Sensitivitas dan Kelayakan Indeks Biotik Menggunakan Makroavertebrata untuk Menentukan Status Kesehatan Sungai
Abstract
Water-quality monitoring using macroinvertebrates has been developed by several countries to determine their water qualities. Meanwhile in Indonesia, water quality monitoring has not been developed to adapt to Indonesia’s natural conditions. Some researchers use the existing biotic indices such as FBI, LQI, SIGNAL, and others. Therefore, this study aims to determine the status of water quality using several biotic indices and to compare the sensitivity and feasibility of indices on monitoring activities using simple matrix and Pearson correlation test. The interpretation results of FBI, LQI, and Singscore to determine water quality on each station in Brantas, Opak, Progo, and Cileungsi Rivers were different. The Pearson’s correlations test showed that the sensitivities are different between rivers. Those results are affected by the river conditions and also the activities around the rivers which release the pollution into the river. The FBI index showed the greatest score number of sensitivities among the other indexes.
Keywords: macroinvertebrate, monitoring, river, sensitivity
Downloads
References
Abdullah MP, Yew CH, Ramli MS, Ali R. 2003. Trihalomethanes (THMs) in Malaysian drinking water. Malaysian Journal of Chemistry. 5(1): 56‒66
Angeler DG, Allen CR, Birgé HE, Drakare S, McKie BG, Johnson RK. 2014. Assessing and managing freshwater ecosystems vulnerable to environmental change. AMBIO. 43: 113‒125. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0566-z
[APHA] American Public Health Association. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington D.C. (US): American Public Association Inc.
Blakely TJ, Eikaas HS, Harding JS. 2014. The Singscore: a macroinvertebrate biotic index for assessing the health of Singapore’s stream and canals. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 62: 540‒548
Brower JE, Zar JH, von Ende CN. 1990. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. Ed ke-3. Iowa (US): Wm C Brown Co Publisher. 194 p
Castello L, McGrath DG, Hess LL, Coe MT, Lefebvre PA, Petry P, Macedo MN, Reno VF, Arantes CC. 2013. The vulnerability of Amazon freshwater ecosystems. Conservation Letters. 6(4): 217‒229. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12008
Cook SEK. 1976. Quest for an index of community structure sensitive to water pollution. Environmental Pollution. 11(4): 269‒288. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0013-9327(76)90067-7
Effendi H. 2003. Telaah Kualitas Air bagi Pengelolaan Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan Perairan. Yogyakarta (ID): Kanisisus
Everaert G, Neve JD, Boets P, Domanguez-Granda L, Mereta ST, Ambelu A, Hoang TH, Goethals PLM, Thas O. 2014. Comparison of the abiotic preferences of macroinvertebrates in tropical river basins. Plos One. 9(10): e108898. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108898
Friedrich G, Chapman D, Beim A. 1996. Water Quality Assessments-A Guide to Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring; Chapman D, editor. Cambridge (UK): F & FN Spon
Hendrasarie N dan Januar. 2019. Pemetaan Kualitas Air di Kali Surabaya Berdasarkan Indeks Makroinvertebrata Benthos dengan Model Wintwins 2.3. Jurnal Envirotek. 11(2): 45‒52. https:// doi.org/10.33005/envirotek.v11i2.5
Hilsenhoff WL. 1982. Using a biotic index to evaluate water quality in streams. Technical bulletin. 132. Madison (US): Department of natural resources. 22 p.
Hudson N, Baker A, Reynolds D. 2007. Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters: a review. River Ressearch Applications. 23: 631–649. https:// doi.org/10.1002/rra.1005
Kalyoncu H, Zeybek M. 2011. An application of different biotic and diversity indices for assessing water quality: A case study in Rivers Çukurca and Isparta (Turkey). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(1): 19‒27
Khairuddin, Yamin M, Syukur Abdul. 2016. Analisis kualitas air Kali Ancar dengan menggunakan bioindikator makroinvertebrata. Jurnal Biologi Tropis. 16(2): 10‒22. https://doi.org/10. 29303/jbt.v16i2.220
Krebs CJ. 1989. Ecological methodology. New York (US): Harper Collins Publishers, Inc. 654 p
Krisanti M, Effendi H, Wardiatno Y, Hariyadi S, Pratiwi NTM, Mursalin, Andriana W. 2010. Struktur komunitas makroavertebrata sebagai indikator keberadaan bahan organik di perairan hulu Sungai Cisadane Bogor, Jawa Barat. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Tahunan VI Penelitian Masalah Lingkungan di Indonesia. Ikatan Ahli Teknik Penyehatan dan Lingkungan Indonesia, Denpasar, Bali. 29 Juli 2010. Bali (ID).
