Prospek Pengembangan Usaha Handline Tuna di Perairan D.I. Yogyakarta: Tinjauan Sumber Daya dan Investasi
Abstract
In 2018, tuna production in D.I. Yogyakarta reached 371.66 tons, of which 75-82% were captured using the handline. The dominance of the tuna caught has led to the development of the handline that highly dependent on the potential of tuna resources. Investment prospects are also important because they become a reference for investors in investing in the tuna handline busineses. This study aims to analyze the potential of tuna fish resources including the spread of its fishing ground and analyze the feasibility of developing tuna handline buseneses in the waters of D.I. Yogyakarta. The data of this study were analyzed using the Schaefer model, mapping using geographic information system (GIS), and investment feasibility analysis. The potential of tuna fish production in the waters of D.I. Yogyakarta reached 628,53 tons/year, while the average production was 427,32 tons/year, so it is still prospective to be developed. Potential fishing ground for tuna handline was spreaded in the waters of Bantul Regency until the western border waters of Gunung Kidul Regency, and in the eastern waters of Gunung Kidul Regency. The tuna handline was also prospective to be developed its investment in D.I. Yogyakarta. The value of NPV, IRR, ROI, and B/C ratio of tuna handline were very good, i.e., IDR 425,121,064; 36.49%; 9,36; and 1.22 respectively.
Keywords: fish resource, geographic information system, investment, the waters of D.I. Yogyakarta, tuna handline
Downloads
References
[BAPPEDA] Badan Pemerintahan Daerah. 2019. Aplikasi Dataku Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. [Internet]. [diakses 2019 Feb 8]. Tersedia pada: http://bappeda. jogjaprov.go.id/dataku/data_dasar/ cetak/132-perikanan-tangkap-laut
Batista MI, Horta e Costa B, Gonçalves L, Henriques M, Erzini K, Caselle JE, Gonçalves EJ, Cabral HN. 2015.
Assessment of catches, landings and fishing effort as useful tools for MPA management. Journal of Fisheries Research. 172(1): 197-208. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.07.020.
Coelho R, Fernandez-Carvalho J, Santos MN. 2015. Habitat use and diel vertical migration of bigeye thresher shark: Overlap with pelagic longline fishing gear. Journal of Marine Environmental Research. 112(2): 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres. 2015. 10.009.
[DKP] Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. 2018. Laporan Kinerja Sektor Perikanan dan Kelautan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta (ID).
Doddema M, Spaargaren G, Wiryawan B, Busha SR. 2018. Fisher responses to private monitoring interventions in an Indonesian tuna handline fishery. Fisheries Research. 208(1): 49-57. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.07.009
Gephart GA, Deutsch L, Pace MM, Troellb M, Seekellde DA. 2017. Shocks to fish production: Identification, trends, and consequences. Global Environmental Change. 42(1): 24-32. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.003
Hanley ND, Spash C. 1993. Cost-Benefic Analysis and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Keputusan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 107/Kepmen-KP/2015 tentang Rencana Pengelolaan Perikanan Tuna, Cakalang dan Tongkol.
Lubis E, Pane AB, Muninggar R, Hamzah A. 2012. Besaran Kerugian Nelayan dalam Pemasaran Hasil Tangkapan: Kasus Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara Palabuhanratu. Maspari Journal. 4(2): 159-167.
Jalali MA, Lerodiaconou D, Monk J, Gorfine H, Rattray A. 2015. Predictive mapping of abalone fishing grounds using remotely-sensed LiDAR and commercial catch data. Journal of Fisheries Research.169(1): 26-36.
Jaquemet S, Potier M, Menard F. 2010. Do drifting and anchored Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) similarly influence tuna feeding habits? A case study from the Western Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research. 107(1-3): 283-290. https://doi.org/10.10 16 /j.fishres.2010.11.011
Macdonald P, Laurenson CH, Johnson A, Tait L. 2009. A comparison of catch rates of artificial lures from an automated handline fishery at Shetland, UK. Fisheries Research. 95(2): 379-385. https//doi.org/ 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.10.003
Macusi ED, Babaran RP, van Zwieten PAM. 2015. Strategies and tactics of tuna fishers in the payao (anchored FAD) fishery from general Santos city, Philippines. Marine Policy. 62(1): 63-73. https,//doi. -org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015. 08.020
Mayes TR, Shank TM. 2006. Financial Analysis with Microsoft Excel 4th Edition. Nashville (US): South-Western College Pub.
