Analisis Respons Hidrologi untuk Mendukung Perencanaan Pengelolaan Sub-DAS Opak Hulu, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Abstract
Land use change is one of the causes of the decreasing of hydrological function that affects the hydrological response of a watershed. Planning of watershed management needs to be conducted to improve the hydrological function of the watershed. This study aims to determine the hydrological response in supporting watershed management planning in Opak Hulu Watershed. This research was conducted using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological modeling. The method used included data collection, processing of input data, running of SWAT model, calibration, validation, and the decision of the best watershed management scenarios. The results of the analysis of land use changes in the Opak Hulu Watershed in 2012–2017 had a significant increase in mixed upland agriculture (3.21%) and shrubs (1.43%). Meanwhile, open field (2,31%) and dry land agriculture (1.71%) decreased significantly. Based on the analyzed hydrological scenario, Soil and Water Conservation techniques can decrease the surface runoff and increase the lateral flow and base flow. The scenario is able to decrease the surface runoff by 542.22 mm (27.09%). It increases lateral flow and base flow by 321.82 mm (13.15%) and 797.28 mm (18.32%), respectively. The best watershed management planning with Soil and Water Conservation technique is able to reach Annual Flow Coefficient value to 0,33 (moderate) and 69,85 (moderate) for Flow Regime Coefficient.
Keywords: land use, soil and water conservation techniques, SWAT model, watershed
Downloads
References
Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR, Haney EB, Neitsch SL. 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009. Agricultural Research Service and Texas AgriLife Research. College Station
Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR, Haney EB, Neitsch SL. 2012. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009. College of Agricultire and Life Science Texas A&M University. Texas.
Arsyad S. 2010. Konservasi Tanah dan Air. Edisi ke-2. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.
[BBWS SO]. Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Serayu Opak. 2010. Pola Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Wilayah Sungai Progo Opak Serang. Keputusan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum. No 590/KPTS/M/2010.
[BPDAS SOP]. Balai Pengelola Daerah Aliran Sungai. 2014. Laporan Kinerja BPDAS Serayu Opak Progo Tahun 2014.
[BPDAS-HL SOP]. Balai Pengelola Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Hutan Lindung. 2016. Laporan Kinerja BPDAS-HL Serayu Opak Progo Tahun 2016.
[BPDAS-HL SOP]. Balai Pengelola Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Hutan Lindung. 2018. Laporan Kinerja BPDAS-HL Serayu Opak Progo Tahun 2018.
[BPS]. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Pertumbuhan Penduduk DIY. Yogyakarta (ID).
Chaube UC, Suryavanshi S, Nurzaman L, Pandey A. 2011. Synthesis of flow series of tributaries in upper Betwa basin. International Journal of Environmental Science. 1(7). 1459-1475
Hendriyanto HS, Purwanto YJ, Setiawan Y. 2019. Penggunaan Tank Model untuk Mempelajari Tindakan Konservasi Tanah dan Hubungannya dengan Debit Sungai di Sub DAS Ciliwung Hulu-Ciliwung. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian. 7(1):1-8.
Hidayat Y, Murtilaksono K, Wahyunie ED, Panuju RD. 2013. Pencirian debit aliran sungai Citarum Hulu. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 18(2): 109-114.
Junaidi E, Tarigan SD. 2012. Penggunaan Model Hidrologi SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) dalam Pengelolaan DAS Cisadane. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam. 9(3): 221-237. https://doi.org/10.20886/jphka.2012. 9.3.221-237
Laturuan A, Hendrayanto, Puspaningsih N. 2018. Penggunaan Lahan Optimal dalam Transformasi Hujan Limpasan di DAS Wae Ruhu. Media Konservasi. 23(1): 52-64.
Manan S. 1979. Pengaruh Hutan dan Manajemen Daerah Aliran Sungai. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Liew MWV, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Journal American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 50(3): 885-900.
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool : Theoritical Documentation Version 2005. Agricultural Research Service and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Temple
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR. 2001a. Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Theoretical Documentation Version 2000. Soil and Water Research Laboratory–ARS. Texas.
Nugroho SP. 2000. Analisis Aliran Permukaan, Sedimen, dan Hara Nitrogen, Fosfor, dan Kebutuhan Oksigen Kimiawi Dengan Menggunakan Model AGNPS di Sub DAS Dumpul. [tesis]. Bogor (ID): Program Pasca Sarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Nugroho SP. 2018. Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Debit Aliran di Sub DAS Citatih. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. 8(2): 258-263. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl. 8.2.258-263
Nuryanto A, Setyawati D, Lidiawati I, Suyana J, Karlinasari L, Nasri MA, Puspaningsih N, Yuwono SB. 2003. Strategi Pengelolaan DAS dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Kelestarian Sumber Daya Air: Studi Kasus DAS Ciliwung Hulu. Makalah Pengantar Falsafah Sains. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Pawitan H. 2006. Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Hidrologi DAS. Bogor (ID): Laboratorium Hidrometeorologi FMIPA, IPB. 2008. Analisis Sistem Hidrologi. Bahan Kuliah. Bogor (ID): Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Rachman A, Dariah A. 2007. Pemodelan dalam Perencanaan Konservasi Tanah Air. Di dalam : Prosiding Seminar dan Kongres Nasional VI MKTI; Cisarua, 17-18 Des 2007. Bogor (ID): Perhimpunan MKTI.
Rahadian A, Buchori I. 2016. Dampak Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Terhadap Limpasan Permukaan dan Laju Aliran Puncak Sub DAS Gajahwong Hulu-Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota. 12(2):127-139. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v12i2.12890
Santhi C, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Williams JR. 2001. Validation of The SWAT Model on a Large River Basin with Point and Nonpoint Sources. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 37(5): 1169-1188.
Silva GM, Netto AAO, Neves JJR, Vasco NA, Ahmeida C, Faccioli GG. 2015. Sensitivity analysis and calibration of hydrological modeling of the watershed Northeast Brazil. Journal of Environmental Protection. 6: 837-850.
Sudadi UDPT, Baskoro, Munibah K, Barus B, Darmawan. 1991. Kajian pengaruh perubahan penggunaan lahan terhadap aliran sungai dan penurunan kualitas lahan di sub DAS Ciliwung Hulu dengan pendekatan model simulasi hidrologi. Laporan Penelitian. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor
Tarigan SD. 2016. Tarigan SD. 2016. Modelling effectiveness of management practices for flood mitigation using GIS spatial analysis functions in Upper Ciliwung watershed. Earth and Environmental Science. 31(2016): 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/31/1/012030
Elsevier Procedia Environmental Sciences 33, pp 386-392.
Vink APA. 1975. Land Use in Advancing Agriculture. New York (US): Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-642-66049-8
Wang X, Kannan N, Santhi C, Potter SR, Williams JR, and Arnold JG. 2011. Integrating APEX output for cultivated cropland with SWAT simulation for regional modeling. Journal American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 54(4): 1281-1298.
Yustika RD. 2012. Simulasi Manajemen Lahan di DAS Ciliwung Hulu Menggunakan Model SWAT. Jurnal Informatika Pertanian. 21(2): 71-79. https://doi.org/10.21082/ip.v21n2.2012.p71-79
Yusuf SM. 2010. Kajian respons perubahan penggunaan lahan terhadap karakteristik hidrologi di DAS Cirasea menggunakan model MWSWAT [tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
View JIPI StatsCounter