Krisanti M, Wardiatno Y, Anzani YM. 2017. Assessin the ecological status of the Cisadane River’s headwaters using benthic macroinvertebates. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 54: 1‒7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/54/ 1/012023
Li L, Zheng B, Liu L. 2010. Biomonitoring and bioindicators used for river ecosystems: Definitions, approaches and trends. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2: 1510‒1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.proenv.2010.10.164
Li J, Luo G, He LJ, Xu J, Lyu J. 2018 Analitycal approaches for determining chemical oxygen demand in water bodies: a review. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 48(1): 47‒65. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2017.1370670
Mason CF. 1991. Biology of freshwater pollution. Ed ke-2. New York (US): Longman, Inc. 351 p
McCafferty WP. 1983. Aquatic entomology: The fishermen’s and ecologist’s illustrated guide to insects and their relatives. London (GB): Jones and Bartlett Publishers 480p.
Moran J. 2016. Application of family biotic index in assessment of two rivers affected oil pollution in Assam, India. International Research Journal Environment Science. 5(11): 35‒40.
Nakin MDV, Bovungana AQ, Majiza VN. 2017. Spatial and temporal variations in the distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates along the Vuvu River, South Africa. In: Brebbia CA, Boukalova Z. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment; 2017; Boston, United State. Boston (US): WIT Press. 47‒56 p. https://doi.org/10.2495/ WRM170051
Odum EP. 1993. Dasar-dasar ekologi. Ed ke-3. Samingan T, penerjemah. Yogyakarta (ID): Gadjah Mada University Press. 697hlm.
Oruta NJ, Oindo BO, Bosire EK. 2017. Relationship between riparian vegetation cover and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Kuywa River, Kenya. Researchjournali’s Journal of Ecology. 4(1): 1‒21.
Patang F, Soegianto A, Hariyanto S. 2018. Benthic macroinvertebrates diversity as bioindicator of water quality of some rivers in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Journal of Ecology. 2018: 1‒11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5129421
Pennak RW. 1978. Fresh‐water invertebrates of the United States. Second Edition. New York (US): Jhon Wiley & Sons
Uherek CB, Gouveia FBP. 2014. Biological monitoring using macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of water quality of Maroaga Stream in the Maroaga Cave System, Presidente Figueiredo, Amazon, Brazil. International Journal of Ecology. 2014: 1‒7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/308149
Ward JV. 1992. Aquatic insect ecology: Biology and habitat. New York (US): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 438 p
Warman I. 2015. Uji kualitas air muara Sungai Lais untuk perikanan di Bengkulu Utara. Jurnal Agroqua. 13(2): 24‒33
[WAV] Water Action Volunteers. 2003. Citizen monitoring biotic index. [Internet]. [diunduh 2019 Apri 06] Tersedia pada http://www.water-research.net/Waterlibrary/Lake/Bugs.pdf
Wildan, DM. 2017. Pemanfaatan Perairan Karst sebagai Media Pemeliharaan Udang Vaname (Litopenaeus vannamei). [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Wimbaningrum R, Indriyani S, Retnaningdyah C, Arisoesilaningsih E. 2016. Monitoring water quality using biotic indices of benthic macroinvertebrates along surface water ecosystems in some tourism areas in East Java, Indonesia. J.Ind. Tour. Dev. Std. 4 (2): 81‒90. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jitode.2016.004.02.06
Yunitawati, Sunarto, Hasan Z. 2012. Hubungan antara karakteristik substrat dengan struktur komunitas makrozoobenthos di Sungai Cantigi, Kabupaten Indramayu. Jurnal Perikanan dan Kelautan. 3(3): 221‒227.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
View JIPI StatsCounter
