception and understanding. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. 3(5): 351-356. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJ EEEE.2013.V3.258

Yusuf MY, Fadhil R, Bahri TS, Maulana H. 2021. Comparison study of agricultural insurance government subsidy and farmers’ self-subsistent premium in Indonesia. Economia agro-alimentare/Food Economy. 23(2): 1-24. https://doi. org/10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12184

Published
2021-10-27
How to Cite
FadhilR., HanumZ., & YunusM. (2021). Sistem Pengembangan Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi/Kerbau di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 26(4), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.26.4.569