Merkel A, Madsen SKS. 2019. Lessons from port sector regulatory reforms in Denmark: An analysis of port governance and institutional structure outcomes. Transport Policy. 78(1): 31-41.
Mustaruddin, Asnil. 2020. Penentuan Wilayah Basis untuk Pengembangan Usaha Perikanan Tangkap Ramah Lingkungan di Perairan Pulau Salahnama dan Pulau Pandang. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 25(2): 253-260. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.18 343/jipi.25.2.253
Mustaruddin, Wiyono ES, Khotib M, Asnil, Bahri S. 2018. Pola pencemaran lokasi penangkapan dan ikan hasil tangkapan akibat berkembangnya aktivitas ekonomi di sekitar Danau Maninjau. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber daya Alam dan Lingkungan. 8(2): 134-142. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.8.2.13 4-142.
Mustaruddin, Baskoro MS, Supriatna A. 2014. Strategi Pengembangan Perikanan Cakalang yang Bersinergi dengan Faktor Lingkungan dan Sosial Ekonomi di Ternate: Studi Kasus Penangkapan Ikan Menggunakan Huhate. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian dan Perikanan. 3(1): 1-9.
Nurani TW, Wahyuningruma PI, Wisudo SH, Gigentika S, Arhatin RE. 2018. Model designs of Indonesian tuna fishery management in the Indian Ocean (FMA 573) using soft system methodology approach. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 44(2): 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2018.06.005
Partosuwirjo M, Haluan J, Baskoro MS, Soemokaryo S. 2008. Model Pengembangan Usaha Perikanan Tangkap di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis. 5(1): 23-32.
Punzon A, Villamor B, Preciado I. 2004. Analysis of the handline fishery targeting mackerel (Scomber scombrus, L.) in the North of Spain (ICES Division VIIIbc). Fisheries Research. 69(2): 189-204. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2004.05.002
Prabowo, Wiyono ES, Haluan J, Iskandar BH. 2013. Kinerja pembiayaan perikanan skala kecil di Kota Tegal, Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Marine Fisheries. 4(1): 1-9.
Rahmi TA, Nurani TW, Wahyuningrum PI. 2013. Usaha Perikanan Tangkap Skala Kecil di Sadeng, Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Amanisal. 2(2): 40-45.
Riandani PA, Bambang AN, Ismail. 2015. Tingkat Pemanfaatan dan Optimalisasi Fasilitas Dasar dan Fungsional di Pelabuhan Perikanan Pantai Sadeng Gunung Kidul Dalam Menunjang Pengembangan Perikanan Tangkap. Journal of Fisheries Resources Utilization Management and Technology. 4(3): 10-20.
Sanders MJ. 1999. Fishery performance and the value of future entitlements under quota management: A case study of a handline fishery in the southwest Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research. 18(34): 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/01657836(93)901 54-Y.
Simbolon D, Irnawati R, Sitanggang LP, Ernaningsih D, Tadjuddah M, Manopo VEN, Karnan, Mohammad. 2009. Pembentukan Daerah Penangkapan Ikan. Bogor (ID): Departemen Pemanfaatan Sumber daya Perikanan FPIK IPB.
Sumaila UR, Bellmann C, Tipping A. 2016. Fishing for the future: An overview of challenges and opportunities. Journal of Marine Policy. 69(1): 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01. 0 03.
Undang-Undang No. 45 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2004. Tentang Perikanan
Yuniarta S, van Zwieten PAM, Groeneveld RA, Wisudo SH, van Ierland EC. 2017. Uncertainty in catch and effort data of small and medium-scale tuna fisheries in Indonesia: Sources, operational causes and magnitude. Fisheries Research. 193(1): 173-183.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
View JIPI StatsCounter
