FAKTOR PENYEBAB PETANI KENTANG LAHAN KERING DATARAN TINGGI KECAMATAN PANGALENGAN, BANDUNG TIDAK MENGADOPSI KONSERVASI TANAH

  • Ratna Khatarina
Keywords: soil conservation, potatos farming, SCUAF model, farm income

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to identify why soil conservation that believed giving more benefits Is not adopted by upland potato’s farmer of pangalengan, Bandung. The study was carried out in pangalengan subdistrict, Bandung. Population of responden is 1148 farmers. Respondent of 180 farmers (15% of population) was drawn randomly from 13 village. The respondent amount of each village was drawn proportionally. The study reveals long term (20 years) and short term (one period of cultivation) impact of three farming systems using an approach of farm income analysis. Two of three farming systems apply soil conservation practices, bench terraces and contour farming systems, while the other does not apply soil conservation practice (slope farming system). Short term of farm income is quantified by using input and revenue prices 2004-2005. Long term of farm income is quantified by using SCUAF (Soil Change Under Agricultural Agroforestry and Forestry) model and Cost Benefit Analysis. In one period of cultivation (short term), farm income of slope farming is higher than farm income of soil consservation practices, benc terraces and contour farming. In 20 years, NPV of bench terraces and contour farming systems is higher than NPV (Net Persent Value) of slope farming system. The long term benefit of soil conservation practices causing farmer reluctant to adopt conservation practices. Soil conservation practices implementation in the future needs supported by policy how to make the long term benefit of conservation is more interesting to farmer such as giving incentive or credit to farmer who adopt soil conservation practice, and as well as the certainty of land holding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ratna Khatarina
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor

References

Arsyad, S. 2000. Konservasi Tanah dan Air. IPB Press.

Banua, S.I. 1994. Dinamika Aliran Permukaan dan Erosi Akibat Tindakan Konservasi Tanah pada Andosol, Pengalengan, Jawa Barat Tesis. Program Pasca Sarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Barbier E.B. 1995. The Economic of soil erosion:theory, methodology and examples. Spesial paper. Paper based on a presentation to the fifth biannual workshop on economy and environment in Southeast Asia. Singapore, November 28-30,1995.

De Zeeum, F. 1997. Borrowing of land, securty of tenure and sustainable land use in Burkina Faso.Development and Change. 28 (3): 583-595. Blackwell Publishers. USA.

Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Bandung. 2004. Laporan Tahunan. Dinas Pertanian Kapupaten Bandung.

Gittinger, J.P. 1982. Economic Analysis of agricultural project. 2ed. Completely revised and xepanded. The johns Hopkins Universitu Press. USA.

Hernawati, 1992. Pengaruh beberapa Teknik Konservasi Tanah dan Air dalam Budidaya Kentang dan Kubis Terhadap Aliran Permukaan, erosi, dan Produksi Tanaman. Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hwang S.W., J. Alwang, and G.W. Norton. 1994. Soil conservation practices and farm income in the Dominican Republic. Agricultural System 46: 59-77. Elseveir Science Limited.

Jaya A. 1994. Dinamika Aliran Permukaan, Erosi serta Kehilangan Hara dalam Aliran permukaaan pada Daerah Tangkapan Citere, Pangalengan. Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Katharina, R. 2001. Biaya Lingkungan Usaha Tani Lahan Kering datran Tinggi. Kasus Usahatani Sayur Mayur di kecamatan Pangalengan, Kabupaten Bandung. Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Pagiola, S. 1999. Economic Analysis of icentives for soil conservation environment. In: D.W. Sanders, O.C. Huszar, S. Sombatpanit, dan T. enters (Eds). Incentives in soil conservation: from theory to pratice. Scientific Publishers, In., Enfield, nh, pp 41-56.

Pedro C,. P. Girst,. K. Menz, and R. Ranola. 1997. Estimating the on-site costs of soil erision in the Philipines: The Replacement cost approach. Imperata Project Paper. SEAMEO Regional, Philipines.

Pidio, L. 2004. Pengaruh Pemantap Tanah Lateks dan Berbagai Guludan Terhadap Beberapa Sifat Fisika Tanah, Erosi dan Hasil Tanaman Kentang (Solanun tuberosun, L.) Pada Andisols. Tesis. Pascasarjana. Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung.

Rachmawati, N.E. 1995. Pengaruh Berbagai Tindakan Konservasi tanah Terhaap aliran Permukaan, erosi serta produksi Tanaman Kubis di Daerah Pangalengan. Skripsi. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Rompas J.J. 1996. Penerapan Model Answers Dalam Memprediksi Aliran Permukaan dan Erosi di Daerah Tangkapan Citere Sub-DAS Citarik Pangalengan, Jawa Barat. Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sinukaban, N,.H. Pawitan, S. Arsyad, J.L. Amstrong, and M.G.Nethary. 1994. Effect of soil conservation practice and slope lenghts on run off, soil loss, amd yield of vegetables in West Java. Australian J. Soil Water Conserv. 7(3): 25-29.

Sutono, S, S. H. Tala’Ohu. Supandi, dan F. Agus. 2003. Erosi pada berbagai penggunaan lahan di DAS citarum. Prosiding seminar nasional multifungsidan konversi laha pertanian. Bogor, 2 oktober dan Jakarta, 25 oktober 2002. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanah dan Agroklimat Bogor. Hal 113-133.

[WCED] World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common future Bruntland Commission. OxfordUniversity Press. NY.

Young, A., K, Menz,. P.Muraya, and C. Smith. 1998. SCUAF Version 4: A Model to estimates soil change under agriculture, agroferestry, and forestry. ACIAR Technical Report Series No. 41, 49 p.

Yuwono, B.S. 1993. Karakterisasi DAS dan Pengaruh Teknik Konservasi Tanah Terhadap Aliran Permukaan dan Erosi di Daerah Tangkapan Citere, sub DAS Citarik, Pangalengan, Jawa Barat, Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

How to Cite
KhatarinaR. (1). FAKTOR PENYEBAB PETANI KENTANG LAHAN KERING DATARAN TINGGI KECAMATAN PANGALENGAN, BANDUNG TIDAK MENGADOPSI KONSERVASI TANAH. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 11(3), 25-31. Retrieved from https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/JIPI/article/view/13909